ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02410772S31/A5349Updated Dec 4, 2024Results posted

TBTC Study 31: Rifapentine-containing Tuberculosis Treatment Shortening Regimens

A Phase 3 interventional study of rifapentine and rifapentine and moxifloxacin in Tuberculosis, sponsored by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Completed at 33 sites in 13 countries. Open to participants aged 12 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-12-04.

Sponsored by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
2,516
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
12 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether one or two four-month regimens of tuberculosis treatment are as effective as a standard six-month regimen for treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). All three regimens are administered daily, seven days each week, with direct observation of each dose by a health-care worker at least five of the seven days of each week.

The standard six-month regimen is two months of isoniazid, rifampin, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide followed by four months of isoniazid and rifampin.

The first short regimen is a single substitution of rifapentine for rifampin: two months of isoniazid, rifapentine, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide, followed by two months of isoniazid and rifapentine.

The second short regimen is a double substitution of rifapentine for rifampin and moxifloxacin for ethambutol: two months of isoniazid, rifapentine, moxifloxacin, and pyrazinamide, followed by two months of isoniazid, rifapentine, and moxifloxacin.

Target enrollment is 2500 participants. Each study participant will remain in the study for 18 months in order to include at least 12 months of evaluation of whether the participant's TB recurs.

Read the detailed description

Title:

Rifapentine-containing treatment shortening regimens for pulmonary tuberculosis: a randomized, open-label, controlled, phase 3 clinical trial

Hypotheses:

A) Seventeen (17) week rifapentine-based regimen In previously untreated individuals with active drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis treated with eight weeks of rifapentine (P), isoniazid (H), pyrazinamide (Z) and ethambutol (E) followed by nine weeks of rifapentine plus isoniazid, all given daily throughout, the proportion of participants who experience absence of cure (unfavorable outcome) will not be inferior to that observed in participants who are treated with a standard regimen (eight weeks of rifampin (R), isoniazid, pyrazinamide and ethambutol followed by eighteen weeks of rifampin plus isoniazid), all given daily throughout.

B) Seventeen (17) week rifapentine- plus moxifloxacin-containing regimen In previously untreated individuals with active drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis treated with eight weeks of rifapentine, isoniazid, pyrazinamide and moxifloxacin (M), followed by nine weeks of rifapentine, isoniazid, and moxifloxacin, all given daily throughout, the proportion of participants who experience absence of cure (unfavorable outcome) will not be inferior to that observed in participants who are treated with a standard regimen (eight weeks of rifampin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide and ethambutol followed by eighteen weeks of rifampin plus isoniazid), all given daily throughout.

Phase: 3

Design: This will be an international, multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label, 3-arm, phase 3 non-inferiority trial.

Population: Patients with newly diagnosed, previously untreated pulmonary tuberculosis.

Number of Sites: Multiple international sites, primarily sites of the Tuberculosis Trials Consortium and the AIDS Clinical Trials Group.

Study Duration: Duration per participant is approximately 18 months.

Description of Agent or Intervention: After written informed consent, participants will be randomly assigned to receive one of the following oral regimens:

Regimen 1 (control regimen): 2RHZE/4RH

  • Eight weeks of daily treatment with rifampin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol, followed by
  • Eighteen weeks of daily treatment with rifampin and isoniazid

Regimen 2 (investigational regimen): 2PHZE/2PH

  • Eight weeks of daily treatment with rifapentine, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol, followed by
  • Nine weeks of daily treatment with rifapentine and isoniazid

Regimen 3 (investigational regimen): 2PHZM/2PHM

  • Eight weeks of daily treatment with rifapentine, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and moxifloxacin, followed by
  • Nine weeks of daily treatment with rifapentine, isoniazid, and moxifloxacin

Objectives:

Primary:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of a rifapentine-containing regimen to determine whether the single substitution of rifapentine for rifampin makes it possible to reduce to seventeen weeks the duration of treatment for drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis
  • To evaluate the efficacy of a rifapentine-containing regimen that in addition substitutes moxifloxacin for ethambutol and continues moxifloxacin during the continuation phase to determine whether it is possible to reduce to seventeen weeks the duration of treatment for drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis

Secondary:

  • To evaluate the safety of the investigational regimens
  • To evaluate the tolerability of the investigational regimens
  • To collect and store biospecimens from consenting participants for the purpose of future research on discovery and validation of TB biomarkers
  • To determine the correlation of mycobacterial and clinical markers with time to culture conversion, culture status at completion of eight weeks of treatment, treatment failure, and relapse.
  • To conduct a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) study of the test drugs. The main objectives of the PK/PD study are to characterize study drug PK parameters and to determine relationships between treatment outcomes and PK parameters.
  • To evaluate the pharmacokinetics of efavirenz-based antiretroviral treatment among patients with TB/HIV co-infection taking efavirenz-based combination antiretroviral therapy and TB treatment with rifapentine

Endpoints:

Primary Endpoints:

  • Efficacy: TB disease-free survival at twelve months after study treatment assignment.
  • Safety: Proportion of participants with grade 3 or higher adverse events during study drug treatment

Secondary Endpoints:

  • TB disease-free survival at eighteen months after study treatment assignment
  • Time to stable sputum culture conversion (solid and liquid media considered separately)
  • Speed of decline of sputum viable bacilli by automated liquid MGIT culture days to detection
  • Proportion of participants who are culture negative at completion of eight weeks of treatment (solid and liquid media considered separately)
  • Sensitivity analyses assuming all participants classified as 'not assessable' have a favorable outcome
  • Discontinuation of assigned treatment for a reason other than microbiological ineligibility
  • Estimated steady state efavirenz PK parameters including mid-dosing interval concentration
02

Conditions studied

  • Tuberculosis

Browse trials for

03

In context

Tuberculosis

1,170 studies on the registry are indexed under Tuberculosis; 175 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 2,516 is above the median of 150 across 820 interventional studies indexed under Tuberculosis.

Browse Tuberculosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is the lead sponsor of 275 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Of its 11 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 8 (73%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Suspected pulmonary tuberculosis plus one or both of the following: a) at least one sputum specimen positive for acid-fast bacilli on smear microscopy OR b) at least one sputum specimen positive for M. tuberculosis by Xpert MTB/RIF testing, with semiquantitative result of 'medium' or 'high' and rifamycin resistance not detected.
  • Age twelve (12) years or older
  • A verifiable address or residence location that is readily accessible for visiting, and willingness to inform the study team of any change of address during the treatment and follow-up period.
  • Women of who are not surgically sterilized must agree to practice a barrier method of or abstain from heterosexual intercourse during study drug treatment.
  • Documentation of infection status.
  • For HIV-positive individuals, greater than or equal to 100 cells/mm3 based on testing performed at or within 30 days prior to screening.
  • Laboratory parameters done at or within 14 days prior to screening:

    • Serum or plasma (ALT) less than or equal to 3 times the
    • Serum or plasma total less than or equal to 2.5 times the upper limit of normal
    • Serum or plasma creatinine level less than or equal to 2 times the upper limit of normal
    • Serum or plasma potassium level greater than or equal to 3.5 meq/L
    • level of 7.0 g/dL or greater
    • count of 100,000/mm3 or greater
  • For women of childbearing potential, a negative pregnancy test at or within seven (7) days prior to screening
  • score greater than or equal to 60
  • Written

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or breast-feeding.
  • Unable to take oral medications.
  • Previously enrolled in this study.
  • Received any drug in the past 3 months.
  • More than five (5) days of treatment directed against active tuberculosis within 6 months preceding initiation of study drugs.
  • More than five (5) days of systemic treatment with any one or more of the following drugs within 30 days preceding initiation of study drugs: isoniazid, rifampin, rifabutin, rifapentine, ethambutol, pyrazinamide, kanamycin, amikacin, streptomycin, capreomycin, moxifloxacin, levofloxacin, gatifloxacin, ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, other fluoroquinolones, ethionamide, prothionamide, cycloserine, terizidone, para-aminosalicylic acid, linezolid, clofazimine, delamanid or bedaquiline.
  • Known history of prolonged syndrome.
  • Suspected or documented tuberculosis involving the central nervous system and/or bones and/or joints, and/or miliary tuberculosis and/or pericardial tuberculosis.
  • Current or planned use within six months following enrollment of one or more of the following medications: protease inhibitors, HIV integrase inhibitors, HIV entry and fusion inhibitors, HIV non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors other than efavirenz, quinidine, procainamide, amiodarone, sotalol, disopyramide, ziprasidone, or terfenadine. Individuals who are currently taking efavirenz-based antiretroviral treatment or for whom initiation of efavirenz-based antiretroviral treatment is planned within 17 weeks following enrollment may participate.
  • Weight less than 40.0 kg.
  • Known allergy or intolerance to any of the study medications.
  • Individuals will be excluded from enrollment if, at the time of enrollment, their M. tuberculosis isolate is already known to be resistant to any one or more of the following: rifampin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, ethambutol, or fluoroquinolones.
  • Other medical conditions, that, in the investigator's judgment, make study participation not in the individual's best interest.
  • Current or planned incarceration or other involuntary detention.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(13)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

CD4 count

The number of CD4 cells, a type of white blood cell, in a given amount of blood. It is used to follow how well the immune system is doing in HIV.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Karnofsky performance status (KPS)

A 0–100 scale of how well someone can carry out everyday activities. 100 is no complaints and no signs of illness; 70 is able to look after yourself but not to work or keep up normal activity; 50 is needing considerable help and frequent medical care.

Studies often ask for 60 or 70 and above. Your doctor gives the score.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

QT and QTc

On an ECG, the QT interval is the time the heart’s lower chambers take to activate electrically and recover in each beat. QTc is that time adjusted for heart rate (QTcF by Fridericia’s formula, QTcB by Bazett’s). Some medicines lengthen it, and a long QTc can raise the risk of a dangerous heart rhythm.

The study may name a correction formula and a limit in milliseconds, often around 450–480.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
2,516 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Regimen 1

    Eight weeks of daily treatment with rifampin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol, followed by Eighteen weeks of daily treatment with rifampin and isoniazid All drugs are administered orally, seven days/week, directly observed by a health care worker at least five of the seven days each week. Pyridoxine (vitamin B6), 25 or 50 mg, is administered with each study dose. study drug doses: rifampin, 600 mg; isoniazid, 300 mg; pyrazinamide, \< 55kg 1000 mg, \>= 55-75 kg 1500 mg, \>75 kg 2000 mg; ethambutol, \< 55kg 800 mg, \>= 55-75 kg 1200 mg, \>75 kg 1600 mg

    Drug: control

  • Experimental
    Regimen 2

    Eight weeks of daily treatment with rifapentine, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol, followed by Nine weeks of daily treatment with rifapentine and isoniazid All drugs are administered orally, seven days/week, directly observed by a health care worker at least five of the seven days each week. Pyridoxine (vitamin B6), 25 or 50 mg, is administered with each study dose. study drug doses: rifapentine 1200 mg; isoniazid, 300 mg; pyrazinamide, \< 55kg 1000 mg, \>= 55-75 kg 1500 mg, \>75 kg 2000 mg; ethambutol, \< 55kg 800 mg, \>= 55-75 kg 1200 mg, \>75 kg 1600 mg

    Drug: rifapentine

  • Experimental
    Regimen 3

    Eight weeks of daily treatment with rifapentine, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and moxifloxacin, followed by Nine weeks of daily treatment with rifapentine, isoniazid, and moxifloxacin All drugs are administered orally, seven days/week, directly observed by a health care worker at least five of the seven days each week. Pyridoxine (vitamin B6), 25 or 50 mg, is administered with each study dose. study drug doses: rifapentine 1200 mg; isoniazid, 300 mg; pyrazinamide, \< 55kg 1000 mg, \>= 55-75 kg 1500 mg, \>75 kg 2000 mg; moxifloxacin, 400 mg

    Drug: rifapentine and moxifloxacin

Interventions

  • Regimen 2: Rifapentine is substituted for rifampin as the basis of 4-month treatment

    Also known as: Priftin

  • Drugrifapentine and moxifloxacin

    Drug pages: Rifapentine · Moxifloxacin

    Regimen 3: In addition to the single substitution described for regimen 2, a second substitution is added, of moxifloxacin for ethambutol.

    Also known as: Priftin and Avelox

  • Drugcontrol

    standard six-month treatment

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. TB Disease-free Survival at 12M After Study Treatment Assignment Among Participants in Control Regimen, Regimen1 (2HRZE/4HR) to Experimental Regimens, Regimen3 (2HPZM/2HPM) and Regimen2 (2HPZ/2HP) (Modified Intent to Treat [MITT] Population)

    To evaluate the efficacy of a rifapentine-containing regimen to determine whether the single substitution of rifapentine for rifampin makes it possible to reduce to seventeen weeks the duration of treatment for drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis To evaluate the efficacy of a rifapentine-containing regimen that in addition substitutes moxifloxacin for ethambutol and continues moxifloxacin during the continuation phase, to determine whether it is possible to reduce to seventeen weeks the duration of treatment for drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis A primary outcome status of "favorable", "unfavorable", or "not assessable" was assigned. For detailed definitions of outcomes please refer to: Dorman SE, at al. N Engl J Med. 2021 May 6;384(18):1705-1718.

    Time frame: Twelve months after treatment assignment

  2. TB Disease-free Survival at 12M After Study Treatment Assignment Among Participants in Control Regimen, Regimen1 (2HRZE/4HR) to Experimental Regimens, Regimen3 (2HPZM/2HPM) and Regimen2 (2HPZ/2HP) (Assessable Population)

    * To evaluate the efficacy of a rifapentine-containing regimen to determine whether the single substitution of rifapentine for rifampin makes it possible to reduce to seventeen weeks the duration of treatment for drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis * To evaluate the efficacy of a rifapentine-containing regimen that in addition substitutes moxifloxacin for ethambutol and continues moxifloxacin during the continuation phase, to determine whether it is possible to reduce to seventeen weeks the duration of treatment for drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis A primary outcome status of "favorable", "unfavorable", or "not assessable" was assigned. For detailed definitions of outcomes please refer to: Dorman SE, at al. N Engl J Med. 2021 May 6;384(18):1705-1718.

    Time frame: Twelve months after treatment assignment

  3. Percentage Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events During Study Drug Treatment in Control Regimen (Regimen 1 2HRZE/4HR) Compared to Experimental Regimens, Regimen 3 (2HPZM/2HPM) and Regimen 2 (2HPZ/2HP) (Safety Analysis Population)

    * To evaluate the Safety of a rifapentine-containing regimen to determine whether the single substitution of rifapentine for rifampin makes it possible to reduce to seventeen weeks the duration of treatment for drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis * To evaluate the Safety of a rifapentine-containing regimen that in addition substitutes moxifloxacin for ethambutol and continues moxifloxacin during the continuation phase, to determine whether it is possible to reduce to seventeen weeks the duration of treatment for drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis Grade 3 or higher Adverse Events are collected by Clinical sites in systematic way through the laboratory tests and physical exam during regular study follow up visits and also in a non-systematic way when it was self-reported by participants during the study visits. The events are graded by site investigators per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE V4.03

    Time frame: Four months and up to 14 days after last does of after study treatment (Regimen 2 and 3) or Six months and up to 14 days after last does of after study treatment (Regimen 1)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Participants Who Are Culture Negative at Eight Weeks

    Proportion of participants who are culture negative at eight weeks, liquid media

    Time frame: eight weeks

  2. Time to Stable Sputum Culture Conversion

    Time to stable sputum culture conversion, liquid media

    Time frame: four or six months

  3. Discontinuation of Assigned Treatment for a Reason Other Than Microbiological Ineligibility (Tolerability)

    Tolerability of the regimen is evaluated using the outcome of discontinuation of assigned treatment for a reason other than microbiological ineligibility.

    Time frame: four or six months

  4. Estimated Steady State Efavirenz PK Parameters Including Mid-dosing Interval Concentration

    Among participants with HIV infection receiving efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy, number of participants who maintained plasma efavirenz concentrations ≥1 mg/L during TB treatment.

    Time frame: four months

  5. TB Disease-free Survival at Eighteen Months After Study Treatment Assignment

    * To evaluate the efficacy of a rifapentine-containing regimen to determine whether the single substitution of rifapentine for rifampin makes it possible to reduce to seventeen weeks the duration of treatment for drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis * To evaluate the efficacy of a rifapentine-containing regimen that in addition substitutes moxifloxacin for ethambutol and continues moxifloxacin during the continuation phase, to determine whether it is possible to reduce to seventeen weeks the duration of treatment for drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis

    Time frame: Eighteen months after study treatment assignment.

  6. TB Disease-free Survival at Eighteen Months After Study Treatment Assignment

    * To evaluate the efficacy of a rifapentine-containing regimen to determine whether the single substitution of rifapentine for rifampin makes it possible to reduce to seventeen weeks the duration of treatment for drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis * To evaluate the efficacy of a rifapentine-containing regimen that in addition substitutes moxifloxacin for ethambutol and continues moxifloxacin during the continuation phase, to determine whether it is possible to reduce to seventeen weeks the duration of treatment for drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis

    Time frame: Eighteen months after treatment assignment

  7. Speed of Decline of Sputum Viable Bacilli by Automated Liquid MGIT Culture Days to Detection

    Parameter estimates of the nonlinear mixed effect models describing longitudinal time to positive (TTP)

    Time frame: 12 months

Other outcomes

  1. Sensitivity Analyses Assuming All Losses to Follow-up and Non-tuberculosis Deaths Have an Unfavorable Outcome

    A sensitivity analysis used to supplement the primary efficacy results and provide further insight into whether the intervention regimens should be considered to have non-inferior efficacy. This analysis considers the difference in proportion of unfavorable outcomes between the control arm and each of the experimental arms. Measurement Description: The difference in proportion unfavorable was calculated using a stratified analysis using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel weights. The analysis was stratified by HIV status and presence of cavitation only, and the stratified difference was considered primary.

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Sensitivity Analyses Assuming All Losses to Follow-up and Non-tuberculosis Deaths Have a Favorable Outcome

    A sensitivity analysis used to supplement the primary efficacy results and provide further insight into whether the intervention regimens should be considered to have non-inferior efficacy. This analysis considers the difference in proportion of unfavorable outcomes between the control arm and each of the experimental arms. Measurement Description: The difference in proportion unfavorable was calculated using a stratified analysis using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel weights. The analysis was stratified by HIV status and presence of cavitation only, and the stratified difference was considered primary.

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Results

Posted Sep 28, 2021
Limitations and caveats
A study limitation is that placebos were not used, and therefore neither participants nor site staff were blinded to treatment assignment. Another limitation is that only 8% of participants were HIV-coinfected, limiting the power to compare regimens in this important population

Participant flow

Participants were enrolled at 34 clinical research sites in 13 countries between January 2016 and October 2018. First participant was enrolled on 25 January 2016. Last participant was enrolled on 30 October 2018.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneRegimen 1 (2HRZE/4HR)Regimen 2 (2HPZ/2HP)Regimen 3 (2HPMZ/2HPM)
Started829838849
Microbiologically eligible analysis population768784791
Assessable population726752756
Completed726752756
Not completed1038693
Withdrew: Death348
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up312322
Withdrew: Pregnancy845
Withdrew: Protocol violation884
Withdrew: Baseline drug resistance494051
Withdrew: No positive mycobacterium tuberculosis culture463
Withdrew: Reinfection with a new strain of mtb010

Outcome measures

PrimaryTB Disease-free Survival at 12M After Study Treatment Assignment Among Participants in Control Regimen, Regimen1 (2HRZE/4HR) to Experimental Regimens, Regimen3 (2HPZM/2HPM) and Regimen2 (2HPZ/2HP) (Modified Intent to Treat [MITT] Population)

To evaluate the efficacy of a rifapentine-containing regimen to determine whether the single substitution of rifapentine for rifampin makes it possible to reduce to seventeen weeks the duration of treatment for drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis To evaluate the efficacy of a rifapentine-containing regimen that in addition substitutes moxifloxacin for ethambutol and continues moxifloxacin during the continuation phase, to determine whether it is possible to reduce to seventeen weeks the duration of treatment for drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis A primary outcome status of "favorable", "unfavorable", or "not assessable" was assigned. For detailed definitions of outcomes please refer to: Dorman SE, at al. N Engl J Med. 2021 May 6;384(18):1705-1718.

Time frame:
Twelve months after treatment assignment
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
TB Disease-free Survival at 12M After Study Treatment Assignment Among Participants in Control Regimen, Regimen1 (2HRZE/4HR) to Experimental Regimens, Regimen3 (2HPZM/2HPM) and Regimen2 (2HPZ/2HP) (Modified Intent to Treat [MITT] Population)
ParticipantsRegimen 1 (2HRZE/4HR)Regimen 2 (2HPZ/2HP)Regimen 3 (2HPMZ/2HPM)
Favorable Outcome656645668
Unfavorable Outcome112139123
Statistical analysis
  • Regimen 1 (2HRZE/4HR) vs Regimen 3 (2HPMZ/2HPM) · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.05 (For a significance level of 0.05, the statistical test is equivalent to obtaining the two-sided 95% confidence interval for the difference of r_b-r_a.) · Risk difference (rd): 1 · 95% CI -2.6 to 4.5
  • Regimen 1 (2HRZE/4HR) vs Regimen 3 (2HPMZ/2HPM) · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.05 · Risk difference (rd): 3 · 95% CI -0.6 to 6.6For a significance level of 0.05, the statistical test is equivalent to obtaining the two-sided 95% confidence interval for the difference of r_b-r_a.
PrimaryTB Disease-free Survival at 12M After Study Treatment Assignment Among Participants in Control Regimen, Regimen1 (2HRZE/4HR) to Experimental Regimens, Regimen3 (2HPZM/2HPM) and Regimen2 (2HPZ/2HP) (Assessable Population)

* To evaluate the efficacy of a rifapentine-containing regimen to determine whether the single substitution of rifapentine for rifampin makes it possible to reduce to seventeen weeks the duration of treatment for drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis * To evaluate the efficacy of a rifapentine-containing regimen that in addition substitutes moxifloxacin for ethambutol and continues moxifloxacin during the continuation phase, to determine whether it is possible to reduce to seventeen weeks the duration of treatment for drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis A primary outcome status of "favorable", "unfavorable", or "not assessable" was assigned. For detailed definitions of outcomes please refer to: Dorman SE, at al. N Engl J Med. 2021 May 6;384(18):1705-1718.

Time frame:
Twelve months after treatment assignment
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
TB Disease-free Survival at 12M After Study Treatment Assignment Among Participants in Control Regimen, Regimen1 (2HRZE/4HR) to Experimental Regimens, Regimen3 (2HPZM/2HPM) and Regimen2 (2HPZ/2HP) (Assessable Population)
ParticipantsRegimen 1 (2HRZE/4HR)Regimen 2 (2HPZ/2HP)Regimen 3 (2HPMZ/2HPM)
Favorable656645668
Unfavorable7010788
Statistical analysis
  • Regimen 1 (2HRZE/4HR) vs Regimen 3 (2HPMZ/2HPM) · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.05 (For a significance level of 0.05, the statistical test is equivalent to obtaining the two-sided 95% confidence interval for the difference of r_b-r_a) · Risk difference (rd): 2 · 95% CI -1.1 to 5.1
  • Regimen 1 (2HRZE/4HR) vs Regimen 2 (2HPZ/2HP) · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.05 (For a significance level of 0.05, the statistical test is equivalent to obtaining the two-sided 95% confidence interval for the difference of r_b-r_a) · Risk difference (rd): 4.4 · 95% CI 1.2 to 7.7
PrimaryPercentage Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events During Study Drug Treatment in Control Regimen (Regimen 1 2HRZE/4HR) Compared to Experimental Regimens, Regimen 3 (2HPZM/2HPM) and Regimen 2 (2HPZ/2HP) (Safety Analysis Population)

* To evaluate the Safety of a rifapentine-containing regimen to determine whether the single substitution of rifapentine for rifampin makes it possible to reduce to seventeen weeks the duration of treatment for drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis * To evaluate the Safety of a rifapentine-containing regimen that in addition substitutes moxifloxacin for ethambutol and continues moxifloxacin during the continuation phase, to determine whether it is possible to reduce to seventeen weeks the duration of treatment for drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis Grade 3 or higher Adverse Events are collected by Clinical sites in systematic way through the laboratory tests and physical exam during regular study follow up visits and also in a non-systematic way when it was self-reported by participants during the study visits. The events are graded by site investigators per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE V4.03

Time frame:
Four months and up to 14 days after last does of after study treatment (Regimen 2 and 3) or Six months and up to 14 days after last does of after study treatment (Regimen 1)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events During Study Drug Treatment in Control Regimen (Regimen 1 2HRZE/4HR) Compared to Experimental Regimens, Regimen 3 (2HPZM/2HPM) and Regimen 2 (2HPZ/2HP) (Safety Analysis Population)
ParticipantsRegimen 1 (2HRZE/4HR)Regimen 2 (2HPZ/2HP)Regimen 3 (2HPMZ/2HPM)
Participants with Grade 3 or higher Adverse events159119159
Participants with less than Grade 3 Adverse Events or no adverse events666716687
Statistical analysis
  • Regimen 1 (2HRZE/4HR) vs Regimen 3 (2HPMZ/2HPM) · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.05 (For a significance level of 0.05, the statistical test is equivalent to obtaining the two-sided 95% confidence interval for the difference of r_b-r_a.) · Risk difference (rd): -0.6 · 95% CI -4.3 to 3.2
  • Regimen 1 (2HRZE/4HR) vs Regimen 2 (2HPZ/2HP) · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.05 (For a significance level of 0.05, the statistical test is equivalent to obtaining the two-sided 95% confidence interval for the difference of r_b-r_a.) · Risk difference (rd): -5.1 · 95% CI -8.7 to -1.5
SecondaryProportion of Participants Who Are Culture Negative at Eight Weeks

Proportion of participants who are culture negative at eight weeks, liquid media

Time frame:
eight weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Proportion of Participants Who Are Culture Negative at Eight Weeks
ParticipantsRegimen 1 (2HRZE/4HR)Regimen 2 (2HPZ/2HP)Regimen 3 (2HPMZ/2HPM)
Proportion of Participants Who Are Culture Negative at Eight Weeks523616641
SecondaryTime to Stable Sputum Culture Conversion

Time to stable sputum culture conversion, liquid media

Time frame:
four or six months
Reported as:
Median · weeks
Time to Stable Sputum Culture Conversion
weeksRegimen 1Regimen 2Regimen 3
Time to Stable Sputum Culture Conversion8.14 (8.00 to 12.14)8.14 (4.14 to 12.00)8.14 (4.14 to 8.29)
SecondaryDiscontinuation of Assigned Treatment for a Reason Other Than Microbiological Ineligibility (Tolerability)

Tolerability of the regimen is evaluated using the outcome of discontinuation of assigned treatment for a reason other than microbiological ineligibility.

Time frame:
four or six months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Discontinuation of Assigned Treatment for a Reason Other Than Microbiological Ineligibility (Tolerability)
ParticipantsRegimen 1 (2HRZE/4HR)Regimen 2 (2HPZ/2HP)Regimen 3 (2HPMZ/2HPM)
Discontinuation of Assigned Treatment for a Reason Other Than Microbiological Ineligibility (Tolerability)613755
SecondaryEstimated Steady State Efavirenz PK Parameters Including Mid-dosing Interval Concentration

Among participants with HIV infection receiving efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy, number of participants who maintained plasma efavirenz concentrations ≥1 mg/L during TB treatment.

Time frame:
four months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Estimated Steady State Efavirenz PK Parameters Including Mid-dosing Interval Concentration
ParticipantsEFV1
Estimated Steady State Efavirenz PK Parameters Including Mid-dosing Interval Concentration62
SecondaryTB Disease-free Survival at Eighteen Months After Study Treatment Assignment

* To evaluate the efficacy of a rifapentine-containing regimen to determine whether the single substitution of rifapentine for rifampin makes it possible to reduce to seventeen weeks the duration of treatment for drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis * To evaluate the efficacy of a rifapentine-containing regimen that in addition substitutes moxifloxacin for ethambutol and continues moxifloxacin during the continuation phase, to determine whether it is possible to reduce to seventeen weeks the duration of treatment for drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis

Time frame:
Eighteen months after study treatment assignment.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
TB Disease-free Survival at Eighteen Months After Study Treatment Assignment
ParticipantsRegimen 1 (2HRZE/4HR)Regimen 2 (2HPZ/2HP)Regimen 3 (2HPMZ/2HPM)
Favorable656636667
Unfavorable112148124
Statistical analysis
  • Regimen 1 (2HRZE/4HR) vs Regimen 3 (2HPMZ/2HPM) · Risk difference (rd): 1.09 · 95% CI -2.45 to 4.63
  • Regimen 1 (2HRZE/4HR) vs Regimen 2 (2HPZ/2HP) · Risk difference (rd): 4.12 · 95% CI 0.45 to 7.79
SecondaryTB Disease-free Survival at Eighteen Months After Study Treatment Assignment

* To evaluate the efficacy of a rifapentine-containing regimen to determine whether the single substitution of rifapentine for rifampin makes it possible to reduce to seventeen weeks the duration of treatment for drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis * To evaluate the efficacy of a rifapentine-containing regimen that in addition substitutes moxifloxacin for ethambutol and continues moxifloxacin during the continuation phase, to determine whether it is possible to reduce to seventeen weeks the duration of treatment for drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis

Time frame:
Eighteen months after treatment assignment
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
TB Disease-free Survival at Eighteen Months After Study Treatment Assignment
ParticipantsRegimen 1 (2HRZE/4HR)Regimen 2 (2HPZ/2HP)Regimen 3 (2HPMZ/2HPM)
Favorable656636667
Unfavorable699779
Statistical analysis
  • Regimen 1 (2HRZE/4HR) vs Regimen 3 (2HPMZ/2HPM) · Risk difference (rd): 1.05 · 95% CI -2.01 to 4.11
  • Regimen 1 (2HRZE/4HR) vs Regimen 2 (2HPZ/2HP) · Risk difference (rd): 3.66 · 95% CI 0.42 to 6.90
SecondarySpeed of Decline of Sputum Viable Bacilli by Automated Liquid MGIT Culture Days to Detection

Parameter estimates of the nonlinear mixed effect models describing longitudinal time to positive (TTP)

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Number · log10 DTP / day
Speed of Decline of Sputum Viable Bacilli by Automated Liquid MGIT Culture Days to Detection
log10 DTP / dayRegimen 1 (2HRZE/4HR)Regimen 2 (2HPZ/2HP)Regimen 3 (2HPMZ/2HPM)
Speed of Decline of Sputum Viable Bacilli by Automated Liquid MGIT Culture Days to Detection0.140.200.24
Other pre-specifiedSensitivity Analyses Assuming All Losses to Follow-up and Non-tuberculosis Deaths Have an Unfavorable Outcome

A sensitivity analysis used to supplement the primary efficacy results and provide further insight into whether the intervention regimens should be considered to have non-inferior efficacy. This analysis considers the difference in proportion of unfavorable outcomes between the control arm and each of the experimental arms. Measurement Description: The difference in proportion unfavorable was calculated using a stratified analysis using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel weights. The analysis was stratified by HIV status and presence of cavitation only, and the stratified difference was considered primary.

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Sensitivity Analyses Assuming All Losses to Follow-up and Non-tuberculosis Deaths Have an Unfavorable Outcome
ParticipantsRegimen 1 (2HRZE/4HR)Regimen 2 (2HPEZ/2HP)Regimen 3 (2HPMZ/2HPM)
Sensitivity Analyses Assuming All Losses to Follow-up and Non-tuberculosis Deaths Have an Unfavorable Outcome656645668
Statistical analysis
  • Regimen 1 (2HRZE/4HR) vs Regimen 2 (2HPEZ/2HP) · Risk difference (rd): 3.0 · 95% CI -0.6 to 6.6
  • Regimen 1 (2HRZE/4HR) vs Regimen 3 (2HPMZ/2HPM) · Risk difference (rd): 2.29 · 95% CI -1.12 to 5.70
Other pre-specifiedSensitivity Analyses Assuming All Losses to Follow-up and Non-tuberculosis Deaths Have a Favorable Outcome

A sensitivity analysis used to supplement the primary efficacy results and provide further insight into whether the intervention regimens should be considered to have non-inferior efficacy. This analysis considers the difference in proportion of unfavorable outcomes between the control arm and each of the experimental arms. Measurement Description: The difference in proportion unfavorable was calculated using a stratified analysis using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel weights. The analysis was stratified by HIV status and presence of cavitation only, and the stratified difference was considered primary.

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Sensitivity Analyses Assuming All Losses to Follow-up and Non-tuberculosis Deaths Have a Favorable Outcome
ParticipantsRegimen 1 (2HRZE/4HR)Regimen 2 (2HPEZ/2HP)Regimen 3 (2HPMZ/2HPM)
Sensitivity Analyses Assuming All Losses to Follow-up and Non-tuberculosis Deaths Have a Favorable Outcome671650673
Statistical analysis
  • Regimen 1 (2HRZE/4HR) vs Regimen 2 (2HPEZ/2HP) · Risk difference (rd): 5.9 · 95% CI 2.8 to 8.9
  • Regimen 1 (2HRZE/4HR) vs Regimen 3 (2HPMZ/2HPM) · Risk difference (rd): 3.4 · 95% CI 0.5 to 6.3

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse Events were reported from randomization to up to 14 days after last dose of study treatment Regimen (4 months and up to 14 days or 6 months and up to 14 days); All cause Mortality is reported during study treatment and up to M18 study follow up visit (18 months). Non-serious events are listed at a 3% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Regimen 1 (2HRZE/4HR)12/825 (1.5%)56/825 (6.8%)74/825 (9%)
Regimen 2 (2HPZ/2HP)11/835 (1.3%)39/835 (4.7%)61/835 (7.3%)
Regimen 3 (2HPMZ/2HPM)13/846 (1.5%)37/846 (4.4%)94/846 (11.1%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 77
Most frequent serious events
EventRegimen 1 (2HRZE/4HR)Regimen 2 (2HPZ/2HP)Regimen 3 (2HPMZ/2HPM)
HepatitisHepatobiliary disorders10/8255/8357/846
HemoptysisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders5/8254/8351/846
NeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders3/8251/8352/846
Deep Vein ThrombosisVascular disorders3/8252/8351/846
PregnancyPregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions2/8253/8352/846
PneumoniaInfections and infestations1/8251/8353/846
UrticariaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/8251/8353/846
Pulmonary EmbolismRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders2/8251/8350/846
Stab WoundInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/8252/8350/846
Diabetic RetinopathyEye disorders1/8250/8350/846
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventRegimen 1 (2HRZE/4HR)Regimen 2 (2HPZ/2HP)Regimen 3 (2HPMZ/2HPM)
NeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders48/82534/83556/846
HepatitisHepatobiliary disorders26/82527/83538/846

Baseline characteristics

Baseline Population Description: The population is the Microbiologically eligible population that included the randomized participants excluding the ones with no evidence of cultures positive for M. tuberculosis, or with resistance to one or more of isoniazid, rifampin or fluoroquinolones, or are enrolled in violation of eligibility criteria

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Regimen 1 (2HRZE/4HR)Regimen 2 (2HPZ/2HP)Regimen 3 (2HPMZ/2HPM)Total
<=18 years19192563
Between 18 and 65 years7437557552253
>=65 years6101127
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Regimen 1 (2HRZE/4HR)Regimen 2 (2HPZ/2HP)Regimen 3 (2HPMZ/2HPM)Total
Median30.9 (24.9 to 41.0)31.0 (24.6 to 41.1)31.0 (24.6 to 41.5)31.0 (24.6 to 41.3)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Regimen 1 (2HRZE/4HR)Regimen 2 (2HPZ/2HP)Regimen 3 (2HPMZ/2HPM)Total
Female224221228673
Male5445635631670
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Regimen 1 (2HRZE/4HR)Regimen 2 (2HPZ/2HP)Regimen 3 (2HPMZ/2HPM)Total
Hispanic or Latino27202774
Not Hispanic or Latino287283297867
Unknown or Not Reported4544814671402
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Regimen 1 (2HRZE/4HR)Regimen 2 (2HPZ/2HP)Regimen 3 (2HPMZ/2HPM)Total
American Indian or Alaska Native0000
Asian869389268
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0000
Black or African American5535715521676
White1581336
More than one race111111135357
Unknown or Not Reported3126
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Regimen 1 (2HRZE/4HR)Regimen 2 (2HPZ/2HP)Regimen 3 (2HPMZ/2HPM)Total
United States871025
Africa5655735781716
South Asia868988263
South America109115115339
HIV Status
HIV Status(Participants)Regimen 1 (2HRZE/4HR)Regimen 2 (2HPZ/2HP)Regimen 3 (2HPMZ/2HPM)Total
HIV Negative7047167292149
HIV Positive646862194
Cavitation status at Baseline
Cavitation status at Baseline(Participants)Regimen 1 (2HRZE/4HR)Regimen 2 (2HPZ/2HP)Regimen 3 (2HPMZ/2HPM)Total
Cavitation on chest radiograph5585735721703
No cavitation on chest radiograph204205210619
Unknown66921
08

Study locations

33 sites
  • TBTC Site 82/ ACTG Site 801 USCF AIDS CRS
    San Francisco, California 94110, United States
  • TBTC Site 24 Columbia Unversity
    New York, New York 10032, United States
  • TBTC Site 20 UNTHSC (University of North Texas Health Science Center)
    Fort Worth, Texas 76104, United States
  • TBTC Site 62 Baylor College of Medicine & Affiliated Hospitals/VA
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • TBTC Site 63 San Antonio VA Medical Center (South Texas Group)
    San Antonio, Texas 78229-4404, United States
  • TBTC Site 94/ ACTG Site 12201 Hospital Nossa Senhora da Conceicao
    Porto Alegre, RS 91350-200, Brazil
  • TBTC Site 91/ ACTG Site 12101 Insituto Nacional de Pesquisa Clínica Evandro Chagas
    Rio de Janeiro, 21040-360, Brazil
  • TBTC Site 36 TB and Chest Service of Hong Kong, China
    Hong Kong, China
  • TBTC Site 45/ ACTG Site 30022: Les Centres Gheskio (INLR)
    Port au Prince, Ouest HT6110, Haiti
  • TBTC Site 67/ ACTG Site 31730 GHESKIO centers IMIS
    Port-au-Prince, Ouest HT 6124, Haiti
  • TBTC Site 43/ ACTG Site 31441 BJ Medical College
    Pune, Maharashtra 4110011, India
  • TBTC Site 44/ ACTG Site 11701 CART CRS, YRGCARE Medical Centre VHS
    Chennai, Tamilnadu 600113, India
  • TBTC Site 02/ ACTG 12501 Kenya Medical Research Institute/Walter Reed Project Clinical Research Center (KEMRI/WRP) CRS
    Kericho, Kericho County 20200, Kenya
  • TBTC Site 39/ ACTG Site 31460 Kisumu CRS
    Kisumu, Nyanza Province 40100, Kenya
  • TBTC Site 03/ ACTG Site 12601 Moi University Clinical Research Site
    Eldoret, 30100, Kenya
  • TBTC Site 04/ ACTG Site 30301 Blantyre CRS (or College of Medicine - Johns Hopkins Research Project, COM-JHP)
    Blantyre, Malawi
  • TBTC Site 05/ ACTG Site 12001 UNC Project Tidziwe Centre
    Lilongwe, Malawi
  • TBTC Site 90/ ACTG Site 11301 Asociacion Civil Impacta Salud y Educacion
    Lima, Lima 04, Peru
  • TBTC Site 93/ ACTG Site 11302 CRS San Miguel
    Lima, Lima 32, Peru
  • TBTC Site 10/ ACTG Site 31718 TASK Applied Science
    Bellville, Cape Town 7530, South Africa
  • TBTC Site 09/ ACTG Site 31792 University of Cape Town Lung Institute (Pty) Ltd
    Mowbray, Cape Town 7700, South Africa
  • TBTC Site 34 Wits Health Consortium Perinatal HIV Research Unit (PHRU)
    Soweto, Gauteng 1864, South Africa
  • TBTC Site 49/ ACTG Site 12301 Soweto ACTG CRS
    Soweto, Johannesburg 2013, South Africa
  • TBTC Site 06/ ACTG Site 11201 Durban International Clinical Research Site
    Durban, KwaZulu Natal 4093, South Africa
  • TBTC Site 01/ACTG Site 8950 FAM CRU
    Parow Valley, Western Cape 7505, South Africa
  • TBTC Site 08/ ACTG Site 31793 South African Tuberculosis Vaccine Initiative (SATVI)
    Cape Town, Western Province 7705, South Africa
  • TBTC Site 07/ ACTG Site 11101 Wits Helen Joseph CRS
    Johannesburg, 2092, South Africa
  • TBTC Site 42/ ACTG Site 31802 The Thai Red Cross AIDS Research Centre
    Pathumwan, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
  • TBTC Site 69/ ACTG Site 31784 Thai-CTIU, CMU HIV Treatment CRS
    Muang Chiang Mai, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
  • TBTC Site 11/ ACTG Site 12401 Joint Clinical Research Centre, Kampala Clinical Research Site
    Kampala, Uganda
  • TBTC Site 30 Uganda-Case Western Reserve Research Collaboration
    Kampala, Uganda
  • TBTC Site 37 Vietnam NTP/UCSF Research Collaboration
    Hanoi, 10000, Vietnam
  • TBTC Site 41/ ACTG Site 30313 Parirenyatwa Clinical Research Site
    Harare, 263, Zimbabwe
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Podany AT, Pham M, Sizemore E, Martinson N, Samaneka W, Mohapi L, Badal-Faesen S, Dawson R, Johnson JL, Mayanja H, Lalloo U, Whitworth WC, Pettit A, Campbell K, Phillips PPJ, Bryant K, Scott N, Vernon A, Kurbatova EV, Chaisson RE, Dorman SE, Nahid P, Swindells S, Dooley KE, Fletcher CV. Efavirenz Pharmacokinetics and Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) Viral Suppression Among Patients Receiving Tuberculosis Treatment Containing Daily High-Dose Rifapentine. Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Sep 10;75(4):560-566. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab1037. PubMed 34918028 ↗
  • Dorman SE, Nahid P, Kurbatova EV, Phillips PPJ, Bryant K, Dooley KE, Engle M, Goldberg SV, Phan HTT, Hakim J, Johnson JL, Lourens M, Martinson NA, Muzanyi G, Narunsky K, Nerette S, Nguyen NV, Pham TH, Pierre S, Purfield AE, Samaneka W, Savic RM, Sanne I, Scott NA, Shenje J, Sizemore E, Vernon A, Waja Z, Weiner M, Swindells S, Chaisson RE; AIDS Clinical Trials Group; Tuberculosis Trials Consortium. Four-Month Rifapentine Regimens with or without Moxifloxacin for Tuberculosis. N Engl J Med. 2021 May 6;384(18):1705-1718. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2033400. PubMed 33951360 ↗
  • Scott NA, Lee KK, Sadowski C, Kurbatova EV, Goldberg SV, Nsubuga P, Kitshoff R, Whitelaw C, Thuy HN, Batra K, Allen-Blige C, Davis H, Kim J, Phan M, Fedrick P, Chiu KW, Heilig CM, Sizemore E; AIDS Clinical Trials Group and The Tuberculosis Trials Consortium. Optimizing drug inventory management with a web-based information system: The TBTC Study 31/ACTG A5349 experience. Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Jun;105:106377. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106377. Epub 2021 Mar 29. PubMed 33794353 ↗
  • Bryant KE, Yuan Y, Engle M, Kurbatova EV, Allen-Blige C, Batra K, Brown NE, Chiu KW, Davis H, Elskamp M, Fagley M, Fedrick P, Hedges KNC, Narunsky K, Nassali J, Phan M, Phan H, Purfield AE, Ricaldi JN, Robergeau-Hunt K, Whitworth WC, Sizemore EE; AIDS Clinical Trials Group; Tuberculosis Trials Consortium. Central monitoring in a randomized, open-label, controlled phase 3 clinical trial for a treatment-shortening regimen for pulmonary tuberculosis. Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 May;104:106355. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106355. Epub 2021 Mar 10. PubMed 33713841 ↗
  • Dorman SE, Nahid P, Kurbatova EV, Goldberg SV, Bozeman L, Burman WJ, Chang KC, Chen M, Cotton M, Dooley KE, Engle M, Feng PJ, Fletcher CV, Ha P, Heilig CM, Johnson JL, Lessem E, Metchock B, Miro JM, Nhung NV, Pettit AC, Phillips PPJ, Podany AT, Purfield AE, Robergeau K, Samaneka W, Scott NA, Sizemore E, Vernon A, Weiner M, Swindells S, Chaisson RE; AIDS Clinical Trials Group and the Tuberculosis Trials Consortium. High-dose rifapentine with or without moxifloxacin for shortening treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis: Study protocol for TBTC study 31/ACTG A5349 phase 3 clinical trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 Mar;90:105938. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.105938. Epub 2020 Jan 22. PubMed 31981713 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Data being collected in CDISC format.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 4, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02410772
Collaborators
Advancing Clinical Therapeutics Globally for HIV/AIDS and Other Infections
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 8, 2015
Start date
Jan 25, 2016
Primary completion
Jul 2020
Completion
May 2021
Results posted
Sep 28, 2021
Last update
Dec 4, 2024

Study contacts

Susan Dorman, MD
study chair · Medical University of South Carolina
Payam Nahid, MD, MPH
study chair · University of California at San Francisco
Susan Swindells, MBBS
study chair · University of Nebraska
Richard Chaisson, MD
study chair · Johns Hopkins University
Ekaterina V Kurbatova, MD, PhD, MPH
study chair · Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Rifapentine · Moxifloxacin

Start the discussion