A Phase 3 interventional study of Olopatadine Hydrochloride Ophthalmic Solution 0.2% and Olopatadine Hydrochloride Ophthalmic Solution 0.1% in Allergic Conjunctivitis, sponsored by Alcon Research. Completed. Open to participants aged 10 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-11-17.
Sponsored by Alcon Research · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment
The purpose of this study is to evaluate olopatadine 0.2% QD (once per day) compared to olopatadine 0.1% BID (twice per day) in the treatment of ocular itching associated with allergic conjunctivitis.
361 studies on the registry are indexed under Conjunctivitis; 17 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 383 is above the median of 100 across 299 interventional studies indexed under Conjunctivitis.
Browse Conjunctivitis studies →Alcon Research is the lead sponsor of 608 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.
Of its 109 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 99 (91%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Olopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution 0.2% in the morning and olopatadine 0.2% vehicle in the evening, 1 drop in each eye for 14 days
Drug: Olopatadine Hydrochloride Ophthalmic Solution 0.2% · Drug: Olopatadine 0.2% Vehicle
Olopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution 0.1%, 1 drop in each eye in the morning and evening, for 14 days
Drug: Olopatadine Hydrochloride Ophthalmic Solution 0.1%
Also known as: PATADAY®
Also known as: PATANOL®
Inactive ingredients used as placebo comparator
Change From Baseline in Worst Ocular Itching Score During the 24 Hours Prior at Day 14
Severity of ocular itching was evaluated as the worst score observed in the past 24 hours prior to each study visit. Ocular itching was assessed by the participant on a scale from 0-4, where 0=None and 4=Incapacitating itch. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.
Time frame: Baseline, Day 14
Participants were recruited from 10 study centers located in China.
| Milestone | PATADAY | PATANOL |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 126 | 127 |
| Treated (safety set) | 126 | 126 |
| Per protocol set (pps) | 123 | 122 |
| Completed | 124 | 123 |
| Not completed | 2 | 4 |
| Withdrew: Adverse event | 1 | 0 |
| Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject | 1 | 4 |
Severity of ocular itching was evaluated as the worst score observed in the past 24 hours prior to each study visit. Ocular itching was assessed by the participant on a scale from 0-4, where 0=None and 4=Incapacitating itch. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.
| units on a scale | PATADAY | PATANOL |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Worst Ocular Itching Score During the 24 Hours Prior at Day 14 | -2.57 ± 0.090 | -2.62 ± 0.092 |
Collected over Adverse events (AEs) were collected from the time of informed consent and for the duration of participation in the study (2 weeks). This analysis group includes all participants who received study treatment. Ocular adverse events are presented for both study eye and non-study eye combined. AEs are reported as pre-treatment and treatment-emergent.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-treatment | — | 0/383 (0%) | 0/383 (0%) |
| PATADAY | — | 0/126 (0%) | 0/126 (0%) |
| PATANOL | — | 0/126 (0%) | 0/126 (0%) |
This analysis population includes all participants who were randomized, received drug, had at least one on-therapy visit, satisfied inclusion/exclusion criteria, and had no major protocol deviations (Per Protocol Set).
| Age, Continuous(years) | PATADAY | PATANOL | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 32.5 ± 13.72 | 31.9 ± 12.79 | 32.2 ± 13.24 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | PATADAY | PATANOL | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 81 | 86 | 167 |
| Male | 42 | 36 | 78 |
| Itching Score(units on a scale) | PATADAY | PATANOL | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 3.35 ± 0.377 | 3.43 ± 0.373 | 3.39 ± 0.376 |
No study locations are listed for this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Alcon Research