CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02429063Updated May 5, 2022

Light Therapy to Increase Energy in Adolescents and Young Adults Newly Diagnosed With Solid Tumors: A Pilot Study

An interventional study of Bright White Light and Dim Red Light in Neoplasms and Fatigue, sponsored by St. Jude Children's Research Hospital. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 12 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-05-05.

Sponsored by St. Jude Children's Research Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
55
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
12 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Fatigue is one of the most consistent and distressing symptoms reported by pediatric oncology patients. The investigators' work has demonstrated that in the period from diagnosis through the initial 8 weeks of treatment, adolescents and young adults with solid tumors experience substantial fatigue that is not related to sleep disruption. Fatigue can contribute to many adverse outcomes including poor treatment adherence, reduced social activities, depressive symptoms, behavior problems, and poorer quality of life. Unfortunately, no definitive intervention to reduce fatigue has been developed for pediatric oncology patients. Investigators propose a study to estimate the feasibility and acceptability of bright light therapy as an intervention to decrease fatigue in adolescents and young adults who are newly diagnosed and receiving treatment for solid tumors, including lymphoma.

Read the detailed description

This feasibility and acceptability study will assess the rate of consent to, adherence to, and side effects from a therapy study in a randomized trial comparing bright white light (BWL) to dim red light (DRL). Four questionnaires will be distributed to patients and/or their parents, depending upon the questionnaire, to study the fatigue, quality of life, mood symptoms, and side effects of the BWL/DRL intervention in adolescents and young adults being treated for solid tumors, including lymphoma.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

  • To estimate the feasibility and acceptability of a BWL intervention compared to a DRL standard comparison group in adolescent/young adult solid tumor and lymphoma patients.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVE:

  • To estimate the effect size of this intervention on measures of fatigue in order to design a larger clinical trial of efficacy of a randomized control trial of BWL versus DRL intervention for fatigue in pediatric oncology patients.

OTHER PRESPECIFIED OBJECTIVES:

  • Estimate the effect of participant location (inpatient, hospital-based housing, or home) on adherence.
  • Estimate rates of depressive symptoms.
  • Describe quality of life.
02

Conditions studied

  • Neoplasms
  • Fatigue

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Solid Tumors
03

In context

Fatigue

1,860 studies on the registry are indexed under Fatigue; 376 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 55 is close to the median of 54 across 1,440 interventional studies indexed under Fatigue.

Browse Fatigue studies →

Lead sponsor

St. Jude Children's Research Hospital is the lead sponsor of 434 studies on the registry; 99 are open to participants now.

Of its 60 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 35 (58%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 12 years or older
  • Has initiated treatment as part of an active St. Jude Children's Research Hospital (SJCRH) treatment plan
  • ≤ 30 days post diagnosis of a solid tumor or lymphoma
  • Patient speaks, reads and writes in English or Spanish
  • Potential participant/guardian is willing to sign informed consent

Exclusion criteria

EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

  • Blind or having a history of eye disease including, but not limited to, macular degeneration, or other diagnosed retinal problems
  • Undergone laser corrective eye surgery in the past 30 days
  • Significant physiological or psychological impairment that interferes with participation (e.g., migraines, bipolar disorder, psychosis, seasonal affective disorder)
  • Recently started on anti-depressant medications (past one month for those on Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors [SSRI] and past two months for those started on Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors [MAOI])
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
55 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Bright White Light

    Participants use the bright white light intervention for 30 minutes upon waking each morning for 60 days.

    Other: Bright White Light

  • Experimental
    Dim Red Light

    Participants use the dim red light intervention for 30 minutes upon waking each morning for 60 days.

    Other: Dim Red Light

Interventions

  • OtherBright White Light

    The light will be administered via a Litebook Elite or Litebook Advantage (Litebook®, Ltd., Medicine Hat, Canada). The Litebook® is a small (6×5×1 in.) and lightweight (8 oz.) box and will be fitted with adherence monitors to record at what time and for what duration the light box is turned on. The Litebook® is designed to be placed on a table approximately 18 inches from the participant's head and within 45° of the midline of the visual field. The BWL Litebook® looks identical to the DRL and utilizes 24 white light-emitting diode (LED) lights and does not emit ultraviolet light.

    Also known as: Litebook®, BWL

  • OtherDim Red Light

    The light will be administered via a Litebook Elite or Litebook Advantage (Litebook®, Ltd., Medicine Hat, Canada). The Litebook® is a small (6×5×1 in.) and lightweight (8 oz.) box and will be fitted with adherence monitors to record at what time and for what duration the light box is turned on. The Litebook® is designed to be placed on a table approximately 18 inches from the participant's head and within 45° of the midline of the visual field. The DRL Litebook looks identical to the BWL box and contains red lights rather than white LED lights.

    Also known as: Litebook®, DRL

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of consent

    Estimate the rates of consent to a BWL intervention, compared to DRL in adolescent/young adult solid tumor and lymphoma patients.

    Time frame: Day 0

  2. Rate of adherence

    Estimate the rates of adherence to the intervention in adolescent/young adult solid tumor or lymphoma patients for each group.

    Time frame: At the end of therapy (Day 60)

  3. Rate of side effects

    Estimate rates of side effects in a light therapy intervention trial.

    Time frame: At the end of therapy (Day 60)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Rate of fatigue

    Estimate the rates of fatigue between the intervention and comparison groups. Fatigue will be measured by self- and parent-report with the 18-item PedsQL™ Multidimensional Fatigue Scale (MFS) that includes three subscales: (1) general fatigue (six items), (2) sleep/rest fatigue (six items), and (3) cognitive fatigue (six items).

    Time frame: At the end of therapy (Day 60)

Other outcomes

  1. Rate of adherence by participant location

    Estimate the effect of participant location (inpatient, hospital-based housing, or home) on adherence.

    Time frame: At the end of therapy (Day 60)

  2. Rate of depressive symptoms

    Mood symptoms will be assessed with the Children's Depression Inventory, 2nd Edition (CDI 2) in participants 8-17 years old and by the BDI-II in participants 18 years of age and older. The CDI 2 is a 27-item self-report measure of depressive symptoms in children ages 7-17.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), and approximately Day 14, Day 28 Day 42, and Day 60

  3. Metrics of quality of life and well-being

    Quality of life will be assessed by self- and parent-report with the PedsQL™ Acute Version \[34\] that includes 4 subscales: (1) physical functioning (eight items), (2) emotional functioning (five items), (3) social functioning (five items), and (4) school functioning (five items) as well as a total score. The Likert scale and scoring method are identical to the MFS, with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life. The PedsQL™ will be completed prior to initiation of the intervention, at three time points during the intervention period (14 +/- 3, 28 +/- 3 days, and 42 +/- 3 days) , and at the end of the 60 day intervention/period (days 61-68).

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), and approximately Day 14, Day 28, Day 42, and Day 60

07

Study locations

1 site
  • St . Jude Children's Research Hospital
    Memphis, Tennessee 38105, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Crabtree VM, LaRosa KN, MacArthur E, Russell K, Wang F, Zhang H, Pan H, Brigden J, Schwartz LE, Wilson M, Pappo A. Feasibility and Acceptability of Light Therapy to Reduce Fatigue in Adolescents and Young Adults Receiving Cancer-Directed Therapy. Behav Sleep Med. 2021 Jul-Aug;19(4):492-504. doi: 10.1080/15402002.2020.1797744. Epub 2020 Aug 4. PubMed 32746639 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 5, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02429063
Lead sponsor
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Collaborators
University of California, San Diego, University of Tennessee
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 29, 2015
Start date
Jul 17, 2015
Primary completion
Oct 16, 2018
Completion
May 3, 2022
Last update
May 5, 2022

Study contacts

Valerie Crabtree, PhD
principal investigator · St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion