ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02497365Updated Oct 19, 2023

Besifloxacin in Bacterial Keratitis

An interventional study of Besifloxacin and Tobramycin and Cefazolin in Bacterial Keratitis, sponsored by McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-10-19.

Sponsored by McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
32
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a study comparing a new treatment for bacterial keratitis (also known as corneal ulcers) with the current standard of care. It is a randomized trial, and the investigators plan to test whether besifloxacin (a new antibiotic) in comparison to the current standard of treatment, fortified antibiotic drops (cefazolin and tobramycin).

Read the detailed description

Hypothesis: patients with bacterial keratitis treated with besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension will have non inferior clinical outcomes as compared to those treated with fortified antibiotic drops (tobramycin and cefazolin)

Bacterial keratitis is a serious ocular problem that can, if not appropriately treated, lead to corneal scarring, perforation, endophthalmitis, and ultimately blindness. Current accepted treatment by some practitioners at a major academic center (McGill University Department of Ophthalmology) for corneal ulcers involves aggressive therapy with fortified antibiotics1, typically tobramycin (for gram negative coverage) and either vancomycin or cefazolin (for gram positive and/or MRSA coverage).

However, there are a number of problems with this treatment method. Patients must obtain the fortified antibiotics from specific pharmacies who must compound the preparations, increasing cost to the patient and potentially risk of contamination. The regimen typically involves every hour, round the clock dosing for at least the 48 hours, causing significant distress to patients (many of whom are eldery) and their families, as well as compliance issues. Finally, fortified antibiotics are toxic, by retarding the epithelial healing rate, as well as having conjunctival and corneal toxic effects.

The investigators' overall goal is to determine whether besifloxacin (at less frequent dosing than that used with fortified antibiotics) can be used safely and effectively in the treatment of bacterial keratitis. Previous studies have examined its effect on bacterial conjunctivitis, but not to the investigators' knowledge bacterial keratitis. However, as some clinicians are already using besifloxacin in this purpose, the investigators wish to examine the safety and efficacy of this.

If the investigators' study shows that besifloxacin is safe and effective in the treatment of bacterial keratitis, a new treatment option for bacterial keratitis may emerge.

The investigators therefore plan to conduct a randomized, open label trial enrolling patients newly diagnosed and not previously treated with bacterial keratitis. The patients will be randomized to receive either besifloxacin 6 x daily initially, or fortified antibiotics (cefazolin and tobramycin) every hour. The investigators will follow the patients closely to try to evaluate whether besifloxacin is an effective treatment for bacterial keratitis.

This is a randomized, single-center, two-arm, open-label study comparing a novel therapy, besofloxacin ophthalmic suspension, to traditional therapy of fortified cefazolin and tobramycin drops, in the treatment of bacterial keratitis.

Patients presenting with bacterial keratitis to the McGill Ophthalmology Center at 5252 Maissoneuve in Montreal, will be offered the opportunity by the resident and staff physician on call, to enroll in the study, with full discussion of risks and benefits as detailed above. Referrals will come from outpatient clinics and emergency departments as detailed above. The population of patients is expected to be outpatients, with a wide range of age groups >18 years old (no pediatrics as the study center does not see any pediatric age patients).

If patients choose not to enroll in the study, they will proceed to receive standard treatment at the center.

If patients choose to enroll in the study, the resident or staff on call, will, in consultation with the study investigators (Dr Jean Deschenes), use a pre-determined random number generator to randomize the patients to A) Besifloxacin arm, or B) Fortified Antibiotics arm.

At the first visit, a complete anterior ophthalmological exam will be performed, along with a detailed ophthalmic and medical history. Corneal scrapings will be performed (blood agar, chocolate agar, Sabaroud agar, slide mount for gram stain).

The participant will then be prescribed either Besifloxacin or Fortified Antibiotics (Cefazolin and Tobramycin) depending on their randomization. The participants will need to take the prescription to an outside pharmacy for purchase at their own cost of the medications. Suggested pharmacies will be made for the Fortified Antibiotics arm (as is standard of care due to the limited number of pharmacies that prepare the compounded drops).

Participants will be re-evaluated multiple times following initial presentation.

In each arm the medication will be tapered according to the clinical discretion of the treating physicians. In the besifloxacin arm, only besifloxacin will be used. In the fortified antibiotics arm, the fortified drops will be tapered and may be switched to another standard of care medication (moxifloxacin drops) as the bacterial keratitis improves as per the typical treatment regimen. Importantly, in this arm, the treatment will be carried out as normal standard of care for bacterial keratitis.

In the besifloxacin arm, if, at the visit on day 8, previous corneal bacterial cultures remain positive, the patient will be crossed over into the fortified antibiotic arm. Otherwise, crossover may occur only if there is significant clinical deterioration by the treating physician that requires urgent intervention.

The expected duration of each subject participation is 4 months. Study enrollment is expected to last for about 4 months as well.

02

Conditions studied

  • Bacterial Keratitis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • keratits
  • besifloxacin
03

In context

Keratitis

108 studies on the registry are indexed under Keratitis; 19 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 32 is below the median of 40 across 70 interventional studies indexed under Keratitis.

Browse Keratitis studies →

Lead sponsor

McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre is the lead sponsor of 421 studies on the registry; 105 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

    • Provide signed and dated form

      • Willing to comply with all study procedures and be available for the duration of the study
      • Male or female, aged 18 or older
      • Clinically diagnosed bacterial keratitis, with any size ulcer > 1mm.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

    • Previously treated for current episode of bacterial keratitis with an antibiotic drop

      • Corneal Ulcers \<1mm
      • Known allergic reaction to components of the study products
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
32 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group A: Besifloxacin

    Patients presenting with bacterial keratitis. These patients will be treated with besifloxacin ophthalmic suspesnion 0.6%, initially 6x a day and tapered down as the patient's condition improves based on the clinical judgement of the treating physician.

    Drug: Besifloxacin

  • Active comparator
    Group B: Fortified Antibiotics

    Patients presenting with bacterial keratitis. These patients will be treated initially with fortified cefazolin and vancomycin drops every 1 hour around the clock (24hours) for a minimum of 48 hours, and will subsequently have their dosages tapered gradually by the treating physician as is the standard of care for bacterial keratitis.

    Drug: Tobramycin and Cefazolin

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to microbial sterilization of the infected cornea

    We will take repeat cultures and determine when no more bacteria can be cultured

    Time frame: 2-14 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time until closure of epithelial defect

    Time frame: 2-14 days

  2. Final pinhole corrected visual acuity

    Time frame: 4 months

  3. Final corneal scar size

    Time frame: 4 months

  4. Severe adverse events: corneal perforation, endophthalmitis

    Time frame: 4 months

  5. Time until clinical resolution as determined by physician

    Time frame: 4 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • McGill Academic Eye Center
    Montreal, Quebec H4A 3S9, Canada
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Sep 2015, a primary completion of Jun 2019 and a completion of Jul 2019. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 10, 2015
First posted
Jul 14, 2015
Start
Sep 2015
Primary completionActual
Jun 2019
CompletionActual
Jul 2019
Last update
Oct 19, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 19, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02497365
Responsible party
Jean Deschenes (Professor, McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 14, 2015
Start date
Sep 2015
Primary completion
Jun 2019
Completion
Jul 2019
Last update
Oct 19, 2023

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Besifloxacin

Start the discussion