An observational study in Blepharoptosis, sponsored by CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-02-02.
Sponsored by CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval · Observational
To compare measurements made by a computer software (ImageJ) made on photographs to the traditional clinical measures with a ruler in the evaluation of blepharoptosis
63 studies on the registry are indexed under Blepharoptosis; 16 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 36 is below the median of 60 across 12 observational studies indexed under Blepharoptosis.
Browse Blepharoptosis studies →CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval is the lead sponsor of 137 studies on the registry; 27 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Patients with ptosis of all causes
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Measurements are made with a paper ruler
Other: Method comparison
Measurements are made with ImageJ from pictures taken with an iPhone 6
Other: Method comparison
Measurements are made with ImageJ from pictures taken with a Nikon D700
Other: Method comparison
Reliability of measurements made on photographs to evaluate blepharoptosis
Comparison between measurements made on digital photographs with measurements made with a ruler in clinic
Time frame: Same day
Reliability of measurements made on photographs taken by smartphone to evaluate blepharoptosis
Comparison between measurements made on digital photographs taken by smartphone with measurements made on digital photographs taken with a digital camera
Time frame: Same day
Plan to share: Undecided
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
The record gives a start of Nov 2013, a primary completion of Nov 2016 and a completion of Nov 2016. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval →