ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02367677Updated Feb 2, 2017

Digital Photographs to Evaluate Blepharoptosis

An observational study in Blepharoptosis, sponsored by CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-02-02.

Sponsored by CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
36
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To compare measurements made by a computer software (ImageJ) made on photographs to the traditional clinical measures with a ruler in the evaluation of blepharoptosis

02

Conditions studied

  • Blepharoptosis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Photo
03

In context

Blepharoptosis

63 studies on the registry are indexed under Blepharoptosis; 16 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 36 is below the median of 60 across 12 observational studies indexed under Blepharoptosis.

Browse Blepharoptosis studies →

Lead sponsor

CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval is the lead sponsor of 137 studies on the registry; 27 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Patients with ptosis of all causes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients 18 years old or older
  • Patients presenting for evaluation of blepharoptosis of any kind except the one mentioned in the exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Myasthenia gravis
  • Thyroid eye disease
05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
36 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Clinical measurements

    Measurements are made with a paper ruler

    Other: Method comparison

  • Smartphone

    Measurements are made with ImageJ from pictures taken with an iPhone 6

    Other: Method comparison

  • Digital camera

    Measurements are made with ImageJ from pictures taken with a Nikon D700

    Other: Method comparison

Interventions

  • OtherMethod comparison
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Reliability of measurements made on photographs to evaluate blepharoptosis

    Comparison between measurements made on digital photographs with measurements made with a ruler in clinic

    Time frame: Same day

  2. Reliability of measurements made on photographs taken by smartphone to evaluate blepharoptosis

    Comparison between measurements made on digital photographs taken by smartphone with measurements made on digital photographs taken with a digital camera

    Time frame: Same day

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Centre Universitaire d'Ophtalmologie, Hôpital du Saint-Sacrement, CHU de Québec
    Québec, Quebec G1S 4L8, Canada
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Nov 2013, a primary completion of Nov 2016 and a completion of Nov 2016. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 3, 2015
First posted
Feb 20, 2015
Start
Nov 2013
Primary completionActual
Nov 30, 2016
CompletionActual
Nov 30, 2016
Last update
Feb 2, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 2, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02367677
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 20, 2015
Start date
Nov 2013
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2016
Completion
Nov 30, 2016
Last update
Feb 2, 2017

Study contacts

Yvonne Molgat, MDCM, FRCSC
principal investigator · Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec : Université Laval

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion