CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02318238Updated Dec 17, 2014

Comparison Between 6 Minute Walk Test, 6 Minute Step Test and 4 Metre Gait Speed

An interventional study of 6 minutes walking test and 6 minutes step test in Healthy and Children, sponsored by Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc- Université Catholique de Louvain. Completed at 1 site in Belgium. Open to participants aged 5 Years to 15 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-12-17.

Sponsored by Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc- Université Catholique de Louvain · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
74
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
5 Years to 15 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to find an alternative to the six minute walk test by validating six minute step test and four metre gait speed in healthy children. Both tests were previously validated in adults and are easier to achieve in non-hospital settings.

02

Conditions studied

  • Healthy
  • Children

Keywords

  • evaluation
  • exercise tolerance
  • healthy children
  • 6MWT
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc- Université Catholique de Louvain is the lead sponsor of 342 studies on the registry; 61 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
5 Years to 15 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • healthy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • a lung disease
  • an overweight
  • an orthopedic disability which can slow down the subject during tests execution
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
74 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    6 minute walking test

    walking during 6 minutes

    Other: 6 minutes walking test

  • Experimental
    6 minute step test

    stepping during 6 minutes

    Other: 6 minutes step test

  • Experimental
    4 meter gait speed

    walking as fast as possible on 4 meters

    Other: 4 meters gait speed

Interventions

  • Other6 minutes walking test

    Also known as: walk during 6 minutes as fast as possible

  • Other6 minutes step test

    Also known as: up and down a step during 6 minutes as fast as possible

  • Other4 meters gait speed

    Also known as: walk a four metre distance

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Walked distance

    The distance walked by subjects during a 6 minute walk test

    Time frame: At 6 minutes

  2. Steps count

    Steps number raised and lowered by subject during a 6 minute step test

    Time frame: At 6 minutes

  3. Time

    Time to walk four metres

    Time frame: at 1 minute

  4. 6MWT speed

    Subjects speed (number of metres/minute) during the 6 minute walk test

    Time frame: at 6 minutes

  5. 6MST speed

    Number of steps/minute during the 6 minute step test

    Time frame: at 6 minutes

  6. 4MGS speed

    Number of metres/second during the four metre gait speed

    Time frame: at 1 minute

Secondary outcomes

  1. Dyspnea

    Dyspnea is measured by a visual analogue scale

    Time frame: at 6 minutes

  2. Perceived exertion

    Percieve exertion is measured by a perceive exertion scale

    Time frame: at 6 minutes

  3. Heart rate

    Heart rate was measured after each test

    Time frame: at 6 minutes

  4. Oxygen saturation

    Oxygen saturation was measured after each test

    Time frame: at 6 minutes

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Clinique universitaire Saint-Luc
    Brussels, Belgium
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 17, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02318238
Lead sponsor
Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc- Université Catholique de Louvain
Responsible party
G.Reychler (Doctor in Physiotherapy, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc- Université Catholique de Louvain) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 17, 2014
Start date
Feb 2014
Primary completion
Feb 2014
Completion
Oct 2014
Last update
Dec 17, 2014

Study contacts

Sophie De Wulf
principal investigator · UCL

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion