CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT02280239SEA-ICUUpdated Nov 4, 2022Results posted

Safety and Efficacy of Acetaminophen in the Intensive Care Unit.

A Phase 4 interventional study of Acetaminophen and Placebo in Critical Illness and Fever, sponsored by University of British Columbia. Terminated at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-11-04.

Sponsored by University of British Columbia · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Only enrolled 10 participants over 9 months which is less then anticipated (75).
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The intensive care unit (ICU) team needs to know what effects acetaminophen has in critically ill patients. Acetaminophen is better known as Tylenol. It is the drug given to reduce fever. Most research that has looked at how safe and effective this drug is, has been done with healthy people. Those studies tell us it is safe and works well to bring down fever.

This may not be true for the ICU patient. Some research found acetaminophen was not as good at reducing fever as expected in the ICU. Fever helps to fight infection so it may help patients get better, but it is also stressful. When you have fever, you to need more oxygen, and your heart beats faster. If you have a fever after brain injury, you are less likely to make a full recovery. In patients with brain injury, a weak heart or trouble breathing we should treat fever. If we can predict how well acetaminophen will reduce fever, we can decide if this drug is enough, or other treatments are also needed.

If you do not have problems with your brain, heart, or lungs, it is safe to not treat fever. When you give this drug to treat fever, the body cools itself by sweating, and bringing hot blood to the skin's surface. These changes do not affect healthy people. Research suggests ICU patients may be at risk for sudden drop in blood pressure.

Our study will answer 2 questions: 1) When acetaminophen is given to treat fever in ICU patients, are they more likely to have a drop in blood pressure? 2) How much will acetaminophen reduce fever in ICU patients? We will study ICU patients with a fever who can safely get, or not get this drug. This information will help us decide when and how to treat fever in the ICU.

Read the detailed description

In the ICU, fever is commonly treated with 650 mg acetaminophen every 4 hours with the hopes of reducing fever burden, thereby also reducing metabolic demand. Acetaminophen is thought to be a safe and effective antipyretic. This assumption has not been tested in the critically ill despite its widespread use. Observational studies report critically ill patients experience hypotension, sometimes severe enough to require treatment; other studies indicate acetaminophen may not be as effective at reducing fever burden in the critically ill.

OBJECTIVES:

  • To see if 650mg acetaminophen, given to febrile critically ill patients affects blood pressure; by comparing the incidence of hypotension severe enough to require treatment in the way of a fluid bolus (500cc or greater) or increase in vasoactive drugs (increase in norepinephrine by 5mcg or greater); by assessing for changes in mean arterial pressure and systolic blood pressure.
  • To quantify the degree of fever suppression achieved by 650mg acetaminophen in the febrile critically ill population.

RESEARCH PROPOSAL:

Patients admitted into Vancouver Hospital's ICU are eligible for this study if they have a new fever and meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Study participants will be randomly assigned into one of 2 study arms, the control group and the 650mg group. Study participants in the control group will receive 2 capsules of placebo and the 650mg group will receive 2 capsules of 325mg acetaminophen. Data (continuous measures of temperature, heart rate and blood pressure) will be collected from the time of the study drug administration until 6 hours post. All patients, health care workers, and researchers will be blinded to which arm the patient is enrolled in until the end of the study. The incidence of fluid bolus administration, increases in vasoactive drug use, will be recorded and compared. We will also compare blood pressure data, and fever burden between the 2 groups.

INCLUSION/EXCLUSION CRITERIA To be included the subject must be admitted to the ICU; have an arterial line as standard of care; have at least 2 hours of a temperature greater than 38.3°C; within 24 hours of fever onset or ICU admission; be hemodynamically stable, and not received any drugs with known antipyretic effects at least 6 hours prior to initiating the study. Patients are excluded if they have an acute brain injury, liver dysfunction, cardiac dysfunction, requiring greater than 50% fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO); mechanical ventilation is permitted, any extracorporeal blood treatments (dialysis, plasmapheresis, etc.), injury to more than 20% of the skin (i.e. burn patient), or the responsible physician is opposed to enrolment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Critical Illness
  • Fever

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Fever
  • Acetaminophen
  • Body Temperature Regulation
  • Critical Illness
  • Hypotension
03

In context

Critical Illness

1,881 studies on the registry are indexed under Critical Illness; 462 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 10 is below the median of 90 across 979 interventional studies indexed under Critical Illness.

Browse Critical Illness studies →

Lead sponsor

University of British Columbia is the lead sponsor of 1,309 studies on the registry; 253 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 1 (17%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Generally to be considered for this study one must be critically ill, febrile, and can safely either receive acetaminophen or have acetaminophen withheld. Also one must not have conditions that would alter normal drug absorption or normal thermoregulation. Specifically the eligibility criteria are:

Inclusion criteria

INCLUSION CRITERIA:

  • Adult patients (> 18 years) admitted to Intensive Care Unit at Vancouver Hospital with a core temperature > 38.3 °C for 2 or more consecutive hours, but not longer than 48 hours*
  • Continuous arterial pressure monitor in place at the time of intervention and data collection
  • Patients may only participate in the study once
  • To remain in the ICU for the entire study period (2 hours prior to drug administration to 4 hours post drug administration)

Exclusion criteria

EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

  • Significant liver dysfunction
  • Acute neurological injury
  • Seizure disorder
  • Cardiomyopathy, elevated cardiac enzymes indicative of an acute cardiac injury, electrocardiogram (ECG) changes indicative of cardiac ischemia (i.e., ST segment elevation/depression)
  • Hemodynamic instability (requiring fluid boluses, or change/initiation of vasopressors. Patients receiving steady doses of vasopressor support may be included)
  • Severe hypoxemia, (fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) requirements of more than 60% to maintain hemoglobin oxygen saturation (SaO2) > 90% or partial pressure of oxygen in the blood (PaO2) > 70)
  • Temperature > 40.0 °C
  • Receiving external cooling
  • Haemodialysis, plasma exchange, or any treatment where the blood is taken out of the body and processed
  • Acute thermal injury to skin (i.e., burn)
  • Gut malabsorption (i.e., receiving \< 40% required calories enterally)
  • Receiving medications that have known antipyretic effects (acetaminophen, ibuprofen, steroids, etc.)
  • Physician opposed to enrolment in the study

NOTE: in response to very low enrollment 2 exclusion criteria were changed on Nov 5, 2015. These were:

  1. patients no longer needed to recieve 40% of required calories enterally, instead patients who were not receiving any caloric intake via the gut could be enrolled as long as they were still permitted to receive oral medications.
  2. patients no longer had to have acetaminophen discontinued upon enrollment. They could not be receiving it regularly but could still receive acetaminophen on an as needed (PRN) basis as long as it could be safely withheld for up to 12 hours if they developed a fever.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
10 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Control Group

    This group consists of stable but febrile ICU patients (temp \>38.3°C). Participants in this group will receive a one-time dose of placebo via the enteral route (via the gut), after which vital signs (including continuous measures of core temperature, heart rate, and blood pressure) will be monitored for 4 hours.

    Drug: Placebo

  • Experimental
    Acetaminophen Group

    This group consists of stable but febrile ICU patients (temp \>38.3°C). Participants in this group will receive a one-time does of acetaminophen 650mg via the enteral route (via the gut), after which vital signs (including continuous measures of core temperature, heart rate, and blood pressure) will be monitored for 4 hours.

    Drug: Acetaminophen

Interventions

  • DrugAcetaminophen

    one-time dose of acetaminophen 650mg given via the enteral route (via the gut)

    Also known as: Tylenol

  • DrugPlacebo

    one-time dose of placebo (identical capsule) given via the enteral route (via the gut)

    Also known as: Pharmacy compounded look alike capsule to the study drug

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Clinically Significant Hypotension

    Clinically significant hypotension is defined as an acute drop in mean arterial pressure requiring treatment. Treatment is defined as either a 500 cc (or greater) fluid bolus and/or an increase in inotrope support of greater than 5 mcg/min over baseline.

    Time frame: 4 hours post acetaminophen administration

Secondary outcomes

  1. Blood Pressure

    systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and mean arterial pressures (MAP) will be monitored for 4 hours post intervention

    Time frame: 4 hours post intervention

  2. Equivalent-dose of Vasoactive Medication Post Intervention

    Total dose of all vasoactive medications will be converted to total Equidose value (with the formula 10 mcg/min norepinephrine ≈ 5 mcg/kg/min dopamine ≈ 10 mcg/min epinephrine ≈ 1 mcg/min phenylephrine ≈ 0.02 u/min vasopressin as per Russell et al. (2008)) before comparing the treatment and control groups Only 2 of the 6 participants were on low-dose vasoactive medications, (i.e., one was on norepinephrine and the other was on milrinone) therefore the pre-planned conversion calculation was not done.

    Time frame: 4 hours post intervention

  3. Equivalent-volume Fluid Administered Post Intervention

    Total crystalloid and colloid fluid will be converted the the equi-volume dose (with the ratio 1.4:1 (as per Finfer et al.(2004) \& Vincent and Weil (2006) before making comparisons between the treatment and control groups.

    Time frame: 4 hours post intervention

  4. Fever Burden

    Continuous measurements of core body temperature will be recorded for 6 hours. Fever burden (FB) is defined as area between the 6 hour temperature curve and 38.3°C cut-off and it is reported in °C-hour. PRE-INTERVENTION FB: is reported for a 2 hour period. POST-INTERVENTION FB: post-intervention fever burden is reported for a 6 hour period and average hourly fever burden. Peak Temperature: is the highest recorded temperature for the study period in °C Minimum Temperature: is the lowest recorded temperature for the study period in °C

    Time frame: 6 hours post intervention

07

Results

Posted Nov 4, 2022

Participant flow

SCREENING: Of the 950 patients who were admitted between May 28, 2015 and Jan. 20, 2016, 790 were screened, at least once. A few were screened a second time if their status had changed. ELIGIBILITY: 100 patients were eligible. RECRUITMENT: 27/100 were successfully contacted to be invited to this study. 10 consented to participate.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneControl GroupAcetaminophen Group
Started15
Completed15
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryClinically Significant Hypotension

Clinically significant hypotension is defined as an acute drop in mean arterial pressure requiring treatment. Treatment is defined as either a 500 cc (or greater) fluid bolus and/or an increase in inotrope support of greater than 5 mcg/min over baseline.

Time frame:
4 hours post acetaminophen administration
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Clinically Significant Hypotension
ParticipantsControl GroupAcetaminophen Group
Clinically Significant Hypotension00
SecondaryBlood Pressure

systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and mean arterial pressures (MAP) will be monitored for 4 hours post intervention

Time frame:
4 hours post intervention
Reported as:
Mean · mmHg
Blood Pressure
mmHgControl GroupAcetaminophen Group
SBP: Pre-Intervention (2 hours)141.6 (102 to 159)122.6 (80 to 170)
SBP: Post-Intervention (4 hours)141.5 (127 to 157)119.5 (86 to 158)
DBP: Pre-Intervention (2 hours)57.4 (46 to 63)66.2 (45 to 91)
DBP: Post-Intervention (4 hours)51.0 (47 to 55)65.4 (45 to 83)
MAP: Pre-Intervention (2 hours)80.8 (61 to 90)84.1 (56 to 114)
MAP: Post-Intervention (4 hours)75.5 (68 to 83)82.4 (61 to 107)
SecondaryEquivalent-dose of Vasoactive Medication Post Intervention

Total dose of all vasoactive medications will be converted to total Equidose value (with the formula 10 mcg/min norepinephrine ≈ 5 mcg/kg/min dopamine ≈ 10 mcg/min epinephrine ≈ 1 mcg/min phenylephrine ≈ 0.02 u/min vasopressin as per Russell et al. (2008)) before comparing the treatment and control groups Only 2 of the 6 participants were on low-dose vasoactive medications, (i.e., one was on norepinephrine and the other was on milrinone) therefore the pre-planned conversion calculation was not done.

Time frame:
4 hours post intervention
Reported as:
Number · mcg
Equivalent-dose of Vasoactive Medication Post Intervention
mcgControl GroupAcetaminophen Group
Pre-Intervention (2 hours) TOTAL Norepinephrine167.0NA
Pre-Intervention (2 hours) TOTAL MilrinoneNA6000.0
Post-Intervention (4 hours) TOTAL Norepinephrine576.0NA
Post-Intervention (4 hours) TOTAL MilrinoneNA7000.0
SecondaryEquivalent-volume Fluid Administered Post Intervention

Total crystalloid and colloid fluid will be converted the the equi-volume dose (with the ratio 1.4:1 (as per Finfer et al.(2004) \& Vincent and Weil (2006) before making comparisons between the treatment and control groups.

Time frame:
4 hours post intervention
Reported as:
Mean · mL
Equivalent-volume Fluid Administered Post Intervention
mLControl GroupAcetaminophen Group
Pre-Intervention (2 hours) Total fluid INTAKE235 (235 to 235)298 (30 to 736)
Pre-Intervention (2 hours) Total fluid OUTPUT80 (80 to 80)370 (140 to 790)
Post-Intervention (4 hours) Total Fluid INTAKE734 (734 to 734)612 (353 to 856)
Post-Intervention (4 hours) Total Fluid OUTPUT245 (245 to 245)852 (230 to 1400)
SecondaryFever Burden

Continuous measurements of core body temperature will be recorded for 6 hours. Fever burden (FB) is defined as area between the 6 hour temperature curve and 38.3°C cut-off and it is reported in °C-hour. PRE-INTERVENTION FB: is reported for a 2 hour period. POST-INTERVENTION FB: post-intervention fever burden is reported for a 6 hour period and average hourly fever burden. Peak Temperature: is the highest recorded temperature for the study period in °C Minimum Temperature: is the lowest recorded temperature for the study period in °C

Time frame:
6 hours post intervention
Reported as:
Mean · °C*hours
Fever Burden
°C*hoursControl GroupAcetaminophen Group
Pre-Intervention FB (2 hours)0.97 (0.97 to 0.97)2.16 (1.07 to 3.78)
Post-Intervention FB (6 hours)0.74 (0.74 to 0.74)5.65 (1.60 to 10.24)

Adverse events

Collected over Until ICU discharge (max 28 days). Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Control Group0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)
Acetaminophen Group1/5 (20%)0/5 (0%)0/5 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Control GroupAcetaminophen GroupTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years055
>=65 years101
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Control GroupAcetaminophen GroupTotal
Median76 (76 to 76)35 (29 to 59)43.5 (29 to 76)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Control GroupAcetaminophen GroupTotal
Female022
Male134
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Control GroupAcetaminophen GroupTotal
Canada156
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Vancouver Hospital
    Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 1M9, Canada
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Russell JA, Walley KR, Singer J, Gordon AC, Hebert PC, Cooper DJ, Holmes CL, Mehta S, Granton JT, Storms MM, Cook DJ, Presneill JJ, Ayers D; VASST Investigators. Vasopressin versus norepinephrine infusion in patients with septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2008 Feb 28;358(9):877-87. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa067373. PubMed 18305265 ↗
  • Finfer S, Bellomo R, Boyce N, French J, Myburgh J, Norton R; SAFE Study Investigators. A comparison of albumin and saline for fluid resuscitation in the intensive care unit. N Engl J Med. 2004 May 27;350(22):2247-56. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040232. PubMed 15163774 ↗
  • Vincent JL, Weil MH. Fluid challenge revisited. Crit Care Med. 2006 May;34(5):1333-7. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000214677.76535.A5. PubMed 16557164 ↗
  • Boyle M, Nicholson L, O'Brien M, Flynn GM, Collins DW, Walsh WR, Bihari D. Paracetamol induced skin blood flow and blood pressure changes in febrile intensive care patients: An observational study. Aust Crit Care. 2010 Nov;23(4):208-14. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2010.06.004. Epub 2010 Jul 22. PubMed 20655241 ↗
  • Boyle M, Hundy S, Torda TA. Paracetamol administration is associated with hypotension in the critically ill. Aust Crit Care. 1997 Dec;10(4):120-2. doi: 10.1016/s1036-7314(97)70414-4. PubMed 9708071 ↗
  • Krajcova A, Matousek V, Duska F. Mechanism of paracetamol-induced hypotension in critically ill patients: a prospective observational cross-over study. Aust Crit Care. 2013 Aug;26(3):136-41. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2012.02.002. Epub 2012 Mar 14. PubMed 22424816 ↗
  • Allegaert K, Naulaers G. Haemodynamics of intravenous paracetamol in neonates. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2010 Sep;66(9):855-8. doi: 10.1007/s00228-010-0860-z. Epub 2010 Jul 4. PubMed 20607221 ↗
  • de Maat MM, Tijssen TA, Bruggemann RJ, Ponssen HH. Paracetamol for intravenous use in medium--and intensive care patients: pharmacokinetics and tolerance. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2010 Jul;66(7):713-9. doi: 10.1007/s00228-010-0806-5. Epub 2010 Mar 19. PubMed 20300741 ↗
  • Danguy des Deserts M, Nguyen BV, Giacardi C, Commandeur D, Paleiron N. [Acetaminophen-induced hypotension after intravenous and oral administration]. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2010 Apr;29(4):313-4. doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2010.02.006. Epub 2010 Mar 12. No abstract available. French. PubMed 20227233 ↗
  • Mrozek S, Constantin JM, Futier E, Zenut M, Ghardes G, Cayot-Constantin S, Bonnard M, Ait-Bensaid N, Eschalier A, Bazin JE. [Acetaminophene-induced hypotension in intensive care unit: a prospective study]. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2009 May;28(5):448-53. doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2009.01.018. Epub 2009 Mar 21. French. PubMed 19304444 ↗
  • Hersch M, Raveh D, Izbicki G. Effect of intravenous propacetamol on blood pressure in febrile critically ill patients. Pharmacotherapy. 2008 Oct;28(10):1205-10. doi: 10.1592/phco.28.10.1205. PubMed 18823215 ↗
  • Cruz P, Garutti I, Diaz S, Fernandez-Quero L. [Metamizol versus propacetamol: comparative study of the hemodynamic and antipyretic effects in critically ill patients]. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2002 Oct;49(8):391-6. Spanish. PubMed 12455318 ↗
  • Mackenzie I, Forrest K, Thompson F, Marsh R. Effects of acetaminophen administration to patients in intensive care. Intensive Care Med. 2000 Sep;26(9):1408. doi: 10.1007/s001340000614. No abstract available. PubMed 11089781 ↗
  • Bendjelid K, Soubirou JL, Bohe J. [Systemic arterial hypotension induced by paracetamol administration: nurse's anecdotes or facts from the intensive care unit?]. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2000 Jun;19(6):499. doi: 10.1016/s0750-7658(00)00230-6. No abstract available. French. PubMed 10941454 ↗
  • Gozzoli V, Treggiari MM, Kleger GR, Roux-Lombard P, Fathi M, Pichard C, Romand JA. Randomized trial of the effect of antipyresis by metamizol, propacetamol or external cooling on metabolism, hemodynamics and inflammatory response. Intensive Care Med. 2004 Mar;30(3):401-7. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-2087-2. Epub 2004 Jan 13. PubMed 14722642 ↗
  • Greenberg RS, Chen H, Hasday JD. Acetaminophen has limited antipyretic activity in critically ill patients. J Crit Care. 2010 Jun;25(2):363.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2009.07.005. Epub 2009 Sep 24. PubMed 19781895 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Under review with the research team.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 4, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02280239
Lead sponsor
University of British Columbia
Collaborators
Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute
Responsible party
Vininder K. Bains (Principal Investigator, University of British Columbia) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 31, 2014
Start date
May 2015
Primary completion
Feb 2016
Completion
Feb 2016
Results posted
Nov 4, 2022
Last update
Nov 4, 2022

Study contacts

William Henderson, PhD
study chair · University of British Columbia
Vininder K Bains, BSN
principal investigator · Vancouver Coastal Health
Martha Mackay, PhD
study chair · University of British Columbia
Leanne Currie, PhD
study chair · University of British Columbia

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Nov 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion