An interventional study of Individualized Arousal-Biofeedback and Treatment as usual in Aggression, Conduct Disorder and Oppositional Defiant Disorder, sponsored by Central Institute of Mental Health, Mannheim. Completed at 2 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 8 Years to 14 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-04-17.
Sponsored by Central Institute of Mental Health, Mannheim · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The purpose of this study is to determine whether individualized biofeedback of arousal (skin conductance) is effective in the treatment of aggressive behavior problems in children and adolescents with either predominantly impulsive (reactive) and/or high callous unemotional traits (proactive) subtypes of aggression when compared to treatment as usual (TAU), and induces normalization when compared to a group of typically developing children receiving no intervention.
In this study, which is part of the EC FP7 projects Aggressotype (FP7-Health-2013-Innovation-1 602805, Aggression subtyping for improved insight and treatment innovation in psychiatric disorders), the investigators focus on the testing of an innovative, non-pharmacological therapeutic approach for children and adolescents with different subtypes of aggressive behavior problems. Participants will be trained to acquire control over their arousal as measured by skin conductance/electrodermal activity. As aggressive behavior involves a dysregulation of arousal at rest and in response to emotional stimuli (lower electrodermal activity and heart rate, differences in EEG), the individualized acquisition of self-control over ones arousal level might represent a promising therapeutic approach for this kind of disorder.
While trying to control their arousal level, participants receive direct continuous feedback about their physiological state and its changes, and are rewarded for successful manipulation, i.e. up- or downregulation. During transfer trials continuous feedback is omitted. Biofeedback methods are currently used to treat patients with a variety of psychiatric disorders such as ADHD.
The investigators would like to focus on the following questions concerning the effectiveness of this treatment approach:
Before the training, all subjects will undergo an extensive pre-treatment assessment as part of the characterization and subtyping of aggression within the large multicenter subtyping studies (EU-Aggressotype and EU-MATRICS). The assessment includes clinical and psychometric measures, neuropsychological testing, fMRI (3 tasks + resting state), MRS (2 voxels) and DTI as well as biosampling (blood/saliva for genetics/epigenetics/hormones). Comparison with a typically developing (TD) control group receiving no intervention will allow to interpret changes in terms of normalisation or compensation.
After completion of this pretest, subjects meeting the inclusion criteria for the arousal-biofeedback treatment study will be randomly assigned to two different treatment arms, either to the experimental arousal feedback condition or to the comparator condition with TAU lasting about 20 weeks. Subjects assigned to the experimental condition will receive 20 sessions (1/week) of arousal (electrodermal activity)-feedback, learning to either in- or decrease levels of electrodermal activity. At the beginning of the first treatment session, a baseline assessment of arousal measures will be done in order to determine the arousal subtype of the participants (hypo- or hyperarousal), and the main direction of individualized training (up- or downregulation). Afterwards, each training will last about 1 hour and consist of several experimental blocks, including feedback as well as transfer trials with EEG and heart rate recorded simultaneously during the sessions. Video clips of emotional and aggressive situations will be used to support regulation of arousal. During the first 10 sessions, all participants will be asked to increase/decrease their electrodermal activity in a proportion of about 2:1 depending on the dominant arousal subtype, in order to train mainly upregulation in patients with hypoarousal, and downregulation in patients with hyperarousal. Subjects in the comparator TAU arm will receive several sessions of psychoeducation and counseling with their parents/caregivers or group training over the 20 weeks.
After the first 10 sessions of feedback training (or several appointments with their parents/caregivers or group trainings in the TAU group) approximately 10 weeks after the beginning of the training, parents/caregivers will be asked to shortly evaluate behavioral measures of aggressive behavior by filling out the MOAS. In the feedback group arousal measures will be reassessed as done at the beginning of the first training to assess stability.
After completion of either the training or the TAU, subjects will undergo post-treatment assessment including again the same teachers and parents reports on behavioral measures, as well as the neuropsychological testing, fMRI and MRS. A follow-up assessment with parents and teachers reports on behavioral measures only will take place 6 months after the end of the treatment phase.
248 studies on the registry are indexed under Aggression; 41 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 28 is below the median of 80 across 221 interventional studies indexed under Aggression.
Browse Aggression studies →Central Institute of Mental Health, Mannheim is the lead sponsor of 60 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Inclusion Criteria (typically developing (TD) control group):
Exclusion Criteria (both groups):
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.
A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.
DSM diagnostic criteria
The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Contraindication
A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
After a pre-training assessment at baseline, subjects will be randomized to either treatment arm or treatment as usual. Subjects in the experimental condition will receive 20 sessions of arousal (electrodermal activity) feedback, 1 session/week. Each session will last about 1 hour. After the first 10 sessions (10 weeks after the beginning of the training phase), parents/caregivers will be asked to evaluate behavioral measures of aggression. After training completion (approximately 20 weeks after the beginning of the training phase), subjects will undergo post-treatment assessment (week 20/21) and follow up (6 months after the end of the training phase).
Behavioral: Individualized Arousal-Biofeedback
After a pre-training assessment at baseline, subjects will be randomized to either treatment arm or treatment as usual. Subjects in the comparator condition will receive several appointments together with their parents/caregivers or group trainings over a timeframe of 20 weeks. Within the sessions, the investigators will focus on psychoeducational issues and provide general counseling for the families. After 10 weeks, parents/caregivers will be asked to evaluate behavioral measures of aggression. After 20 weeks, subjects will undergo post-treatment assessment (week 20/21) and follow up (6 months after the end of the treatment phase).
Behavioral: Treatment as usual
Healthy, typically developing children will only undergo baseline assessment (observational) for comparison
biofeedback of biological measures of arousal (electrodermal activity)
counseling, psychoeducation
Changes in aggressive behavior from baseline at 10 weeks, 20 weeks and at follow up after 6 months as assessed by the Modified Overt Aggression Scale (MOAS)
Parents or caregivers report on type and intensity of aggressive behavior over the last week (questionnaire)
Time frame: Baseline, evaluation after 10 weeks of treatment, post treatment assessment (20 weeks after the beginning of the training), follow up at 6 months
Changes in brain activation as assessed by fMRI from baseline after 20 weeks
• At pre-treatment assessment and at the end of the treatment phase, patients will perform 3 tasks during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). The tasks used are: Passive Avoidance task, Emotional Faces task, Stop-Signal task
Time frame: Baseline and post treatment assessment (20 weeks after the beginning of the training)
Changes in composition of neurotransmitter metabolites as assessed by MRS from baseline after 20 weeks
At pre-treatment assessment and at the end of the treatment phase, patients will undergo magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) of two brain areas implicated in inhibitory control (ACC and insula)
Time frame: Baseline and post treatment assessment (20 weeks after the beginning of the training)
Changes in aggressive behavior from baseline after 20 weeks and at follow up after 6 months as assessed by teachers through the aggressive behavior subscale of theTRF (Teachers Report Form)
At pre-treatment assessment, after the end of the treatment phase and at follow up, teachers will be asked to complete the TRF, which is a questionnaire focusing on general psychopathology (and allows to differentiate between several subsets of symptoms, amongst others those indicating externalizing and aggressive behavior)
Time frame: Baseline, post treatment assessment at 20 weeks and follow up at 6 months after the beginning of the training
This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Central Institute of Mental Health, Mannheim