CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT02282410Updated Nov 4, 2014

Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of ADVATE in the Standard Prophylaxis Treatment of Severe or Moderately Severe Hemophilia A

An interventional study of ADVATE in Hemophilia A, sponsored by The Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School. Status unknown. Open to participants aged 2 Years to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-11-04.

Sponsored by The Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Oct 2014), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
15
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
2 Years to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Based on the successful pioneer work of Dr Nilsson and her colleagues in Sweden that started in the late 1950's, prophylaxis is recommend as the standard of care for boys with severe haemophilia by WHO and World Federation of Hemophilia (WFH). The efficacy and safety of prophylaxis in preventing bleeds and arthropathy in patients with hemophilia has been confirmed in well-designed clinical studies.To keep the factor level above 1%, the standard dosage for patients with severe hemophilia A is 20-40 Units /kg/infusion (average 30 Units /kg) every other day or three times a week. This dosage has a very high consumption of factor, up to 5000-6000 international unit(IU)/kg/year. The high consumption of factor and cost present a major barrier to use the standard prophylaxis in many countries particularly in the developing world.

But after the Recombinant Human Coagulation Factor VIII for injection (ADVATE) Patient Assistance Program(Golden Key) was launched in 24 Apr 2014 in Nanjing China, the affordability of patients was solved and many patients will get more chance to receive standard prophylaxis.

This study is designed to evaluate the Annual Bleeding rate (ABR), joint health outcomes and QoL outcomes in subjects using standard prophylaxis under the conditions of routine practice.

Read the detailed description

Hemophilia A is an X-linked recessive, congenital bleeding disorder caused by deficient or defective coagulation factor VIII (FVIII). The absence or severe reduction of FVIII leads to 'spontaneous' bleeding episodes (occurring primarily in joints, muscles, and less commonly, in soft tissues) and to excessive bleeding following trauma or injury. Estimations based on the WFH's annual global surveys indicate that the number of people with hemophilia in the world is approximately 400,000. [1] China accounts for a quarter of about 100,000.

Currently, based on the successful pioneer work of Dr Nilsson and her colleagues in Sweden that started in the late 1950's, prophylaxis is recommend as the standard of care for boys with severe haemophilia by WHO and WFH. [2] The efficacy and safety of prophylaxis in preventing bleeds and arthropathy in patients with hemophilia has been confirmed in well-designed clinical studies.[3,4,5]To keep the factor level above 1%, the standard dosage for patients with severe hemophilia A is 20-40 Units /kg/infusion (average 30 Units /kg) [6] every other day or three times a week. This dosage has a very high consumption of factor, up to 5000-6000 international unit(IU)/kg/year. [7] The high consumption of factor and cost present a major barrier to use the standard prophylaxis in many countries particularly in the developing world. [8] Many families are looking forward to standard prophylaxis to reducing bleeding episodes, stop or slow the deterioration of joint disease in their sons with severe hemophilia and thus improving their quality of life (QoL). But in China the majority of boys with severe hemophilia A cannot afford the high costs of standard prophylaxis .They can only pay for on-demand treatment or low-dose prophylaxis. But after the Advate Patient Assistance Program(Golden Key) was launched in 24 Apr 2014 in Nanjing China, the affordability of patients was solved and many patients will get more chance to receive standard prophylaxis.

This study is designed to evaluate the Annual Bleeding rate (ABR), joint health outcomes and QoL outcomes in subjects using standard prophylaxis under the conditions of routine practice.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hemophilia A

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • severe hemophilia A
  • moderately severe hemophilia A
  • Recombinant Human Coagulation Factor VIII
  • standard prophylaxis
03

In context

Hemophilia A

866 studies on the registry are indexed under Hemophilia A; 137 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 15 is below the median of 28 across 512 interventional studies indexed under Hemophilia A.

Browse Hemophilia A studies →

Lead sponsor

The Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School is the lead sponsor of 242 studies on the registry; 144 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
2 Years to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Subject has hemophilia A with FVIII≤2 %.
  2. Previously treated patients (PTPs).
  3. Age from 2 to 18 years.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject has known hypersensitivity to the active substance or any of the excipients.
  2. Subject has known allergic reaction to mouse or hamster proteins.
  3. Subject has participated in another clinical study involving an investigational product (IP) or device within 30 days prior to study enrollment or is scheduled to participate in another clinical study involving another FVIII concentrate or device during the course of this study.
  4. Subject is planned, or likely to have surgery during the study period.
  5. Subject has end-stage renal failure or evidence of a severe or uncontrolled systemic disease as judged by the investigator.
  6. Subject has full-blown Acquired Immuno Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS),determined by cluster differentiation antigen 4+ (CD4+) and clinical presentation.
  7. Subject has active hepatic disease (alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels > 5 times the upper limit of normal).
  8. Subject has clinical or laboratory evidence of severe liver impairment including (but not limited to) a recent and persistent international normalized ratio (INR)> 1.4, and/or the presence of splenomegaly and/or significant spider angioma on physical exam, and/or a history of esophageal hemorrhage or documented esophageal varices.
  9. The subject in the opinion of the investigator is unable or unwilling to comply with study protocol
  10. Subject is a family member of the investigator or site staff
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
15 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ADVATE standard prophylaxis

    This study is a prospective, open-label, interventional, multicenter study in a total of 15 PTPs with hemophilia A (FVIII≤2 %).The baseline ABR will be assessed from bleeding log and clinic records from preceding year. Subjects will initially be treated standard prophylaxis(20 - 40 IU/Kg body weight 2-3 times one week with ADVATE for 1 year. Subjects must be prescribed ADVATE by the treating physician. Data will be collected over a period of 2 years from the time of study enrollment. Study visits are to coincide with routinely rescheduled and emergency visits. Available data from these visits shall be transcribed onto the case report forms (CRFs).

    Drug: ADVATE

Interventions

  • DrugADVATE

    The baseline ABR will be assessed from bleeding log and clinic records from preceding year. Subjects will initially be treated standard prophylaxis(20 - 40 IU/Kg body weight 2-3 times one week with ADVATE for 1 year.

    Also known as: Recombinant Human Coagulation Factor VIII for injection

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Annual Bleed Rate (ABR)

    Every 3 months, evaluate the joint bleeding episode and any other bleeding episodes. After 1 year later, sum up all the bleeding and get the ABR.

    Time frame: 3 months up to 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. incidence of new target joints

    Incidence of new target joints.

    Time frame: 3 months

  2. joint health of Pettersson score

    Status of joint health by X-ray using Pettersson scale.

    Time frame: 1 year

  3. magnetic resonance imaging scoring of joint

    Status of joint health by magnetic resonance imaging scoring system.

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS) of joint

    Status of joint health using the Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS)

    Time frame: 3 months

  5. Number of Recombinant Human Coagulation Factor VIII for injection (ADAVTE) units

    Number of ADVATE infusions required for bleed cessation and Number of ADAVTE units required for bleed cessation

    Time frame: 3 months

  6. Qol assessment

    QoL assessment by The Canadian Hemophilia Outcomes-Kids Life Assessment Tool (CHO-KLAT)

    Time frame: 3 months

  7. Inhibitor rate

    Inhibitor rate monitoring: inhibitor will be tested at entry of study, every 3 months and at end of study.

    Time frame: 3 months up to 1 year

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Astermark J, Petrini P, Tengborn L, Schulman S, Ljung R, Berntorp E. Primary prophylaxis in severe haemophilia should be started at an early age but can be individualized. Br J Haematol. 1999 Jun;105(4):1109-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1999.01463.x. PubMed 10554828 ↗
  • Berntorp E, Boulyjenkov V, Brettler D, Chandy M, Jones P, Lee C, Lusher J, Mannucci P, Peak I, Rickard K, et al. Modern treatment of haemophilia. Bull World Health Organ. 1995;73(5):691-701. PubMed 8846496 ↗
  • Manco-Johnson MJ, Abshire TC, Shapiro AD, Riske B, Hacker MR, Kilcoyne R, Ingram JD, Manco-Johnson ML, Funk S, Jacobson L, Valentino LA, Hoots WK, Buchanan GR, DiMichele D, Recht M, Brown D, Leissinger C, Bleak S, Cohen A, Mathew P, Matsunaga A, Medeiros D, Nugent D, Thomas GA, Thompson AA, McRedmond K, Soucie JM, Austin H, Evatt BL. Prophylaxis versus episodic treatment to prevent joint disease in boys with severe hemophilia. N Engl J Med. 2007 Aug 9;357(6):535-44. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa067659. PubMed 17687129 ↗
  • Gringeri A, Lundin B, von Mackensen S, Mantovani L, Mannucci PM; ESPRIT Study Group. A randomized clinical trial of prophylaxis in children with hemophilia A (the ESPRIT Study). J Thromb Haemost. 2011 Apr;9(4):700-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2011.04214.x. PubMed 21255253 ↗
  • Valentino LA, Mamonov V, Hellmann A, Quon DV, Chybicka A, Schroth P, Patrone L, Wong WY; Prophylaxis Study Group. A randomized comparison of two prophylaxis regimens and a paired comparison of on-demand and prophylaxis treatments in hemophilia A management. J Thromb Haemost. 2012 Mar;10(3):359-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2011.04611.x. PubMed 22212248 ↗
  • Srivastava A, Brewer AK, Mauser-Bunschoten EP, Key NS, Kitchen S, Llinas A, Ludlam CA, Mahlangu JN, Mulder K, Poon MC, Street A; Treatment Guidelines Working Group on Behalf of The World Federation Of Hemophilia. Guidelines for the management of hemophilia. Haemophilia. 2013 Jan;19(1):e1-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2012.02909.x. Epub 2012 Jul 6. PubMed 22776238 ↗
  • Nilsson IM, Berntorp E, Lofqvist T, Pettersson H. Twenty-five years' experience of prophylactic treatment in severe haemophilia A and B. J Intern Med. 1992 Jul;232(1):25-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.1992.tb00546.x. PubMed 1640190 ↗
  • Ljung R. Prophylactic therapy in haemophilia. Blood Rev. 2009 Nov;23(6):267-74. doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2009.08.001. Epub 2009 Sep 22. PubMed 19775786 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 4, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02282410
Lead sponsor
The Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School
Responsible party
Jian OUYANG (Director of Hematology-Oncology Department, The Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 4, 2014
Start date
Dec 2014
Primary completion
Dec 2016 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2016 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 4, 2014

Study contacts

Rongfu Zhou, Doctor
Contact
rfzhoucn@163.com
+86 13605142342
Ouyang Jian, Doctor
principal investigator · The Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Nanjing Medical University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Oct 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion