An interventional study of Restoration with hand-mixed material and Restoration with Encapsulated material in Dental Caries, sponsored by University of Sao Paulo. Completed at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 3 Years to 10 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-03-11.
Sponsored by University of Sao Paulo · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The aim of this RCT is to evaluate the survival of different glass ionomer cement in minimally invasive restorations, with different handling characteristics: hand-mixed versus encapsulated.
Detailed Description: This study was approved by the research ethics committee of the School of Dentistry (University of São Paulo, Brazil) and written informed consent will be obtained from the parents or legal guardians. The sample size was calculated based on the data obtained in a systematic review, which reported average longevity of 78% after 2 years of follow up (mean survival of occlusal and occlusoproximal surfaces). The minimum difference of 15% in the success rate between the control and treatment groups after 2 years of follow-up, with and α of 5% and power (strength) of 80% using paired test. As more than one tooth per children might be included, we must add a 20% for clustering. Adding 20% for possible losses the final estimate is 116 teeth per group, reaching a final sample of 232 teeth.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Implementation:
All the occlusal and occlusoproximal restorations will be performed by two operators on the dental chair. The operators will be assisted by another dentist, who will be previously trained to mix the GIC according to the manufacturers' protocol. The children will be randomly assigned into two groups: Hand-mixed and encapsulated materials.
Treatment procedure:
The restorative technique will be performed according to the Minimal Intervention Dentistry. No local anaesthesia will be used during treatment. Rotary instruments can be used to open or to expand the cavity opening, removing only enamel. Infected carious dentin will be removed with hand instruments. The use of hand instruments on the dentin surface results in a smear layer and need to be removed by the use of dentine conditioner. The liquid component of the hand-mixed powder-liquid GIC, containing the acid component, will be used and saliva isolation will be done with cotton wool rolls. The cavities will be restored with one of the two GIC brands: Fuji IX (GC Europe, Leuven, BE) and EQUIA (GC Europe, Leuven, BE). A thin layer of petroleum jelly will be rubbed over the index finger and the restoration will be pressed for 20 seconds. The material will include sealing pits and the fissure. After preparing for a balanced occlusion, a new layer of petroleum jelly will be applied to the GIC restoration. The amount of GIC used, element number, cavity dimension and dmft will be recorded. The duration of the restorative procedure will be recorded with a stopwatch. The participating children will be instructed not to eat for one hour after the restoration is placed.
Evaluation:
The success of the restorations will be evaluated after 6 months according to the Frencken and Holmgren criteria for occlusal surfaces, and modified version of Roeleveld et al. (2006) criteria for occlusoproximal surfaces. A restoration will be considered as 'failure' when there is a defect in the filling when secondary caries is observed, when the restoration is not present or when the pulp is inflamed. When the restoration is still present or a slight defect is observed, it will be considered as 'success'. When the tooth is unavailable for evaluation, it will be censored. All evaluations will be carried out by two independent evaluators, who did not restore the cavities, trained and calibrated by a benchmark.
Estimation of cost-effectiveness:
The material cost (GICs) will be estimated per restoration. The average cost per restoration will be estimated. Costs of equipment, autoclave and hand instruments, disposables (hand gloves, face masks, cotton wool rolls), articulating paper and petroleum jelly used for the restorations are equal for both GIC groups and will be excluded. There will be no labour costs for the operators.
1,137 studies on the registry are indexed under Dental Caries; 201 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 145 is above the median of 60 across 936 interventional studies indexed under Dental Caries.
Browse Dental Caries studies →University of Sao Paulo is the lead sponsor of 1,032 studies on the registry; 93 are open to participants now.
Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Restorations performed with encapsulated glass ionomer cement (EQUIA - GC Corp). Capsules with glass ionomer will be activated and applied after selective carious tissue removal in primary molars.
Procedure: Restoration with Encapsulated material · Device: Encapsulated glass ionomer cement (EQUIA - GC Corp).
Restorations will be performed with hand-mixed glass ionomer cement (Fuji IX - GC Corp) after selective carious tissue removal in primary molars.
Procedure: Restoration with hand-mixed material · Device: powder-liquid glass ionomer cement (Fuji IX - GC Corp)
restoration with hand-mixed glass ionomer cement
Also known as: Minimally invasive restoration
restoration with encapsulated ionomer cement
Restorations survival
The survival of restorations will be evaluated over 24 months according to the Frencken and Holmgren (1999) index for occlusal cavities and Roeleveld (2006) for occlusoproximal cavities.
Time frame: 24 months
Cost-Effectiveness
Cost-effectiveness will be measured according to each restoration performed and the cost of all reinterventions.
Time frame: 24 months
The record gives a start of Oct 2014, a primary completion of Oct 2016 and a completion of Oct 2016. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.