ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02501161DUAL™ VIIIUpdated Nov 27, 2019Results posted

A 104 Week Clinical Trial Comparing Long Term Glycaemic Control of Insulin Degludec/Liraglutide (IDegLira) Versus Insulin Glargine Therapy in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

A Phase 3 interventional study of insulin degludec/liraglutide and insulin glargine in Diabetes and Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, sponsored by Novo Nordisk A/S. Completed at 143 sites in 16 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-11-27.

Sponsored by Novo Nordisk A/S · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,012
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This trial is conducted in Africa, Asia, Europe, North America and South America. The purpose is to compare long-term glycaemic control of insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) versus insulin glargine (IGlar) in insulin naïve subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with oral anti diabetics.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetes
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus

11,090 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus; 1,319 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1,012 is above the median of 80 across 8,491 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus studies →

Lead sponsor

Novo Nordisk A/S is the lead sponsor of 1,401 studies on the registry; 102 are open to participants now.

Of its 204 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 98 (48%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female, age greater than or equal to 18 years at the time of signing informed consent
  • Subjects diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus
  • HbA1c 7.0-11.0% (both inclusive) (53-97 mmol/mol) by central laboratory analysis
  • Body mass index greater than or equal to 20 kg/m\^2
  • Insulin naïve subjects; however short term insulin treatment for a maximum of 14 days prior to the day of screening is allowed, as is prior insulin treatment for gestational diabetes
  • Stable daily dose(s) including any of the following antidiabetic drug(s)/regimens within 90 days prior to the day of screening: a) Biguanides (metformin greater than or equal to 1500 mg or maximum tolerated dose documented in the subject medical record), b) Other OAD(s) allowed: sulphonylurea, glinides, pioglitazone, and DPP4-inhibitors (greater than or equal to half of the maximum approved dose according to local label or maximum tolerated dose as documented in subjects medical record)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Screening calcitonin greater than or equal to 50 ng/L
  • Renal impairment estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) less than 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 as per CKD-EPI value to be defined as listed in the classification CKD-EPI using IDMS for serum creatinine measurement on the day of screening
  • Impaired liver function, defined as ALAT or ASAT greater than or equal to 2.5 times upper limit of normal
  • Family or personal history of Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 2 or Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma
  • History of pancreatitis (acute or chronic)
  • Treatment with any medication for the indication of diabetes or obesity other than stated in the inclusion criteria in a period of 90 days before the day of screening
  • Anticipated initiation or change in concomitant medications for more than 14 consecutive days or on a frequent basis known to affect weight or glucose metabolism (e.g. orlistat, thyroid hormones, corticosteroids)
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
1,012 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Insulin degludec/liraglutide QD + OAD(s)

    Drug: insulin degludec/liraglutide

  • Active comparator
    insulin glargine QD + OAD(s)

    Drug: insulin glargine

Interventions

  • Druginsulin degludec/liraglutide

    Drug pages: Insulin degludec · Liraglutide

    Injected subcutaneously (under the skin) once daily for 104 weeks. Dose individually adjusted.

  • Injected subcutaneously (under the skin) once daily for 104 weeks. Dose individually adjusted.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time From Randomisation to Inadequate Glycaemic Control and Need for Treatment Intensification

    Inadequate glycaemic control and need for treatment intensification was defined as a glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) of 7.0% or greater at 2 consecutive visits from week 26, including week 26 if HbA1c was greater than or equal to 7% at week 12. Time from randomisation to inadequate glycaemic control and need for treatment intensification was analysed using a stratified log-rank test where treatment, baseline HbA1c group and previous OAD treatment were included as strata in the model. The variable "baseline HbA1c group" was a dichotomised baseline HbA1c variable with 2 categories: HbA1c \< 8.5% or HbA1c ≥ 8.5% and the variable "previous OAD treatment" was a categorical variable with 2 categories: SU ± OAD(s) (SU users) or OAD(s) (Non-SU users). 25%, median (50%) and 75% percentiles for the cumulative distribution function were obtained from the Kaplan-Meier survival function.

    Time frame: Weeks 0-104 + 7 days follow-up-1 + 30 days follow-up-2

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time From Randomisation to HbA1c >6.5% at 2 Consecutive Visits

    Time to HbA1c \> 6.5% at 2 consecutive visits is defined as time from randomization to HbA1c \> 6.5% at 2 consecutive planned scheduled visits from week 26 (including week 26 if HbA1c was \> 6.5% at week 12). Time from randomisation to HbA1c \>6.5% at 2 consecutive visits was analysed using a stratified log-rank test where treatment, baseline HbA1c group and previous OAD treatment were included as strata in the model. The variable "baseline HbA1c group" was a dichotomised baseline HbA1c variable with 2 categories: HbA1c \< 8.5% or HbA1c ≥ 8.5% and the variable "previous OAD treatment" was a categorical variable with 2 categories: SU ± OAD(s) (SU users) or OAD(s) (Non-SU users). 25%, median (50%) and 75% percentiles for the cumulative distribution function were obtained from the Kaplan-Meier survival function.

    Time frame: Weeks 0-104 + 7 days follow-up-1 + 30 days follow-up-2

  2. Change in HbA1c

    Change in HbA1c from baseline (week 0) to week 26 is presented.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26

  3. Change in Body Weight

    Change in body weight from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104

  4. Insulin Dose

    Insulin dose after 26 and 104 weeks of treatment is presented.

    Time frame: Week 26, week 104

  5. Participants Who Achieved (Yes/no): HbA1c <7.0%

    Percentage of participants who achieved (yes/no) HbA1c \<7.0% at week 26 and week 104 is presented.

    Time frame: Week 26, week 104

  6. Participants Who Achieved (Yes/no): HbA1c <7.0% Without Weight Gain

    Percentage of participants who achieved (yes/no) HbA1c \<7.0% without weight gain at week 26 and week 104 is presented.

    Time frame: Week 26, week 104

  7. Participants Who Achieved (Yes/no): HbA1c <7.0% Without Treatment-emergent Severe or Blood Glucose (BG) Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes

    Severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia was defined as an episode that was severe according to the American Diabetes Association (ADA) classification or BG confirmed by a plasma glucose value \<3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. Percentage of participants who achieved (yes/no) HbA1c \<7.0% without treatment-emergent severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes at week 26 and week 104 is presented.

    Time frame: Week 26, week 104

  8. Participants Who Achieved (Yes/no): HbA1c < 7.0% Without Treatment-emergent Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes and Without Weight Gain

    Severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia was defined as an episode that was severe according to the ADA classification or BG confirmed by a plasma glucose value \<3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. Percentage of participants who achieved (yes/no) HbA1c \<7.0% without treatment-emergent severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes and without weight gain at week 26 and week 104 is presented.

    Time frame: Week 26, week 104

  9. Participants Who Achieved (Yes/no): HbA1c ≤6.5%

    Percentage of participants who achieved (yes/no) HbA1c ≤6.5% at week 26 and week 104 is presented.

    Time frame: Week 26, week 104

  10. Participants Who Achieved (Yes/no): HbA1c ≤6.5% Without Weight Gain

    Percentage of participants who achieved (yes/no) HbA1c ≤6.5% without weight gain at week 26 and week 104 is presented.

    Time frame: Week 26, week 104

  11. Participants Who Achieved (Yes/no): HbA1c ≤6.5% Without Treatment-emergent Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes

    Severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia is defined as an episode that is severe according to the ADA classification or BG confirmed by a plasma glucose value \<3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. Percentage of participants who achieved (yes/no) HbA1c ≤6.5% without treatment-emergent severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes at week 26 and week 104 is presented.

    Time frame: Week 26, week 104

  12. Participants Who Achieved (Yes/no): HbA1c ≤6.5% Without Treatment-emergent Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes and Without Weight Gain

    Severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia is defined as an episode that is severe according to the ADA classification or BG confirmed by a plasma glucose value \<3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. Percentage of participants who achieved (yes/no) HbA1c ≤6.5% without treatment-emergent severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes and without weight gain at week 26 and week 104 is presented.

    Time frame: Week 26, week 104

  13. Change in FPG

    Change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104

  14. SMPG-9-point Profile (Individual Points in the Profile)

    Participants measured plasma glucose values using the blood glucose meter at 9 time points: before breakfast, 90 min after start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after start of lunch, before dinner, 90 min after start of dinner, bedtime, at 4:00 am and before breakfast the following day. Self-measured plasma glucose (SMPG)-9-point profile (individual points in the profile) at week 26 and week 104 is presented.

    Time frame: Week 26, week 104

  15. Change in SMPG-mean 9-point Profile

    Participants measured plasma glucose values using the blood glucose meter at 9 time points: before breakfast, 90 min after start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after start of lunch, before dinner, 90 min after start of dinner, bedtime, at 4:00 am and before breakfast the following day. Change in SMPG-mean 9-point profile from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104

  16. Change in SMPG-mean Postprandial Increment Over All Meals

    Participants measured plasma glucose values using the blood glucose meter at 9 time points: before breakfast, 90 min after start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after start of lunch, before dinner, 90 min after start of dinner, bedtime, at 4:00 am and before breakfast the following day. Change in SMPG-mean postprandial increment over all meals from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104

  17. Change in Blood Pressure (Systolic and Diastolic)

    Change in blood pressure (systolic and diastolic) from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104

  18. Change in Fasting C-peptide

    Change in fasting C-peptide (measured in nanomoles per liter \[nmol/L\]) from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented as ratio to baseline.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104

  19. Change in Fasting Human Insulin

    Change in fasting human insulin (measured in picomoles per liter \[pmol/L\]) from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented as ratio to baseline.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104

  20. Change in Fasting Total Cholesterol

    Change in fasting total cholesterol (measured in mmol/L) from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented as ratio to baseline.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104

  21. Change in Fasting LDL-cholesterol

    Change in fasting low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol (measured in mmol/L) from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented as ratio to baseline.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104

  22. Change in Fasting HDL-cholesterol

    Change in fasting high density lipoprotein (HDL)- cholesterol (measured in mmol/L) from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented as ratio to baseline.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104

  23. Change in Fasting VLDL-cholesterol

    Change in fasting very low density lipoprotein (VLDL)-cholesterol (measured in mmol/L) from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented as ratio to baseline.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104

  24. Change in Fasting Triglycerides

    Change in fasting triglycerides (measured as mmol/L) from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented as ratio to baseline.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104

  25. Change in Fasting Free Fatty Acids

    Change in fasting free fatty acids (measured as mmol/L) from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented as ratio to baseline.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104

  26. Number of Treatment-emergent Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes During 26 Weeks of Treatment

    Severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia is defined as an episode that is severe according to the ADA classification or BG confirmed by a plasma glucose value \<3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. Number of treatment-emergent severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes during 26 weeks of treatment is presented.

    Time frame: Weeks 0-26

  27. Number of Treatment-emergent Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes During 104 Weeks of Treatment

    Severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia is defined as an episode that is severe according to the ADA classification or BG confirmed by a plasma glucose value \<3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. Number of treatment-emergent severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes during 104 weeks of treatment is presented.

    Time frame: Weeks 0-104

  28. Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes During 26 Weeks of Treatment

    Hypoglycaemic episodes (SMPG value ≤3.9 mmol/L (70 mg/dL)) were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. Number of treatment-emergent hypoglycaemic episodes according to ADA during 26 weeks of treatment is presented.

    Time frame: Weeks 0-26

  29. Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes During 104 Weeks of Treatment

    Hypoglycaemic episodes (SMPG value ≤3.9 mmol/L (70 mg/dL)) were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. Number of treatment emergent hypoglycaemic episodes according to ADA during 104 weeks of treatment is presented.

    Time frame: Weeks 0-104

  30. Number of Treatment-emergent Nocturnal Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes During 26 Weeks of Treatment

    Severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia is defined as an episode that is severe according to the ADA classification or BG confirmed by a plasma glucose value \<3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Nocturnal hypoglycaemic episodes were episodes occurring between 00:01 and 05.59 both inclusive. Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. Number of treatment-emergent nocturnal severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes during 26 weeks of treatment is presented.

    Time frame: Weeks 0-26

  31. Number of Treatment-emergent Nocturnal Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes During 104 Weeks of Treatment

    Severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia is defined as an episode that is severe according to the ADA classification or BG confirmed by a plasma glucose value \<3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Nocturnal hypoglycaemic episodes were episodes occurring between 00:01 and 05.59 both inclusive. Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. Number of treatment-emergent nocturnal severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes during 104 weeks of treatment is presented.

    Time frame: Weeks 0-104

  32. Number of TEAEs During 26 Weeks of Treatment

    An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a product, and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. A treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an adverse event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product. If the event had onset date before the first day of exposure on trial product and increased in severity during the treatment period and until 7 days after the last drug date, then this event was also considered as a TEAE. Number of TEAEs during 26 weeks of treatment is presented.

    Time frame: Weeks 0-26

  33. Number of TEAEs During 104 Weeks of Treatment

    An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a product, and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. A TEAE was defined as an adverse event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product. If the event had onset date before the first day of exposure on trial product and increased in severity during the treatment period and until 7 days after the last drug date, then this event was also considered as a TEAE. Number of TEAEs during 104 weeks of treatment is presented.

    Time frame: Week 0 to week 104

  34. Eye Examination Category

    Fundus photography or a dilated fundoscopy was performed at baseline (within 12 weeks prior to week 0) and week 104. The investigator interpreted each eye's (left and right) results and categorised them as: normal, abnormal not clinically significant (NCS) or abnormal clinically significant (CS). Number of participants in each category at baseline and week 104 were presented.

    Time frame: Baseline (within 12 weeks prior to week 0), week 104

  35. ECG Evaluation

    The electrocardiogram (ECG) was assessed at baseline (within 2 weeks prior to week 0) and week 104. The investigator interpreted the results and categorised them as: normal, abnormal NCS or abnormal CS. Number of participants in each ECG category at baseline and week 104 are presented.

    Time frame: Baseline (within 2 weeks prior to week 0), week 104

  36. Change in Urine Albumin/Creatinine Ratio

    Change in urine albumin/creatinine ratio from baseline (week 0) to week 104 is presented.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 104

  37. Change in Pulse Rate

    Change in pulse rate from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104

  38. Change in Biochemistry Parameter- Creatinine, Total Bilirubin

    Change in biochemistry parameter- creatinine, total bilirubin from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104

  39. Change in Biochemistry Parameter- Albumin

    Change in biochemistry parameter- albumin from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104

  40. Change in Biochemistry Parameters- ALP, ALT, AST, Lipase and Amylase

    Change in biochemistry parameters- alkaline phosphatase (ALP), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), lipase and amylase from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104

  41. Change in Biochemistry Parameter- Sodium, Potassium and Calcium

    Change in sodium, potassium and calcium from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104

  42. Change in Haematological Parameter- Haemoglobin

    Change in haemoglobin from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104

  43. Change in Haematological Parameter- Haematocrit

    Change in haematocrit from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104

  44. Change in Haematological Parameter- Erythrocytes

    Change in erythrocytes from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104

  45. Change in Haematological Parameter- Thrombocytes and Leukocytes

    Change in thrombocytes and leukocytes from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104

  46. Change in Haematological Parameter- Eosinophils

    Change in eosinophils from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104

  47. Change in Haematological Parameter- Neutrophils

    Change in neutrophils from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104

  48. Change in Haematological Parameter- Basophils

    Change in basophils from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104

  49. Change in Haematological Parameter- Monocytes

    Change in monocytes from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104

  50. Change in Haematological Parameter- Lymphocytes

    Change in lymphocytes from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104

  51. Change in Calcitonin

    The number of participants who reported low, normal and high levels of calcitonin in relation to reference ranges at baseline (week 0), week 26 and week 104 are presented.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104

  52. Change in Short Form Health Survey Version 2.0 (SF-36v2™, Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains and Summaries of the Physical Component Score (PCS) and the Mental Component Score (MCS)

    SF-36 is a 36-item patient-reported survey of patient health that measures the participant's overall health-related quality of life (HRQoL). SF-36v2™ (acute version) questionnaire measured eight domains of functional health and well-being as well as two component summary scores (physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS)). The scores 0-100 (where higher scores indicated a better HRQoL) from the SF-36 were converted to norm-based scores to enable a direct interpretation in relation to the distribution of the scores in the 2009 U.S. general population. A norm-based score of 50 corresponds to the mean score and 10 corresponds to the standard deviation of the 2009 U.S. general population. Change from baseline in the sub-domain scores and component summary (PCS and MCS) scores are presented. A positive change score indicates an improvement since baseline.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104

  53. Change in TRIM-D

    Treatment related impact measures-diabetes (TRIM-D) was developed according to the FDA guidance from 2009 on development of new PRO measures. The questionnaire consists of 5 sub-domains, which are scored according to a 1-5 point scale with a higher score indicating a better health state (less negative impact). Sub-domain scores are calculated by summing across items in the same sub-domain, and the total score is calculated by summing scores from all the sub-domains. The highest possible summed score within a sub-domain ranges from 20 (compliance sub-domain) to 40 (psychological health sub-domain) points and the highest possible total score is 140 points. Change in TRIM-D total score from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented. A positive change score indicates an improvement since baseline.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104

07

Results

Posted Nov 27, 2019

Participant flow

The trial was conducted at 130 sites in Argentina (4),Czech Republic (4), Hungary (5), India (11), Israel (8), Italy (7), Mexico (4), Norway (7), Poland (3), Russian Federation (8), Slovakia (5), South Africa (10), Turkey (8), United Kingdom (9) and United States (37).

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Glargine
Started506506
Exposed506504
Completed484481
Not completed2225
Withdrew: Adverse event26
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up74
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject1015
Withdrew: Other30

Outcome measures

PrimaryTime From Randomisation to Inadequate Glycaemic Control and Need for Treatment Intensification

Inadequate glycaemic control and need for treatment intensification was defined as a glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) of 7.0% or greater at 2 consecutive visits from week 26, including week 26 if HbA1c was greater than or equal to 7% at week 12. Time from randomisation to inadequate glycaemic control and need for treatment intensification was analysed using a stratified log-rank test where treatment, baseline HbA1c group and previous OAD treatment were included as strata in the model. The variable "baseline HbA1c group" was a dichotomised baseline HbA1c variable with 2 categories: HbA1c \< 8.5% or HbA1c ≥ 8.5% and the variable "previous OAD treatment" was a categorical variable with 2 categories: SU ± OAD(s) (SU users) or OAD(s) (Non-SU users). 25%, median (50%) and 75% percentiles for the cumulative distribution function were obtained from the Kaplan-Meier survival function.

Time frame:
Weeks 0-104 + 7 days follow-up-1 + 30 days follow-up-2
Reported as:
Median · Weeks
Time From Randomisation to Inadequate Glycaemic Control and Need for Treatment Intensification
WeeksInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Glargine
Baseline HbA1c <8.5% + Non-SU usersNA (104.0 to NA)104.3 (38.1 to NA)
Baseline HbA1c <8.5% + SU users106.7 (89.9 to NA)90.3 (26.4 to 105.1)
Baseline HbA1c >=8.5% + Non-SU usersNA (39.7 to NA)64.6 (26.1 to 105.1)
Baseline HbA1c >=8.5% + SU users104.0 (26.4 to NA)26.6 (26.1 to 91.1)
Statistical analysis
  • Insulin Degludec/Liraglutide vs Insulin Glargine · Stratified log-rank test · p = <.0001
SecondaryTime From Randomisation to HbA1c >6.5% at 2 Consecutive Visits

Time to HbA1c \> 6.5% at 2 consecutive visits is defined as time from randomization to HbA1c \> 6.5% at 2 consecutive planned scheduled visits from week 26 (including week 26 if HbA1c was \> 6.5% at week 12). Time from randomisation to HbA1c \>6.5% at 2 consecutive visits was analysed using a stratified log-rank test where treatment, baseline HbA1c group and previous OAD treatment were included as strata in the model. The variable "baseline HbA1c group" was a dichotomised baseline HbA1c variable with 2 categories: HbA1c \< 8.5% or HbA1c ≥ 8.5% and the variable "previous OAD treatment" was a categorical variable with 2 categories: SU ± OAD(s) (SU users) or OAD(s) (Non-SU users). 25%, median (50%) and 75% percentiles for the cumulative distribution function were obtained from the Kaplan-Meier survival function.

Time frame:
Weeks 0-104 + 7 days follow-up-1 + 30 days follow-up-2
Reported as:
Median · Weeks
Time From Randomisation to HbA1c >6.5% at 2 Consecutive Visits
WeeksInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Glargine
Baseline HbA1c <8.5% + Non-SU usersNA (52.1 to NA)64.1 (26.1 to 104.3)
Baseline HbA1c <8.5% + SU users90.1 (27.0 to NA)26.6 (26.1 to 89.9)
Baseline HbA1c >=8.5% + Non-SU users64.1 (26.1 to NA)26.6 (26.1 to 90.1)
Baseline HbA1c >=8.5% + SU users52.1 (26.1 to 104.1)26.1 (26.1 to 38.1)
Statistical analysis
  • Insulin Degludec/Liraglutide vs Insulin Glargine · Stratified log-rank test · p = <.0001
SecondaryChange in HbA1c

Change in HbA1c from baseline (week 0) to week 26 is presented.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage of HbA1c
Change in HbA1c
Percentage of HbA1cInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Glargine
Change in HbA1c-1.99 ± 1.14-1.69 ± 1.10
SecondaryChange in Body Weight

Change in body weight from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26, week 104
Reported as:
Mean · Kilogram (kg)
Change in Body Weight
Kilogram (kg)Insulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Glargine
Week 260.5 ± 3.32.2 ± 3.6
Week 1041.2 ± 4.93.0 ± 4.9
SecondaryInsulin Dose

Insulin dose after 26 and 104 weeks of treatment is presented.

Time frame:
Week 26, week 104
Reported as:
Mean · Units
Insulin Dose
UnitsInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Glargine
Week 2634.6 ± 13.448.6 ± 28.2
Week 10436.1 ± 12.950.6 ± 31.5
SecondaryParticipants Who Achieved (Yes/no): HbA1c <7.0%

Percentage of participants who achieved (yes/no) HbA1c \<7.0% at week 26 and week 104 is presented.

Time frame:
Week 26, week 104
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Participants Who Achieved (Yes/no): HbA1c <7.0%
Percentage of participantsInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Glargine
Week 26: Yes78.755.7
Week 26: No21.344.3
Week 104: Yes55.528.5
Week 104: No44.571.5
SecondaryParticipants Who Achieved (Yes/no): HbA1c <7.0% Without Weight Gain

Percentage of participants who achieved (yes/no) HbA1c \<7.0% without weight gain at week 26 and week 104 is presented.

Time frame:
Week 26, week 104
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Participants Who Achieved (Yes/no): HbA1c <7.0% Without Weight Gain
Percentage of participantsInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Glargine
Week 26: Yes38.515.4
Week 26: No61.584.6
Week 104: Yes20.96.3
Week 104: No79.193.7
SecondaryParticipants Who Achieved (Yes/no): HbA1c <7.0% Without Treatment-emergent Severe or Blood Glucose (BG) Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes

Severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia was defined as an episode that was severe according to the American Diabetes Association (ADA) classification or BG confirmed by a plasma glucose value \<3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. Percentage of participants who achieved (yes/no) HbA1c \<7.0% without treatment-emergent severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes at week 26 and week 104 is presented.

Time frame:
Week 26, week 104
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Participants Who Achieved (Yes/no): HbA1c <7.0% Without Treatment-emergent Severe or Blood Glucose (BG) Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes
Percentage of participantsInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Glargine
Week 26: Yes71.344.9
Week 26: No28.755.1
Week 104: Yes51.825.5
Week 104: No48.274.5
SecondaryParticipants Who Achieved (Yes/no): HbA1c < 7.0% Without Treatment-emergent Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes and Without Weight Gain

Severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia was defined as an episode that was severe according to the ADA classification or BG confirmed by a plasma glucose value \<3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. Percentage of participants who achieved (yes/no) HbA1c \<7.0% without treatment-emergent severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes and without weight gain at week 26 and week 104 is presented.

Time frame:
Week 26, week 104
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Participants Who Achieved (Yes/no): HbA1c < 7.0% Without Treatment-emergent Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes and Without Weight Gain
Percentage of participantsInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Glargine
Week 26: Yes35.213.6
Week 26: No64.886.4
Week 104: Yes20.06.1
Week 104: No80.093.9
SecondaryParticipants Who Achieved (Yes/no): HbA1c ≤6.5%

Percentage of participants who achieved (yes/no) HbA1c ≤6.5% at week 26 and week 104 is presented.

Time frame:
Week 26, week 104
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Participants Who Achieved (Yes/no): HbA1c ≤6.5%
Percentage of participantsInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Glargine
Week 26: Yes63.635.4
Week 26: No36.464.6
Week 104: Yes43.321.7
Week 104: No56.778.3
SecondaryParticipants Who Achieved (Yes/no): HbA1c ≤6.5% Without Weight Gain

Percentage of participants who achieved (yes/no) HbA1c ≤6.5% without weight gain at week 26 and week 104 is presented.

Time frame:
Week 26, week 104
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Participants Who Achieved (Yes/no): HbA1c ≤6.5% Without Weight Gain
Percentage of participantsInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Glargine
Week 26: Yes33.29.9
Week 26: No66.890.1
Week 104: Yes17.65.7
Week 104: No82.494.3
SecondaryParticipants Who Achieved (Yes/no): HbA1c ≤6.5% Without Treatment-emergent Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes

Severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia is defined as an episode that is severe according to the ADA classification or BG confirmed by a plasma glucose value \<3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. Percentage of participants who achieved (yes/no) HbA1c ≤6.5% without treatment-emergent severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes at week 26 and week 104 is presented.

Time frame:
Week 26, week 104
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Participants Who Achieved (Yes/no): HbA1c ≤6.5% Without Treatment-emergent Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes
Percentage of participantsInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Glargine
Week 26: Yes57.927.9
Week 26: No42.172.1
Week 104: Yes40.119.2
Week 104: No59.980.8
SecondaryParticipants Who Achieved (Yes/no): HbA1c ≤6.5% Without Treatment-emergent Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes and Without Weight Gain

Severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia is defined as an episode that is severe according to the ADA classification or BG confirmed by a plasma glucose value \<3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. Percentage of participants who achieved (yes/no) HbA1c ≤6.5% without treatment-emergent severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes and without weight gain at week 26 and week 104 is presented.

Time frame:
Week 26, week 104
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Participants Who Achieved (Yes/no): HbA1c ≤6.5% Without Treatment-emergent Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes and Without Weight Gain
Percentage of participantsInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Glargine
Week 26: Yes30.28.7
Week 26: No69.891.3
Week 104: Yes16.65.5
Week 104: No83.494.5
SecondaryChange in FPG

Change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26, week 104
Reported as:
Mean · mmol/L
Change in FPG
mmol/LInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Glargine
Week 26-3.97 ± 3.06-3.79 ± 3.18
Week 104-3.93 ± 2.96-3.73 ± 2.75
SecondarySMPG-9-point Profile (Individual Points in the Profile)

Participants measured plasma glucose values using the blood glucose meter at 9 time points: before breakfast, 90 min after start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after start of lunch, before dinner, 90 min after start of dinner, bedtime, at 4:00 am and before breakfast the following day. Self-measured plasma glucose (SMPG)-9-point profile (individual points in the profile) at week 26 and week 104 is presented.

Time frame:
Week 26, week 104
Reported as:
Mean · mmol/L
SMPG-9-point Profile (Individual Points in the Profile)
mmol/LInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Glargine
Week 26: Before breakfast5.59 ± 1.575.58 ± 1.58
Week 26: 90 minutes after breakfast8.34 ± 2.628.76 ± 2.68
Week 26: Before lunch6.03 ± 2.006.43 ± 2.24
Week 26: 90 minutes after lunch8.02 ± 2.328.79 ± 2.64
Week 26: Before dinner6.67 ± 2.266.91 ± 2.35
Week 26: 90 minutes after dinner8.31 ± 2.479.10 ± 2.70
Week 26: Bedtime7.48 ± 2.428.13 ± 2.68
Week 26: At 4:00 a.m.5.72 ± 1.555.91 ± 1.99
Week 26: Before breakfast the following day5.53 ± 1.375.56 ± 1.56
Week 104: Before breakfast5.58 ± 1.385.57 ± 1.27
Week 104: 90 minutes after breakfast7.99 ± 2.508.64 ± 2.59
Week 104: Before lunch6.06 ± 1.916.37 ± 2.02
Week 104: 90 minutes after lunch7.80 ± 2.168.87 ± 2.45
Week 104: Before dinner6.58 ± 1.977.02 ± 2.45
Week 104: 90 minutes after dinner8.20 ± 2.209.10 ± 2.61
Week 104: Bedtime7.47 ± 2.177.90 ± 2.41
Week 104: At 4:00 a.m.5.67 ± 1.355.96 ± 1.73
Week 104: Before breakfast the following day5.44 ± 1.235.47 ± 1.35
SecondaryChange in SMPG-mean 9-point Profile

Participants measured plasma glucose values using the blood glucose meter at 9 time points: before breakfast, 90 min after start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after start of lunch, before dinner, 90 min after start of dinner, bedtime, at 4:00 am and before breakfast the following day. Change in SMPG-mean 9-point profile from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26, week 104
Reported as:
Mean · mmol/L
Change in SMPG-mean 9-point Profile
mmol/LInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Glargine
Week 26-3.34 ± 2.46-3.32 ± 2.62
Week 104-3.27 ± 2.36-2.76 ± 2.41
SecondaryChange in SMPG-mean Postprandial Increment Over All Meals

Participants measured plasma glucose values using the blood glucose meter at 9 time points: before breakfast, 90 min after start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after start of lunch, before dinner, 90 min after start of dinner, bedtime, at 4:00 am and before breakfast the following day. Change in SMPG-mean postprandial increment over all meals from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26, week 104
Reported as:
Mean · mmol/L
Change in SMPG-mean Postprandial Increment Over All Meals
mmol/LInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Glargine
Week 26-0.28 ± 2.130.20 ± 2.17
Week 104-0.47 ± 1.990.12 ± 2.17
SecondaryChange in Blood Pressure (Systolic and Diastolic)

Change in blood pressure (systolic and diastolic) from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26, week 104
Reported as:
Mean · Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Change in Blood Pressure (Systolic and Diastolic)
Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Insulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Glargine
Week 26: Systolic blood pressure-1.2 ± 14.00.5 ± 13.1
Week 26: Diastolic blood pressure0.1 ± 8.8-0.3 ± 8.4
Week 104: Systolic blood pressure0.5 ± 14.30.9 ± 13.6
Week 104: Diastolic blood pressure-0.1 ± 8.8-0.2 ± 8.6
SecondaryChange in Fasting C-peptide

Change in fasting C-peptide (measured in nanomoles per liter \[nmol/L\]) from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26, week 104
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Ratio of C-peptide
Change in Fasting C-peptide
Ratio of C-peptideInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Glargine
Week 260.63 ± 60.790.57 ± 62.44
Week 1040.58 ± 64.210.54 ± 70.45
SecondaryChange in Fasting Human Insulin

Change in fasting human insulin (measured in picomoles per liter \[pmol/L\]) from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26, week 104
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Ratio of insulin
Change in Fasting Human Insulin
Ratio of insulinInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Glargine
Week 260.67 ± 90.680.68 ± 89.19
Week 1040.60 ± 91.840.62 ± 92.55
SecondaryChange in Fasting Total Cholesterol

Change in fasting total cholesterol (measured in mmol/L) from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26, week 104
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Ratio of total cholesterol
Change in Fasting Total Cholesterol
Ratio of total cholesterolInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Glargine
Week 260.99 ± 17.380.99 ± 17.68
Week 1040.97 ± 19.110.97 ± 20.40
SecondaryChange in Fasting LDL-cholesterol

Change in fasting low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol (measured in mmol/L) from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26, week 104
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Ratio of LDL-cholesterol
Change in Fasting LDL-cholesterol
Ratio of LDL-cholesterolInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Glargine
Week 261.05 ± 35.971.02 ± 30.10
Week 1040.96 ± 38.830.98 ± 34.40
SecondaryChange in Fasting HDL-cholesterol

Change in fasting high density lipoprotein (HDL)- cholesterol (measured in mmol/L) from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26, week 104
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Ratio of HDL-cholesterol
Change in Fasting HDL-cholesterol
Ratio of HDL-cholesterolInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Glargine
Week 261.03 ± 16.611.02 ± 15.57
Week 1041.02 ± 16.931.03 ± 17.36
SecondaryChange in Fasting VLDL-cholesterol

Change in fasting very low density lipoprotein (VLDL)-cholesterol (measured in mmol/L) from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26, week 104
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Ratio of VLDL-cholesterol
Change in Fasting VLDL-cholesterol
Ratio of VLDL-cholesterolInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Glargine
Week 260.85 ± 40.780.85 ± 42.01
Week 1040.90 ± 40.900.88 ± 35.98
SecondaryChange in Fasting Triglycerides

Change in fasting triglycerides (measured as mmol/L) from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26, week 104
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Ratio of triglycerides
Change in Fasting Triglycerides
Ratio of triglyceridesInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Glargine
Week 260.84 ± 43.820.85 ± 45.75
Week 1040.89 ± 42.200.89 ± 40.08
SecondaryChange in Fasting Free Fatty Acids

Change in fasting free fatty acids (measured as mmol/L) from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26, week 104
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Ratio of free fatty acids
Change in Fasting Free Fatty Acids
Ratio of free fatty acidsInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Glargine
Week 260.68 ± 59.690.75 ± 60.25
Week 1040.70 ± 57.710.78 ± 59.48
SecondaryNumber of Treatment-emergent Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes During 26 Weeks of Treatment

Severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia is defined as an episode that is severe according to the ADA classification or BG confirmed by a plasma glucose value \<3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. Number of treatment-emergent severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes during 26 weeks of treatment is presented.

Time frame:
Weeks 0-26
Reported as:
Number · Episodes
Number of Treatment-emergent Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes During 26 Weeks of Treatment
EpisodesInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Glargine
Number of Treatment-emergent Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes During 26 Weeks of Treatment143261
SecondaryNumber of Treatment-emergent Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes During 104 Weeks of Treatment

Severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia is defined as an episode that is severe according to the ADA classification or BG confirmed by a plasma glucose value \<3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. Number of treatment-emergent severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes during 104 weeks of treatment is presented.

Time frame:
Weeks 0-104
Reported as:
Number · Episodes
Number of Treatment-emergent Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes During 104 Weeks of Treatment
EpisodesInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Glargine
Number of Treatment-emergent Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes During 104 Weeks of Treatment319642
SecondaryNumber of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes During 26 Weeks of Treatment

Hypoglycaemic episodes (SMPG value ≤3.9 mmol/L (70 mg/dL)) were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. Number of treatment-emergent hypoglycaemic episodes according to ADA during 26 weeks of treatment is presented.

Time frame:
Weeks 0-26
Reported as:
Number · Episodes
Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes During 26 Weeks of Treatment
EpisodesInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Glargine
Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes During 26 Weeks of Treatment31903806
SecondaryNumber of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes During 104 Weeks of Treatment

Hypoglycaemic episodes (SMPG value ≤3.9 mmol/L (70 mg/dL)) were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. Number of treatment emergent hypoglycaemic episodes according to ADA during 104 weeks of treatment is presented.

Time frame:
Weeks 0-104
Reported as:
Number · Episodes
Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes During 104 Weeks of Treatment
EpisodesInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Glargine
Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes During 104 Weeks of Treatment893410658
SecondaryNumber of Treatment-emergent Nocturnal Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes During 26 Weeks of Treatment

Severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia is defined as an episode that is severe according to the ADA classification or BG confirmed by a plasma glucose value \<3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Nocturnal hypoglycaemic episodes were episodes occurring between 00:01 and 05.59 both inclusive. Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. Number of treatment-emergent nocturnal severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes during 26 weeks of treatment is presented.

Time frame:
Weeks 0-26
Reported as:
Number · Episodes
Number of Treatment-emergent Nocturnal Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes During 26 Weeks of Treatment
EpisodesInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Glargine
Number of Treatment-emergent Nocturnal Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes During 26 Weeks of Treatment2760
SecondaryNumber of Treatment-emergent Nocturnal Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes During 104 Weeks of Treatment

Severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia is defined as an episode that is severe according to the ADA classification or BG confirmed by a plasma glucose value \<3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Nocturnal hypoglycaemic episodes were episodes occurring between 00:01 and 05.59 both inclusive. Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. Number of treatment-emergent nocturnal severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes during 104 weeks of treatment is presented.

Time frame:
Weeks 0-104
Reported as:
Number · Episodes
Number of Treatment-emergent Nocturnal Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes During 104 Weeks of Treatment
EpisodesInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Glargine
Number of Treatment-emergent Nocturnal Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes During 104 Weeks of Treatment61164
SecondaryNumber of TEAEs During 26 Weeks of Treatment

An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a product, and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. A treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an adverse event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product. If the event had onset date before the first day of exposure on trial product and increased in severity during the treatment period and until 7 days after the last drug date, then this event was also considered as a TEAE. Number of TEAEs during 26 weeks of treatment is presented.

Time frame:
Weeks 0-26
Reported as:
Number · Adverse events
Number of TEAEs During 26 Weeks of Treatment
Adverse eventsInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Glargine
Number of TEAEs During 26 Weeks of Treatment718624
SecondaryNumber of TEAEs During 104 Weeks of Treatment

An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a product, and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. A TEAE was defined as an adverse event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product. If the event had onset date before the first day of exposure on trial product and increased in severity during the treatment period and until 7 days after the last drug date, then this event was also considered as a TEAE. Number of TEAEs during 104 weeks of treatment is presented.

Time frame:
Week 0 to week 104
Reported as:
Number · Adverse events
Number of TEAEs During 104 Weeks of Treatment
Adverse eventsInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Glargine
Number of TEAEs During 104 Weeks of Treatment17881368
SecondaryEye Examination Category

Fundus photography or a dilated fundoscopy was performed at baseline (within 12 weeks prior to week 0) and week 104. The investigator interpreted each eye's (left and right) results and categorised them as: normal, abnormal not clinically significant (NCS) or abnormal clinically significant (CS). Number of participants in each category at baseline and week 104 were presented.

Time frame:
Baseline (within 12 weeks prior to week 0), week 104
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Eye Examination Category
ParticipantsInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Glargine
Left eye: Normal (baseline)345341
Left eye: Abnormal NCS (baseline)151155
Left eye: Abnormal CS (baseline)108
Left eye: Normal (week 104)204129
Left eye: Abnormal NCS (week 104)9750
Left eye: Abnormal CS (week 104)176
Right eye: Normal (baseline)344355
Right eye: Abnormal NCS (baseline)151143
Right eye: Abnormal CS (baseline)116
Right eye: Normal (week 104)200132
Right eye: Abnormal NCS (week 104)9948
Right eye: Abnormal CS (week 104)195
SecondaryECG Evaluation

The electrocardiogram (ECG) was assessed at baseline (within 2 weeks prior to week 0) and week 104. The investigator interpreted the results and categorised them as: normal, abnormal NCS or abnormal CS. Number of participants in each ECG category at baseline and week 104 are presented.

Time frame:
Baseline (within 2 weeks prior to week 0), week 104
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
ECG Evaluation
ParticipantsInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Glargine
Normal (Baseline)335335
Abnormal NCS (Baseline)162165
Abnormal CS (Baseline)94
Normal (week 104)227122
Abnormal NCS (week 104)9765
Abnormal CS (week 104)72
SecondaryChange in Urine Albumin/Creatinine Ratio

Change in urine albumin/creatinine ratio from baseline (week 0) to week 104 is presented.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 104
Reported as:
Mean · Milligrams per millimole (mg/mmol)
Change in Urine Albumin/Creatinine Ratio
Milligrams per millimole (mg/mmol)Insulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Glargine
Change in Urine Albumin/Creatinine Ratio-1.09 ± 7.43-0.74 ± 15.58
SecondaryChange in Pulse Rate

Change in pulse rate from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26, week 104
Reported as:
Mean · Beats per minute
Change in Pulse Rate
Beats per minuteInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Glargine
Week 262.0 ± 8.8-0.4 ± 8.7
Week 1041.7 ± 9.3-0.5 ± 9.7
SecondaryChange in Biochemistry Parameter- Creatinine, Total Bilirubin

Change in biochemistry parameter- creatinine, total bilirubin from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26, week 104
Reported as:
Mean · Micromoles per liter (umol/L)
Change in Biochemistry Parameter- Creatinine, Total Bilirubin
Micromoles per liter (umol/L)Insulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Glargine
Week 26: creatinine-0.50 ± 10.080.25 ± 8.78
Week 104: creatinine0.75 ± 10.852.20 ± 11.86
Week 26: total bilirubin-0.30 ± 3.35-0.32 ± 2.80
Week 104: total bilirubin-0.33 ± 3.42-0.59 ± 3.01
SecondaryChange in Biochemistry Parameter- Albumin

Change in biochemistry parameter- albumin from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26, week 104
Reported as:
Mean · Grams per deciliter (g/dL)
Change in Biochemistry Parameter- Albumin
Grams per deciliter (g/dL)Insulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Glargine
Week 26-0.03 ± 0.24-0.03 ± 0.21
Week 1040.01 ± 0.240.03 ± 0.27
SecondaryChange in Biochemistry Parameters- ALP, ALT, AST, Lipase and Amylase

Change in biochemistry parameters- alkaline phosphatase (ALP), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), lipase and amylase from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26, week 104
Reported as:
Mean · Units per liter (U/L)
Change in Biochemistry Parameters- ALP, ALT, AST, Lipase and Amylase
Units per liter (U/L)Insulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Glargine
Week 26: ALP-4.16 ± 14.16-4.33 ± 12.84
Week 104: ALP-1.35 ± 15.71-1.34 ± 14.22
Week 26: ALT-5.45 ± 18.50-3.33 ± 13.24
Week 104: ALT-5.39 ± 14.16-3.45 ± 14.46
Week 26: AST-1.62 ± 9.78-0.39 ± 9.51
Week 104: AST-1.84 ± 9.86-0.67 ± 10.78
Week 26: lipase9.26 ± 42.92-7.97 ± 34.28
Week 104: lipase5.41 ± 48.35-13.33 ± 42.27
Week 26: amylase9.72 ± 23.282.79 ± 20.92
Week 104: amylase7.23 ± 25.42-0.13 ± 25.94
SecondaryChange in Biochemistry Parameter- Sodium, Potassium and Calcium

Change in sodium, potassium and calcium from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26, week 104
Reported as:
Mean · mmol/L
Change in Biochemistry Parameter- Sodium, Potassium and Calcium
mmol/LInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Glargine
Week 26: sodium0.89 ± 2.741.03 ± 2.61
Week 104: sodium1.22 ± 2.541.47 ± 2.39
Week 26: potassium-0.05 ± 0.40-0.08 ± 0.42
Week 104: potassium-0.06 ± 0.42-0.07 ± 0.43
Week 26: calcium-0.01 ± 0.11-0.00 ± 0.11
Week 104: calcium-0.07 ± 0.10-0.06 ± 0.11
SecondaryChange in Haematological Parameter- Haemoglobin

Change in haemoglobin from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26, week 104
Reported as:
Mean · g/dL
Change in Haematological Parameter- Haemoglobin
g/dLInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Glargine
Week 260.08 ± 0.720.08 ± 0.74
Week 104-0.00 ± 0.89-0.03 ± 0.92
SecondaryChange in Haematological Parameter- Haematocrit

Change in haematocrit from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26, week 104
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage of red blood cells
Change in Haematological Parameter- Haematocrit
Percentage of red blood cellsInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Glargine
Week 26-0.33 ± 2.45-0.36 ± 2.43
Week 104-0.71 ± 2.83-0.95 ± 3.02
SecondaryChange in Haematological Parameter- Erythrocytes

Change in erythrocytes from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26, week 104
Reported as:
Mean · 10^12 cells/L
Change in Haematological Parameter- Erythrocytes
10^12 cells/LInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Glargine
Week 26-0.02 ± 0.28-0.03 ± 0.27
Week 104-0.12 ± 0.30-0.11 ± 0.32
SecondaryChange in Haematological Parameter- Thrombocytes and Leukocytes

Change in thrombocytes and leukocytes from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26, week 104
Reported as:
Mean · 10^9 cells/L
Change in Haematological Parameter- Thrombocytes and Leukocytes
10^9 cells/LInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Glargine
Week 26: Thrombocytes8.77 ± 35.827.05 ± 41.71
Week 104: Thrombocytes16.87 ± 39.2718.73 ± 53.76
Week 26: Leukocytes0.49 ± 1.450.39 ± 1.43
Week 104: Leukocytes0.07 ± 1.500.32 ± 1.55
SecondaryChange in Haematological Parameter- Eosinophils

Change in eosinophils from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26, week 104
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage of eosinophils
Change in Haematological Parameter- Eosinophils
Percentage of eosinophilsInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Glargine
Week 260.10 ± 1.880.06 ± 2.09
Week 1040.32 ± 2.080.43 ± 1.56
SecondaryChange in Haematological Parameter- Neutrophils

Change in neutrophils from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26, week 104
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage of neutrophils
Change in Haematological Parameter- Neutrophils
Percentage of neutrophilsInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Glargine
Week 261.86 ± 7.200.78 ± 7.68
Week 1041.25 ± 7.941.21 ± 8.02
SecondaryChange in Haematological Parameter- Basophils

Change in basophils from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26, week 104
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage of basophils
Change in Haematological Parameter- Basophils
Percentage of basophilsInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Glargine
Week 260.00 ± 0.28-0.00 ± 0.29
Week 1040.20 ± 0.380.16 ± 0.35
SecondaryChange in Haematological Parameter- Monocytes

Change in monocytes from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26, week 104
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage of monocytes
Change in Haematological Parameter- Monocytes
Percentage of monocytesInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Glargine
Week 26-0.10 ± 2.040.01 ± 1.91
Week 1040.49 ± 2.020.59 ± 1.88
SecondaryChange in Haematological Parameter- Lymphocytes

Change in lymphocytes from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26, week 104
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage of lymphocytes
Change in Haematological Parameter- Lymphocytes
Percentage of lymphocytesInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Glargine
Week 26-1.87 ± 6.29-0.84 ± 6.73
Week 104-2.25 ± 6.76-2.38 ± 7.29
SecondaryChange in Calcitonin

The number of participants who reported low, normal and high levels of calcitonin in relation to reference ranges at baseline (week 0), week 26 and week 104 are presented.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26, week 104
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Change in Calcitonin
ParticipantsInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Glargine
Week 0: Low00
Week 0: Normal481472
Week 0: High2532
Week 26: Low00
Week 26: Normal437431
Week 26: High4030
Week 104: Low00
Week 104: Normal301169
Week 104: High3117
SecondaryChange in Short Form Health Survey Version 2.0 (SF-36v2™, Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains and Summaries of the Physical Component Score (PCS) and the Mental Component Score (MCS)

SF-36 is a 36-item patient-reported survey of patient health that measures the participant's overall health-related quality of life (HRQoL). SF-36v2™ (acute version) questionnaire measured eight domains of functional health and well-being as well as two component summary scores (physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS)). The scores 0-100 (where higher scores indicated a better HRQoL) from the SF-36 were converted to norm-based scores to enable a direct interpretation in relation to the distribution of the scores in the 2009 U.S. general population. A norm-based score of 50 corresponds to the mean score and 10 corresponds to the standard deviation of the 2009 U.S. general population. Change from baseline in the sub-domain scores and component summary (PCS and MCS) scores are presented. A positive change score indicates an improvement since baseline.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26, week 104
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Change in Short Form Health Survey Version 2.0 (SF-36v2™, Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains and Summaries of the Physical Component Score (PCS) and the Mental Component Score (MCS)
Score on a scaleInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Glargine
Week 26: Physical functioning1.2 ± 6.81.1 ± 7.0
Week 104: Physical functioning0.7 ± 7.50.6 ± 7.9
Week 26: Role-physical1.4 ± 7.70.5 ± 7.4
Week 104: Role-physical1.4 ± 8.70.7 ± 7.5
Week 26: Bodily pain1.5 ± 9.70.4 ± 10.0
Week 104: Bodily pain1.6 ± 11.20.1 ± 8.5
Week 26: General health2.5 ± 8.22.1 ± 7.6
Week 104: General health2.3 ± 8.72.1 ± 8.3
Week 26: Vitality1.4 ± 8.11.4 ± 8.0
Week 104: Vitality1.5 ± 8.41.5 ± 8.0
Week 26: Social functioning1.8 ± 8.10.9 ± 8.8
Week 104: Social functioning0.9 ± 8.91.1 ± 7.6
Week 26: Role-emotional0.6 ± 8.90.7 ± 8.8
Week 104: Role-emotional1.6 ± 10.11.2 ± 8.2
Week 26: Mental health1.7 ± 8.71.3 ± 8.4
Week 104: Mental health2.5 ± 9.40.3 ± 8.9
Week 26: PCS1.6 ± 6.30.9 ± 6.3
Week 104: PCS1.0 ± 7.20.8 ± 6.0
Week 26: MCS1.3 ± 8.21.2 ± 8.0
Week 104: MCS2.0 ± 9.01.0 ± 7.8
SecondaryChange in TRIM-D

Treatment related impact measures-diabetes (TRIM-D) was developed according to the FDA guidance from 2009 on development of new PRO measures. The questionnaire consists of 5 sub-domains, which are scored according to a 1-5 point scale with a higher score indicating a better health state (less negative impact). Sub-domain scores are calculated by summing across items in the same sub-domain, and the total score is calculated by summing scores from all the sub-domains. The highest possible summed score within a sub-domain ranges from 20 (compliance sub-domain) to 40 (psychological health sub-domain) points and the highest possible total score is 140 points. Change in TRIM-D total score from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented. A positive change score indicates an improvement since baseline.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26, week 104
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Change in TRIM-D
Score on a scaleInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Glargine
Week 269.6 ± 12.47.3 ± 13.1
Week 10411.4 ± 13.79.5 ± 12.8

Adverse events

Collected over Weeks 0-104 (treatment period) + 7 days follow-up-1 + 30 days follow-up-2. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Insulin Degludec/Liraglutide2/506 (0.4%)60/506 (11.9%)206/506 (40.7%)
Insulin Glargine5/504 (1%)43/504 (8.5%)156/504 (31%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 115
Most frequent serious events
EventInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Glargine
Angina unstableCardiac disorders4/5060/504
OsteoarthritisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders4/5063/504
CholelithiasisHepatobiliary disorders2/5063/504
Acute myocardial infarctionCardiac disorders3/5062/504
Cholecystitis acuteHepatobiliary disorders3/5061/504
FallInjury, poisoning and procedural complications3/5060/504
Lower respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations3/5060/504
Peripheral arterial occlusive diseaseVascular disorders3/5060/504
Atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders0/5062/504
Basal cell carcinomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/5062/504
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Glargine
HeadacheNervous system disorders58/50645/504
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations57/50644/504
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders39/50612/504
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations28/50636/504
InfluenzaInfections and infestations36/50628/504
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders31/5068/504
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders24/50629/504
Back painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders25/50627/504

Baseline characteristics

Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomised participants.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Insulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin GlargineTotal
Mean56.8 ± 10.056.4 ± 10.156.6 ± 10.0
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Insulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin GlargineTotal
Female226231457
Male280275555
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Insulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin GlargineTotal
Hispanic or Latino115126241
Not Hispanic or Latino391380771
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Insulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin GlargineTotal
White424414838
Black or African American252853
Asian5461115
Other336
08

Study locations

143 sites
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Muscle Shoals, Alabama 35662, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Tuscumbia, Alabama 35674, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Glendale, Arizona 85306-4652, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Glendale, Arizona 85308, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Phoenix, Arizona 85018, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Phoenix, Arizona 85020, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Phoenix, Arizona 85050, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Bermuda Dunes, California 92203, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Fresno, California 93720, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Lancaster, California 93534, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Monterey, California 93940, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Sacramento, California 95821, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Spring Valley, California 91978, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Ventura, California 93003, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Walnut Creek, California 94598, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Colorado Springs, Colorado 80910, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Boynton Beach, Florida 33472, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Lake Worth, Florida 33461, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Miami, Florida 33135, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Blackfoot, Idaho 83221, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Avon, Indiana 46123, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46254, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Metairie, Louisiana 70002, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Hyattsville, Maryland 20782, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Rockville, Maryland 20852, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Waltham, Massachusetts 02453, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Buckley, Michigan 49620, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Billings, Montana 59101, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Nashua, New Hampshire 03063, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    New Windsor, New York 12553, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Mason, Ohio 45040-6815, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Maumee, Ohio 43537, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Beaver, Pennsylvania 15009, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Greer, South Carolina 29651, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Humboldt, Tennessee 38343, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Dallas, Texas 75251, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Houston, Texas 77040, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Irving, Texas 75061-2210, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Katy, Texas 77450, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    San Antonio, Texas 78215, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Midlothian, Virginia 23114, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Kenosha, Wisconsin 53142, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Kenosha, Wisconsin 53144, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Buenos Aires, C1425AGC, Argentina
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    CABA, C1179AAB, Argentina
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Capital Federal, C1056ABJ, Argentina
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Mendoza, 5500, Argentina
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    São Paulo, São Paulo 01228-000, Brazil
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Porto Alegre, 90035-170, Brazil
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Pilsen, 30100, Czechia
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Pilsen, 32600, Czechia
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Prague, 11694, Czechia
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Prague, 140 46, Czechia
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Budapest, 1106, Hungary
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Budapest, H-1134, Hungary
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Dunaújváros, 2400, Hungary
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Kaposvár, 7400, Hungary
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Pécs, H-7624, Hungary
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Secunderabad, Andhra Pradesh 500003, India
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh 530002, India
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Rohtak, Haryana 124001, India
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Bangalore, Karnataka 560054, India
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Mumbai, Maharashtra 400058, India
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Nagpur, Maharashtra 440015, India
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Pune, Maharashtra 411001, India
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Pune, Maharashtra 411040, India
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Delhi, New Delhi 110002, India
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Jaipur, Rajasthan 302006, India
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641018, India
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Kolkata, West Bengal 700020, India
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Kolkata, West Bengal 700107, India
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Haifa, 35152, Israel
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Haifa, Israel
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Nahariya, 22100, Israel
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Rishon LeZiyyon, 75650, Israel
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Tel Aviv, 62038, Israel
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Tel Aviv, 6789714, Israel
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Tel Litwinsky, 52621, Israel
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Ẕerifin, 70300, Israel
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Bologna, 40138, Italy
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Catanzaro, 88100, Italy
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Cittadella (PD), 35013, Italy
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Negrar (VR), 37024, Italy
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Palermo, 90129, Italy
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Pavia, 27100, Italy
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Verona, 37126, Italy
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Guadalajara, Jalisco 44600, Mexico
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Cuernavaca, Morelos 62250, Mexico
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Ciudad Madero, Tamaulipas 89440, Mexico
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Durango, 34000, Mexico
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Bodø, 8005, Norway
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Hamar, 2317, Norway
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Hoenefoss, 3515, Norway
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Kløfta, 2040, Norway
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Lierskogen, 3420, Norway
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Oslo, 0424, Norway
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Stavanger, 4005, Norway
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Tananger, 4056, Norway
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Bialystok, 15-276, Poland

Showing the first 100 of 143 sites across 16 countries.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Aroda VR, Gonzalez-Galvez G, Gron R, Halladin N, Haluzik M, Jermendy G, Kok A, Orsy P, Sabbah M, Sesti G, Silver R. Durability of insulin degludec plus liraglutide versus insulin glargine U100 as initial injectable therapy in type 2 diabetes (DUAL VIII): a multicentre, open-label, phase 3b, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019 Aug;7(8):596-605. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30184-6. Epub 2019 Jun 9. PubMed 31189519 ↗
  • Philis-Tsimikas A, Aroda VR, De Block C, Billings LK, Liebl A, Sivarathinasami R, D'Cruz JM, Lingvay I. Higher Derived Time in Range With IDegLira Versus Insulin Glargine U100 in People With Type 2 Diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 May;18(3):653-659. doi: 10.1177/19322968221149041. Epub 2023 Jan 29. PubMed 36710452 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Mar 1, 2019
  • Statistical analysis plan · Mar 7, 2019

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jan 2016 to primary completion in Oct 2018, 32 months.

Results were first posted in Nov 2019, 1 year 1 month after primary completion.

Of 353 industry-sponsored phase 3 interventional studies under Diabetes Mellitus, half reached primary completion within 18 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 25. This study's 32 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 457 studies reached it within 19 months; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 29.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 15, 2015
First posted
Jul 17, 2015
StartActual
Jan 31, 2016
Primary completionActual
Oct 3, 2018
CompletionActual
Oct 3, 2018
Results first posted
Nov 27, 2019
Last update
Nov 27, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 27, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02501161
Lead sponsor
Novo Nordisk A/S
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 17, 2015
Start date
Jan 31, 2016
Primary completion
Oct 3, 2018
Completion
Oct 3, 2018
Results posted
Nov 27, 2019
Last update
Nov 27, 2019

Study contacts

Global Clinical Registry GCR, 1452
study director · Novo Nordisk A/S

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Insulin degludec · Liraglutide

Start the discussion