CClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT02328300Updated Nov 14, 2018

FLT PET/MR for Evaluation of Pseudoprogression in Patients With Brain Lesions

An observational study in Brain Lesions, Brain Metastasis and Brain Metastases, sponsored by UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center. Withdrawn at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-11-14.

Sponsored by UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center · Observational

Why this study was withdrawn
FLT production not available
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
0
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a single arm, single center study of 15 patients with brain lesions being treated at UNC Hospitals. Subjects will undergo one (1) FLT-PET-MRI scan before their scheduled surgical biopsy of their brain lesion(s).

Read the detailed description

Identifying imaging biomarkers of metastatic brain tumor treatment response could allow early modification of treatment by determination of tumor progression vs. treatment related effects (pseudo-progression, radiation necrosis). Earlier treatment response assessment could reduce cost, improve clinical trial efficiency and allow better assessment of prognosis. The development of PET/MRI offers the possibility of combining the functional imaging of PET with the exquisite soft tissue contrast and physiologic imaging capabilities of MRI. Combining FLT-PET imaging with MRI may allow better evaluation of new and unclear lesions in brain metastatic disease. The goal of this study is to explore FLT-PET imaging combined with dynamic MR imaging techniques for the identification of tumor response markers in metastatic brain tumors.

02

Conditions studied

  • Brain Lesions
  • Brain Metastasis
  • Brain Metastases
03

In context

Neoplasm Metastasis

3,517 studies on the registry are indexed under Neoplasm Metastasis; 885 are open to participants now.

Browse Neoplasm Metastasis studies →

Lead sponsor

UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center is the lead sponsor of 414 studies on the registry; 96 are open to participants now.

Of its 32 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 25 (78%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

UNC Hospitals

Inclusion criteria

  • Known brain lesion in central nervous system (CNS) scheduled to have surgical biopsy of the lesion, identified by the UNC Brain Tumor Board as having clinical question of radiation necrosis vs. recurrence
  • At least one measurable lesion greater than 1 cm in diameter
  • ≥ 18 years of age
  • Study-specific informed consent reviewed and signed

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant, nursing, or planning to become pregnant within 30 days of anticipated PET-MRI scan
  • Condition that makes MRI unsafe (e.g., cardiac pacemaker, epicardial pacemaker leads, cochlear implants, metal aneurysm clips, metal halo devices)
  • Inability to tolerate MRI (e.g., unable to lie flat for > 1 hour, severe claustrophobia)
  • Allergy to MRI contrast agent (Magnevist, Multihance, Ablavar, Dotarem, Eovist, Gadavist)
  • Known allergy to fluorothymidine
  • Study participation would cause significant delay (> 2 weeks) in scheduled standard of care therapy
  • Creatinine clearance \< 60 ml/min, as estimated by the Cockcroft-Gault formula
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) > 35
  • Poorly controlled diabetes mellitus (fasting blood glucose > 200 mg/dl)
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • FLT PET/MR

    All participants will have known brain lesion in the central nervous system (CNS) scheduled to have surgical biopsy of the lesion, identified by the UNC Brain Tumor Board and will have the clinical question of radiation necrosis vs. recurrence. All participants will receive a FLT PET/MR scan.

    Drug: FLT PET/MR

Interventions

  • DrugFLT PET/MR

    Each participant will be injected with FLT, a common PET radiotracer for brain tumors and lesions, and then will complete one (1) PET/MR scan.

    Also known as: FLT PET/MRI

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Sensitivity and specificity of FLT-PET-MRI in distinguishing between recurrence and radiation necrosis, with surgical biopsy as gold standard

    Time frame: 1 week post-surgical biopsy

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill
    Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 14, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02328300
Lead sponsor
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 31, 2014
Start date
May 7, 2014
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2018
Completion
Jul 31, 2018
Last update
Nov 14, 2018

Study contacts

Yueh Lee, MD/PhD
principal investigator · University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Nov 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion