ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02395653Updated Oct 26, 2017Results posted

Safety and Clinical Utility Study of SSEC Fentanyl 40 mcg for Acute Post-op Pain Management in Pediatric Participants

A Phase 3 interventional study of fentanyl in Pain, Postoperative, sponsored by The Medicines Company. Completed at 10 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 12 Years to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-10-26.

Sponsored by The Medicines Company (part of Novartis) · Phase 3, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
71
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
12 Years to 17 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and clinical utility of the active, SSEC fentanyl 40 micrograms (mcg) for the management of acute, postoperative pain in pediatric participants.

Read the detailed description

An open label evaluation of the safety and clinical utility of the active, SSEC fentanyl 40 mcg for the management of acute postoperative pain in pediatric participants 12 to less than 18 years of age.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain, Postoperative

Keywords

  • Pediatric
  • Postoperative
  • Pain Management
03

In context

Pain, Postoperative

5,224 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Postoperative; 1,154 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 71 is close to the median of 75 across 4,457 interventional studies indexed under Pain, Postoperative.

Browse Pain, Postoperative studies →

Lead sponsor

The Medicines Company is the lead sponsor of 50 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 9 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 8 (89%) have results posted.

First submitted before The Medicines Company became part of Novartis.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Participants whose parent(s) or guardian(s) have/has signed and dated an informed consent form for the participant to participate in the study, or participants who have provided written assent to participate in the study
  • Male or female inpatients, age 12 to \<18 years of age inclusive on the day of surgery
  • Participants capable of understanding and cooperating with the requirements of the study, including being able to report their pain intensity using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale and operate the SSEC
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I, II or III
  • Body weight of at least 40.0 kilogram (kg)
  • Postoperative participants who have undergone general or regional anesthesia for abdominal, pelvic/genitourinary, orthopedic, or thoracic surgery
  • Postoperative participants who have been observed during recovery and are expected to remain hospitalized and have pain requiring parenteral opioids (that is, intravenous [IV] patient-controlled anesthesia) for the next 24 hours or longer
  • Participants who are awake and breathing spontaneously with a respiratory rate of 14 to 18 breaths per minute, peripheral capillary oxygen saturation ≥93% (with or without supplemental oxygen), and able to answer questions and follow commands
  • Participants who have been observed during recovery, who are awake, able to answer questions and follow commands, and who have been comfortable for at least 30 minutes, with a pain intensity score ≤4 (numeric rating scale 0-10), with or without titration to comfort with IV opioids

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants who have undergone any surgery on the airway, head, or neck
  • Participants who received an extended-release opioid within 48 hours prior to Hour 0 or who are expected to have postoperative analgesia supplied by a continuous regional technique or participant-controlled epidural analgesia
  • Participants with a history of allergy or hypersensitivity to fentanyl, skin adhesives, and/or cetylpyridinium chloride
  • Participants who are expected to require intensive care or will likely require additional surgical procedures within 36 hours
  • Participants who received intra-operative and/or postoperative administration of opioids other than morphine, hydromorphone, fentanyl, sufentanil, or alfentanil. Exception: If there are no medical contraindications, meperidine (pethidine) up to 0.5 milligram/kg IV is permitted during recovery for shivering
  • Participants who require airway support (nasal or oropharyngeal airway intubation, or laryngeal mask airway at the time of final baseline assessments (that is, at the time of IONSYS application [Hour 0])
  • Participants who are known or suspected to be opioid tolerant, have a history of opioid dependence within 3 months before the start of the study, or who are known to have used illicit drugs or alcohol within 14 days of the start of the study
  • Participants with active generalized skin disorders or active local skin disease that precludes SSEC application to the chest or upper arm
  • Participants with any coexisting major medical conditions that are likely to interfere with study procedures including, but not limited to, psychiatric conditions, chronic depression, suicidal ideation, autism
  • Positive pregnancy test for any female
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
71 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    SSEC Fentanyl

    SSEC fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system, 40 mcg fentanyl per activation.

    Drug: fentanyl

Interventions

  • An opioid that has been administered parenterally as an anesthetic and analgesic for more than 20 years.

    Also known as: IONSYS

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Assessment Of Participant's Ability To Use The SSEC

    Investigator's assessment of participant's ability to use the SSEC system safely and effectively. The assessment consisted of a 4-level categorical evaluation (poor, fair, good, and excellent). Because of the descriptive nature of this study, no formal statistical hypothesis testing was performed.

    Time frame: Completed at the time of the participant's termination of study treatment (up to 72 hours after study drug administration)

  2. Assessment Of Adherence Of The SSEC System To Skin

    The adhesion of each SSEC was evaluated immediately prior to removal at each 24-hour time point, or at early withdrawal. Adhesion was recorded using the following classification: System adhered to at least 90% of the application area with no edges unattached; System adhered between 75% and 89%; System was \<75% adhered and not taped; System was secured with tape. The number of SSEC systems for all time points in each category is presented. Because of the descriptive nature of this study, no formal statistical hypothesis testing was performed.

    Time frame: Immediately prior to removal at each 24-hour time point, or at early withdrawal, for up to 3 consecutive days (up to 72 hours)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline To 1 Hour And 24 Hours In Skin Irritation Score After SSEC Removal

    Skin irritation at the SSEC application site was to be assessed immediately prior to placement of the study system and at 1 and 24 hours after removal of each study system. The application site was to be scored using the following scale: 0=No evidence of irritation; 1=Minimal erythema, barely perceptible; 2=Definite erythema, readily visible, minimal edema, or minimal papular response; 3=Erythema and papules; 4=Definite edema; 5=Erythema, edema, and papules; 6=Vesicular eruption; 7=Strong reaction spreading beyond the application site.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 hour and 24 hours after SSEC removal.

  2. Number Of Participants To Experience Clinically Relevant Respiratory Depression (CRRD)

    Respiratory function and occurrence of CRRD was defined as simultaneous occurrence of bradypnoea (respiratory rate \<10 breaths per minute for participants 9-15 years of age and sustained for 1 minute, or \<8 breaths per minute for participants 16-17 years of age), with excessive sedation (that is, the participant is not easily aroused).

    Time frame: From the time of application of the first system through 7 days following end of study drug administration.

07

Results

Posted Sep 18, 2017

Participant flow

Pediatric participants from 12 to less than 18 years of age who had undergone general or regional anesthesia for elective abdominal, pelvic/genitourinary, orthopedic, or thoracic surgery.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneSSEC Fentanyl
Started71
Received at least 1 dose of study drug61
Completed59
Not completed12
Withdrew: Exclusion criteria met at screening4
Withdrew: Consent withdrawn at screening1
Withdrew: Ssec application but with 0 dose1
Withdrew: Investigator decision at screening1
Withdrew: Inclusion criteria not met at screening3
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject1
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up1

Outcome measures

PrimaryAssessment Of Participant's Ability To Use The SSEC

Investigator's assessment of participant's ability to use the SSEC system safely and effectively. The assessment consisted of a 4-level categorical evaluation (poor, fair, good, and excellent). Because of the descriptive nature of this study, no formal statistical hypothesis testing was performed.

Time frame:
Completed at the time of the participant's termination of study treatment (up to 72 hours after study drug administration)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Assessment Of Participant's Ability To Use The SSEC
participantsSSEC Fentanyl
Poor1
Fair2
Good10
Excellent48
Missing0
PrimaryAssessment Of Adherence Of The SSEC System To Skin

The adhesion of each SSEC was evaluated immediately prior to removal at each 24-hour time point, or at early withdrawal. Adhesion was recorded using the following classification: System adhered to at least 90% of the application area with no edges unattached; System adhered between 75% and 89%; System was \<75% adhered and not taped; System was secured with tape. The number of SSEC systems for all time points in each category is presented. Because of the descriptive nature of this study, no formal statistical hypothesis testing was performed.

Time frame:
Immediately prior to removal at each 24-hour time point, or at early withdrawal, for up to 3 consecutive days (up to 72 hours)
Reported as:
Number · SSEC systems
Assessment Of Adherence Of The SSEC System To Skin
SSEC systemsSSEC Fentanyl
≥90% of area with no edges unattached97
75% to 89%6
<75% adhered and not taped3
System was secured with tape1
Not assessed0
SecondaryChange From Baseline To 1 Hour And 24 Hours In Skin Irritation Score After SSEC Removal

Skin irritation at the SSEC application site was to be assessed immediately prior to placement of the study system and at 1 and 24 hours after removal of each study system. The application site was to be scored using the following scale: 0=No evidence of irritation; 1=Minimal erythema, barely perceptible; 2=Definite erythema, readily visible, minimal edema, or minimal papular response; 3=Erythema and papules; 4=Definite edema; 5=Erythema, edema, and papules; 6=Vesicular eruption; 7=Strong reaction spreading beyond the application site.

Time frame:
Baseline, 1 hour and 24 hours after SSEC removal.
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline To 1 Hour And 24 Hours In Skin Irritation Score After SSEC Removal
units on a scaleSSEC Fentanyl
System 1, Hour 11.1 ± 0.94
System 1, Hour 241.8 ± 1.43
System 2, Hour 11.0 ± 0.61
System 2, Hour 241.6 ± 1.33
System 3, Hour 11.0 ± 1.22
System 3, Hour 240.8 ± 1.26
SecondaryNumber Of Participants To Experience Clinically Relevant Respiratory Depression (CRRD)

Respiratory function and occurrence of CRRD was defined as simultaneous occurrence of bradypnoea (respiratory rate \<10 breaths per minute for participants 9-15 years of age and sustained for 1 minute, or \<8 breaths per minute for participants 16-17 years of age), with excessive sedation (that is, the participant is not easily aroused).

Time frame:
From the time of application of the first system through 7 days following end of study drug administration.
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number Of Participants To Experience Clinically Relevant Respiratory Depression (CRRD)
participantsSSEC Fentanyl
Bradypnoea0
Excessive Sedation0
Simultaneous Bradypnoea and Excessive Sedation0

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were collected from the time of application of the first system through 7 days following the end of study drug administration.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
SSEC Fentanyl0/61 (0%)1/61 (1.6%)44/61 (72.1%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventSSEC Fentanyl
AtelectasisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/61
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventSSEC Fentanyl
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders19/61
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders18/61
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders11/61
Application site erythemaGeneral disorders10/61
Application site papulesGeneral disorders10/61
DizzinessNervous system disorders7/61
PyrexiaGeneral disorders7/61
Pruritus generalisedSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders5/61

Baseline characteristics

The Safety Population included all participants who received ≥1 dose of fentanyl from the SSEC.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)SSEC Fentanyl
Mean14.7 ± 1.54
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)SSEC Fentanyl
Female45
Male16
08

Study locations

10 sites
  • Packard Children's Hospital at Stanford
    Palo Alto, California 94304, United States
  • University of Miami/Jackson Memorial Hospital
    Miami, Florida 33136, United States
  • Children's Healthcare of Atlanta
    Atlanta, Georgia 30342, United States
  • Johns Hopkins Hospital, Charlotte R. Bloomberg Children's Center
    Baltimore, Maryland 21287, United States
  • St. Louis Children's Hospital
    St Louis, Missouri 63110, United States
  • The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
  • Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15224, United States
  • Children's Medical Center of Dallas
    Dallas, Texas 75235, United States
  • Harborview Medical Center
    Seattle, Washington 98104, United States
  • Children's Hospital of Wisconsin
    Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Chelly JE, Grass J, Houseman TW, Minkowitz H, Pue A. The safety and efficacy of a fentanyl patient-controlled transdermal system for acute postoperative analgesia: a multicenter, placebo-controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2004 Feb;98(2):427-433. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000093314.13848.7E. PubMed 14742382 ↗
  • Grond S, Hall J, Spacek A, Hoppenbrouwers M, Richarz U, Bonnet F. Iontophoretic transdermal system using fentanyl compared with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia using morphine for postoperative pain management. Br J Anaesth. 2007 Jun;98(6):806-15. doi: 10.1093/bja/aem102. PubMed 17519263 ↗
  • Hartrick CT, Bourne MH, Gargiulo K, Damaraju CV, Vallow S, Hewitt DJ. Fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system for acute-pain management after orthopedic surgery: a comparative study with morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2006 Nov-Dec;31(6):546-54. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2006.08.011. PubMed 17138198 ↗
  • Minkowitz HS, Rathmell JP, Vallow S, Gargiulo K, Damaraju CV, Hewitt DJ. Efficacy and safety of the fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system (ITS) and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA) with morphine for pain management following abdominal or pelvic surgery. Pain Med. 2007 Nov-Dec;8(8):657-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2006.00257.x. PubMed 18028044 ↗
  • Minkowitz HS, Yarmush J, Donnell MT, Tonner PH, Damaraju CV, Skowronski RJ. Safety and tolerability of fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system: findings from a pooled data analysis of four clinical trials. J Opioid Manag. 2010 May-Jun;6(3):203-10. doi: 10.5055/jom.2010.0018. PubMed 20642249 ↗
  • Viscusi ER, Reynolds L, Chung F, Atkinson LE, Khanna S. Patient-controlled transdermal fentanyl hydrochloride vs intravenous morphine pump for postoperative pain: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004 Mar 17;291(11):1333-41. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.11.1333. PubMed 15026400 ↗
  • Viscusi ER, Reynolds L, Tait S, Melson T, Atkinson LE. An iontophoretic fentanyl patient-activated analgesic delivery system for postoperative pain: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2006 Jan;102(1):188-94. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000183649.58483.77. PubMed 16368828 ↗
  • Viscusi ER, Siccardi M, Damaraju CV, Hewitt DJ, Kershaw P. The safety and efficacy of fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system compared with morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain management: an analysis of pooled data from three randomized, active-controlled clinical studies. Anesth Analg. 2007 Nov;105(5):1428-36, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000281913.28623.fd. PubMed 17959978 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 26, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02395653
Collaborators
Incline Therapeutics, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 23, 2015
Start date
Jun 29, 2015
Primary completion
Sep 12, 2016
Completion
Sep 12, 2016
Results posted
Sep 18, 2017
Last update
Oct 26, 2017

Study contacts

Elliot J Krane, MD
principal investigator · Stanford Children's Health

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Fentanyl

Start the discussion