ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02281487HYSTUBUpdated May 30, 2017

Hysterectomy for Benign Gynaecological Conditions With or Without Tubectomy

An interventional study of Hysterectomy plus Tubectomy and Hysterectomy in Abdominal Hysterectomy (& Wertheim), sponsored by Gynaecologisch Oncologisch Centrum Zuid. Completed at 5 sites in Netherlands. Open to female participants aged 36 Years to 55 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-05-30.

Sponsored by Gynaecologisch Oncologisch Centrum Zuid · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
105
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
36 Years to 55 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a tubectomy during hysterectomy for benign gynaecological conditions does not result into a premature menopause.

Read the detailed description

RATIONALE Recent studies in women at hereditary high risk to develop ovarian cancer indicate that high grade serous carcinomas arise from (ectopic and/or dysplastic) tubal epithelium. Historically, in pre-menopausal women undergoing a hysterectomy for benign indications (such as bleeding disorders, fibroids and adenomyosis) adnexa, including the Fallopian tubes, are left in situ. However, removing the tubes during a hysterectomy potentially prevents the development of serous ovarian carcinomas. Such a simple preventive procedure should avoid serious adverse effects of adnexectomy, like premature ovarian failure (POF).

STUDY DESIGN This is a randomized controlled trial in which patients undergoing a hysterectomy for benign indications will either be included into a group in which a standard hysterectomy (abdominal or laparoscopic) will be performed or into a group in which hysterectomy (abdominal or laparoscopic) will be combined with salpingectomy.The accrual is aimed to take until July 2015 and will be performed in the regular clinical setting.

STUDY POPULATION Women undergoing hysterectomy for benign conditions (fibroids, endosalpingiosis, bleeding disorders, etc) either abdominal or laparoscopic.

SAMPLE SIZE N=50/arm

TREATMENT Hysterectomy (abdominal or laparoscopic) with or without bilateral tubectomy.

METHODS

  1. Study endpoint Main study endpoint: serum concentration Anti Mullerian Hormone (AMH) just before the operation and on average six months after the operation.

    Secondary study endpoint: premalignant changes within the removed Fallopian tubes from this cohort of women, defined as histological dysplastic areas detected by light microscope

  2. Randomization Randomization is performed online with Alea software.
  3. Study procedures One day preoperative, together with regular blood drawing, blood for AMH concentration assessment is drawn. The operation procedure will either be the regular procedure or the regular procedure plus removal of the Fallopian tubes by removing the tubes from the ovaries by dissection of the mesovarium. On an expected average of six months after the operation blood for serum AMH concentration assessment is drawn. Blood serum is stored at -80C and AMH concentration assessment is performed in one badge.
  4. Withdrawal of individual subjects Subjects can leave the study at any time for any reason if they wish to do so without any consequences. After withdrawal the individual subjects will be replaced.
  5. Premature termination of the study In case of serious adverse events (like postoperative haemorrhage).

SAFETY REPORTING

  1. In accordance to section 10, subsection 1, of the WMO, the investigator will inform the subjects and the reviewing accredited Medical Ethical Committee (METC) if anything occurs, on the basis of which it appears that the disadvantages of participation may be significantly greater than was foreseen in the research proposal. The study will be suspended pending further review by the accredited METC, except insofar as suspension would jeopardize the subjects' health. The investigator will take care that all subjects are kept informed.
  2. Adverse and serious adverse events All Serious Adverse Event (SAE) s will be reported to the accredited METC that approved the protocol.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Data will both be described qualitatively and quantitatively. Student t-test will be applied to study differences in hormone levels between the groups.

ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS

  1. The study will be conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki (2nd edition, 2009) and in accordance with the Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (WMO).
  2. Patients will be recruited at the outpatient clinic when a decision is made for hysterectomy (abdominal or laparoscopic) on benign indication. They will receive oral information from their gynecologist and an information letter will be handed out (a telephone number will be stated which patients can call for extra information). On the day of preoperative admission (mostly one day preoperative) the gynecologist will answer any remaining questions and the informed consent will be signed by both the patient and the gynecologist. Patients on oral contraceptives will stop using these at least two weeks prior to the operation.
  3. Literature on the effects of salpingectomy during hysterectomy for benign gynecological conditions on the ovarian reserve is very scant, but the one available study does not show any adverse effects. Furthermore, the chance of a postoperative hemorrhage is increased (estimated 1%). We believe that, in the light of the burden and risk, this study is justified since the prophylactic removal of the Fallopian tubes might diminish the risk of serous ovarian carcinomas (life time risk around 1%).

ADMINISTRATIVE ASPECTS AND PUBLICATION

  1. Data will be collected from the participating hospitals by one study medical doctor. Together with the principal investigator (s)he has access to the source data which are coded by a case number. The key to the code is safeguarded in the safe from the TweeSteden hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands. Data and human material will be kept for seven years (or fifteen with patient consent). Data security is assured by the fact that one medical doctor collects the data. The privacy of the participants is protected by the fact that the data is coded.
  2. The investigator will submit a summary of the progress of the trial to the accredited METC once a year. Information will be provided on the date of inclusion of the first subject, numbers of subjects included and numbers of subjects that have completed the trial, serious adverse events / serious adverse reactions, other problems, and amendments.
  3. The investigator will notify the accredited METC of the end of the study within a period of 8 weeks. The end of the study is defined as the last patient's last visit. In case the study is ended prematurely, the investigator will notify the accredited METC, including the reasons for the premature termination. Within one year after the end of the study, the investigator will submit a final study report with the results of the study, including any publications/abstracts of the study, to the accredited METC.
  4. The data will be published in peer reviewed medical journals as well as presented in abstracts at medical conferences.
02

Conditions studied

  • Abdominal Hysterectomy (& Wertheim)

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • tubal carcinoma
  • ovarian carcinoma
  • tubectomy
  • hysterectomy
  • dysplastic changes
  • Anti Mullerian Hormone
  • Tubal Intraepithelial Carcinoma
  • Salpingectomy
03

In context

Ovarian Neoplasms

3,381 studies on the registry are indexed under Ovarian Neoplasms; 790 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 105 is above the median of 54 across 2,548 interventional studies indexed under Ovarian Neoplasms.

Browse Ovarian Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Gynaecologisch Oncologisch Centrum Zuid is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
36 Years to 55 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • hysterectomy (abdominally or laparoscopically) for benign indications
  • premenopausal
  • age >36 \< 55

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • history of cancer
  • hereditary cancer in the family
  • previous intraluminal tubal occlusion
  • previous salpingitis
  • failure to perform a tubectomy during hysterectomy
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
105 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Hysterectomy

    standard hysterectomy

    Procedure: Hysterectomy

  • Experimental
    Hysterectomy plus tubectomy

    Hysterectomy plus tubectomy

    Procedure: Hysterectomy plus Tubectomy · Device: light microscopy

Interventions

  • ProcedureHysterectomy plus Tubectomy

    hysterectomy with tubectomy

  • ProcedureHysterectomy

    standard hysterectomy

  • Devicelight microscopy

    analysis of the incidence of dysplastic lesions (defined as: nuclear atypia, pilling of epithelial cells, multiple mitosis), if any, in the removed Fallopian tubes by light microscopy (Leica DM4000)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Anti Mullerian Hormone

    Difference, if any, in concentration of Anti Mullerian Hormone one day prior to hysterectomy and on average around six months after surgery between the study groups (hysterectomy alone versus hysterectomy and tubectomy).

    Time frame: at baseline and on average six months after the operation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Dysplasia

    Analysis of the incidence of dysplastic lesions (defined as: nuclear atypia, pilling of epithelial cells, multiple mitosis), if any, in the removed Fallopian tubes by light microscopy.

    Time frame: on average six months after the operation

07

Study locations

5 sites
  • Jeroen Bosch ziekenhuis
    Den Bosch, Brabant 5223 GZ, Netherlands
  • Catharina Ziekenhuis
    Eindhoven, Brabant 5623EJ, Netherlands
  • Elisabeth ziekenhuis
    Tilburg, Brabant 5022 GC, Netherlands
  • TweeStedenziekenhuis
    Tilburg, Brabant 5042AD, Netherlands
  • Radboudumc
    Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Piek JM, van Diest PJ, Zweemer RP, Kenemans P, Verheijen RH. Tubal ligation and risk of ovarian cancer. Lancet. 2001 Sep 8;358(9284):844. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05992-X. No abstract available. PubMed 11570411 ↗
  • Kurman RJ, Shih IeM. The origin and pathogenesis of epithelial ovarian cancer: a proposed unifying theory. Am J Surg Pathol. 2010 Mar;34(3):433-43. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181cf3d79. PubMed 20154587 ↗
  • Crum CP. Intercepting pelvic cancer in the distal fallopian tube: theories and realities. Mol Oncol. 2009 Apr;3(2):165-70. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2009.01.004. Epub 2009 Feb 3. PubMed 19383378 ↗
  • Sezik M, Ozkaya O, Demir F, Sezik HT, Kaya H. Total salpingectomy during abdominal hysterectomy: effects on ovarian reserve and ovarian stromal blood flow. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2007 Dec;33(6):863-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2007.00669.x. PubMed 18001455 ↗
  • Narod SA, Sun P, Ghadirian P, Lynch H, Isaacs C, Garber J, Weber B, Karlan B, Fishman D, Rosen B, Tung N, Neuhausen SL. Tubal ligation and risk of ovarian cancer in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations: a case-control study. Lancet. 2001 May 12;357(9267):1467-70. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04642-0. PubMed 11377596 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Jul 2014, a primary completion of Apr 2016 and a completion of Aug 2016. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 1, 2014
First posted
Nov 2, 2014
Start
Jul 2014
Primary completionActual
Apr 2016
CompletionActual
Aug 2016
Last update
May 30, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 30, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02281487
Lead sponsor
Gynaecologisch Oncologisch Centrum Zuid
Collaborators
Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis, Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven, Radboud University Medical Center, Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis
Responsible party
Jurgen M.J. Piek (MD. PhD., Gynaecologisch Oncologisch Centrum Zuid) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 2, 2014
Start date
Jul 2014
Primary completion
Apr 2016
Completion
Aug 2016
Last update
May 30, 2017

Study contacts

Jurgen M Piek, MD. PhD.
principal investigator · Gynaecologisch Oncologisch Centrum Zuid

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion