A Phase 2 interventional study of Radiofrequency ablation (StarMed) in Pancreas Cancer, Cholangiocarcinoma and Obstructive Jaundice, sponsored by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven. Completed at 1 site in Belgium. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-05-11.
Sponsored by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment
This phase-2 study aims to evaluate feasibility, safety and efficacy of thermal ablation of biliary obstructive malignancies by means of radiofrequency ablation (RFA, ELRA, StarMed) during endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreaticography (ERCP) with primary intent to obtain palliative biliary drainage via stenting
INTRODUCTION
Biliary obstruction is the most relevant factor for survival and quality of life in patients suffering from primary bile duct malignancies or pancreatic head carcinoma. Due to their insidious course, these cancers are often diagnosed at an advanced stage. Thus, therapy is frequently restricted to palliative management. Within this setting, the prevention/treatment of biliary complications such as jaundice, cholangitis, or sepsis is one of the key therapeutic factors to extend survival and maintain quality of life (1-3). Endoscopic stenting of the biliary tract is now generally accepted as the primary approach to reestablish sufficient biliary drainage, provided approximately 50% of the liver parenchyma is drained (4). As the tumor grows, unfortunately, it often occurs that jaundice reappears despite primary stenting. Most oftenly this relates to unbridled tumor expansion leading to either stent-dysfunction by tumor ingrowth (through the mesh in case of metallic stenting of or via clogging of plastic stents) or either to extension in more proximal bile ducts/branches shutting of sufficient/adequate biliary drainage.
Given the context of incurable disease, a minimally-invasive strategy that could reduce the tumor burden in addition to stenting might be considered beneficial in terms of longer sustained bile duct drainage, and as such improve quality of life, more efficiently administered and better tolerated courses chemotherapy and delayed disease progression.
An example of such a potential minimal invasive strategy is RadioFrequency Ablation (RFA). It involves a modified electrocautery technique that has emerged among the many choices for local, minimally invasive tissue ablation. It has proven effective, versatile, and relatively inexpensive. RFA has been used for years in the treatment of cardiac dysrhythmias from aberrant conduction pathways, osteoid osteoma, prostate hypertrophy, and chronic pain (5-8). Recent clinical applications include tumor ablation in the liver (9-11), kidney (12,13) adrenal gland (14,15), bone (16), lung (17), and breast (18) as well as soft tissue debulking and pain palliation (19).
In the context of gastro-intestinal endoscopy, RFA has taken its place in the reduction of neoplastic progression of Barrett esophagus over 3 years of follow-up (20).
With regard to biliopancreatic endoscopy and oncology in particular, this approach has only recently been introduced. A primary experience using an alternative endoscopically applicable RFA-system for bile duct lesions, has shown to be feasible and safe ex vivo in resected fresh pig livers and in an open-label pilot study involving 22 patients with malignant biliary obstruction (21,22). Similar results have been obtained in animal testing for the ELRA-system (StarMed, Taewoong Medical, Seoul, Korea).
The presumed theoretical advantage of the current system (ELRA system, StarMed, Taewoong Medical, Seoul, Korea) is the capacity to better control the locally applied temperature at all times and to maintain temperature continuous, as such preventing tissue adjacent to an active tip from carbonization during the procedure. Additionally the 4-ring appliance of thermal ablation allows a better thermal spreading and therefore appliance of ablation
STUDY OBJECTIVE \& DESIGN
This project involves a single center investigator-driven prospective non-randomized non-controlled trial evaluating feasibility, safety and efficacy of thermal ablation of biliary obstructive malignancies by means of the ELRA RF during ERCP with primary intent to obtain palliative biliary drainage via stenting .
STUDY METHODOLOGY : POPULATION \& INTERVENTION
ELIGIBLE PATIENT POPULATION
All patients with an inoperable biliopancreatic tumor with obstructive jaundice and therefore in need of biliary drainage via ERCP, eligible and consenting for inclusion (cfr infra), will be considered for entry in the study. This is a non-randomized non-controlled investigator-driven trial.
ENDOSCOPIC INTERVENTION
All procedures will be performed under general anesthesia, according to standard good clinical practice. After performing an endoscopic sphincterotomy with/without balloon dilatation of the stenosis (conventional approach) in preparation of stenting, a RFA catheter (ELRA, Taewoong, Seoul, Korea), suitable for endoscopic delivery into the biliary tree over a 0.035-inch guide wire, will be advanced up to the level of the malignant stenosis.
The "end of follow-up" is defined as the end of the follow-up period (designated at 3 months after index procedure) or failure of treatment or death.
The outcome parameters will be compared to those of a historically matched control group (i.e. stented without RFA).
3,896 studies on the registry are indexed under Pancreatic Neoplasms; 1,007 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 18 is below the median of 47 across 2,932 interventional studies indexed under Pancreatic Neoplasms.
Browse Pancreatic Neoplasms studies →Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven is the lead sponsor of 963 studies on the registry; 267 are open to participants now.
Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
18 patients to be included : Hilar cholangiocarcinoma : n=9 Distal cholangiocarcinoma/pancreatic cancer n=9
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.
Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.
Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.
The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Platelets
Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)
Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.
Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Life expectancy
The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
COPD
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Radiofrequency ablation catheter
Device: Radiofrequency ablation (StarMed)
Radiofrequency ablation into bile duct
Feasibility (ratio of technically successful RFA-applications to all examinations in which RFA-use was intended)
Time frame: 90 days after index procedure
Efficacy measured by progression-free survival at 3 months upon standard follow-up imaging study and duration of stent patency (days) after the RFA-performed procedure
Time frame: 90 days after index procedure
30-day-, 90-day and overall mortality
Time frame: 90 days after index procedure
Number of days and reasons for hospitalizations during the study period
Time frame: 90 day after index procedure
Quality of life (QuoL) by means of the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL questionnaire after the procedure and at 30 and 90 days vs before
Time frame: 90 days after index procedure
safety (number and type of adverse events)
Time frame: 90 days after index procedure
This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven →