ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02329626HYCOREUpdated Nov 21, 2025

Metabolic Anomolies Associated With the 6 Month Clinical Evolution of Patients Suffering From Motor Conversion Disorder

An observational study in Conversion Disorder, sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes. Completed at 3 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-11-21.

Sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
20
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The main objective of this study is to make a first evaluation of the relationship between metabolic abnormalities objectified by Positron emission tomography with 2-deoxy-2-[fluorine-18]fluoro- D-glucose integrated with computed tomography (PET CT 18 FDH) performed at rest at the onset of symptoms in patients with a first episode of motor conversion disorder and the persistence of a motor disability at 6 months measured by the modified Rankin score (mRS).

Read the detailed description

The secondary objectives of this study are:

A. To assess whether metabolic abnormalities objectified by PET CT 18 FDH performed at rest at the onset of symptoms may be predictive of persistent disability at 6 months as measured by the EDSS, the NIHSS and WHO status.

B. To assess whether metabolic abnormalities objectified by PET CT 18 FDH performed at rest at 3 months after diagnosis may be predictive of persistent motor disability at 6 months (EDSS, NIHSS, mRS, WHO) C. To search for and characterize any abnormalities of metabolism objectified in the initial PET CT 18 FDH predictive of persistent motor disability at 3 months.

D. To determine if there are persistent metabolic abnormalities 3 months post-diagnosis independently of the clinical course (marker trait).

E. Define the brain areas whose metabolism is often altered in patients with motor conversion disorders.

F. Establish a collection of biological samples from patients for future research studies of prognostic biomarkers of a motor conversion disorder.

02

Conditions studied

  • Conversion Disorder

Browse trials for

03

In context

Conversion Disorder

89 studies on the registry are indexed under Conversion Disorder; 34 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 20 is below the median of 60 across 37 observational studies indexed under Conversion Disorder.

Browse Conversion Disorder studies →

Lead sponsor

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes is the lead sponsor of 595 studies on the registry; 90 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

The study population consists of patients with paralysis, motor weakness or abnormal movements meeting DSM-IV criteria for motor conversion disorder consulting via the Emergency or Neurology department of participating centers.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • The patient must have given free and and signed the consent
  • The patient must be affiliated with or beneficiary of a health insurance plan
  • The patient meets criteria for motor conversion disorder (with paralysis, motor weakness or abnormal movements) lasting for less than 1 month and euthymic (HAMD score \< or = 7, as evaluated by a psychiatrist)
  • First episode (incident cases)
  • The latest symptom dates to within a month
  • The patient is not under neuroleptics

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The subject is participating in another study
  • The subject is in an exclusion period determined by a previous study
  • The subject is under judicial protection, guardianship or curatorship
  • The subject refuses to sign the consent
  • It is not possible to correctly inform the patient
  • The patient is pregnant, parturient or she is breastfeeding
  • Specialized clinical neurological examination and brain and spinal cord MRI revealed an organic neurological cause
  • The subject has a HAMD score > 7
  • The subject currently has manic/hypomanic episode, a diagnosis of substance abuse or dependency (excluding tobacco), a diagnosis of schizophrenia (any time in the past) or chronic neurological disease (active epilepsy, stroke, brain tumor)
  • Suicidal or high risk for suicide (according to MINI assessment)
  • for a PET scan
  • Patient under neuroleptics at inclusion
  • The last symptom happened over 1 month ago
  • The patient has had previous episodes (prevalent cases)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

DSM diagnostic criteria

The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Study population

    The study population consists of patients with paralysis, motor weakness or abnormal movements meeting DSM-IV criteria for motor conversion disorder consulting via the Emergency or Neurology department of participating centers. Intervention: PET CT 18 FDG

    Device: PET CT 18 FDG

Interventions

  • DevicePET CT 18 FDG

    Positron emission tomography with 2-deoxy-2-\[fluorine-18\]fluoro- D-glucose integrated with computed tomography. This intervention is required for the observational needs of the study.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Presence/absence of a modified Ranking score > 1

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Presence/absence of a metabolic anomoly according to PET CT 18 FDG

    PET CT 18 FDG = Positron emission tomography with 2-deoxy-2-\[fluorine-18\]fluoro- D-glucose integrated with computed tomography

    Time frame: Day 0 to Day 15

Secondary outcomes

  1. Presence/absence of a metabolic anomoly according to PET CT 18 FDG

    Time frame: 3 months

  2. Modified Rankin Score

    Time frame: 3 months

  3. Modified Rankin Score

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. EDSS score

    Time frame: Day 0 to Day 15

  5. EDSS score

    Time frame: 3 months

  6. EDSS score

    Time frame: 6 months

  7. NIHSS score

    Time frame: Day 0 to Day 15

  8. NIHSS score

    Time frame: 3 months

  9. NIHSS score

    Time frame: 6 months

  10. MINI questionnaire

    Time frame: Day 0 to Day 15

  11. HAMD scale

    Time frame: Day 0 to Day 15

  12. HAMD scale

    Time frame: 3 months

  13. HAMD scale

    Time frame: 6 months

  14. HADS scale

    Time frame: Day 0 to Day 15

  15. HADS scale

    Time frame: 3 months

  16. HADS scale

    Time frame: 6 months

  17. WHO score

    Time frame: 3 months

  18. WHO score

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

3 sites
  • CHRU de Montpellier - Hôpital Gui de Chauliac
    Montpellier, 34295, France
  • CHRU de Montpellier - Hôpital Lapeyronie
    Montpellier, 34295, France
  • CHRU de Nîmes - Hôpital Universitaire Carémeau
    Nîmes, 30029, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Conejero I, Thouvenot E, Abbar M, Mouchabac S, Courtet P, Olie E. Neuroanatomy of conversion disorder: towards a network approach. Rev Neurosci. 2018 Jun 27;29(4):355-368. doi: 10.1515/revneuro-2017-0041. PubMed 29252202 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jan 2016 to primary completion in Jan 2018, 23 months.

Of 16 observational studies under Conversion Disorder, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 55. This study's 23 months is close to that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 29, 2014
First posted
Dec 31, 2014
StartActual
Jan 29, 2016
Primary completionActual
Jan 15, 2018
CompletionActual
Jan 15, 2018
Last update
Nov 21, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 21, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02329626
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 31, 2014
Start date
Jan 29, 2016
Primary completion
Jan 15, 2018
Completion
Jan 15, 2018
Last update
Nov 21, 2025

Study contacts

Ismaël Conejero
study director · Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion