CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02516852Updated Feb 6, 2018

Assessing the Effect of Sustainable Small-scale Egg Production on Maternal and Child Nutrition in Rural Zambia

An interventional study of Egg production in Malnutrition, Child and Malnutrition, Infant, sponsored by Cornell University. Completed at 1 site in Zambia. Open to participants aged 6 Months to 36 Months, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-02-06.

Sponsored by Cornell University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
3,546
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
6 Months to 36 Months
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Animal source foods (ASF), such as meat and eggs, are rich in nutrients critical for growth and development. Yet, for poor children in developing countries, ASF consumption is limited by cost, inadequate caregiver knowledge, and lack of local production and physical availability. The impact of HH- and village-level livestock interventions on household dietary diversity and nutritional status in resource-poor communities is not well established. The objective of this study is to test the effectiveness of local egg production intervention on maternal and child diets and child nutrition status.

This project takes place in the Luangwa Valley, Zambia in partnership with a local non-governmental organization, COMACO. Twenty communities will be assigned to the intervention, and 20 matched communities will be selected as controls. In each intervention community, an egg production facility will be built, owned, and operated by trained COMACO farmers.

Households (HHs) in each community will be sampled twice annually for 1 year pre-intervention (baseline) and 1 year post-intervention to assess dietary diversity and nutritional status. Data analysis will test for a change in these outcomes from baseline in each intervention community compared to the matched control community.

Read the detailed description

The objective of this study is to test the effectiveness of an intervention establishing local egg production on maternal and child diets and nutrition status. The investigators hypothesize that this intervention, combined with appropriate agricultural extension and nutrition education programs, will result in: 1) increased total household, maternal, and child consumption of eggs; 2) improved maternal and child dietary quality; and 3) improved infant/ young child nutritional status.

The investigators will test this hypothesis in the Luangwa Valley, Zambia in partnership with a local non-governmental organization, Community Markets for Conservation (COMACO). The forty study sites are located in four geographic clusters (Chiefdoms) in Eastern Province Zambia. These Chiefdoms are located in two districts: Mambwe (Mnkhanya, Jumbe, and Nsefu Chiefdoms) and Lundazi (Mwanya Chiefdom).

Twenty communities will be assigned to the intervention (egg production), and 20 matched communities will be selected as controls (no intervention). In each intervention community, an egg production facility will be built, each owned and operated by trained COMACO farmers, mostly women. Each group will be provided layer pullets at point-of-lay and layer mash. Facility owners will make all business decisions, retain all profits, and will be responsible for all upkeep costs.

In a repeated cross-sectional study design, indicators of food security, wealth, diet, nutritional status (anthropometrics), and health and wellbeing will be assessed in all egg-producing HHs and in women/child dyads (children aged 6-36 months) residing in the area surrounding each facility or central control point. Data will be collected twice annually for 1 year pre-intervention (baseline) and 1 year post-intervention.

The exposure of interest is living in an egg-producing community. In the primary analysis, the investigators will use hierarchical mixed effects modeling to analyze the effect of the program on each of the outcomes of interest (see Outcome Measures section for details).

02

Conditions studied

  • Malnutrition, Child
  • Malnutrition, Infant

Keywords

  • community development; poultry; animal-source food; stunting
03

In context

Malnutrition

1,587 studies on the registry are indexed under Malnutrition; 237 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 3,546 is above the median of 90 across 1,134 interventional studies indexed under Malnutrition.

Browse Malnutrition studies →

Lead sponsor

Cornell University is the lead sponsor of 96 studies on the registry; 18 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Months to 36 Months
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  1. the HH dwelling is ≤1.5 km from the egg production facility or central control point;
  2. there is a child 6-36 months of age in the HH; and,

Additionally, all HHs that include a member of the egg production group will be enrolled in the study, regardless of whether or not they meet the above inclusion criteria.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. the mother/primary caretaker or head of HH cannot converse with the field staff because of language;
  2. the mother/primary caretaker or head of HH is unable to give informed consent or complete an interview without assistance; or,
  3. the child is deformed, disabled, severely ill, or unable to cooperate for anthropometric measures.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
3,546 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention

    Other: Egg production

  • No intervention
    Control

Interventions

  • OtherEgg production

    Establishment and support of a community-owned and -operated egg production facility located at a central location in the community

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in child height-for-age Z-score

    Recumbent length for children \< 24 months and standing height for those 24-36 months, with WHO Child Growth Standards as the reference population.

    Time frame: 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in household egg consumption

    7 day recall on total number of chicken or other eggs consumed in the household

    Time frame: 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after intervention

  2. Change in maternal egg consumption

    Time frame: 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after intervention

  3. Change in child egg consumption

    Time frame: 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after intervention

  4. Change in maternal dietary diversity

    Measured by Women's Dietary Diversity Score, a 24 hour recall of all foods consumed, organized into 9 food groups

    Time frame: 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after intervention

  5. Change in child dietary diversity

    Time frame: 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after intervention

  6. Change in child stunting

    Defined as having a height-for-age z-score \< -2.0, with WHO Growth Standards as the reference population.

    Time frame: 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after intervention

Other outcomes

  1. Change in household food security

    Measure by Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS), Household Hunger Scale (HHS) and/or Months of inadequate household food provisioning (MIHFP)

    Time frame: 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after intervention

  2. Change in producer household and poultry incomes

    Time frame: 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after intervention

  3. Change in maternal physical and emotional health

    Measured through a 6-item index adapted from RAND short form

    Time frame: 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after intervention

  4. Change in maternal nutritional status

    Measured by mid-upper arm circumference and body mass index

    Time frame: 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after intervention

  5. Change in child weight-for-height Z-score

    Time frame: 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after intervention

  6. Change in child weight-for-age Z-score

    Time frame: 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after intervention

07

Study locations

1 site
  • COMACO
    Mfuwe, Eastern Province, Zambia
08

References and documents

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 6, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02516852
Lead sponsor
Cornell University
Collaborators
Community Markets for Conservation (COMACO)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 6, 2015
Start date
Jun 2014
Primary completion
Jul 2016
Completion
May 2017
Last update
Feb 6, 2018

Study contacts

Alexander J Travis, VMD, PhD
principal investigator · Cornell University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion