CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT02443285Updated Jun 20, 2017

Is Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis Still Responding to 3rd Generation Cephalosporins?

A Phase 3 interventional study of Cefotaxime and ceftriaxone in Primary Bacterial Peritonitis, sponsored by Tanta University. Status unknown at 1 site in Egypt. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-06-20.

Sponsored by Tanta University · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jun 2017), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2015, registered May 2015).
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Current European and most other international guidelines recommend the use of a third-generation cephalosporin as the first choice, or amoxicillin-clavulanate acid or fluoroquinolones as an alternative choice .

These recommendations are based mainly on clinical trials that were very often conducted a decade or more ago, and on the assumption that E. coli would be involved in nearly half of the cases.

The microbial etiology of SBP remains relatively constant; however, the antibiotic resistance rate especially for third-generation cephalosporins (including cefotaxime and ceftazidime), ciprofloxacin, and ofloxacin increased dramatically .

Read the detailed description

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP), defined as an infection of ascites in the absence of a contiguous source of infection.

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is a common and potentially fatal bacterial infection in patients with cirrhosis and ascites, occurring in 10 to 30% of patients, with in-hospital mortality rates ranging from 20 to 30% .

It is secondary to impaired humoral and cellular immune responses that result in indirect intestinal bacterial translocation into the ascitic fluid .

SBP is also associated with a poor long-term prognosis for patients, as mortality rates can reach 50 to 70% at 1 year .

Early diagnosis and early optimal treatment of these infections with appropriate antibiotics and the prevention of hepatorenal syndrome with albumin are required .

Current European and most other international guidelines recommend the use of a third-generation cephalosporin as the first choice, or amoxicillin-clavulanate acid or fluoroquinolones as an alternative choice.

These recommendations are based mainly on clinical trials that were very often conducted a decade or more ago, and on the assumption that E. coli would be involved in nearly half of the cases.

The microbial etiology of SBP remains relatively constant; however, the antibiotic resistance rate especially for third-generation cephalosporins (including cefotaxime and ceftazidime), ciprofloxacin, and ofloxacin increased dramatically.

02

Conditions studied

  • Primary Bacterial Peritonitis

Browse trials for

03

In context

Peritonitis

185 studies on the registry are indexed under Peritonitis; 25 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is close to the median of 95 across 118 interventional studies indexed under Peritonitis.

Browse Peritonitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Tanta University is the lead sponsor of 963 studies on the registry; 304 are open to participants now.

Of its 16 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Liver cirrhosis with ascites and SBP

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ascitic fluid with polymicrobial infections
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Cefotaxime

    cefotaxime 2gm every 12 hours daily for 5 days

    Drug: Cefotaxime

  • Active comparator
    Ceftriaxone

    ceftriaxone 2 gm every 24 hours for 5 days.

    Drug: ceftriaxone

Interventions

  • DrugCefotaxime

    Cefotaxime 2 gram every12 hours for 5 days

    Also known as: claforan, cefotax

  • Drugceftriaxone

    Ceftriaxone 2 gm every 24 hours for 5 days

    Also known as: rocephin, cefaxone

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. number of patients with clearence of infection

    number of patients having clearence of infection

    Time frame: 5 days

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Tanta university - faculty of medicine
    Cairo, Egypt
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 20, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02443285
Lead sponsor
Tanta University
Responsible party
Sherief Abd-Elsalam (PI, Tanta University) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 13, 2015
Start date
Jan 2015
Primary completion
Dec 2019 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2019 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 20, 2017

Study contacts

Sherief M Abd-elsalam
Contact
Sheriefabdelsalam@yahoo.com
00201095159522
Sherief M Abd-elsalam, lecturer
Contact
Sheriefabdelsalam@yahoo.com
01095159522
Sherief M Abd-elsalam, lecturer
principal investigator · hepatology dept-Tanta
Hanan H Soliman, Professor
study director · hepatology dept-Tanta
Walaa A Elkhalawany, lecturer
study chair · hepatology dept-Tanta

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jun 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion