ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02419196Updated Mar 1, 2016

Perioperative Change of Regional Ventilation During Spontaneous Breathing

An observational study in Pulmonary Infection, Pleural Effusion and Atelectasis, sponsored by Wuerzburg University Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-03-01.

Sponsored by Wuerzburg University Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
72
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Perioperative changes in regional ventilation by pulmonary electrical impedance tomography and spirometry will be investigated in patients at risk for postoperative pulmonary complications. Those patients undergo abdominal and limb operations. In a pilot study arm electrical impedance tomography is tested in patients receiving osteosynthesis of serial rib fractures.

Read the detailed description

Postoperative pulmonary complications (Defined as pulmonary infection, pleural effusion, atelectasis, pneumothorax, bronchospasm, aspiration pneumonitis or respiratory insufficiency subsequent to surgery) increase the morbidity and mortality of surgical patients. Several independent factors determined by the patients' characteristics and the operative procedure increase the risk for those complications. The postoperative decrease of values measured by spirometry, such as the forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), were found in patients after major surgical procedures for several days. The postoperative reduction of those measurement can be the result of general functional limitations in those patients (e.g. by postoperative pain) or the result of a regional postoperative pulmonary complication (e.g. atelectasis, pleural effusion). The method of the electrical impedance tomography (EIT) enables to visualize the regional ventilation within a transversal section of the lung in real time. Studies examining the change of pulmonary EIT for several days postoperatively in spontaneously breathing patients are lacking. The aim of the present study is to examine perioperative changes in regional ventilation in spontaneously breathing patients during their recovery after abdominal and limb surgery. Moreover, the association of those changes with expected changes in spirometry is tested. Finally, in patients with evident postoperative pulmonary complications the value of pulmonary EIT to detect those changes is investigated. The study should improve the knowledge about the development of postoperative pulmonary complications and test the scientific and clinical value of pulmonary EIT in those spontaneously breathing patients.

In a group of patients undergoing osteosynthesis of a flail chest, it is tested how regional ventilation changes by these operations and whether pulmonary EIT is actually usable in these patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pulmonary Infection
  • Pleural Effusion
  • Atelectasis
  • Pneumothorax
  • Bronchospasm
  • Aspiration Pneumonitis
  • Respiratory Insufficiency
03

In context

Pleural Effusion

241 studies on the registry are indexed under Pleural Effusion; 50 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 72 is below the median of 140 across 93 observational studies indexed under Pleural Effusion.

Browse Pleural Effusion studies →

Lead sponsor

Wuerzburg University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 98 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

adult inpatients undergoing elective surgery

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult
  • Inpatient
  • Surgery under general anesthesia with and without additional regional anesthesia
  • increased risk for postoperative pulmonary complications according to the ARISCAT-Score (except pilot arm for osteosynthesis of flail chest)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Missing
  • Outpatient
  • Emergency procedure
  • Revision surgery of hospitalized patients
  • Operation under local or regional anesthesia alone
  • Expected postoperative ventilation
  • Expected hospital stay of less than three days
  • Pregnancy
  • Allergy against material of the electrode belt (silicone rubber, stainless steel, gold-plated brass)
  • Injured, inflamed or otherwise affected skin within the target region of the electrode belt
  • Unstable spine injury
  • of more than 50 kg/m2
  • Incapacity to lie quietly for the examination
  • Pacemaker, defibrillator or other active implant
  • Reoperation before the examination at the third postoperative day
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
72 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • abdominal surgery

    27 patients undergoing abdominal surgery having an elevated risk for postoperative pulmonary complications will be examined by perioperative pulmonary function tests

    Other: Perioperative pulmonary function tests

  • limb surgery

    27 patients undergoing upper and lower limb surgery having an elevated risk for postoperative pulmonary complications will be examined by perioperative pulmonary function tests

    Other: Perioperative pulmonary function tests

  • flail chest

    10 patients undergoing an operative stabilization of a flail chest will be examined by perioperative pulmonary function tests

    Other: Perioperative pulmonary function tests

Interventions

  • OtherPerioperative pulmonary function tests

    Pulmonary electrical impedance tomography, spirometry, pulse oximetry and query performed preoperatively, at the first and the third postoperative day

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in regional ventilation at the first postoperative day

    Regional ventilation is measured by pulmonary electrical impedance tomography. The change in the calculated 'Center of Ventilation' in the sagittal direction is used for the primary outcome measure. Power calculation accounts for the use of two time points for the primary outcome measure.

    Time frame: baseline and 1. postoperative day

  2. Change from baseline in regional ventilation at the third postoperative day

    Regional ventilation is measured by pulmonary electrical impedance tomography. The change in the calculated 'Center of Ventilation' in the sagittal direction is used for the primary outcome measure. Power calculation accounts for the use of two time points for the primary outcome measure.

    Time frame: baseline and 3. postoperative day

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in forced vital capacity (FVC)

    Measured by spirometry. The best value of three attempts is used.

    Time frame: baseline, 1. and 3. postoperative day

Other outcomes

  1. Change in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1)

    Measured by spirometry. The best value of three attempts is used.

    Time frame: baseline, 1. and 3. postoperative day

  2. Change in peripheral oxygen saturation

    Measured by pulse oximetry

    Time frame: baseline, 1. and 3. postoperative day

  3. Change in pain score

    Measured by visual analogue scale

    Time frame: baseline, 1. and 3. postoperative day

  4. Change in respiratory rate

    Measured by electric impedance tomography

    Time frame: baseline, 1. and 3. postoperative day

  5. pulmonary complications

    Defined as pulmonary infection, pleural effusion, atelectasis, pneumothorax, bronchospasm, aspiration pneumonitis or respiratory insufficiency

    Time frame: baseline, 1., 3. and 7. postoperative day or at discharge

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Würzburg
    Würzburg, 97080, Germany
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Canet J, Gallart L, Gomar C, Paluzie G, Valles J, Castillo J, Sabate S, Mazo V, Briones Z, Sanchis J; ARISCAT Group. Prediction of postoperative pulmonary complications in a population-based surgical cohort. Anesthesiology. 2010 Dec;113(6):1338-50. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181fc6e0a. PubMed 21045639 ↗
  • Mazo V, Sabate S, Canet J, Gallart L, de Abreu MG, Belda J, Langeron O, Hoeft A, Pelosi P. Prospective external validation of a predictive score for postoperative pulmonary complications. Anesthesiology. 2014 Aug;121(2):219-31. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000334. PubMed 24901240 ↗
  • Karayiannakis AJ, Makri GG, Mantzioka A, Karousos D, Karatzas G. Postoperative pulmonary function after laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. Br J Anaesth. 1996 Oct;77(4):448-52. doi: 10.1093/bja/77.4.448. PubMed 8942326 ↗
  • Guizilini S, Bolzan DW, Faresin SM, Alves FA, Gomes WJ. Ministernotomy in myocardial revascularization preserves postoperative pulmonary function. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2010 Oct;95(5):587-93. doi: 10.1590/s0066-782x2010005000137. Epub 2010 Oct 15. English, Portuguese. PubMed 20963310 ↗
  • Davoudi M, Farhanchi A, Moradi A, Bakhshaei MH, Safarpour G. The Effect of Low Tidal Volume Ventilation during Cardiopulmonary Bypass on Postoperative Pulmonary Function. J Tehran Heart Cent. 2010 Summer;5(3):128-31. Epub 2010 Aug 31. PubMed 23074580 ↗
  • Leonhardt S, Lachmann B. Electrical impedance tomography: the holy grail of ventilation and perfusion monitoring? Intensive Care Med. 2012 Dec;38(12):1917-29. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2684-z. Epub 2012 Sep 20. PubMed 22992946 ↗
  • Radke OC, Schneider T, Heller AR, Koch T. Spontaneous breathing during general anesthesia prevents the ventral redistribution of ventilation as detected by electrical impedance tomography: a randomized trial. Anesthesiology. 2012 Jun;116(6):1227-34. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318256ee08. PubMed 22531334 ↗
  • Karsten J, Heinze H, Meier T. Impact of PEEP during laparoscopic surgery on early postoperative ventilation distribution visualized by electrical impedance tomography. Minerva Anestesiol. 2014 Feb;80(2):158-66. Epub 2013 Jul 23. PubMed 23877309 ↗
  • Frerichs I, Hahn G, Golisch W, Kurpitz M, Burchardi H, Hellige G. Monitoring perioperative changes in distribution of pulmonary ventilation by functional electrical impedance tomography. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1998 Jul;42(6):721-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1998.tb05308.x. PubMed 9689281 ↗
  • Bauer M, Opitz A, Filser J, Jansen H, Meffert RH, Germer CT, Roewer N, Muellenbach RM, Kredel M. Perioperative redistribution of regional ventilation and pulmonary function: a prospective observational study in two cohorts of patients at risk for postoperative pulmonary complications. BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 Jul 27;19(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0805-8. PubMed 31351452 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Jan 2015, a primary completion of Feb 2016 and a completion of Feb 2016. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 1, 2014
First posted
Apr 17, 2015
Start
Jan 2015
Primary completionActual
Feb 2016
CompletionActual
Feb 2016
Last update
Mar 1, 2016
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 1, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02419196
Lead sponsor
Wuerzburg University Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 17, 2015
Start date
Jan 2015
Primary completion
Feb 2016
Completion
Feb 2016
Last update
Mar 1, 2016

Study contacts

Markus Kredel, PD. Dr. med
principal investigator · University of Würzburg, Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion