ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT02437461Updated Oct 30, 2017

Dosing of Intra-articular Triamcinolone Hexacetonide for Knee Synovitis in Chronic Polyarthritis

A Phase 4 interventional study of Triamcinolone hexacetonide in Arthritis of the Knee, sponsored by Uppsala University. Status unknown at 1 site in Sweden. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-10-30.

Sponsored by Uppsala University · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Oct 2017), so the status shown — last known as Active, not recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
159
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This prospective randomised controlled single blind trial comparing the relapse rate in 6 months for 20 mg versus 40 mg intraarticular triamcinolone hexacetonide (Lederspan®) for knee synovitis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic artritis (PsoA) is performed to find the optimal dose to use.

Read the detailed description

Background:

Triamcinolone hecacetonide (THA) has been used for local intraarticular injecton treatment for knee synovitis in decades, but no dose finding studies have been performed. In the literature the doses for knee injections vary between 20 mg and 80 mg, depending on local traditions.

The aim of the present study is to find the optimal THA dosing, comparing the relapse rate during a 6 month observation period for the two most used dosages .

Methods:

Adult patients with RA or PsoA with treatment demands for ongoing knee synovitis are recruited at the Rheumatology Departments in Gävle and Falun. After informed consent patient characteristics,(age, sex, medical treatment), clinical and laboratory parameters of disease activity (DAS28, CRP), as well as degree of functional impairment (HAQ) are collected. A radiographic examination of the knee is performed and assessed (using Larsen Dale index) by an independent radiologist. The patients are allocated to either 20 mg or 40 mg THA using the randomisation dose which is hidden in prepared closed envelopes. After complete synovial fluid aspiration the THA dose is injected . The patients are told to contact the rheumatology department if no treatment response or if symtoms from the treated knee recurr. If so, the knee is examined again and if synovitis is confirmed a relapse is registered. Time from injection to relapse is calculated. Patients without relapse are called after 6 months to confirm they still are well and that no unknown relapse have occurred. When the observation period for the last included patient is finished the relapse rate between the 20 mg THA group is compared with the 40 mg THA Group.

02

Conditions studied

  • Arthritis of the Knee

Keywords

  • knee synovitis
  • triamcinolone hexacetonide
  • treatment response
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Uppsala University is the lead sponsor of 390 studies on the registry; 86 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria: synovitis of the knee, rheumatoid arthritis or psoriatic arthrthritis, written

-

Exclusion Criteria:

  • inability to understand study information, function class 4 according to Steinbrocker, planning knee surgery, , joint infection, intraarticular injection in this joint the past 3 months, oral glucocortoid treatment corresponding to >10 mg prednisolone
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
159 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    single dose 20 mg

    Intraarticular injection of triamcinolone hexacetonide

    Drug: Triamcinolone hexacetonide

  • Experimental
    single dose 40 mg

    Intraarticular injection of triamcinolone hexacetonide

    Drug: Triamcinolone hexacetonide

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. arthritis relapse

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Section of Rheumatology, Gävle hospital
    Gavle, 80187, Sweden
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Weitoft T, Uddenfeldt P. Importance of synovial fluid aspiration when injecting intra-articular corticosteroids. Ann Rheum Dis. 2000 Mar;59(3):233-5. doi: 10.1136/ard.59.3.233. PubMed 10700435 ↗
  • Lopes RV, Furtado RN, Parmigiani L, Rosenfeld A, Fernandes AR, Natour J. Accuracy of intra-articular injections in peripheral joints performed blindly in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2008 Dec;47(12):1792-4. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ken355. Epub 2008 Sep 27. PubMed 18820311 ↗
  • Prevoo ML, van 't Hof MA, Kuper HH, van Leeuwen MA, van de Putte LB, van Riel PL. Modified disease activity scores that include twenty-eight-joint counts. Development and validation in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1995 Jan;38(1):44-8. doi: 10.1002/art.1780380107. PubMed 7818570 ↗
  • Ekdahl C, Eberhardt K, Andersson SI, Svensson B. Assessing disability in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Use of a Swedish version of the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire. Scand J Rheumatol. 1988;17(4):263-71. doi: 10.3109/03009748809098795. PubMed 3187457 ↗
  • Weitoft T, Ronnelid J, Knight A, Lysholm J, Saxne T, Larsson A. Outcome predictors of intra-articular glucocorticoid treatment for knee synovitis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis - a prospective cohort study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2014 Jun 20;16(3):R129. doi: 10.1186/ar4586. PubMed 24950951 ↗
  • Larsen A, Dale K. Standardized radiological examination of rheumatoid arthritis in therapeutical trials. In Dumonde DC, Jasani MK, eds. The recognition of antirheumatic drugs. Lancaster: MTP Press, 1978: 285-292
  • Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, McShane DJ, Fries JF, Cooper NS, Healey LA, Kaplan SR, Liang MH, Luthra HS, et al. The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1988 Mar;31(3):315-24. doi: 10.1002/art.1780310302. PubMed 3358796 ↗
  • Taylor W, Gladman D, Helliwell P, Marchesoni A, Mease P, Mielants H; CASPAR Study Group. Classification criteria for psoriatic arthritis: development of new criteria from a large international study. Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Aug;54(8):2665-73. doi: 10.1002/art.21972. PubMed 16871531 ↗
  • STEINBROCKER O, TRAEGER CH, BATTERMAN RC. Therapeutic criteria in rheumatoid arthritis. J Am Med Assoc. 1949 Jun 25;140(8):659-62. doi: 10.1001/jama.1949.02900430001001. No abstract available. PubMed 18150288 ↗
  • Weitoft T, Oberg K. Dosing of intra-articular triamcinolone hexacetonide for knee synovitis in chronic polyarthritis: a randomized controlled study. Scand J Rheumatol. 2019 Jul;48(4):279-283. doi: 10.1080/03009742.2019.1571222. Epub 2019 Mar 7. PubMed 30843453 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Apr 2015 to primary completion in Sep 2017, 29 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 30, 2015
First posted
May 7, 2015
StartActual
Apr 2015
Primary completionActual
Sep 30, 2017
CompletionEst.
Jun 20, 2018
Last update
Oct 30, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 30, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02437461
Lead sponsor
Uppsala University
Responsible party
Thomas Weitoft (MD, PhD, Uppsala University) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 7, 2015
Start date
Apr 2015
Primary completion
Sep 30, 2017
Completion
Jun 20, 2018 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 30, 2017

Study contacts

Tomas Weitoft, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Center for Research and Development Uppsala University/Region Gavleborg

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Oct 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Triamcinolone hexacetonide

Start the discussion