CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02311881Updated Apr 7, 2017Results posted

A 12-Week Efficacy Study of Paracetamol 1000mg Sustained-release Tablets in Patients With Osteoarthritis

A Phase 3 interventional study of Paracetamol 1000 mg SR tablets and Paracetamol 665 mg SR tablets in Pain, sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline. Completed at 56 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-04-07.

Sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
960
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of the study is to determine whether paracetamol 1000 mg sustained-release (SR) tablets administered orally, twice daily are effective and safe in the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee or hip.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain

Browse trials for

03

In context

Osteoarthritis

4,398 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteoarthritis; 582 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 960 is above the median of 70 across 3,440 interventional studies indexed under Osteoarthritis.

Browse Osteoarthritis studies →

Lead sponsor

GlaxoSmithKline is the lead sponsor of 3,562 studies on the registry; 117 are open to participants now.

Of its 258 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 232 (90%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female participants between 40 and 80 years of age
  • Diagnosis of moderate to moderately-severe osteoarthritis (OA) of either the knee or hip with respect to the following:

    • Pain in one knee/hip over 3 months immediately before screening visit
    • Use of non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), acetaminophen (paracetamol) or any other analgesic for 3 or more days per week for at least 3 months prior to screening visit
    • Clinical diagnosis of osteoarthritis of knee/hip for minimum 6 month duration prior to screening visit
    • Therapeutic benefit with acetaminophen use with a score of ≥ 1 on 5-point categorical scale
    • Radiological evidence of ≥ Grade 2 osteoarthritis according to Kellgren-Lawrence radiographic criteria
  • Increased WOMAC Pain Subscale score of at least 20 % following untreated run-in period
  • Moderate to moderately-severe self-reported pain on a 5-point categorical scale following untreated run-in period
  • Historical self-reported positive therapeutic benefit with paracetamol use for osteoarthritis pain relief

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of surgery or major trauma to the study joint
  • Clinically significant signs or symptoms of inflammation upon completion of run-in period
  • Required ongoing use of analgesic therapy for other indications, anticoagulants, psychotherapeutic agents, aspirin at daily doses greater than 325 mg, statin-class hypolipidemic agents at doses that have not been stabilized, or other treatments know to interfere with pain perception
  • History of hepatic or renal or liver or biliary disease or gastrointestinal surgery
  • Participants with alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >2 times Upper Limit Normal (2xULN) and bilirubin > 1.5 times Upper Limit Normal (1.5xULN) (However, if direct bilirubin is \<35% and fractioned, isolated bilirubin >1.5xULN is acceptable)
  • Other arthritis type, fibromyalgia or collagen vascular disease or secondary OA of study joint or chronic pain condition
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
960 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Paracetamol 2000 mg twice daily (BID)

    Participants will be instructed to take two active paracetamol 1000 mg SR tablets twice daily (with 10-12 hours between adjacent doses) and two placebo to match paracetamol 665 mg SR tablets thrice daily (with 6-8 hours between adjacent doses) orally with approximately 8 ounces (\~ 240 mL) of water/dose for 12 weeks.

    Drug: Paracetamol 1000 mg SR tablets

  • Active comparator
    Paracetamol 1330 mg thrice daily (TID)

    Participants will be instructed to take two active paracetamol 665 mg SR tablets orally thrice daily (with 6-8 hours between adjacent doses) and two placebo to match paracetamol 1000 mg SR tablets orally twice daily (with 10-12 hours between adjacent doses) orally with approximately 8 ounces (\~ 240 mL) of water/dose for 12 weeks.

    Drug: Paracetamol 665 mg SR tablets

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Participants will be instructed to take two placebo to match paracetamol 1000 mg SR tablets twice daily (with 10-12 hours between adjacent doses) and two placebo to match paracetamol 665 mg SR tablets thrice daily (with 6-8 hours between adjacent doses) orally with approximately 8 ounces (\~ 240 mL) of water/dose for 12 weeks.

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugParacetamol 1000 mg SR tablets

    Two paracetamol 1000 mg SR tablets administered orally two times a day plus two placebo-matched paracetamol 665 mg SR tablets administered orally three times a day for 12 weeks.

  • DrugParacetamol 665 mg SR tablets

    Two paracetamol 665 mg SR tablets administered orally three times a day plus two placebo-matched paracetamol 1000 mg SR tablets administered orally two times a day for 12 weeks.

  • DrugPlacebo

    Two placebo-matched paracetamol 665 mg SR tablets administered orally three times a day plus two placebo-matched paracetamol 1000 mg SR tablets administered orally two times a day for 12 weeks.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time-weighted Mean Change From Baseline in Western Ontario McMaster (WOMAC) Pain Through Week 12 of Treatment

    The WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index is a 24-item questionnaire that assesses pain, physical function, and stiffness in the target joint. WOMAC Pain was measured using visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0mm (no pain) to 100mm (extreme pain) at baseline and at week 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12. Lower values represent a better outcome. At each time point the assessment included 5 WOMAC Pain items: 1-walking on flat, 2-going up down stairs, 3-at night while in bed, 4-sitting or lying; 5-standing upright. Mean WOMAC Pain subscale score was calculated at each visit as the sum of 5 pain category scores divided by 5. Change from baseline was calculated for each visit as the mean WOMAC Pain subscale score minus the mean baseline WOMAC Pain subscale score. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. The time-weighted mean change was calculated as the area under the curve of change from baseline divided by the nominal time of the last on-therapy visit (week 12) from randomization (baseline).

    Time frame: Baseline up to week 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time Weighted Mean Change From Baseline in WOMAC Physical Function Through Week 12 of Treatment

    The WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index is a 24-item questionnaire that assesses pain, physical function, and stiffness in the target joint. WOMAC Physical function was measured using VAS ranging from 0mm (no difficulty) to 100mm (extreme difficulty) at baseline and at week 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12. Lower values represent a better outcome. At each time point the assessment included 17 WOMAC Physical function categories. Mean WOMAC Physical function was calculated for baseline and each time point (sum of scores for 17 physical function categories divided by 17). Change from baseline was calculated for each visit as mean WOMAC physical function subscale score minus mean baseline WOMAC physical function subscale score. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. The time-weighted mean change was calculated as the area under the curve of change from baseline divided by the nominal time of the last on-therapy visit (week 12) from randomization (baseline).

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12

  2. Time Weighted Mean Change From Baseline in WOMAC Stiffness Through Week 12 of Treatment

    The WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index is a 24-item questionnaire that assesses pain, physical function, and stiffness in the target joint. WOMAC stiffness was measured using VAS ranging from 0mm (no stiffness) to 100mm (maximum stiffness) at baseline and at week 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12. Lower values represent a better outcome. At each time point the assessment included 2 WOMAC stiffness categories: 1- after awakening in the morning; 2- later in the day. Mean WOMAC stiffness was calculated for baseline and each time point (sum of scores for 2 stiffness categories divided by 2). Change from baseline was calculated for each visit as mean WOMAC stiffness subscale score at specific time point minus mean WOMAC stiffness subscale score at baseline. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. The time-weighted mean change from baseline was calculated as area under the curve of change from baseline divided by nominal time of the last on-therapy visit (week 12) from randomization (baseline).

    Time frame: Baseline up to week 12

  3. Time-weighted Mean Change From Baseline in WOMAC Total Index Through Week 12 of Treatment

    The WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index is a 24-item questionnaire that assesses pain, physical function, and stiffness in the target joint. The Total Index Score included the WOMAC Pain Score (5 questions about pain where: 0=no pain to 100=extreme pain), the WOMAC Physical Function score (17 questions about the difficulty of daily activities where: 0=no difficulty to 100=extreme difficulty) and the WOMAC Stiffness Score (2 questions about stiffness where: 0=no stiffness to 100=extreme stiffness). WOMAC Total Index was calculated at baseline and each time point as sum of scores of all 24 WOMAC questions divided by 2400, ranging from 0 (no pain/difficulty/stiffness) to 1 (extreme pain/ difficulty/stiffness). Change from baseline was calculated as WOMAC Total Index at specific time point minus WOMAC Total Index at baseline. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline up to week 12

  4. Mean Change From Baseline in Global Patient Assessment of Arthritis (GPAOA)

    Participants performed an instantaneous GPAOA via a 0-100mm VAS, ranging from 0 (best ever) to 100 (worst ever) with respect to "With respect to your arthritis condition, how would you describe yourself now?" GPAOA was calculated periodically during the 12 week treatment period.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12

  5. Number of Participants Classified as Responder

    A participant was considered a "responder" if his/her improvement from baseline (change from baseline at week 12) satisfied at least one of the two criteria high' or 'moderate' improvement as follows:- High improvement: 50% improvement from baseline in the last available WOMAC pain score or 60% improvement from baseline in the last available WOMAC physical function score. Moderate improvement: Fulfills two out of three criteria: 30% improvement from baseline in the last available WOMAC Pain score, 20% improvement from baseline in the last available WOMAC Physical Function score, 25% improvement from baseline in the last available GPAOA.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

  6. Mean Change From Baseline in Daily Pain, Daily Stiffness and Pain/Stiffness (Composite) at Week 12

    Participants assessed their daily pain and stiffness each morning (upon awakening) during the 12-week treatment period using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), ranging from 0 (no pain / no stiffness) to 10 (extreme pain / extreme stiffness). Composite daily pain/stiffness score was calculated as sum of scores of pain and stiffness each morning divided by 2, ranging from 0 (no pain/stiffness) to 10 (extreme pain/stiffness). The mean of pain, mean of stiffness, and mean pain /stiffness composite score was calculated. Change from baseline was calculated as the difference between Daily Pain, stiffness and composite score each morning with that at baseline and was presented per week. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

  7. Mean Number of Rescue Medication Pills Taken Per Day up to 12 Weeks

    Participants recorded use of rescue medication daily in their patient diary. The mean number of doses of rescue medications taken per day during the 12-week treatment period was calculated.

    Time frame: every day up to 12 weeks

  8. Mean Change From Baseline in Chronic Pain Sleep Inventory (CPSI)

    Chronic Pain Sleep Inventory (CPSI) was assessed, based on the three questions: CPSI-1-'Trouble falling asleep': How often the participant had trouble falling asleep? , CPSI-3-'Awakening due to pain at night': How often the subject was awakened by pain during the night, CPSI-4- Awakening due to pain in the morning': How often the participant was awakened by pain in the morning? The participants responded to these questions via 0-100mm VAS, ranging from 0 (never) to 100 (always). Sleep problem index (SPI) was calculated as mean of these three CPSI questions, ranging from 0 (never affected by pain during sleep) to 100 (always affected by pain during sleep).

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12

  9. Patient Global Assessment of Response to Therapy (PGART)

    The PGART is a global assessment of the participant's response to therapy, was measured using on a 5 point Likert scale as follows: 0=None (no good at all, ineffective), 1= Poor (some effect, but unsatisfactory), 2= Fair (reasonable effect, but could be better), 3= Good (satisfactory effect with occasional episodes of pain and/or stiffness), 4= Excellent (ideal response, virtually pain-free). Mean PGART scores from 5 point Likert scale was calculated periodically (at Week 4, Week 8, Week 12) for the 12 week treatment period.

    Time frame: Week 4, Week 8, Week 12

07

Results

Posted Apr 7, 2017

Participant flow

This study was conducted in 57 centers in United States.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneParacetamol 2000 mg Twice Daily (BID)Paracetamol 1330 mg Thrice Daily (TID)Placebo
Started235236237
Safety population234236237
Completed200193196
Not completed354341
Withdrew: Did not meet the study criteria220
Withdrew: Adverse event7158
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up332
Withdrew: Protocol violation123
Withdrew: Withdrawal of consent141617
Withdrew: Other001
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy120
Withdrew: Subject has border line pregnancy test100
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject314
Withdrew: Sponsor decision111
Withdrew: Protocol deviation100
Withdrew: Non-compliance102
Withdrew: Physician decision001
Withdrew: Medical monitor discretion001
Withdrew: Participant taking another medication001
Withdrew: Serious adverse event010

Outcome measures

PrimaryTime-weighted Mean Change From Baseline in Western Ontario McMaster (WOMAC) Pain Through Week 12 of Treatment

The WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index is a 24-item questionnaire that assesses pain, physical function, and stiffness in the target joint. WOMAC Pain was measured using visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0mm (no pain) to 100mm (extreme pain) at baseline and at week 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12. Lower values represent a better outcome. At each time point the assessment included 5 WOMAC Pain items: 1-walking on flat, 2-going up down stairs, 3-at night while in bed, 4-sitting or lying; 5-standing upright. Mean WOMAC Pain subscale score was calculated at each visit as the sum of 5 pain category scores divided by 5. Change from baseline was calculated for each visit as the mean WOMAC Pain subscale score minus the mean baseline WOMAC Pain subscale score. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. The time-weighted mean change was calculated as the area under the curve of change from baseline divided by the nominal time of the last on-therapy visit (week 12) from randomization (baseline).

Time frame:
Baseline up to week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · millimeter(mm)
Time-weighted Mean Change From Baseline in Western Ontario McMaster (WOMAC) Pain Through Week 12 of Treatment
millimeter(mm)Paracetamol 2000 mg Twice Daily (BID)Paracetamol 1330 mg Thrice Daily (TID)Placebo
Time-weighted Mean Change From Baseline in Western Ontario McMaster (WOMAC) Pain Through Week 12 of Treatment-28.25 ± 1.697-25.89 ± 1.714-25.74 ± 1.713
Statistical analysis
  • Paracetamol 2000 mg Twice Daily (BID) vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.1626 · Ls mean difference: -2.51 · 95% CI -6.037 to 1.016LS treatment means from mixed model analysis of covariance with treatment, target joint and center pools as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate.
  • Paracetamol 2000 mg Twice Daily (BID) vs Paracetamol 1330 mg Thrice Daily (TID) · ANCOVA · Ls mean difference: -2.36 · 95% CI -5.894 to 1.166LS treatment means from mixed model analysis of covariance with treatment, target joint and center pools as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate.
  • Paracetamol 1330 mg Thrice Daily (TID) vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.9352 · Ls mean difference: -0.15 · 95% CI -3.687 to 3.394LS treatment means from mixed model analysis of covariance with treatment, target joint and center pools as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate.
SecondaryTime Weighted Mean Change From Baseline in WOMAC Physical Function Through Week 12 of Treatment

The WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index is a 24-item questionnaire that assesses pain, physical function, and stiffness in the target joint. WOMAC Physical function was measured using VAS ranging from 0mm (no difficulty) to 100mm (extreme difficulty) at baseline and at week 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12. Lower values represent a better outcome. At each time point the assessment included 17 WOMAC Physical function categories. Mean WOMAC Physical function was calculated for baseline and each time point (sum of scores for 17 physical function categories divided by 17). Change from baseline was calculated for each visit as mean WOMAC physical function subscale score minus mean baseline WOMAC physical function subscale score. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. The time-weighted mean change was calculated as the area under the curve of change from baseline divided by the nominal time of the last on-therapy visit (week 12) from randomization (baseline).

Time frame:
Baseline up to Week 12
Reported as:
Mean · mm
Time Weighted Mean Change From Baseline in WOMAC Physical Function Through Week 12 of Treatment
mmParacetamol 2000 mg Twice Daily (BID)Paracetamol 1330 mg Thrice Daily (TID)Placebo
Time Weighted Mean Change From Baseline in WOMAC Physical Function Through Week 12 of Treatment-28.24 ± 21.341-26.23 ± 22.028-26.68 ± 20.137
SecondaryTime Weighted Mean Change From Baseline in WOMAC Stiffness Through Week 12 of Treatment

The WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index is a 24-item questionnaire that assesses pain, physical function, and stiffness in the target joint. WOMAC stiffness was measured using VAS ranging from 0mm (no stiffness) to 100mm (maximum stiffness) at baseline and at week 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12. Lower values represent a better outcome. At each time point the assessment included 2 WOMAC stiffness categories: 1- after awakening in the morning; 2- later in the day. Mean WOMAC stiffness was calculated for baseline and each time point (sum of scores for 2 stiffness categories divided by 2). Change from baseline was calculated for each visit as mean WOMAC stiffness subscale score at specific time point minus mean WOMAC stiffness subscale score at baseline. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. The time-weighted mean change from baseline was calculated as area under the curve of change from baseline divided by nominal time of the last on-therapy visit (week 12) from randomization (baseline).

Time frame:
Baseline up to week 12
Reported as:
Mean · mm
Time Weighted Mean Change From Baseline in WOMAC Stiffness Through Week 12 of Treatment
mmParacetamol 2000 mg Twice Daily (BID)Paracetamol 1330 mg Thrice Daily (TID)Placebo
Time Weighted Mean Change From Baseline in WOMAC Stiffness Through Week 12 of Treatment-27.68 ± 21.579-25.61 ± 22.238-26.16 ± 21.554
SecondaryTime-weighted Mean Change From Baseline in WOMAC Total Index Through Week 12 of Treatment

The WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index is a 24-item questionnaire that assesses pain, physical function, and stiffness in the target joint. The Total Index Score included the WOMAC Pain Score (5 questions about pain where: 0=no pain to 100=extreme pain), the WOMAC Physical Function score (17 questions about the difficulty of daily activities where: 0=no difficulty to 100=extreme difficulty) and the WOMAC Stiffness Score (2 questions about stiffness where: 0=no stiffness to 100=extreme stiffness). WOMAC Total Index was calculated at baseline and each time point as sum of scores of all 24 WOMAC questions divided by 2400, ranging from 0 (no pain/difficulty/stiffness) to 1 (extreme pain/ difficulty/stiffness). Change from baseline was calculated as WOMAC Total Index at specific time point minus WOMAC Total Index at baseline. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline up to week 12
Reported as:
Mean · mm
Time-weighted Mean Change From Baseline in WOMAC Total Index Through Week 12 of Treatment
mmParacetamol 2000 mg Twice Daily (BID)Paracetamol 1330 mg Thrice Daily (TID)Placebo
Time-weighted Mean Change From Baseline in WOMAC Total Index Through Week 12 of Treatment-0.28 ± 0.209-0.26 ± 0.217-0.27 ± 0.200
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Global Patient Assessment of Arthritis (GPAOA)

Participants performed an instantaneous GPAOA via a 0-100mm VAS, ranging from 0 (best ever) to 100 (worst ever) with respect to "With respect to your arthritis condition, how would you describe yourself now?" GPAOA was calculated periodically during the 12 week treatment period.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
Reported as:
Mean · mm
Mean Change From Baseline in Global Patient Assessment of Arthritis (GPAOA)
mmParacetamol 2000 mg Twice Daily (BID)Paracetamol 1330 mg Thrice Daily (TID)Placebo
At Baseline68.23 ± 16.96569.20 ± 16.60769.79 ± 16.734
At Week 439.34 ± 20.60541.46 ± 22.33042.93 ± 21.856
Change from baseline at Week 4-29.02 ± 22.343-27.78 ± 26.398-26.83 ± 24.229
At Week 836.08 ± 22.66237.62 ± 23.52339.09 ± 21.858
Change from baseline at Week 8-32.51 ± 24.429-31.15 ± 28.064-31.00 ± 23.649
At Week 1232.41 ± 23.73736.04 ± 23.84835.44 ± 20.546
Change from baseline at Week 12-36.15 ± 26.192-33.04 ± 29.547-34.31 ± 25.521
SecondaryNumber of Participants Classified as Responder

A participant was considered a "responder" if his/her improvement from baseline (change from baseline at week 12) satisfied at least one of the two criteria high' or 'moderate' improvement as follows:- High improvement: 50% improvement from baseline in the last available WOMAC pain score or 60% improvement from baseline in the last available WOMAC physical function score. Moderate improvement: Fulfills two out of three criteria: 30% improvement from baseline in the last available WOMAC Pain score, 20% improvement from baseline in the last available WOMAC Physical Function score, 25% improvement from baseline in the last available GPAOA.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 12
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants Classified as Responder
participantsParacetamol 2000 mg Twice Daily (BID)Paracetamol 1330 mg Thrice Daily (TID)Placebo
Number of Participants Classified as Responder157148159
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Daily Pain, Daily Stiffness and Pain/Stiffness (Composite) at Week 12

Participants assessed their daily pain and stiffness each morning (upon awakening) during the 12-week treatment period using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), ranging from 0 (no pain / no stiffness) to 10 (extreme pain / extreme stiffness). Composite daily pain/stiffness score was calculated as sum of scores of pain and stiffness each morning divided by 2, ranging from 0 (no pain/stiffness) to 10 (extreme pain/stiffness). The mean of pain, mean of stiffness, and mean pain /stiffness composite score was calculated. Change from baseline was calculated as the difference between Daily Pain, stiffness and composite score each morning with that at baseline and was presented per week. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 12
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline in Daily Pain, Daily Stiffness and Pain/Stiffness (Composite) at Week 12
score on a scaleParacetamol 2000 mg Twice Daily (BID)Paracetamol 1330 mg Thrice Daily (TID)Placebo
Pain at Baseline (n= 224, 225, 227)6.39 ± 1.9026.27 ± 1.9426.63 ± 1.774
Pain at Week 12(n= 176, 175, 177)3.80 ± 2.4543.80 ± 2.1973.82 ± 2.056
Pain, Change at Week 12 (n= 176, 175, 177)-2.54 ± 2.301-2.49 ± 2.457-2.91 ± 2.442
Stiffness at Baseline (n= 224, 225, 227)6.20 ± 2.0156.13 ± 1.9086.38 ± 1.842
Stiffness at Week 12(n= 176, 175, 177)3.56 ± 2.3833.63 ± 2.2463.72 ± 2.145
Stiffness, Change at Week 12(n= 176, 175, 177-2.56 ± 2.227-2.44 ± 2.361-2.76 ± 2.500
Composite at Baseline (n= 224, 225, 227)6.30 ± 1.8836.20 ± 1.8176.51 ± 1.729
Composite at Week 12(n= 176, 175, 177)3.68 ± 2.3613.71 ± 2.1503.77 ± 2.043
Composite, Change at Week 12(n= 176, 175, 177-2.55 ± 2.209-2.46 ± 2.347-2.83 ± 2.410
SecondaryMean Number of Rescue Medication Pills Taken Per Day up to 12 Weeks

Participants recorded use of rescue medication daily in their patient diary. The mean number of doses of rescue medications taken per day during the 12-week treatment period was calculated.

Time frame:
every day up to 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · number of rescue medication pills/day
Mean Number of Rescue Medication Pills Taken Per Day up to 12 Weeks
number of rescue medication pills/dayParacetamol 2000 mg Twice Daily (BID)Paracetamol 1330 mg Thrice Daily (TID)Placebo
Mean Number of Rescue Medication Pills Taken Per Day up to 12 Weeks0.356 ± 1.79100.200 ± 0.80520.337 ± 1.1254
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Chronic Pain Sleep Inventory (CPSI)

Chronic Pain Sleep Inventory (CPSI) was assessed, based on the three questions: CPSI-1-'Trouble falling asleep': How often the participant had trouble falling asleep? , CPSI-3-'Awakening due to pain at night': How often the subject was awakened by pain during the night, CPSI-4- Awakening due to pain in the morning': How often the participant was awakened by pain in the morning? The participants responded to these questions via 0-100mm VAS, ranging from 0 (never) to 100 (always). Sleep problem index (SPI) was calculated as mean of these three CPSI questions, ranging from 0 (never affected by pain during sleep) to 100 (always affected by pain during sleep).

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
Reported as:
Mean · mm
Mean Change From Baseline in Chronic Pain Sleep Inventory (CPSI)
mmParacetamol 2000 mg Twice Daily (BID)Paracetamol 1330 mg Thrice Daily (TID)Placebo
At Baseline, CPSI-160.40 ± 26.08957.77 ± 27.70561.30 ± 25.500
At Baseline, CPSI-359.21 ± 26.98057.19 ± 28.82960.50 ± 25.532
At Baseline, CPSI-458.49 ± 27.75956.94 ± 28.83461.30 ± 25.773
At Baseline, Sleep Problems Index59.36 ± 25.88657.26 ± 27.38461.04 ± 24.156
At Week 4, CPSI-132.32 ± 25.39629.23 ± 26.71834.01 ± 24.701
At Week 4, Change in CPSI-1-27.87 ± 24.563-27.61 ± 28.248-27.44 ± 26.746
At Week 4, CPSI-332.54 ± 26.43728.94 ± 27.23232.75 ± 24.833
At Week 4, Change in CPSI-3-26.63 ± 25.621-27.51 ± 28.497-27.69 ± 26.257
At Week 4, CPSI-431.70 ± 25.66728.85 ± 26.36533.80 ± 25.749
At Week 4, Change in CPSI-4-26.55 ± 25.230-27.52 ± 28.135-27.47 ± 27.265
At Week 4, Sleep Problems Index32.16 ± 24.84528.96 ± 26.10233.52 ± 24.004
At Week 4, Change in Sleep Problems Index-27.04 ± 23.458-27.59 ± 26.860-27.53 ± 24.930
At Week 8, CPSI-130.53 ± 26.67229.22 ± 26.46830.84 ± 24.277
At Week 8, Change in CPSI-1-29.98 ± 26.601-27.45 ± 28.842-31.34 ± 25.290
At Week 8, CPSI-330.25 ± 27.32929.45 ± 27.28629.71 ± 24.478
At Week 8, Change at CPSI-3-29.16 ± 27.321-26.91 ± 28.210-30.83 ± 25.892
At Week 8, CPSI-430.33 ± 26.85629.12 ± 27.44431.02 ± 24.625
At Week 8, Change at CPSI-4-28.19 ± 27.359-26.78 ± 29.961-30.11 ± 25.874
At Week 8, Sleep Problems Index30.33 ± 26.20629.20 ± 26.53330.50 ± 23.868
At Week 8, Change in Sleep Problems Index-29.15 ± 25.838-27.11 ± 27.784-30.78 ± 24.315
At Week 12, CPSI-126.73 ± 25.30226.90 ± 25.28827.64 ± 21.977
At Week 12, Change in CPSI-1-33.12 ± 27.859-30.17 ± 30.532-34.43 ± 25.975
At Week 12, CPSI-326.95 ± 25.12426.63 ± 25.68427.42 ± 21.827
At Week 12, Change in CPSI-3-32.23 ± 29.228-29.99 ± 29.859-33.01 ± 27.116
At Week 12, CPSI-427.26 ± 25.88726.85 ± 25.81227.79 ± 22.581
At Week 12, Change in CPSI-4-30.90 ± 29.052-29.73 ± 30.967-32.97 ± 27.357
At Week 12, Sleep Problems Index26.96 ± 24.70926.72 ± 25.13527.61 ± 21.593
At Week 12, Change in Sleep Problems Index-32.11 ± 27.489-30.03 ± 29.275-33.48 ± 25.485
SecondaryPatient Global Assessment of Response to Therapy (PGART)

The PGART is a global assessment of the participant's response to therapy, was measured using on a 5 point Likert scale as follows: 0=None (no good at all, ineffective), 1= Poor (some effect, but unsatisfactory), 2= Fair (reasonable effect, but could be better), 3= Good (satisfactory effect with occasional episodes of pain and/or stiffness), 4= Excellent (ideal response, virtually pain-free). Mean PGART scores from 5 point Likert scale was calculated periodically (at Week 4, Week 8, Week 12) for the 12 week treatment period.

Time frame:
Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Patient Global Assessment of Response to Therapy (PGART)
score on a scaleParacetamol 2000 mg Twice Daily (BID)Paracetamol 1330 mg Thrice Daily (TID)Placebo
At Week 4 (n=197, 188, 202)2.50 ± 0.8672.43 ± 0.8712.25 ± 0.900
At Week 8(n=196, 184, 192)2.58 ± 0.8522.40 ± 0.9982.44 ± 0.958
At Week 12(n=189, 182, 181)2.62 ± 0.8702.46 ± 1.0222.43 ± 1.045

Adverse events

Collected over throughout the study completion (up to 408 days). Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Paracetamol 2000 mg Twice Daily (BID)—4/234 (1.7%)67/234 (28.6%)
Paracetamol 1330 mg Thrice Daily (TID)—5/236 (2.1%)69/236 (29.2%)
Placebo—0/237 (0%)51/237 (21.5%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventParacetamol 2000 mg Twice Daily (BID)Paracetamol 1330 mg Thrice Daily (TID)Placebo
CHEST PAINGeneral disorders1/2340/2360/237
ABDOMINAL PAINGastrointestinal disorders1/2340/2360/237
DEHYDRATIONMetabolism and nutrition disorders1/2340/2360/237
COLON CANCERNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/2340/2360/237
OESOPHAGEAL CARCINOMANeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/2341/2360/237
CHOLELITHIASISHepatobiliary disorders0/2341/2360/237
GUN SHOT WOUNDInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/2341/2360/237
MULTIPLE INJURIESInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/2341/2360/237
CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENTNervous system disorders0/2341/2360/237
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 118
Most frequent other events
EventParacetamol 2000 mg Twice Daily (BID)Paracetamol 1330 mg Thrice Daily (TID)Placebo
NAUSEAGastrointestinal disorders8/2345/2364/237
ALANINE AMINOTRANSFERASE INCREASEDInvestigations7/2344/2360/237
DIARRHOEAGastrointestinal disorders6/2347/2362/237
GASTROENTERITISInfections and infestations6/2341/2361/237
HYPERTENSIONVascular disorders6/2342/2361/237
CONSTIPATIONGastrointestinal disorders1/2346/2362/237
UPPER RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTIONInfections and infestations5/2343/2362/237
HEADACHENervous system disorders5/2345/2365/237
FLATULENCEGastrointestinal disorders4/2340/2361/237
ABDOMINAL DISCOMFORTGastrointestinal disorders2/2342/2364/237

Baseline characteristics

Baseline data are displayed for the safety population; i.e. for the population of all treated participants. One participant was randomized but did not receive any treatment.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Paracetamol 2000 mg Twice Daily (BID)Paracetamol 1330 mg Thrice Daily (TID)PlaceboTotal
Mean60.27 ± 8.54460.47 ± 8.41061.46 ± 8.18760.73 ± 8.385
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Paracetamol 2000 mg Twice Daily (BID)Paracetamol 1330 mg Thrice Daily (TID)PlaceboTotal
Female146147150443
Male888987264
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(number of participants)Paracetamol 2000 mg Twice Daily (BID)Paracetamol 1330 mg Thrice Daily (TID)PlaceboTotal
Hispanic or Latino778195253
Not Hispanic or Latino157155142454
08

Study locations

56 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Birmingham, Alabama 35242, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Huntsville, Alabama 35801, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Chandler, Arizona 85224, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Tucson, Arizona 85712, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Tucson, Arizona 85745, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Anaheim, California 92801, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Carmichael, California 95608, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Fresno, California 93702, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    North Hollywood, California 91606-1559, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    San Diego, California 92103, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Brandon, Florida 33511, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Clearwater, Florida 33756, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Edgewater, Florida 32132, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Hialeah, Florida 33012, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Hialeah, Florida 33016, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Homestead, Florida 33030, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Jupiter, Florida 33458, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Miami, Florida 33155, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Miami, Florida 33173, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Miami, Florida 33185, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Oldsmar, Florida 34677, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Orlando, Florida 32806, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Oviedo, Florida 32765, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Port Orange, Florida 32127, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    South Miami, Florida 33143, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    West Palm Beach, Florida 33409, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Savannah, Georgia 31406, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Chicago, Illinois 60640, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Evanston, Illinois 60201, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Prairie Village, Kansas 66206, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Wichita, Kansas 67203, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Crestview Hills, Kentucky 41017, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    New Orleans, Louisiana 70115, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Watertown, Massachusetts 02472, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63139, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Bellevue, Nebraska 68005, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Omaha, Nebraska 68134, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Las Vegas, Nevada 89119, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Brooklyn, New York 11230, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Buffalo, New York 14223, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Hartsdale, New York, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Hickory, North Carolina 28601, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45227, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45242, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45255, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Dayton, Ohio 45424, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Toledo, Ohio 43623, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Oklahoma, Oklahoma 73119, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Altoona, Pennsylvania 16602, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Duncansville, Pennsylvania 16635, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Smithfield, Pennsylvania 15478, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Mount Pleasant, South Carolina 29464, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Dallas, Texas 75230, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Plano, Texas 75075, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    San Antonio, Texas 78209, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    San Antonio, Texas 78229, United States
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 7, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02311881
Lead sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 9, 2014
Start date
Jan 2015
Primary completion
Feb 2016
Completion
Feb 2016
Results posted
Apr 7, 2017
Last update
Apr 7, 2017

Study contacts

GSK Clinical Trials
study director · GlaxoSmithKline

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion