CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02363933Updated Apr 27, 2018Results posted

Perampanel in Seizure Patients With Primary Glial Brain Tumors

A Phase 4 interventional study of Perampanel in Brain Tumor, Primary, sponsored by Duke University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-04-27.

Sponsored by Duke University · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
9
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a Phase 2 single-arm study to assess the efficacy of perampanel as an adjunctive anti-epileptic drug (AED) in patients with primary glioma that are presenting refractory partial onset seizure activity (defined as 3 or more seizures in a 28-day period). In this study, patients will be started on a dose of 2 mg of perampanel daily taken orally at bedtime for 2 weeks. At the start of week 3 perampanel will be titrated up in dose in 2mg increments per week up to 8mg daily, as long as it is well tolerated by the patient. The highest dose of perampanel will be 8 mg orally at bedtime. Once this is achieved, patients will remain on a maintenance dose of 8 mg for 12 more weeks. The planned treatment dose is 8mg, but the dose can be modified by the physician based on patient reported tolerability. Titration and taper periods will be determined by the physician in the case where patients do not reach the planned treatment dose of 8 mg daily. Patients will be assessed in the Brain Tumor Center Clinic every 8 weeks. Study assessments will be made at enrollment, 8 weeks, 16 weeks, and 24 weeks. Assessments will include history and physical examination (H\&P) including Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), neurological examination, evaluation of seizure history, patient-reported outcomes of QoL, and computer based neurocognitive testing. After a total of 16 weeks of therapy, perampanel will be tapered down. At Week 17, patients will begin taking 6mg of perampanel, Week 18 4mg, Week 19 2mg, and Week 20 they will no longer take perampanel. Patients will be considered off treatment at the end of week 20, once perampanel has cleared their system. Patients will then be monitored through Week 24. Patients will continue to take their original AED regimen after they stop perampanel. If seizure control is achieved during the maintenance period or if seizures occur during the tapering period, patients can be continued on perampanel per the discretion of the treating physician. In this instance, perampanel will be prescribed by the treating physician and not provided within the confines of the study. Efficacy will be assessed using a log of patient-reported seizure activity. As is standard procedure at the Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center (PRTBTC), patients will be given a log to record the number of seizures that occur. Research team members will regularly contact patients for reminders and reports from the log. Safety will be assessed with the following laboratory evaluations: complete blood count (CBC) with differential, complete metabolic panel (CMP), and toxicity assessment.

Read the detailed description

This is a Phase 2 single-arm study to assess the efficacy of perampanel as an adjunctive anti-epileptic drug (AED) in patients with primary glioma that are presenting refractory partial onset seizure activity (defined as 3 or more seizures in a 28-day period). In this study, patients will be started on a dose of 2 mg of perampanel daily taken orally at bedtime for 2 weeks. At the start of week 3 perampanel will be titrated up in dose in 2mg increments per week up to 8mg daily, as long as it is well tolerated by the patient. The highest dose of perampanel will be 8 mg orally at bedtime. Once this is achieved, patients will remain on a maintenance dose of 8 mg for 12 more weeks. The planned treatment dose is 8mg, but the dose can be modified by the physician based on patient reported tolerability. Titration and taper periods will be determined by the physician in the case where patients do not reach the planned treatment dose of 8 mg daily. Patients will be assessed in the Brain Tumor Center Clinic every 8 weeks. Study assessments will be made at enrollment, 8 weeks, 16 weeks, and 24 weeks. Assessments will include history and physical examination (H\&P) including Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), neurological examination, evaluation of seizure history, patient-reported outcomes of QoL, and computer based neurocognitive testing. After a total of 16 weeks of therapy, perampanel will be tapered for 3 weeks and then will be discontinued, such that Week 20 patients will no longer be taking perampanel. Patients will then be monitored through Week 24. Patients will continue to take their original AED regimen after they stop perampanel. Patients will remain on their original AED regimen during this treatment time and the dose of their original AED regimen at the start of the study will not be changed while they are on study. If seizure control is achieved during the maintenance period or if seizures occur during the tapering period, patients can be continued on perampanel per the discretion of the treating physician. In this instance, perampanel will be prescribed by the treating physician and not provided within the confines of the study. Efficacy will be assessed using a log of patient-reported seizure activity. As is standard procedure at the PRTBTC, patients will be given a log to record the number of seizures that occur. Research team members will regularly contact patients for reminders and reports from the log. Safety will be assessed with the following laboratory evaluations: complete blood count (CBC) with differential, complete metabolic panel (CMP), and toxicity assessment.

This study has been designed with 90% power to detect an increase in the 50% responder rate during the maintenance period from a benchmark of 20% to 35%. Assuming a type I error rate of 0.1, 61 patients will be required. Based on prior studies the early discontinuation rate was 16%, therefore 71 patients will be enrolled to compensate for patients discontinuing prior to the completion of the maintenance period.

02

Conditions studied

  • Brain Tumor, Primary

Keywords

  • Perampanel
  • Seizures
03

In context

Brain Neoplasms

1,960 studies on the registry are indexed under Brain Neoplasms; 516 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 9 is below the median of 40 across 1,458 interventional studies indexed under Brain Neoplasms.

Browse Brain Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Duke University is the lead sponsor of 2,025 studies on the registry; 275 are open to participants now.

Of its 194 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 159 (82%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients must be diagnosed with a primary glioma and have refractory partial onset seizure activity (defined as 3 or more seizures in a 28-day period) on levetiracetam monotherapy
  2. Adult patients (≥ 18 years old)
  3. Karnofsky ≥ 70%
  4. Hematocrit ≥ 29%, ANC ≥ 1,500 cells/L, platelets ≥ 100,000 cells/L
  5. Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 mg/dL, serum AST and bilirubin ≤ 1.5 times the upper limit of normal
  6. If sexually active, patients will take contraceptive measures for the duration of protocol treatment and continue until two months after treatment. The effectiveness of hormonal contraceptives containing levonorgestrel has been shown to be reduced by perampanel at a 12 mg dose.1 Therefore, alternative or back-up methods of contraception are recommended.
  7. Signed informed consent approved by the Duke Institutional Review Board

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnant or breastfeeding (Both perampanel and other Anti-epileptic drugs are classified as Pregnancy Category C drugs.)
  2. Chronic excessive use of psycho-pharmaceuticals, alcohol, illicit drugs, or narcotics
  3. Inability to complete or perform measures of patient-reported outcomes or neurocognitive testing on the computer
  4. Known allergy to perampanel
  5. Concomitant use of known cytochrome P450 inducers such as carbamazepine, phenytoin, or oxcarbazepine (see Appendix A)
  6. Previous history of suicidal ideation, homicidal ideation, depression leading to hospitalization or mood disturbance leading to hospitalization.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
9 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Perampanel + Current Anti-Epileptic Drug

    Primary glioma patients will receive perampanel along with their current AED for a total of 20 weeks. Perampanel will be titrated from 2 mg in weeks 1 and 2 and up to 8 mg daily by week 5 if well tolerated by the patient. They will then receive a maintenance dose of 8 mg per day through 16 weeks. After 16 weeks, subjects will be tapered off perampanel over a 4 week period.

    Drug: Perampanel

Interventions

  • DrugPerampanel

    Perampanel is a highly selective non-competitive alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) type glutamate receptor antagonist that has shown efficacy in a randomized phase III study for refractory partial-onset seizures

    Also known as: FYCOMPA

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Patients With ≥50% Seizure Reduction During the Maintenance Period Compared With Seizure Frequency Before Initiation of Perampanel

    The primary objective of this study is to assess the efficacy of perampanel as an adjunctive anti-epileptic drug (AED) in patients with primary glioma presenting refractory partial onset seizure activity. Efficacy will be assessed by the 50% responder rate, defined as the percentage of patients with a ≥50% seizure reduction during the maintenance period compared with the seizure frequency before initiation of perampanel. Seizure frequency during maintenance perampanel will be computed as the ratio of the total number of seizure episodes while receiving perampanel during the maintenance period and the number of days perampanel is administered

    Time frame: 20 Weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Patients Who Experience a Adverse Event Possibly, Probably, or Definitely Attributable to Perampanel Treatment

    The percentage of patients with unacceptable adverse events that are possibly, probably, or definitely related to perampanel treatment will be calculated. Unacceptable adverse events include all Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 Grade 4 or 5 toxicities that are possibly, probably, or definitely related to perampanel, as well as suicidal ideation (any grade) or suicide attempt (Grade 3-5).

    Time frame: 24 Weeks

07

Results

Posted Apr 2, 2018

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePerampanel + Current Anti-Epileptic Drug
Started8
Completed2
Not completed6

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Patients With ≥50% Seizure Reduction During the Maintenance Period Compared With Seizure Frequency Before Initiation of Perampanel

The primary objective of this study is to assess the efficacy of perampanel as an adjunctive anti-epileptic drug (AED) in patients with primary glioma presenting refractory partial onset seizure activity. Efficacy will be assessed by the 50% responder rate, defined as the percentage of patients with a ≥50% seizure reduction during the maintenance period compared with the seizure frequency before initiation of perampanel. Seizure frequency during maintenance perampanel will be computed as the ratio of the total number of seizure episodes while receiving perampanel during the maintenance period and the number of days perampanel is administered

Time frame:
20 Weeks

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryPercentage of Patients Who Experience a Adverse Event Possibly, Probably, or Definitely Attributable to Perampanel Treatment

The percentage of patients with unacceptable adverse events that are possibly, probably, or definitely related to perampanel treatment will be calculated. Unacceptable adverse events include all Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 Grade 4 or 5 toxicities that are possibly, probably, or definitely related to perampanel, as well as suicidal ideation (any grade) or suicide attempt (Grade 3-5).

Time frame:
24 Weeks
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Patients Who Experience a Adverse Event Possibly, Probably, or Definitely Attributable to Perampanel Treatment
percentage of participantsPerampanel + Current Anti-Epileptic Drug
Percentage of Patients Who Experience a Adverse Event Possibly, Probably, or Definitely Attributable to Perampanel Treatment0

Adverse events

Collected over 24 Weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Perampanel + Current Anti-Epileptic Drug1/8 (12.5%)1/8 (12.5%)8/8 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventPerampanel + Current Anti-Epileptic Drug
Multi-organ failureGeneral disorders1/8
Lung infectionInfections and infestations1/8
FallInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/8
HypoxiaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/8
Respiratory failureRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/8
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 49
Most frequent other events
EventPerampanel + Current Anti-Epileptic Drug
FatigueGeneral disorders6/8
Platelet count decreasedInvestigations3/8
HyperglycemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders3/8
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders2/8
Mucosal infectionInfections and infestations2/8
Creatinine increasedInvestigations2/8
HypokalemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders2/8
DizzinessNervous system disorders2/8
Nervous system disorders - Other, specifyNervous system disorders2/8
Pyramidal tract syndromeNervous system disorders2/8

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Perampanel + Current Anti-Epileptic Drug
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years8
>=65 years0
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Perampanel + Current Anti-Epileptic Drug
Mean45.0 ± 9.1
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Perampanel + Current Anti-Epileptic Drug
Female2
Male6
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Perampanel + Current Anti-Epileptic Drug
Hispanic or Latino0
Not Hispanic or Latino8
Unknown or Not Reported0
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Perampanel + Current Anti-Epileptic Drug
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American0
White8
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Perampanel + Current Anti-Epileptic Drug
United States8
08

Study locations

1 site
  • The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center
    Durham, North Carolina 27710, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jul 24, 2015

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 27, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02363933
Lead sponsor
Duke University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 16, 2015
Start date
Apr 7, 2015
Primary completion
Mar 14, 2017
Completion
Apr 10, 2017
Results posted
Apr 2, 2018
Last update
Apr 27, 2018

Study contacts

Katherine B Peters, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Duke University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion