ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02311751Updated Mar 6, 2019

rTMS for Executive Function Deficits in Autism Spectrum Disorder

An interventional study of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Autism Spectrum Disorder, sponsored by Centre for Addiction and Mental Health. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 16 Years to 35 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-03-06.

Sponsored by Centre for Addiction and Mental Health · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
16 Years to 35 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In this study, the investigators will be examining the effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on executive function deficits in individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Half of the participants will be chosen by chance to receive active rTMS stimulation while half will be chosen by chance to receive sham rTMS. Sham rTMS will feel the same as active rTMS only there will be no direct brain stimulation. This is necessary to ensure that active rTMS is efficacious in the enhancement of executive function in individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Based on results from a recently published pilot study, the investigators propose that active rTMS treatment will result in a significant improvement in working memory performance compared to sham rTMS treatment.

Read the detailed description

This study is a randomized, double blind, sham controlled study to evaluate the efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) as a treatment for executive function deficits in individuals with autism spectrum disorder between 16 and 25 years of age. The study duration is approximately 3 months, with the rTMS sessions lasting for 4 weeks, 5 times a week, for about 1 hour each. Several scales will be used to assess for symptom severity and adaptive functioning. Cognition will be assessed using a validated battery.

This study also involves a type of brain imaging known as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at the beginning and at the end of the 4 weeks of daily rTMS to better understand the effects of rTMS on brain structure and function. Investigators will measure the size and connections of different parts of the brain to assess brain structure and blood flow while participants are completing some basic tasks to asses brain function.

02

Conditions studied

  • Autism Spectrum Disorder

Keywords

  • Autism Spectrum Disorder
  • Executive Function
  • rTMS (Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation)
  • MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging)
  • Healthy Subjects
03

In context

Autism Spectrum Disorder

1,755 studies on the registry are indexed under Autism Spectrum Disorder; 507 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 40 is below the median of 52 across 1,391 interventional studies indexed under Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Browse Autism Spectrum Disorder studies →

Lead sponsor

Centre for Addiction and Mental Health is the lead sponsor of 339 studies on the registry; 51 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years to 35 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD):

  • Are fluent in the English language
  • Have a diagnosis of high functioning ASD (HF-ASD) (i.e., are verbal with an Intelligence Quotient (IQ) ≥ 70)
  • Are competent to consent based on the subjects' ability to provide a spontaneous narrative description of the key elements of the study
  • Are clinically stable as determined by their treating physician, with no medication changes over the past 4 weeks

Exclusion Criteria (ASD):

  • Have a history of substance abuse or dependence in the last 6 months or have a positive urine toxicology screen
  • Have a concomitant major medical or neurologic illness
  • Have had a seizure in the past, or have a first-degree relative with epilepsy
  • Have an abnormal clinical EEG
  • Are pregnant or likely to get pregnant during the next 4 weeks
  • Are clinically unstable
  • Are on benzodiazepines or anticonvulsant medication
  • Have a history of rTMS treatment.

Inclusion Criteria (Healthy Controls):

  • Are fluent in the English language
  • Competent to consent

Exclusion Criteria (Healthy Controls):

  • Have a history of substance abuse or dependence in the last 6 months or have a positive urine toxicology screen
  • Have a major medical or neurologic illness
  • Have a diagnosed learning disorder or impaired academic or adaptive functioning on history
  • Are pregnant
  • Have an IQ \< 80
  • Have a psychiatric diagnosis on diagnostic interview assessments.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Active rTMS

    Active treatment will be delivered at an intensity that is 90% of the resting motor threshold (RMT). Stimulation will be delivered at 20 Hz with 25 simulation trains of 30 stimuli each (i.e., 750 stimuli) and an intertrain interval of 30 sec. Treatment will be applied in sequential order bilaterally to the left and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). The order of bilateral stimulation (i.e. right then left or left than right) will be held constant for all 20 treatments. Intervention: Device: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

    Device: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

  • Sham comparator
    Sham rTMS

    Sham stimulation will be delivered using the same stimulation parameters and at the site of active treatment, but with only the side-edge resting on the scalp. The coil will be angled 45 degrees way from the skull in a single-wing tilt position. This method produces sound and some somatic sensation (e.g. contraction of scalp muscles) similar to those of active stimulation, but with minimal direct brain effects. Intervention: Device: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

    Device: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Interventions

  • DeviceRepetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

    rTMS is a non-invasive procedure involving the use of magnetic fields to stimulate nerve cells.

    Also known as: MagPro x100 series (Medtronic A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in accuracy on the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) Spatial Working Memory Task

    Specifically the investigators will evaluate the changes in spatial working memory scores before and after rTMS treatment.

    Time frame: Baseline; Post rTMS (4 weeks after baseline); One month follow up ( 4 weeks after post rTMS); 6 month follow up (post rTMS); One year follow up (post rTMS)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in scores on Behaviour Rating Inventory of Executive Functioning (A) (BRIEF) (A)

    Specifically the investigators will evaluate the changes in executive function (EF) scores before and after rTMS treatment.

    Time frame: Baseline; Post rTMS (4 weeks after baseline); One month follow up ( 4 weeks after post rTMS); 6 month follow up (post rTMS); One year follow up (post rTMS)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Centre for Addictions and Mental Health
    Toronto, Ontario M6J 1H4, Canada
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Moxon-Emre I, Daskalakis ZJ, Blumberger DM, Croarkin PE, Lyon RE, Forde NJ, Tani H, Truong P, Lai MC, Desarkar P, Sailasuta N, Szatmari P, Ameis SH. Modulation of Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Glutamate/Glutamine Levels Following Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Young Adults With Autism. Front Neurosci. 2021 Oct 6;15:711542. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.711542. eCollection 2021. PubMed 34690671 ↗
  • Ameis SH, Blumberger DM, Croarkin PE, Mabbott DJ, Lai MC, Desarkar P, Szatmari P, Daskalakis ZJ. Treatment of Executive Function Deficits in autism spectrum disorder with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: A double-blind, sham-controlled, pilot trial. Brain Stimul. 2020 May-Jun;13(3):539-547. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.01.007. Epub 2020 Jan 15. PubMed 32289673 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Oct 2014 to primary completion in May 2018, 43 months.

Of 801 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Autism Spectrum Disorder, half reached primary completion within 25 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 48. This study's 43 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 825 studies reached it within 25 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 47.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 25, 2014
First posted
Dec 8, 2014
StartActual
Oct 2014
Primary completionActual
May 4, 2018
CompletionActual
May 4, 2018
Last update
Mar 6, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 6, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02311751
Collaborators
Academic Health Science Centres
Responsible party
Stephanie Ameis (Clinician Scientist, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 8, 2014
Start date
Oct 2014
Primary completion
May 4, 2018
Completion
May 4, 2018
Last update
Mar 6, 2019

Study contacts

Stephanie H Ameis, M.D., M.S.C
principal investigator · Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion