CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02339454Updated Apr 10, 2018

Efficacy of Extracorporeal Shockwave Myocardial Revascularization Therapy in Patients With Stable Angina Pectoris

A Phase 3 interventional study of Active treatment group and Placebo group in Stable Angina Pectoris, sponsored by Evgeny Shkolnik, MD. Completed at 2 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-04-10.

Sponsored by Evgeny Shkolnik, MD · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
72
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Low intensity shockwaves have been proven in animal and pilot clinical studies to induce local growth of new blood vessels. Small single-center clinical trials with shockwave therapy showed promising results in reducing angina symptoms, improving perfusion and contractility in patients with refractory angina and stress-induced ischemia on imaging test.

The hypothesis of this study is that shockwave therapy could improve angina symptoms and exercise tolerance in broader population of patients with stable angina regardless of imaging test results Study aims to demonstrate anti-anginal efficacy of Extracorporeal Shockwave Myocardial Revascularization Therapy (ESMR), on top of stable optimal medical treatment in patients with stable angina.

Read the detailed description

Low intensity shockwaves (0.09 millijoule/mm2) are delivered to myocardial tissue. Shockwaves are created by a special generator and are focused using a shockwave applicator device. The treatment is guided by standard echocardiography equipment. The shockwaves are delivered in synchronization with Patient R-wave (ECG) to avoid arrhythmias. The treatment is painless.

At first, the patient undergoes modified Bruce treadmill test, to assess exercise induced ischemia.

Exercise induced ECG ischemia is defined as the new development of horizontal or down - sloping ST segment depression (≥1 mm at 60 ms after J point) versus baseline tracing.

Study treatment consists of 9 sessions, with 3 sessions per week 1, 5 and 9. 100 shocks are delivered per spot, 1200 shocks per session.

During 1st treatment week ESMR will be delivered 3 times (every other day) to basal segments (2 spots in each wall in apical 4-, 2-, 3- chamber positions).

During 2nd treatment week ESMR will be delivered 3 times (every other day) to middle segments (2 spots in each wall in apical 4-, 2-, 3- chamber positions).

During 3rd treatment week ESMR will be delivered 3 times (every other day) to apical segments (2 spots in each wall in apical 4-, 2-, 3- chamber positions).

The spots are localized by the ultra-sound device and the shockwaves are focused to this area. Several treatments are required for optimal results.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stable Angina Pectoris

Keywords

  • Cardiac Shock wave therapy
  • stable angina
  • exercise tolerance
03

In context

Angina Pectoris

519 studies on the registry are indexed under Angina Pectoris; 82 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 72 is below the median of 123 across 336 interventional studies indexed under Angina Pectoris.

Browse Angina Pectoris studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Evgeny Shkolnik, MD as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Male and female patients (females of childbearing potential must be using adequate contraceptive precautions such as implants, injectables, combined oral contraceptives, intrauterine devices, sexual abstinence or vasectomized partner).
  • Patients aged ≥ 18 years.
  • Patients with coronary artery disease confirmed by angiography, prior MI, prior revascularization (PCI, CABG) and with exercise angina not controlled by the optimal medical therapy.
  • Patient should be on a stable dosage of medication used to treat angina for at least 4 weeks prior to enrollment.
  • ST-segment depression ≥ 1mm during exercise ECG.
  • Able and willing to sign informed consent and to comply with study procedures.
  • Written informed consent prior to enrolment into the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Angina at rest.
  • ECG abnormalities at rest (left bundle-branch block, resting ST-segment depression ≥ 1mm, digoxin therapy, WPW-syndrome).
  • Planned coronary intervention or CABG within 6 months.
  • Heart failure (class III or IV NYHA).
  • Moderate-severe hypertension (SBP>160 mmHg and/or DBP>100 mmHg).
  • Hypotension (SBP\<100 mmHg).
  • Acute coronary syndrome or coronary revascularization procedure within the prior 3 months before enrolment.
  • Females who are pregnant or nursing.
  • Any clinically relevant hematological or biochemical abnormality on routine screening, according to Investigator's judgment.
  • Severe concurrent pathology, including terminal illness (cancer, AIDS, etc.).
  • Renal impairment defined as Creatinine >150 mcmol/l.
  • Mild, moderate or severe hepatic impairment or hepatic insufficiency defined as: SGOT or SGPT > 3 times greater than normal upper limit or total serum bilirubin > 1.5 times greater than normal upper limit
  • Existing contraindications for exercise testing (e.g. acute myocarditis or pericarditis, DVT, severe aortic stenosis)
  • Dementia, psychosis, alcoholism (>350 g ethanol/week) or chronic abuse of medicines, drugs or psychoactive substances.
  • Conditions which in the Investigator's opinion may interfere with the study's execution or due to which the patient should not participate for safety reasons.
  • Risk of low patient cooperation.
  • Inability or unwillingness to issue the informed consent.
  • Patient is simultaneously participating in another device or drug study, or has participated in any clinical trial involving an experimental device or drug, including other drugs or devices enhancing cardiac neovascularization, or any cardiac shock wave therapy machine of a competitor company within 3 months of entry into the study.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
72 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Active treatment group

    Patients in this group receive actual shockwave therapy. Study treatment consists of 9 sessions, with 3 sessions per week 1, 5 and 9. 100 shocks are delivered per spot, 1200 shocks per session. During 1st treatment week ESMR will be delivered 3 times (every other day) to basal segments (2 spots in each wall in apical 4-, 2-, 3- chamber positions). During 2nd treatment week ESMR will be delivered 3 times (every other day) to middle segments (2 spots in each wall in apical 4-, 2-, 3- chamber positions). During 3rd treatment week ESMR will be delivered 3 times (every other day) to apical segments (2 spots in each wall in apical 4-, 2-, 3- chamber positions).

    Device: Active treatment group

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo group

    This group of patients undergoes the same procedure as the treatment group; however shockwaves are not delivered to the heart.

    Device: Placebo group

Interventions

  • DeviceActive treatment group

    Energy Density - 0.09 mJ/mm2 Device: Active Applicator

    Also known as: Cardiospec, Extracorporeal Shockwave Myocardial Revascularization (ESMR), Extracorporeal Cardiac Shock wave therapy (CSWT)

  • DevicePlacebo group

    Placebo Applicator

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Total Exercise duration

    To evaluate if ESMR able to improve total exercise duration in modified Bruce treadmill test. Patients will be assessed at baseline visit (screening) and 6 months after the first treatment.

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to 1 mm ST-segment depression in modified Bruce treadmill test

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Time to angina in modified Bruce treadmill test

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Number of angina attacks per week

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Number of sublingual nitroglycerin consumption per week

    Time frame: 6 months

  5. CCS angina functional class

    Time frame: 6 months

  6. Seattle angina questionnaire score

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Vilnius University Hospital, Santariskiu klinkos
    Vilnius, Lithuania
  • Moscow state university of medicine&dentistry
    Moscow, 127473, Russian Federation
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Celutkiene J, Burneikaite G, Shkolnik E, Jakutis G, Vajauskas D, Cerlinskaite K, Zuoziene G, Petrauskiene B, Puronaite R, Komiagiene R, Butkuviene I, Steponeniene R, Misiura J, Laucevicius A. The effect of cardiac shock wave therapy on myocardial function and perfusion in the randomized, triple-blind, sham-procedure controlled study. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2019 Jul 4;17(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12947-019-0163-1. PubMed 31272465 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 10, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02339454
Lead sponsor
Evgeny Shkolnik, MD
Collaborators
Vilnius University, Medispec
Responsible party
Evgeny Shkolnik, MD (Professor, department of functional methods in internal medicine, Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jan 15, 2015
Start date
May 2012
Primary completion
Dec 2017
Completion
Dec 2017
Last update
Apr 10, 2018

Study contacts

Jelena Celutkiene, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Vilnius University Hospital, Santariskiu klinikos
Evgeny Shkolnik, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Moscow State University of Medicine&Dentistry

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion