ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02468076IGNITE-1Updated May 11, 2016

Radiofrequency Ablation for Biliopancreatic Malignancy

A Phase 2 interventional study of Radiofrequency ablation (StarMed) in Pancreas Cancer, Cholangiocarcinoma and Obstructive Jaundice, sponsored by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven. Completed at 1 site in Belgium. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-05-11.

Sponsored by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
18
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This phase-2 study aims to evaluate feasibility, safety and efficacy of thermal ablation of biliary obstructive malignancies by means of radiofrequency ablation (RFA, ELRA, StarMed) during endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreaticography (ERCP) with primary intent to obtain palliative biliary drainage via stenting

Read the detailed description

INTRODUCTION

Biliary obstruction is the most relevant factor for survival and quality of life in patients suffering from primary bile duct malignancies or pancreatic head carcinoma. Due to their insidious course, these cancers are often diagnosed at an advanced stage. Thus, therapy is frequently restricted to palliative management. Within this setting, the prevention/treatment of biliary complications such as jaundice, cholangitis, or sepsis is one of the key therapeutic factors to extend survival and maintain quality of life (1-3). Endoscopic stenting of the biliary tract is now generally accepted as the primary approach to reestablish sufficient biliary drainage, provided approximately 50% of the liver parenchyma is drained (4). As the tumor grows, unfortunately, it often occurs that jaundice reappears despite primary stenting. Most oftenly this relates to unbridled tumor expansion leading to either stent-dysfunction by tumor ingrowth (through the mesh in case of metallic stenting of or via clogging of plastic stents) or either to extension in more proximal bile ducts/branches shutting of sufficient/adequate biliary drainage.

Given the context of incurable disease, a minimally-invasive strategy that could reduce the tumor burden in addition to stenting might be considered beneficial in terms of longer sustained bile duct drainage, and as such improve quality of life, more efficiently administered and better tolerated courses chemotherapy and delayed disease progression.

An example of such a potential minimal invasive strategy is RadioFrequency Ablation (RFA). It involves a modified electrocautery technique that has emerged among the many choices for local, minimally invasive tissue ablation. It has proven effective, versatile, and relatively inexpensive. RFA has been used for years in the treatment of cardiac dysrhythmias from aberrant conduction pathways, osteoid osteoma, prostate hypertrophy, and chronic pain (5-8). Recent clinical applications include tumor ablation in the liver (9-11), kidney (12,13) adrenal gland (14,15), bone (16), lung (17), and breast (18) as well as soft tissue debulking and pain palliation (19).

In the context of gastro-intestinal endoscopy, RFA has taken its place in the reduction of neoplastic progression of Barrett esophagus over 3 years of follow-up (20).

With regard to biliopancreatic endoscopy and oncology in particular, this approach has only recently been introduced. A primary experience using an alternative endoscopically applicable RFA-system for bile duct lesions, has shown to be feasible and safe ex vivo in resected fresh pig livers and in an open-label pilot study involving 22 patients with malignant biliary obstruction (21,22). Similar results have been obtained in animal testing for the ELRA-system (StarMed, Taewoong Medical, Seoul, Korea).

The presumed theoretical advantage of the current system (ELRA system, StarMed, Taewoong Medical, Seoul, Korea) is the capacity to better control the locally applied temperature at all times and to maintain temperature continuous, as such preventing tissue adjacent to an active tip from carbonization during the procedure. Additionally the 4-ring appliance of thermal ablation allows a better thermal spreading and therefore appliance of ablation

STUDY OBJECTIVE \& DESIGN

This project involves a single center investigator-driven prospective non-randomized non-controlled trial evaluating feasibility, safety and efficacy of thermal ablation of biliary obstructive malignancies by means of the ELRA RF during ERCP with primary intent to obtain palliative biliary drainage via stenting .

STUDY METHODOLOGY : POPULATION \& INTERVENTION

ELIGIBLE PATIENT POPULATION

All patients with an inoperable biliopancreatic tumor with obstructive jaundice and therefore in need of biliary drainage via ERCP, eligible and consenting for inclusion (cfr infra), will be considered for entry in the study. This is a non-randomized non-controlled investigator-driven trial.

ENDOSCOPIC INTERVENTION

All procedures will be performed under general anesthesia, according to standard good clinical practice. After performing an endoscopic sphincterotomy with/without balloon dilatation of the stenosis (conventional approach) in preparation of stenting, a RFA catheter (ELRA, Taewoong, Seoul, Korea), suitable for endoscopic delivery into the biliary tree over a 0.035-inch guide wire, will be advanced up to the level of the malignant stenosis.

The "end of follow-up" is defined as the end of the follow-up period (designated at 3 months after index procedure) or failure of treatment or death.

The outcome parameters will be compared to those of a historically matched control group (i.e. stented without RFA).

02

Conditions studied

  • Pancreas Cancer
  • Cholangiocarcinoma
  • Obstructive Jaundice

Keywords

  • ERCP
  • radiofrequency ablation
  • obstructive jaundice
03

In context

Pancreatic Neoplasms

3,896 studies on the registry are indexed under Pancreatic Neoplasms; 1,007 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 18 is below the median of 47 across 2,932 interventional studies indexed under Pancreatic Neoplasms.

Browse Pancreatic Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven is the lead sponsor of 963 studies on the registry; 267 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Male or female subjects with age above 18 years old
  2. A confirmed diagnosis (endoscopic radiology, histology etc) of pancreatic or cholangiocarcinoma with obstructive jaundice considered inoperable according to multidisciplinary assessment
  3. Willing and able to give written

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Refusal to consent or undergo ERCP
  2. Less than 50% of liver parenchyma potentially drainable on pre-intervention imaging
  3. \< 40 x 109 mm3, an (INR) > 1.5
  4. Other concomitant disease or condition likely to significantly decrease (e.g., moderate to severe congestive heart failure, severe )
  5. Portal vein thrombosis

18 patients to be included : Hilar cholangiocarcinoma : n=9 Distal cholangiocarcinoma/pancreatic cancer n=9

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
18 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Radiofrequency ablation (StarMed)

    Radiofrequency ablation catheter

    Device: Radiofrequency ablation (StarMed)

Interventions

  • DeviceRadiofrequency ablation (StarMed)

    Radiofrequency ablation into bile duct

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Feasibility (ratio of technically successful RFA-applications to all examinations in which RFA-use was intended)

    Time frame: 90 days after index procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Efficacy measured by progression-free survival at 3 months upon standard follow-up imaging study and duration of stent patency (days) after the RFA-performed procedure

    Time frame: 90 days after index procedure

  2. 30-day-, 90-day and overall mortality

    Time frame: 90 days after index procedure

  3. Number of days and reasons for hospitalizations during the study period

    Time frame: 90 day after index procedure

  4. Quality of life (QuoL) by means of the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL questionnaire after the procedure and at 30 and 90 days vs before

    Time frame: 90 days after index procedure

  5. safety (number and type of adverse events)

    Time frame: 90 days after index procedure

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University Hospitals Leuven
    Leuven, Brabant 3000, Belgium
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Laleman W, van der Merwe S, Verbeke L, Vanbeckevoort D, Aerts R, Prenen H, Van Cutsem E, Verslype C. A new intraductal radiofrequency ablation device for inoperable biliopancreatic tumors complicated by obstructive jaundice: the IGNITE-1 study. Endoscopy. 2017 Oct;49(10):977-982. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-113559. Epub 2017 Jul 21. PubMed 28732391 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 11, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02468076
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 10, 2015
Start date
Nov 2014
Primary completion
Mar 2016
Completion
Mar 2016
Last update
May 11, 2016

Study contacts

Laleman Wim, MD PhD
principal investigator · Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion