CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02388035Updated Jun 4, 2015

Cefotaxime Resistance in Treatment of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis

An interventional study of Cefotaxime in Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis, sponsored by Dr Ahmed Ali Elbaz. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-06-04.

Sponsored by Dr Ahmed Ali Elbaz · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
254
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is a serious complication in cirrhotic patients, and the changes in the microbiological characteristics reported in the last years are impacting the choice of antibiotic used in the treatment. Cefotaxime has been the most extensively studied antibiotic for this infection. It is considered to be one of the first choice antibiotics because of low toxicity and excellent efficacy. Treatment of SBP by intravenous cefotaxime should be administered for a minimum 5 days. Antibiotic-resistant microorganisms have been increasingly reported especially to cefotaxime and its effect on the clinical outcome in treating SBP.

02

Conditions studied

  • Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • profiles changes
  • microorganisms
  • cefotaxime
  • SBP
  • Egyptian
  • effective antibiotics
03

In context

Peritonitis

185 studies on the registry are indexed under Peritonitis; 25 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 254 is above the median of 95 across 118 interventional studies indexed under Peritonitis.

Browse Peritonitis studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Dr Ahmed Ali Elbaz as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites and clinical findings suspicious of ascitic fluid infection

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients were excluded if they received antibiotics ten days prior to the hospital admission or there is evidence of secondary bacterial peritonitis, tuberculous peritonitis, malignant ascites or ascites due to other causes e.g. cardiac or renal diseases
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
254 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    SBP-group 1

    Spontanous bacterial peritonitis

    Drug: Cefotaxime

  • Experimental
    CNNA-group 2

    Culture negative neutrocytic ascites

    Drug: Cefotaxime

  • Experimental
    MNBA-group 3

    monomicrobial non-neutrocytic ascites

    Drug: Cefotaxime

  • No intervention
    group 4

    no evidence of ascitic fluid infection

Interventions

  • DrugCefotaxime
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Organisms detected with their antibiotics sensitivity

    Time frame: 8 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Nasser institute
    Cairo, Shubra, Egypt
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 4, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02388035
Lead sponsor
Dr Ahmed Ali Elbaz
Responsible party
Dr Ahmed Ali Elbaz (Dr, Nasser Institute For Research and Treatment) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Mar 13, 2015
Start date
Mar 2015
Primary completion
May 2015
Completion
Jun 2015
Last update
Jun 4, 2015

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion