CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02300519Updated Aug 13, 2015

Thrombin Generation Numerical Models Validation in Haemophilic Case

An observational study in Haemophilia B and Haemophilia A, sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to male participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-08-13.

Sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
40
Ages
18 Years to 45 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

Personalized therapy in haemophilia has not been reached yet. Treatment is substitutive and its doses are only based on the levels of deficient factor VIII (for haemophilia A) or IX (for haemophilia B). The bleeding severity is not only related to the factor deficiency but also to levels of other coagulation factors (e.g. factor X, II, AT or TFPI). It's necessary to take them into account in order to individualize treatments; and Thrombin Generation Assay (TGA) with the CAT method (Calibrated Automated Thrombography) is a good way because it measures the result of the coagulation cascade. TGA on Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) is even closer to physiological conditions than on Platelet Poor Plasma (PPP) because platelet influence is represented. It has already been shown (at least in PPP) that the bleeding tendency in haemophilic patients is usually well correlated to TG. Some TG parameters are used to characterize the individual coagulation phenotype, the most important being the Endogenous Thrombin Potential (ETP) and the Lag Time (LT). A hemorrhagic profile usually provides a longer lag time and / or a lower ETP. However, only few studies tried to determine the influence of each coagulation factor and inhibitor on TG. They were done on Platelet Poor Plasma (PPP) or on lyophilized plasma. So the relation between coagulation factors and the different TG parameters remains to be determined, especially in the haemophilic case. It is possible, experimentally, to find the optimal dose of the factor to be added by measuring TG in samples with different factor VIII or IX concentrations, but this method would be time consuming and expensive, especially because it should be done for each haemophilic patient. A better way consists in using TG numerical models. For a set of initial factor levels they simulate the TG and its associated parameters. It is now essential to validate the existing models, especially in haemophilic cases, in order to see whether they are reliable and can be used in clinical practice afterwards.The objective of this study is to validate thrombin generation numerical models which could predict the factor VIII or IX activity correction to reach a thrombin generation sufficient to avoid bleeding. A comparison between the TG observed in haemophilic patients and the TG predicted by the models is needed to validate the models. In order to define a 'safe' TG i.e. sufficient to avoid bleeding, normal ranges of TG parameters have to be measured.

02

Conditions studied

  • Haemophilia B
  • Haemophilia A

Keywords

  • Haemophilia
  • numerical models
  • thrombin generation
  • volunteers
  • endogenous thrombin potential
03

In context

Hemophilia A

866 studies on the registry are indexed under Hemophilia A; 137 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 40 is below the median of 80 across 314 observational studies indexed under Hemophilia A.

Browse Hemophilia A studies →

Lead sponsor

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne is the lead sponsor of 578 studies on the registry; 128 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

volunteers witch work in CHU Saint-Etienne

Inclusion criteria

  • Signed consent form
  • Age between 18 and 45 years old
  • Male
  • no smoker

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • other clinical research protocol participation during the 3 months before inclusion
  • Personal or familial history of hemorrhagic disease (parents, brothers and sisters
  • Personal history of thrombosis (arterial or venous)
  • Familial history of thrombosis before 45 years old (parents, brothers and sisters)
  • Drug treatments of aspirin or anti-inflammatory type during the week before sampling
  • Surgery the month before sampling
  • Chronic pathology responsible for inflammatory syndrome
  • Infectious episode in course
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Volunteers

    Blood sampling : 1 blood punction of 36.5 ml for each volunteer

    Other: blood sampling

Interventions

  • Otherblood sampling

    Samplings will be taken on 4 citrated S-monovette tubes, 3 citrated tubes and 1 EDTA tube, namely 36.5 ml for each volunteer

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Endogenous Thrombin Potential (ETP) predicted by numerical models

    ETP (i.e. the aera under the thrombin generation curve, nM.min) measured in haemophilic patients is compared to ETP predicted by numerical models.

    Time frame: up to 12 monthes

  2. Lag Time of the thrombin generation curve predicted by numerical models

    Lag time (min) measured in haemophilic patients is compared to the lag time predicted by numerical models

    Time frame: up to 12 monthes

  3. Peak value of the thrombin generation curve predicted by numerical models

    Peak value (nmol thrombin) measured in haemophilic patients is compared to the peak value predicted by numerical models

    Time frame: up to 12 monthes

  4. Time to peak (TTP) of the thrombin generation curve predicted by numerical models

    TTP (min) measured in haemophilic patients is compared to TTP predicted by numerical models

    Time frame: up to 12 monthes

  5. Velocity Index (V) of the thrombin generation curve predicted by numerical models

    Velocity Index measured in haemophilic patients is compared to TTP predicted by numerical models

    Time frame: up to 12 monthes

Secondary outcomes

  1. Endogenous Thrombin Potential (ETP) for volunteers

    ETP (i.e. the aera under the thrombin generation curve, nM.min) is measured by Thromboplastin Generation Tests (TGTs)

    Time frame: day 1

  2. Lag Time of the thrombin generation curve for volunteers

    Lag time (min) of the thrombin generation curve is measured by Thromboplastin Generation Tests (TGTs)

    Time frame: day 1

  3. Peak value of the thrombin generation curve for volunteers

    Peak value of the thrombin generation curve is measured by Thromboplastin Generation Tests (TGTs)

    Time frame: day 1

  4. Time to peak (TTP) of the thrombin generation curve for volunteers

    TTP of the thrombin generation curve is measured by Thromboplastin Generation Tests (TGTs)

    Time frame: day 1

  5. Velocity Index (V) of the thrombin generation curve for volunteers

    Velocity Index (V) of the thrombin generation curves measured by Thromboplastin Generation Tests (TGTs)

    Time frame: day 1

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Chu Saint-Etienne
    Saint-Etienne, 42055, France
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 13, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02300519
Lead sponsor
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne
Collaborators
Pfizer, Ecole Normale Supérieure des Mines de Saint-Etienne
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 25, 2014
Start date
Mar 2015
Primary completion
Jul 2015
Completion
Jul 2015
Last update
Aug 13, 2015

Study contacts

Brigitte TARDY-PONCET, MD
principal investigator · CHU SAINT-ETIENNE

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion