An interventional study of Hysterectomy plus Tubectomy and Hysterectomy in Abdominal Hysterectomy (& Wertheim), sponsored by Gynaecologisch Oncologisch Centrum Zuid. Completed at 5 sites in Netherlands. Open to female participants aged 36 Years to 55 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-05-30.
Sponsored by Gynaecologisch Oncologisch Centrum Zuid · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention
The purpose of this study is to determine whether a tubectomy during hysterectomy for benign gynaecological conditions does not result into a premature menopause.
RATIONALE Recent studies in women at hereditary high risk to develop ovarian cancer indicate that high grade serous carcinomas arise from (ectopic and/or dysplastic) tubal epithelium. Historically, in pre-menopausal women undergoing a hysterectomy for benign indications (such as bleeding disorders, fibroids and adenomyosis) adnexa, including the Fallopian tubes, are left in situ. However, removing the tubes during a hysterectomy potentially prevents the development of serous ovarian carcinomas. Such a simple preventive procedure should avoid serious adverse effects of adnexectomy, like premature ovarian failure (POF).
STUDY DESIGN This is a randomized controlled trial in which patients undergoing a hysterectomy for benign indications will either be included into a group in which a standard hysterectomy (abdominal or laparoscopic) will be performed or into a group in which hysterectomy (abdominal or laparoscopic) will be combined with salpingectomy.The accrual is aimed to take until July 2015 and will be performed in the regular clinical setting.
STUDY POPULATION Women undergoing hysterectomy for benign conditions (fibroids, endosalpingiosis, bleeding disorders, etc) either abdominal or laparoscopic.
SAMPLE SIZE N=50/arm
TREATMENT Hysterectomy (abdominal or laparoscopic) with or without bilateral tubectomy.
METHODS
Study endpoint Main study endpoint: serum concentration Anti Mullerian Hormone (AMH) just before the operation and on average six months after the operation.
Secondary study endpoint: premalignant changes within the removed Fallopian tubes from this cohort of women, defined as histological dysplastic areas detected by light microscope
SAFETY REPORTING
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Data will both be described qualitatively and quantitatively. Student t-test will be applied to study differences in hormone levels between the groups.
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS
ADMINISTRATIVE ASPECTS AND PUBLICATION
3,381 studies on the registry are indexed under Ovarian Neoplasms; 790 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 105 is above the median of 54 across 2,548 interventional studies indexed under Ovarian Neoplasms.
Browse Ovarian Neoplasms studies →Gynaecologisch Oncologisch Centrum Zuid is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
standard hysterectomy
Procedure: Hysterectomy
Hysterectomy plus tubectomy
Procedure: Hysterectomy plus Tubectomy · Device: light microscopy
hysterectomy with tubectomy
standard hysterectomy
analysis of the incidence of dysplastic lesions (defined as: nuclear atypia, pilling of epithelial cells, multiple mitosis), if any, in the removed Fallopian tubes by light microscopy (Leica DM4000)
Anti Mullerian Hormone
Difference, if any, in concentration of Anti Mullerian Hormone one day prior to hysterectomy and on average around six months after surgery between the study groups (hysterectomy alone versus hysterectomy and tubectomy).
Time frame: at baseline and on average six months after the operation
Dysplasia
Analysis of the incidence of dysplastic lesions (defined as: nuclear atypia, pilling of epithelial cells, multiple mitosis), if any, in the removed Fallopian tubes by light microscopy.
Time frame: on average six months after the operation
The record gives a start of Jul 2014, a primary completion of Apr 2016 and a completion of Aug 2016. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in May 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Gynaecologisch Oncologisch Centrum Zuid