ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02294487Updated Oct 3, 2024

Study of the Immune Response After Vaccination in Multiple Myeloma Patients

An observational study in Multiple Myeloma, Myeloma, Multiple and Myeloma-Multiple, sponsored by Wake Forest University Health Sciences. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 50 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-10-03.

Sponsored by Wake Forest University Health Sciences · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
19
Ages
50 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will collect blood samples from healthy volunteers and volunteers with multiple myeloma who are going to get the seasonal flu, pneumonia, haemophilus influenzae B (HIB), and/or meningococcus vaccines.

The main goal of the study is to start to identify differences in the immune response between multiple myeloma patients and people who don't have multiple myeloma. We hope this will provide important information about the best way and time to vaccinate multiple myeloma patients to flu, pneumonia, haemophilus influenzae B (HIB), and/or meningococcus .

Read the detailed description

This study will consist of a prospective blood sample collection to gather baseline data to confirm antibody protection from vaccines in the Aurora Health Care multiple myeloma (MM) patients.

The overall goal of this study is to obtain a normative dataset for MM patients and non-MM control populations as well as determining baseline IgG levels to seasonal influenza A, influenza B, pneumococcal polysaccharide, and tetanus toxoid and confirmation of antibody protection from vaccines with assays based upon WHO standards of detection.

This is part of a series of studies designed to provide important information about the best way and time to vaccinate MM patients to flu, pneumonia, haemophilus influenzae B (HIB), and/or meningococcus and to gather additional information about MM and immune function.

02

Conditions studied

  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Myeloma, Multiple
  • Myeloma-Multiple

Keywords

  • influenza
  • pneumococcal
  • pneumonia
  • vaccine
  • immunization
  • #CAImmun
  • Immuno-oncology
  • supportive care
  • vaccination
  • meningococcal
  • HIB
03

In context

Multiple Myeloma

3,712 studies on the registry are indexed under Multiple Myeloma; 752 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 19 is below the median of 145 across 482 observational studies indexed under Multiple Myeloma.

Browse Multiple Myeloma studies →

Lead sponsor

Wake Forest University Health Sciences is the lead sponsor of 1,345 studies on the registry; 198 are open to participants now.

Of its 328 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 249 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Multiple myeloma patients and age and sex matched control subjects over 50 who are already planning to have the flu and/or pneumonia vaccine as part of normal care. The control group is important for comparison of age-adjusted changes in immune responses to vaccination.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • 50 years old or over
  • planning on getting the seasonal flu and/or pneumonia vaccine as part of normal care
  • have multiple myeloma, or don't have multiple myeloma and want to serve as a health control

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

- do not meet inclusion criteria

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
19 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Subjects

    Individuals over 50 who are going to get the seasonal flu vaccine, pneumococcal, HIB, and/or meningococcal vaccination and either have multiple myeloma or do not have multiple myeloma.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Evaluate composition of T cells, B cells, NK cell and monocyte populations from pre-vaccination though 24 weeks post-vaccination

    Evaluate composition of T cells, B cells, NK cell and monocyte populations to identify immune suppression. Multiparameter flow cytometer will be used to evaluate T cells, B cells, and NK cell and monocyte populations using differentiation markers for the cell populations in subjects at five time points, baseline to 24 weeks.

    Time frame: 24 weeks

  2. Measure of interferon -gamma in activated T cells from pre-vaccination though 24 weeks post-vaccination

    Measure of interferon -gamma in activated T cells to evaluate T cell function. An intracellular interferon-gamma assay will be performed by incubating peripheral blood mononuclear cells overnight with an influenza antigen and evaluating the level of an intracellular interferon-y assay will be performed by incubating peripheral blood mononuclear cells overnight with an influenza antigen and evaluating the level of interferon -gamma in activated T cells. Vaccination should increase numbers of T cells producing interferon -gamma. Vaccination should increase numbers of T cells producing interferon -gamma.This evaluation will be done using blood drawn at 5 time points, including pre-vaccination and post vaccination at 2, 4, 12 and 24 weeks.

    Time frame: 24 weeks

  3. Measure of antigen specific B cells from pre-vaccination though 24 weeks post-vaccination

    Measure of antigen specific B cells to determine B cell responsiveness to the pneumococcal vaccine. Polysaccharides from various pathogenic strains will be conjugated to a fluorescent molecule such as fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC). These constructs will be combined with B cell markers to evaluate pneumococcal specific B cells pre- and post-vaccination. If vaccination is successful, there should be an increase in antigen specific B cells.

    Time frame: 24 weeks

  4. Total PnC-IgG, IgG2, PnC-IgG1 and IgG3 levels from pre-vaccination though 24 weeks post-vaccination

    Total PnC-IgG levels and IgG2 levels will be determined by EIA using commercially available, FDA cleared kits (The Binding Site). PnC-IgG1 and IgG3 levels will be measured by ELISA using commercially available kits that we will modify in-house with optimized reagents for detection of IgG1 and IgG3 isotopes, standardized against a reference serum. This evaluation will be done using blood drawn at 5 time points, including pre-vaccination and post vaccination at 2, 4, 12 and 24 weeks.

    Time frame: 24 weeks

  5. Evaluate both FcyRIIa and FcyRIII polymorphisms

    Effectiveness of pneumococcal vaccines has an association with FcyRIIa that is expressed predominantly on phagocytic cells such as neutrophils and macrophages. There are no reports that suggest polymorphisms in FcyRIII are associated with improved efficacy of pneumococcal vaccines. However, therapeutic antibodies for the treatment of cancer such as rituximab have demonstrated that there is a survival advantage of individuals that have the FcyRIIa (H131R) and FcyRIII (V158F) polymorphisms. By evaluating both FcyRIIa and FcyRIII we can position ourselves to evaluate the use of vaccines and therapeutics in cancer.

    Time frame: up to 24 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Assess outcomes of MM patients after vaccination

    Long term outcomes data will be collected from the medical record of MM patients in order to access the impact of vaccination on health outcomes.

    Time frame: up to 10 years

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Aurora Health Care
    Milwaukee, Wisconsin 43233, United States
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Dec 2014 to primary completion in Jan 2016, 12 months.

Of 175 non-industry observational studies under Multiple Myeloma, half reached primary completion within 70 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 33. This study's 12 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 238 studies reached it within 61 months; a quarter within 31 and three quarters within 126.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 21, 2014
First posted
Nov 19, 2014
StartActual
Dec 30, 2014
Primary completionActual
Jan 28, 2016
CompletionActual
Aug 10, 2017
Last update
Oct 3, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 3, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02294487
Collaborators
Vince Lombardi Cancer Clinic
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 19, 2014
Start date
Dec 30, 2014
Primary completion
Jan 28, 2016
Completion
Aug 10, 2017
Last update
Oct 3, 2024

Study contacts

Michael Thompson, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion