ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02274142Updated Mar 11, 2021

Primary Molars Restorations With Encapsulated or Hand-Mixed Glass Ionomer: Clinical Trial

An interventional study of Restoration with hand-mixed material and Restoration with Encapsulated material in Dental Caries, sponsored by University of Sao Paulo. Completed at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 3 Years to 10 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-03-11.

Sponsored by University of Sao Paulo · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
145
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
3 Years to 10 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this RCT is to evaluate the survival of different glass ionomer cement in minimally invasive restorations, with different handling characteristics: hand-mixed versus encapsulated.

Read the detailed description

Detailed Description: This study was approved by the research ethics committee of the School of Dentistry (University of São Paulo, Brazil) and written informed consent will be obtained from the parents or legal guardians. The sample size was calculated based on the data obtained in a systematic review, which reported average longevity of 78% after 2 years of follow up (mean survival of occlusal and occlusoproximal surfaces). The minimum difference of 15% in the success rate between the control and treatment groups after 2 years of follow-up, with and α of 5% and power (strength) of 80% using paired test. As more than one tooth per children might be included, we must add a 20% for clustering. Adding 20% for possible losses the final estimate is 116 teeth per group, reaching a final sample of 232 teeth.

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Children who have sought treatment in the School of Dentistry, University of Sao Paulo;
  • Children between 3 and 10 years old without systemic diseases;
  • Children presenting at least one dentin caries cavity in primary teeth (occlusal or oclusoproximal) with no signs of pulp involvement.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children whose parents did not agree to participate in the study;
  • Children with behavioural issues at the initial exam or who did not assent to participate in the study.

Implementation:

All the occlusal and occlusoproximal restorations will be performed by two operators on the dental chair. The operators will be assisted by another dentist, who will be previously trained to mix the GIC according to the manufacturers' protocol. The children will be randomly assigned into two groups: Hand-mixed and encapsulated materials.

Treatment procedure:

The restorative technique will be performed according to the Minimal Intervention Dentistry. No local anaesthesia will be used during treatment. Rotary instruments can be used to open or to expand the cavity opening, removing only enamel. Infected carious dentin will be removed with hand instruments. The use of hand instruments on the dentin surface results in a smear layer and need to be removed by the use of dentine conditioner. The liquid component of the hand-mixed powder-liquid GIC, containing the acid component, will be used and saliva isolation will be done with cotton wool rolls. The cavities will be restored with one of the two GIC brands: Fuji IX (GC Europe, Leuven, BE) and EQUIA (GC Europe, Leuven, BE). A thin layer of petroleum jelly will be rubbed over the index finger and the restoration will be pressed for 20 seconds. The material will include sealing pits and the fissure. After preparing for a balanced occlusion, a new layer of petroleum jelly will be applied to the GIC restoration. The amount of GIC used, element number, cavity dimension and dmft will be recorded. The duration of the restorative procedure will be recorded with a stopwatch. The participating children will be instructed not to eat for one hour after the restoration is placed.

Evaluation:

The success of the restorations will be evaluated after 6 months according to the Frencken and Holmgren criteria for occlusal surfaces, and modified version of Roeleveld et al. (2006) criteria for occlusoproximal surfaces. A restoration will be considered as 'failure' when there is a defect in the filling when secondary caries is observed, when the restoration is not present or when the pulp is inflamed. When the restoration is still present or a slight defect is observed, it will be considered as 'success'. When the tooth is unavailable for evaluation, it will be censored. All evaluations will be carried out by two independent evaluators, who did not restore the cavities, trained and calibrated by a benchmark.

Estimation of cost-effectiveness:

The material cost (GICs) will be estimated per restoration. The average cost per restoration will be estimated. Costs of equipment, autoclave and hand instruments, disposables (hand gloves, face masks, cotton wool rolls), articulating paper and petroleum jelly used for the restorations are equal for both GIC groups and will be excluded. There will be no labour costs for the operators.

02

Conditions studied

  • Dental Caries

Keywords

  • dentinal caries
  • occlusal
  • occluso-proximal
03

In context

Dental Caries

1,137 studies on the registry are indexed under Dental Caries; 201 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 145 is above the median of 60 across 936 interventional studies indexed under Dental Caries.

Browse Dental Caries studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Sao Paulo is the lead sponsor of 1,032 studies on the registry; 93 are open to participants now.

Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
3 Years to 10 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Children who have sought treatment in the School of Dentistry, University of Sao Paulo;
  • Children between 3 and 10 years old without systemic diseases;
  • Children presenting at least one dentin caries cavity in primary teeth (occlusal or oclusoproximal) with no signs of pulp involvement.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children whose parents did not agree to participate in the study;
  • Children with behavioural issues at the initial exam or who did not assent to participate in the study.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Factorial assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
145 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Restorations with Encapsulated material

    Restorations performed with encapsulated glass ionomer cement (EQUIA - GC Corp). Capsules with glass ionomer will be activated and applied after selective carious tissue removal in primary molars.

    Procedure: Restoration with Encapsulated material · Device: Encapsulated glass ionomer cement (EQUIA - GC Corp).

  • Active comparator
    Restorations with Hand-Mixed material

    Restorations will be performed with hand-mixed glass ionomer cement (Fuji IX - GC Corp) after selective carious tissue removal in primary molars.

    Procedure: Restoration with hand-mixed material · Device: powder-liquid glass ionomer cement (Fuji IX - GC Corp)

Interventions

  • ProcedureRestoration with hand-mixed material

    restoration with hand-mixed glass ionomer cement

    Also known as: Minimally invasive restoration

  • ProcedureRestoration with Encapsulated material

    restoration with encapsulated ionomer cement

  • DeviceEncapsulated glass ionomer cement (EQUIA - GC Corp).
  • Devicepowder-liquid glass ionomer cement (Fuji IX - GC Corp)
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Restorations survival

    The survival of restorations will be evaluated over 24 months according to the Frencken and Holmgren (1999) index for occlusal cavities and Roeleveld (2006) for occlusoproximal cavities.

    Time frame: 24 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Cost-Effectiveness

    Cost-effectiveness will be measured according to each restoration performed and the cost of all reinterventions.

    Time frame: 24 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Sao Paulo
    São Paulo, 05508-000, Brazil
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Oliveira RC, Camargo LB, Novaes TF, Pontes LRA, Olegario IC, Gimenez T, Passaro AL, Tedesco TK, Braga MM, Mendes FM, Raggio DP. Survival rate of primary molar restorations is not influenced by hand mixed or encapsulated GIC: 24 months RCT. BMC Oral Health. 2021 Jul 23;21(1):371. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01710-0. PubMed 34301217 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Oct 2014, a primary completion of Oct 2016 and a completion of Oct 2016. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 15, 2014
First posted
Oct 24, 2014
Start
Oct 2014
Primary completionActual
Oct 2016
CompletionActual
Oct 2016
Last update
Mar 11, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 11, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02274142
Responsible party
Daniela Prócida Raggio (Associate Professor, University of Sao Paulo) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 24, 2014
Start date
Oct 2014
Primary completion
Oct 2016
Completion
Oct 2016
Last update
Mar 11, 2021

Study contacts

Daniela Raggio, Professor
principal investigator · University of Sao Paulo

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion