CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT02507180LEaDUpdated Feb 27, 2020

Safely Ruling Out Deep Vein Thrombosis in Pregnancy With the LEFt Clinical Decision Rule and D-Dimer

An observational study in Pregnancy and Deep Vein Thrombosis, sponsored by Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. Status unknown at 12 sites in 4 countries. Open to female participants aged 16 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-02-27.

Sponsored by Ottawa Hospital Research Institute · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Feb 2020), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
366
Ages
16 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This is prospective cohort study in pregnant women who present with signs and symptoms of possible deep vein thrombosis (DVT). All patients will have the same method of assessment of their DVT symptoms (the LEFt clinical decision rule will be applied and D-dimer test will be done) to determine if a compression ultrasound is required. All patients will be followed for a period of 3 months.

Read the detailed description

VTE is a leading cause of maternal death in the developed world. Suspected DVT in pregnancy is a common clinical problem faced by clinicians daily. The only validated method to exclude DVT in pregnancy requires leg vein CUS imaging. This imaging modality is costly and has limited availability (only available in radiology departments and, usually, only during weekday daytime hours) often necessitating referral to the emergency room for initiation of heparin injections until leg vein CUS can be obtained. A simple and seemingly powerful clinical decision rule (LEFt) and a simple blood test (D-dimer) may be promising to exclude DVT in pregnancy without the need for diagnostic imaging. Validating the safety of a simple, non-invasive, widely available approach to suspected DVT in pregnancy would be an important advance in maternal health.

A prospective cohort diagnostic management study in pregnant women with suspected DVT, with three-month follow-up for symptomatic VTE will take place in multiple centres throughout Canada and Europe.

After obtaining informed consent, all patient will have the LEFt clinical decision rule applied by the attending physician and will have D-Dimer testing (D-Dimer results of test performed within 24 hours will be accepted and do not need to be repeated).

Patients with an "unlikely" LEFt score of 0 or 1 point and a negative D-dimer will not undergo diagnostic imaging.

Patients with either a "likely" LEFt score of 2 or 3 points or a positive D-dimer will undergo either a single complete leg vein compression ultrasound (CCUS) (Day 1) or a serial proximal leg vein (CUS) (Day 1 and Day 7).

All patients will be followed for 3 months for symptomatic VTE.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pregnancy
  • Deep Vein Thrombosis

Keywords

  • Clinical Decision Rule
  • Ultrasound
  • Suspected Deep Vein Thrombosis
  • D-Dimer
  • LEFt
03

In context

Thrombosis

1,506 studies on the registry are indexed under Thrombosis; 238 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 366 is above the median of 213 across 586 observational studies indexed under Thrombosis.

Browse Thrombosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute is the lead sponsor of 538 studies on the registry; 100 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Unselected pregnant women presenting with suspected deep vein thrombosis

Inclusion criteria

  1. Unselected pregnant women (as self-reported by patient and/or previously documented positive beta hCG on urine or serum pregnancy tests) with
  2. Suspected acute symptomatic deep vein thrombosis, defined as:

    1. New leg swelling or edema with onset in the last month or,
    2. New leg pain (buttock, groin, thigh or calf) with onset in the last month.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Below the age of legal consent in jurisdiction of residence (18 years old for Quebec and 16 years old for rest of Canada)
  2. Baseline imaging (imaging done after a minimum of 3 months of treatment for prior proximal DVT) not available if suspected recurrence in the same leg as prior
  3. Unable or unwilling to provide informed consent
  4. Concomitant symptoms of suspected pulmonary embolism (chest pain or shortness of breath or syncope/pre-syncope or unexplained tachycardia)
  5. Therapeutic anticoagulant more than 48 hours.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
366 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Pregnant women with suspected DVT

    Pregnant women presenting with suspected DVT will have the LEFt clinical decision rule applied by the attending physician and will have a clinical D-dimer test done.

    Other: LEFt clinical decision rule

Interventions

  • OtherLEFt clinical decision rule

    The LEFt rule Predictor Points Left leg symptoms +1 Extremity swelling (≥ 2 cm difference in calf circumference +1 First trimester symptom onset +1 Clinical probability Unlikely: 0 or 1 point Likely: \> 1 point

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of VTE diagnosed in patients deemed DVT "unlikely"

    The primary outcome will be the number of VTE (distal or proximal DVT, sub-segmental or greater pulmonary embolism (PE), death attributable to VTE) documented during the three-month follow-up in those patients left untreated for DVT on the basis of the study's initial diagnostic management (see Figure 2) i.e. not doing CUS on patients with an "unlikely" LEFt score (0 or 1 points) and a negative D-dimer

    Time frame: 3 months after presentation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of VTE diagnosed in all patients

    The number of major VTE events (any proximal DVT, segmental or greater PE, death attributable to VTE) documented during the 3-month follow-up in all patients. Some clinicians may not treat distal DVT or sub-segmental PE in pregnancy, instead following these patients with serial US imaging, and hence may prefer to focus on this outcome that excludes distal DVT and sub-segmental PE.

    Time frame: 3 months after presentation

  2. Proportion of women requiring CUS

    The proportion of women requiring CUS using the study's diagnostic strategy (i.e. no imaging in patients with an "unlikely" LEFt score (0 or 1 points) and a negative D-dimer). We anticipate that an important proportion (\>40%) of women will be able to avoid the need for CUS imaging based on safely excluding DVT on the basis of an "unlikely" LEFt (0 or 1) and a negative D-dimer. However, if this proportion is very low (\<5%) this may argue against the widespread adoption of our proposed diagnostic management strategy even if it proves to be safe.

    Time frame: Baseline

  3. Average number of CUS in pregnant women with suspected DVT

    The mean number of ultrasounds per patient with suspected DVT. In the study by Chan, validating serial CUS in pregnancy, the mean number of US per patient was 2.8630. We anticipate that we will be able to reduce this by \>40% with our diagnostic approach.

    Time frame: 7 days from initial presentation

07

Study locations

9 of 12 sites recruiting
  • Intermountain Healthcare, Inc.
    Murray, Utah, United States
    • Scott Stevens, MD · Contact
    • Scott Stevens, MD · Principal investigator
    Not yet recruiting
  • Foothills Medical Centre
    Calgary, Alberta, Canada
    • Jessica Lee, BA · Contact
    • Alissa Kazakoff, BSc · Contact
    • Paul Gibson, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Royal Alexandra Hospital
    Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
    • Shauna Littlefair, RN · Contact
    • Rshmi Khurana, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Children's and Women's Health Centre of British Columbia
    Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
    • Frannie MacKenzie · Contact
    • Wee-Shian Chan, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Queen Elizabeth II Health Science Centre
    Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
    • Blaine Gallant, RN · Contact
    • Sudeep Shivakumar, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Hamilton Health Sciences Centre
    Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
    • Carolyn Webb, RN · Contact
    • Shannon Bates, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • London Health Sciences Centre
    London, Ontario, Canada
    Withdrawn
  • Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
    Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
    • Veronica Whitham, BSc · Contact
    • Marc Rodger, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Sunnybrook Medical Hospital
    Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    Withdrawn
  • Jewish General Hospital
    Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    • Carla Strulovitch, RN · Contact
    • Susam Kahn, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Leiden University Medical Center
    Leiden, Netherlands
    • Erik Klok, MD · Contact
    • Erik Klok, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Hopitaux Universitaires de Geneve
    Geneva, Switzerland
    • Louise Riberdy, MD · Contact
    • Marc Righini, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 27, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02507180
Lead sponsor
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Collaborators
University Hospital, Geneva, Leiden University Medical Center
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 23, 2015
Start date
Sep 2015
Primary completion
Sep 2021 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 2022 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 27, 2020

Study contacts

Marc A Rodger, MD
Contact
marc.rodger@mcgill.ca
514-843-1578
Veronica Bates, BSc
Contact
vebates@ohri.ca
613-737-8899 ext. 71068
Marc Rodger, MD
principal investigator · Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Marc Righini, MD
principal investigator · Hopitaux Universitaires de Geneve

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Feb 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion