ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02461810SAKOSUpdated Feb 22, 2019

Prospective Comparative Study to Compare Safety and Effectiveness of Two Vertebral Compression Fracture Reduction Techniques

An interventional study of Vertebral fracture surgery SpineJack® and Balloon Kyphoplasty in Spinal Fractures, Vertebral Compression Fractures and Back Injuries, sponsored by Vexim SA. Completed at 13 sites in 5 countries. Open to participants aged 50 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-02-22.

Sponsored by Vexim SA (part of Stryker) · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
152
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
50 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 21 studies in Spinal Fractures with a site in France — 4 open to participants now, 5 under way, none of them phase 3. Spinal Fractures · France.

Enrollment
5th of 12
152 · median 93
Started
2015
the only one that year
No phase
8 of 21
2 open now
Registered
6th of 21
by date
Lead sponsor
2 of 21
Vexim SA

Among the 21 studies in Spinal Fractures with a site in France, this one is the 5th largest by enrollment of the 12 interventional ones that give a count, is the only one that started in 2015, is one of 8 with no phase, and was the 6th registered.

Spinal Fractures

144 studies on the registry are indexed under Spinal Fractures; 24 are open to participants now.

Browse Spinal Fractures studies →

Open to participants now

4 of the 21 studies in Spinal Fractures with a site in France are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

All 4 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in France have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in France →

Who these studies take

Of the 18 Spinal Fractures studies recruiting now, 11 (61%) set no upper age limit and 4 (22%) stop at 75 or younger; 2 take children under 18; none take healthy volunteers.

This study: 50 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 21 studies in Spinal Fractures with a site in France, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of the SpineJack® with the Kyphx Xpander® Inflatable Bone Tamp and support a non-inferiority finding for the use of SpineJack® VCF treatment system versus Balloon Kyphoplasty.

03

Conditions studied

  • Spinal Fractures
  • Vertebral Compression Fractures
  • Back Injuries
  • Osteoporosis
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Male or Female with at least 50 years of age
  2. 1 painful VCF which at least meet all following criteria:

    • Fracture due to diagnosed or presumed underlying osteoporosis
    • VCF between T7 and L3
    • Fracture age \<3 months
    • VCF shows loss of height in the anterior, mid or posterior third of the VB from estimated pre-fracture configuration of at least 15% but not more than 40% based on X-Ray at baseline
    • The Index fracture is acute or persistent (not healed), as demonstrated by T2 weighted STIR MRI (or bone scan if patient is for MRI)
  3. Patient has failed conservative medical therapy, defined as either having a VAS back pain score of ≥50 mm at 6 weeks after initiation of fracture care or a VAS back pain score of ≥70mm at 2 weeks after initiation of fracture care
  4. Investigator believes target VB is suitable for SpineJack procedure and Balloon kyphoplasty (e.g., appropriate pedicle diameter) assessed on CT scan pre op
  5. Patient has an Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score of ≥ 30/100
  6. Patient is mentally capable and willing to sign a study specific as documentation of the informed consent process prior to any study procedures
  7. The patient is willing and able to comply with all study requirements including follow-up visits and radiographic assessments.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Target VCF due to underlying or suspected tumor
  2. Target VCF due to high-energy trauma
  3. Target VCF is diagnosed as an osteonecrotic fracture
  4. Segmental kyphosis of target VB of >30°
  5. Any prior surgical treatment for a vertebral body compression fracture or other surgical procedure on target VB or adjacent level
  6. The patient has uncontrolled diabetes
  7. Pre-existing or clinically unstable neurologic deficit
  8. The patient has spinal canal compromise causing clinical manifestations of cord, neural foramen, or nerve root compression at the level to be treated
  9. Any physical exam evidence of myelopathy or radiculopathy
  10. The patient has pain based on clinical diagnosis of herniated nucleus pulposus or severe spinal stenosis (progressive weakness or paralysis)
  11. Patient not able to walk without assistance prior to fracture
  12. Any radiographic evidence of pedicle fracture visible on CT scan pre op
  13. Spondylolisthesis >Grade 1 at target VB
  14. Any underlying systemic bone disease other than osteoporosis (e.g., osteomalacia, osteogenesis imperfect, Paget's disease, etc.)
  15. A medical to spinal surgery and/or general anesthesia, such as coagulopathy and/or taking warfarin (Coumadin) or other anticoagulant on regular basis for coagulopathy (with a threshold for normal being ≤1.5, PTT within lab normal range, and count > 100,000)
  16. Pain due to any other condition that requires daily narcotic medication
  17. Disabling back pain due to causes other than acute fracture
  18. History of intolerance or allergic reaction to titanium or acrylic compounds
  19. Active systemic or local infection at baseline
  20. >40
  21. Severe cardiopulmonary deficiencies
  22. Any other medical illness or condition that, in the investigator's opinion, is likely to impair long-term follow-up (e.g., cancer) or greatly increase the risk of surgery including but not limited to patients with contraindications for general anesthesia (surgeon expertise)
  23. Any evidence of alcohol or drug abuse
  24. The patient has uncontrolled psychiatric illness or severe dementia
  25. The patient is currently on anti-cancer therapy or anti- therapy
  26. Patient's is less than the study duration or undergoing palliative care
  27. Participating in any other study
  28. The patient is on long-term therapy (steroid dose ≥ 30 mg /day for > 3 months)
  29. The patient is known to be involved in medical litigation including Workmen's Compensation
  30. Patient with contraindication for MRI
  31. The patient is pregnant or considering getting pregnant during study participation.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(9)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
152 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    SpineJack® system

    VCF treatment system Vertebral fracture surgery

    Device: Vertebral fracture surgery SpineJack®

  • Active comparator
    Balloon Kyphoplasty

    VCF treatment system Vertebral fracture surgery

    Procedure: Balloon Kyphoplasty

Interventions

  • DeviceVertebral fracture surgery SpineJack®

    Vertebral augmentation for one osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture

  • ProcedureBalloon Kyphoplasty
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Participants With Study Success

    The primary composite endpoint defines a successful subject if the following components are satisfied (safety and effectiveness): 1. Reduction in VCF fracture-related pain at 12 months from baseline as measured by a 100 mm VAS scale (reduction of pain at 12 months by \> 20 mm) AND, 2. Maintenance or improvement in function at 12 months from baseline as measured by the 100 point Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) AND, 3. Absence of device-related serious adverse events, defined as device-related adverse events (device migration, recollapse, protrusion) or symptomatic cement extravasation requiring surgical re-intervention or retreatment at the index level, including revision, removal, reoperation, and/or supplemental fixation.

    Time frame: 12 month post-op

07

Study locations

13 sites
  • Hôpital Jean Minjoz Service Neurochirurgie
    Besancon, France
  • Centre Hospitalier La Cavale Blanche
    Brest, France
  • CHU La Timone
    Marseille, France
  • Hôpital Nord
    Marseille, France
  • CHU Hôtel Dieu Service Neuro traumatologie
    Nantes, France
  • Klinik und Poliklinik fur Orthopädie Universitatsklinikum
    Bonn, Germany
  • Loretto-Krankenhaus Freiburg
    Freiburg, Germany
  • Krankenhaus NEUWERK Sankt Augustinus kliniken
    Monchengladbach, Germany
  • Ospedale SS Trinita ASL8
    Cagliari, Italy
  • Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla
    Santander, Spain
  • Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valladolid,
    Valladolid, Spain
  • HFR Fribourg - Hôpital cantonal
    Fribourg, Switzerland
  • Clinique Bois-Cerf
    Lausanne, Switzerland
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Apr 2015, a primary completion of Feb 2018 and a completion of Feb 2018. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 27, 2015
First posted
Jun 3, 2015
Start
Apr 2015
Primary completionActual
Feb 20, 2018
CompletionActual
Feb 20, 2018
Last update
Feb 22, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 22, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02461810
Lead sponsor
Vexim SA
Collaborators
ACES Ing.-GmbH
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 3, 2015
Start date
Apr 2015
Primary completion
Feb 20, 2018
Completion
Feb 20, 2018
Last update
Feb 22, 2019

Study contacts

Marie-Pierre HONTAS, Director Clinical Affairs
study director · Vexim SA

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion