CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02459327Updated Oct 16, 2025

Integrated Model for Promoting Parenting and Early School Readiness in Pediatrics

An interventional study of Video Interaction Project and Family Check Up in Infant Behavior, Child Behavior and Parenting, sponsored by New York University. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 0 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-10-16.

Sponsored by New York University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
403
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
0 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study tests a comprehensive approach to the promotion of school readiness in low-income families, beginning shortly after the birth of the child, through enhancement of positive parenting practices (and when present, reduction of psychosocial stressors) within the pediatric primary care platform. The investigators do so by integrating two evidence-based interventions: 1) a universal primary prevention strategy (Video Interaction Project [VIP]); and 2) a targeted secondary/tertiary prevention strategy (Family Check-up [FCU]) for families with infants/toddlers identified as having additional risks. VIP provides parents with a developmental specialist who videotapes the parent and child and coaches the parent on effective parenting practices at each pediatric primary care visit. FCU is a home-based, family-centered intervention that utilizes an initial ecologically-focused assessment to promote motivation for parents to change child-rearing behaviors, with follow-up sessions on parenting and factors that compromise parenting quality.

Two primary care settings serving low-income communities in New York City, NY and Pittsburgh, PA will be utilized to test this integrated intervention in hospital-based clinics, providing information about translation across venues where one of the two interventions has been previously used alone.

The investigators plan to test the VIP/FCU model in a randomized trial of 400 families utilizing parent surveys, observational data on parent-child interactions, and direct assessments of children's development, at key points during intervention follow-up. Analyses will address questions of program impact for the integrated program across all families and by key subgroups.

The largest single contribution made by this study is to test whether an integrated primary and secondary/tertiary prevention strategy implemented in pediatric primary care can produce impacts on early school readiness outcomes, including social-emotional, pre-academic, and self-regulation. As such, this study has the potential to provide the scientific and practice communities with information about an innovative approach to promoting school readiness skills among low-income children.

02

Conditions studied

  • Infant Behavior
  • Child Behavior
  • Parenting
  • Child Rearing
  • Depression
  • Personal Satisfaction
  • Behavioral Symptoms
  • Social Control, Informal

Keywords

  • Infant behavior
  • Child behavior
  • Parenting
  • Child rearing
  • Depression
  • Personal satisfaction
  • Randomized controlled trials
  • Intervention studies
  • Behavioral symptoms
  • Social behavior
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
0 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Baby is getting pediatric care at Bellevue Hospital Center or Pittsburgh Children's Hospital
  • Caregiver primary language is English or Spanish
  • Family can be contacted (has a working phone)
  • Family attended second (follow-up) meeting with study team between when the child was aged 10days and 6weeks old

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Birth weight \<2500gm
  • Gestational age \< 37 weeks
  • Not singleton birth (twin, triplet, etc.)
  • Known or suspected significant genetic abnormality
  • Known neurodevelopmental/neuromuscular disorder likely to affect development, movement, e.g., seizure disorder, microcephaly (low head circumference)
  • Known sensory defect
  • Known significant malformation likely to affect development or likely to require significant therapy
  • Meets criteria for Early Intervention at birth
  • Not in level I nursery at time of enrollment
  • Significant postnatal complication requiring level II or III nursery stay. Examples: sepsis, significant hypoglycemia, seizures
  • Mother with known significant impairment that will be barrier to communication and participation (e.g., intellectual disability, schizophrenia)
  • Baby not being discharged to mother or father
  • Mother and baby will be staying in shelter
  • Not planning to stay in NYC/ Pittsburgh for at least 3 years
  • Has previously participated in VIP or FCU projects
  • Baby experiencing significant medical issues
  • Doctor has concerns about baby's hearing or vision
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
403 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    VIP/FCU

    VIP (Video Interaction Project) will be offered to all families assigned to the treatment group. FCU (Family Check Up) will be offered to families identified as high risk within the treatment group. Both treatments are parenting interventions.

    Behavioral: Video Interaction Project · Behavioral: Family Check Up

  • No intervention
    Control

Interventions

  • BehavioralVideo Interaction Project

    VIP utilizes pediatric well-child visits to build a relationship with an interventionist who facilitates self-reflection regarding interactions with the child through review of videotapes of the parent and child made that day and further facilitates interactions through provision of learning materials (toys and books).

    Also known as: VIP

  • BehavioralFamily Check Up

    FCU utilizes home visitation to build a relationship with an interventionist who assesses family strengths and challenges and uses motivational interviewing and evidence-based family management strategies to support parent and child behavioral change.

    Also known as: FCU

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Caregiver's cognitive stimulation

    Caregiver's reports of cognitive stimulation. For example engagement in reading, teaching, and play (e.g., StimQ, Dreyer, Mendelsohn, \& Tamis-LeMonda, 1995; Mendelsohn, Dreyer, \& Tamis-LeMonda, 1999)

    Time frame: When the child is 6 months - 6 years old

  2. Caregiver's harsh parenting and discipline

    Caregiver's reports of discipline strategies (e.g., Socolar et al., 2004; Incredible Years, Webster-Stratton, 2001; Steele et al., 2005)

    Time frame: When the child is 18 months - 6 years old

  3. Caregiver-child interaction quality

    Caregiver's reports and coded videotaped interactions between caregivers and children (e.g., Parenting Young Children, PARYC; McEachern et al., 2011)

    Time frame: When the child is 6 months - 6 years old

  4. Quality of the home environment

    Observer reports of the home environment (e.g., HOME inventory: Infant-Toddler (IT), Bradley \& Caldwell, 1984)

    Time frame: When the child is 18 months old

  5. Caregiver depression

    Caregiver's reports of depression (Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), Cox, Holden \& Sagovsky, 1987; Cox, Chapman, Declan \& Jones, 1995)

    Time frame: When the child is 6 months - 6 years old

  6. Caregiver stress/ support

    Caregiver's reports of stress, support, and perceptions of daily hassles (e.g., Abidin Parenting Stress Index, Abidin, 1990; General Life Satisfaction Questionnaire, Crnic, 1983; Parenting Daily Hassle scale, Crnic \& Greenberg, 1990; Concern for Children scale, Vines \& Baird, 2009)

    Time frame: When the child is 6 months - 6 years old

  7. Child prosocial and problem behavior

    Caregiver's reports of their child's behavioral problems, including externalizing and internalizing problems and prosocial behavior and social skills (e.g., Child Behavior Checklist; Achenbach \& Rescorla, 2000; BASC-3, Altmann et al., 2017; Infant-Toddler Social Emotional Assessment, ITSEA, Carter \& Briggs-Gowan, 1993; Brief Infant Toddler Social Emotional Assessment, BITSEA, Briggs-Gowan \& Carter, 2006; Positive Behavior Scale, Epps et al., 2003)

    Time frame: When the child is 6 months - 6 years old

  8. Children's early language skills

    Caregiver report of non-verbal communication and early expressive language (e.g., MacArthur Communicative Development Inventory; CDI, Fenson et al., 2008; Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scale, CSBS, Wetherby et al., 2001)

    Time frame: When the child is 6 months - 2 years old

  9. Child achievement

    Direct assessment of children's achievement, including receptive language skills, early academic skills including, reading, math, and writing as well as oral language abilities and academic knowledge (e.g., Receptive One-Word Picture Vocabulary Tests; ROWPVT, Martin and Brownell, 2010; Woodcock Johnson-IV Letter-Word Identification, Applied Problems and Oral Language Comprehension (WJ-IV)/ Bateria III Woodcock-Munoz, Muñoz-Sandoval et al., 2007; McGrew et al., 2014; Test of Word Reading Eficiency (TOWRE), Tarar et al., 2015)

    Time frame: When the child is 4 years old - 6 years old

  10. Child executive functioning skills

    Direct assessment of children's executive functioning, including cognitive skills, inhibitory control, and effortful control (e.g., Dimensional Change Card Sort, DCCS, Zelazo, 2006; Walk a Line, Cookie Waiting, Kochanska et al., 2000)

    Time frame: When the child is 4 years old - 6 years old

  11. Caregiver-child relationship quality

    Caregiver's reports of relationship quality, including the caregiver's perception of conflict and warmth/openness in relationship with the child (e.g., Adult Child Relationship Scale, Pianta \& Steinberg, 1991)

    Time frame: When the child is 4 years old - 6 years old

  12. Children's self-regulation

    Observer reports of children's attention/emotional regulation during the direct assessment (e.g., Preschool Self-Regulation Interviewer Assessment, PSRA, Smith-Donald et al., 2007; Moffit Scale, Caspi et al., 1995)

    Time frame: When the child is 4 years old - 6 years old

Secondary outcomes

  1. Parenting Quality

    Examiner impressions of parenting quality, including measures of responsivity, acceptance, involvement, social skills, and affect. (e.g., items adapted from HOME inventory: Infant-Toddler (IT), Bradley \& Caldwell, 1984)

    Time frame: Time Frame: When the child is 2 - 4 years old

  2. Child temperament

    Caregiver's reports of their child's temperament (e.g., Infant Characteristics Questionnaire, Bates, Freeland, \& Lounsbury, 1979; Children's Behavior Questionnaire, CBQ, Rothbart, 2007)

    Time frame: When the child is 6 months, 4 years old, 6 years old

  3. Special services

    Caregiver's reports of their child's Early Intervention referrals and services received

    Time frame: When the child is 6 months - 6 years old

  4. Basic child health

    Attendance in well-child care, growth/ nutrition

    Time frame: When the child is 6 months - 6 years old

  5. Caregiver-child relationship quality

    Caregiver's reports of relationship quality, including the caregiver's perception of conflict and warmth/openness in relationship with the child (e.g., Adult Child Relationship Scale, Pianta \& Steinberg, 1991)

    Time frame: When the child is 18 months - 2 years old

  6. Caregiver routines and activities

    Caregiver's reports of routines and activities, including, play, planning, feeding, sleep and media (e.g., McEachern, Dishion, Weaver, Shaw, Wilson, Gardner, 2012; Mendelsohn et al., 2008; Infant Feeding Style Questionnaire, Thompson, A. L., et al. 2009; Parent Teacher Involvement, Kohl et al., 2000)

    Time frame: When the child is 6 months - 6 years old

  7. Caregiver relationship satisfaction

    Caregiver's reports of relationship satisfaction and conflict (e.g., Dyadic Adjustment Scale, Spanier, 1976)

    Time frame: When the child is 6 months - 6 years old

  8. Caregiver regulation of negative emotion

    Caregiver's reports of their ability to maintain emotional equilibrium when faced with child rearing challenges (e.g., Raver, 2003) and difficulties with emotion regulation (Kaufman et al., 2015)

    Time frame: When the child is 24 months old and 6 years old

  9. Caregiver confidence

    Caregiver's reports of their self-efficacy and beliefs related to children's behavior and school readiness. readiness (e.g., adapted Pachter, Sheehan \& Cloutier, 2000; Parenting Self-Agency Measure, PSAM, Dumka et al., 1996)

    Time frame: When the child is 6 months - 4 years old

  10. Child narrative comprehension

    Direct assessment of children's ability to understand and retell narratives, and use higher-order language (e.g., Reese et al., 2012)

    Time frame: When the child is 4 years old - 6 years old

  11. Child Theory of Mind

    Direct assessment of children's ability to mentally represent others' internal states, including measures of false belief and memory control (e.g., Mahy et al., 2017)

    Time frame: When the child is 4 years old

  12. Caregiver Mindfulness

    Caregiver's reports of mindfulness in parenting behavior (e.g., Interpersonal Mindfulness in Parenting, IM-P, Duncan, 2007)

    Time frame: When the child is 18 months old

06

Study locations

2 sites
  • Bellevue Hospital Center
    New York, New York 11211, United States
  • Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15224, United States
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Mendelsohn AL, Dreyer BP, Flynn V, Tomopoulos S, Rovira I, Tineo W, Pebenito C, Torres C, Torres H, Nixon AF. Use of videotaped interactions during pediatric well-child care to promote child development: a randomized, controlled trial. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2005 Feb;26(1):34-41. PubMed 15718881 ↗
  • Shaw DS, Dishion TJ, Supplee L, Gardner F, Arnds K. Randomized trial of a family-centered approach to the prevention of early conduct problems: 2-year effects of the family check-up in early childhood. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006 Feb;74(1):1-9. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.74.1.1. PubMed 16551138 ↗
  • Dishion TJ, Shaw D, Connell A, Gardner F, Weaver C, Wilson M. The family check-up with high-risk indigent families: preventing problem behavior by increasing parents' positive behavior support in early childhood. Child Dev. 2008 Sep-Oct;79(5):1395-414. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01195.x. PubMed 18826532 ↗
  • Mendelsohn AL, Huberman HS, Berkule SB, Brockmeyer CA, Morrow LM, Dreyer BP. Primary care strategies for promoting parent-child interactions and school readiness in at-risk families: the Bellevue Project for Early Language, Literacy, and Education Success. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011 Jan;165(1):33-41. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2010.254. PubMed 21199978 ↗
  • Roby E. Erin Roby: ECI biocommentary. Pediatr Res. 2026 May 13. doi: 10.1038/s41390-026-05093-2. Online ahead of print. PubMed 42129365 ↗
  • Roby E, O'Connell LK, Griffin MG, Guevara VA, Aviles AI, Larkins BC, Guyon-Harris KL, Hunter LJ, McLoughlin M, Ndee C, Vaca-Condado L, Canfield CF, Miller EB, Mendelsohn AL, Morris-Perez PA, Shaw DS, Gross RS. Promoting early relational health and resilience in pediatric primary care: a qualitative study. Pediatr Res. 2026 Mar 15:10.1038/s41390-026-04842-7. doi: 10.1038/s41390-026-04842-7. Online ahead of print. PubMed 41833975 ↗
  • Roby E, Miller EB, Canfield CF, Shaw DS, Morris-Perez PA, Mendelsohn AL. Supporting Early Social-Emotional Competencies Through Reading and Play: Findings From an RCT of the Tiered Smart Beginnings Program. Soc Dev. 2025 Nov;34(4):e70024. doi: 10.1111/sode.70024. Epub 2025 Sep 14. PubMed 41394760 ↗
  • Miller EB, Roby E, Zhang Y, Coskun L, Rosas JM, Scott MA, Gutierrez J, Shaw DS, Mendelsohn AL, Morris-Perez PA. Promoting Cognitive Stimulation in Parents Across Infancy and Toddlerhood: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Pediatr. 2023 Apr;255:159-165.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2022.11.013. Epub 2022 Dec 5. PubMed 36481243 ↗
  • Reno R, Whipps M, Wallenborn JT, Demirci J, Bogen DL, Gross RS, Mendelsohn AL, Morris PA, Shaw DS. Housing Insecurity, Housing Conditions, and Breastfeeding Behaviors for Medicaid-Eligible Families in Urban Settings. J Hum Lact. 2022 Nov;38(4):760-770. doi: 10.1177/08903344221108073. Epub 2022 Jul 1. PubMed 35775199 ↗
  • Roby E, Miller EB, Shaw DS, Morris P, Gill A, Bogen DL, Rosas J, Canfield CF, Hails KA, Wippick H, Honoroff J, Cates CB, Weisleder A, Chadwick KA, Raak CD, Mendelsohn AL. Improving Parent-Child Interactions in Pediatric Health Care: A Two-Site Randomized Controlled Trial. Pediatrics. 2021 Mar;147(3):e20201799. doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-1799. PubMed 33608413 ↗
  • Canfield CF, Miller EB, Shaw DS, Morris P, Alonso A, Mendelsohn AL. Beyond language: Impacts of shared reading on parenting stress and early parent-child relational health. Dev Psychol. 2020 Jul;56(7):1305-1315. doi: 10.1037/dev0000940. Epub 2020 Apr 30. PubMed 32352828 ↗

Study documents

  • Informed consent form · Aug 22, 2019

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02459327
Lead sponsor
New York University
Collaborators
University of Pittsburgh, NYU Langone Health
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 2, 2015
Start date
Jun 3, 2015
Primary completion
May 9, 2025
Completion
May 9, 2025
Last update
Oct 16, 2025

Study contacts

Pamela Morris, Ph.D
principal investigator · New York University
Alan Mendelsohn, MD
principal investigator · NYU Langone Health
Daniel Shaw, Ph.D
principal investigator · University of Pittsburgh

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion