CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT02322554CTPRUpdated May 1, 2018

Cellular and Tissue Based Therapy Registry

An observational study in Diabetic Foot Ulcers, Venous Stasis Ulcer and Pressure Ulcer, sponsored by U.S. Wound Registry. Status unknown at 1 site in United States. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-05-01.

Sponsored by U.S. Wound Registry · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Apr 2018), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
50,000
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of the Cellular and Tissue Based Therapy Registry (CTPR) for Wounds is to provide real world patient data from electronic health records submitted to meet Stage 2 Meaningful Use in order to understand the value of these products among patients with chronic wounds and ulcers. Randomized, controlled trials to establish product efficacy routinely exclude patients with the co-morbid conditions common to patients seen in usual clinical practice and thus the results of these RCTs tend to be non-generalizable. Little is known about the effectiveness of CTPs among typical patients.

Read the detailed description

The goal of the Cellular and Tissue Based Therapy Registry (CTPR) for Wounds is to provide comparative effectiveness data for patients with chronic wounds and ulcers and to understand whether clinical practice guidelines are followed in the use of these products. These products are referred to by a variety of names of which are inaccurate reflections of their structure or purpose (e.g. Cellular and Engineered Tissue Alternatives, "bioengineered tissues," "biological dressings"). The preferred term is cellular and/or tissue based products (CTPs). CTPs are utilized for their biological influence on the healing process by stimulating or supporting healing. They may or may not be incorporated into regenerating tissue. Both tissue derived and biosynthetic products may be made with or without dead cells and biomaterials made of living cells may be comprised of autologous cells (cultured and not cultured), xenogenic, or allogenic cells (minimally manipulated, cultured, immortal).The diversity of products and the rate at which they are becoming available for clinical use make it impossible to perform randomized controlled trials to compare their effectiveness against one another. Effectiveness in real world patients is the best current option to understand the role of CTPs in wound healing.

Hospital based outpatient wound centers participating in the US Wound Registry agree to provide data as part of quality initiatives and to meet their Stage 2 Meaningful use criteria. The CTPR is a subset of the USWR data. All patient data from all participating outpatient clinics are transmitted to the USWR where it is available for benchmarking, PQRS and other initiatives. Data used for effectiveness research is HIPAA de-identified. These data are derived from structured language entries directly transmitted from electronic health records which also link to billing and charge documents once practitioners sign and lock charts, confirming the veracity of data entries.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetic Foot Ulcers
  • Venous Stasis Ulcer
  • Pressure Ulcer
  • Chronic Non Healing Wound
  • Surgical Wound Dehiscence

Keywords

  • electronic health records
  • Qualified Clinical Data Registry
  • PQRS
  • quality reporting
  • cellular based products
  • bioengieered skin
  • USWR
03

In context

Diabetic Foot

1,054 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetic Foot; 222 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50,000 is above the median of 100 across 186 observational studies indexed under Diabetic Foot.

Browse Diabetic Foot studies →

Lead sponsor

U.S. Wound Registry is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

All patients seen at participating hospital based outpatient wound centers to whom CTPs are applied

Inclusion criteria

  • patients receiving cellular and tissue based products

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • none
05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
50,000 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
2 Months
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • wounds treated with CTPs

    All cellular and tissue based products currently reimbursed in the hospital based outpatient department, administered at intervals as determined in the course of clinical practice

    Biological: Cellular and tissue based products

Interventions

  • BiologicalCellular and tissue based products

    Procedure: Application of device or biological to wounds

    Also known as: Apligraf, Dermagraft, Epifix, Oasis, Talymed, Primatrix, Theraskin, Grafix, Dermaspan, Alloderm, Amnioband, GraftJacket, Integra, Matristem

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Healing

    Healing or wound closure by wound type and stratified by Wound Healing Index

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 1, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02322554
Lead sponsor
U.S. Wound Registry
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 23, 2014
Start date
Jan 2005
Primary completion
Jan 2020 (estimated)
Last update
May 1, 2018

Study contacts

Caroline E Fife, MD
Contact
cfife@uswoundregistry.com
800-603-7896
Monica Weir
Contact
monica.weir@intellicure.com
800-603-7896

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Apr 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion