ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02271477Updated Aug 31, 2017Results posted

Can Vena Cava Ultrasound Guided Volume Repletion Prevent Spinal Induced Significant Hypotension in Elective Patients?

An interventional study of Ultrasound-guided volemic repletion in Fluid Overload, Anesthesia; Adverse Effect, Spinal and Epidural and Regional Anesthesia Morbidity, sponsored by Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona. Completed at 1 site in Switzerland. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-08-31.

Sponsored by Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
160
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Aim of this study is to determine whether Inferior Vena Cava analyzed by trans-thoracic echocardiography is an effective method to guide titrated fluid repletion in non critical patients, in order both to decrease post procedural significant hypotension rate and to avoid unnecessary fluid overload in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia for elective surgical procedures

Read the detailed description

The setting is standard spinal anesthesia and corresponds to our first arm of the study, used as the control sample and statistical reference. During the induction phase, the patient is fitted with non-invasive blood pressure monitoring, three-lead ECG, pulse-oximetry and peripheral intravenous device. Data and vital signs are recorded and an infusion of crystalloid (NaCl 0.9% or Ringer's acetate) is given during the procedure until the beginning of the operation. Total amount of fluid is also recorded before and after the spinal anesthesia.

In addition to the current clinical standard, for the second arm of the study, a trans-thoracic echocardiography is performed before spinal anesthesia, with the aim of assessing the patient's volume status; the exam is performed to assess size and collapsing of the Inferior Vena Cava during breathing cycle. According to different pre-established parameters, the patient is defined as fluid-responsive or unresponsive. If the patient is not responsive, investigators proceed to spinal anesthesia; otherwise they proceed to administration of crystalloid bolus (500 ml of NaCl 0.9% or Hartmann's solution). The patient may receive another bolus so as to reach a non-responsive pattern for echocardiographic evaluation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Fluid Overload
  • Anesthesia; Adverse Effect, Spinal and Epidural
  • Regional Anesthesia Morbidity

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Fluid replacement
  • Trans-Thoracic Echocardiography
  • Spinal Anesthesia
  • Empirical Volemic Repletion
03

In context

Edema

840 studies on the registry are indexed under Edema; 92 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 160 is above the median of 52 across 608 interventional studies indexed under Edema.

Browse Edema studies →

Lead sponsor

Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona is the lead sponsor of 38 studies on the registry; 17 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • both sexes
  • grater than 18 year old
  • requiring spinal anesthesia
  • classified according to American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) level as 1, 2 or 3

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients required invasive blood pressure monitoring (arterial/pulmonary catheter, thermodilution catheter),
  • patients show signs of pre-procedural hypotension (defined as two measurements of systolic arterial pressure less than 80 mmHg and/or mean arterial pressure less than 60 mmHg),
  • patients unable to give informed consent to language barriers, mental retard or any reduction in own ability to understand or give their informed consent,
  • patient in which is not possible to perform spinal anesthesia for patient's refusal or technical difficulties in sampling,
  • patients with International Normalized Ratio (INR) greater than 1.5 and/or activated Partial Thrombin Time in therapeutic range (more than 1.5 - 2 times the patient's normal values) and/or anti-factor X activity in therapeutic range
  • patients with thrombocytopenia less than 50 G/l.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
160 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Wild-Type

    The setting is standard spinal anesthesia and corresponds to our first arm of the study, used as the control sample and statistical reference. During the induction phase, the patient is fitted with non-invasive blood pressure monitoring, three-lead ECG, pulse-oximetry and peripheral intravenous device. Data and vital signs are recorded and an infusion of crystalloid (NaCl 0.9% or Ringer's acetate) is given during the procedure until the beginning of the operation. Total amount of fluid is also recorded before and after the spinal anesthesia.

  • Experimental
    Echocardiography

    In addition to the current clinical standard, a Trans-Thoracic Echocardiography is performed before spinal anesthesia, with the aim of assessing the patient's volume status; the exam is performed to assess size and collapsing of the Inferior Vena Cava during breathing cycle. According to different pre-established parameters13, the patient is defined as fluid-responsive or unresponsive. If the patient is not responsive, investigators proceed to spinal anesthesia; otherwise they proceed to administration of crystalloid bolus (500 ml of NaCl 0.9% or Hartmann's solution). The patient may receive another bolus so as to reach a non-responsive pattern for echocardiographic evaluation.

    Device: Ultrasound-guided volemic repletion

Interventions

  • DeviceUltrasound-guided volemic repletion

    After echocardiography analysis of Inferior Vena Cava, patient is repleted with a pre-established bolus of fluid (500 ml of crystalloid). After this repletion, patient is analyzed till the exam reach signal of non-responsiveness, previously defined as a reduction of Inferior Vena Cava diameter less than 36% from baseline level during normal breath

    Also known as: IVCUS

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of Arterial Hypotension

    To compare rates of arterial hypotension (previously define by international standard) after spinal anesthesia in patients who have undergone volemic optimization according to Trans-thoracic Echocardiography with patients who have been treated according to the current standard on the intention to treat population.

    Time frame: 30 minute after spinal anesthesia

Secondary outcomes

  1. Total Amount of IV Fluid at the End of the Procedure

    To assess if there is a difference between all treatments in the total quantity of fluids amount

    Time frame: 30 minutes after spinal anesthesia

  2. Percentage of Participants Administered Vasoactive Drug

    Total amount of vasoactive drug administered for each group; for "vasoactive drug" we intended the use both of atropine than vascular amine

    Time frame: 30 minutes after spinal anesthesia

  3. Time of Procedures

    Time employed to execute all procedure from the start of the study till 30 minutes after the end of the procedure

    Time frame: From time 0 to 30 minutes after spinal anesthesia

07

Results

Posted Apr 20, 2015
Limitations and caveats
It cannot be performed blindly. Ultrasound is an operator-dependent technique.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneWild-TypeEchocardiography
Started8080
Completed8080
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryRate of Arterial Hypotension

To compare rates of arterial hypotension (previously define by international standard) after spinal anesthesia in patients who have undergone volemic optimization according to Trans-thoracic Echocardiography with patients who have been treated according to the current standard on the intention to treat population.

Time frame:
30 minute after spinal anesthesia
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Rate of Arterial Hypotension
percentage of participantsWild-TypeEchocardiography
Rate of Arterial Hypotension42.527.5
SecondaryTotal Amount of IV Fluid at the End of the Procedure

To assess if there is a difference between all treatments in the total quantity of fluids amount

Time frame:
30 minutes after spinal anesthesia
Reported as:
Median · milliliters (mL)
Total Amount of IV Fluid at the End of the Procedure
milliliters (mL)Wild-TypeEchocardiography
Total Amount of IV Fluid at the End of the Procedure350 (200 to 550)665 (250 to 800)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Administered Vasoactive Drug

Total amount of vasoactive drug administered for each group; for "vasoactive drug" we intended the use both of atropine than vascular amine

Time frame:
30 minutes after spinal anesthesia
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Administered Vasoactive Drug
percentage of participantsWild-TypeEchocardiography
Percentage of Participants Administered Vasoactive Drug13.516.49
SecondaryTime of Procedures

Time employed to execute all procedure from the start of the study till 30 minutes after the end of the procedure

Time frame:
From time 0 to 30 minutes after spinal anesthesia
Reported as:
Mean · minutes
Time of Procedures
minutesWild-TypeEchocardiography
Time of Procedures22 ± 1324 ± 10

Adverse events

Collected over Serious Adverse Events are checked till the end of the surgical procedure.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Wild-Type—0/80 (0%)0/80 (0%)
Echocardiography—0/80 (0%)0/80 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Wild-TypeEchocardiographyTotal
Mean59.7 ± 16.756.6 ± 18.857.74 ± 18.18
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Wild-TypeEchocardiographyTotal
Female444387
Male363773
Weight
Weight(Kg)Wild-TypeEchocardiographyTotal
Mean78.01 ± 18.4076.07 ± 17.5976.52 ± 25
Systolic blood pressure (SBP) pre-induction
Systolic blood pressure (SBP) pre-induction(mmHg)Wild-TypeEchocardiographyTotal
Mean136 ± 22132 ± 21134.05 ± 21.95
Mean blood pressure (MBP) pre-induction
Mean blood pressure (MBP) pre-induction(mmHg)Wild-TypeEchocardiographyTotal
Mean94.5 ± 13.9991.5 ± 1393 ± 13.21
Heart Rate (HR) pre-induction
Heart Rate (HR) pre-induction(bpm)Wild-TypeEchocardiographyTotal
Mean70 ± 1672 ± 1271.88 ± 12.27
B-blockers therapy
B-blockers therapy(participants)Wild-TypeEchocardiographyTotal
B-blockers718
No therapy7379152
ACE-inhibitors therapy
ACE-inhibitors therapy(participants)Wild-TypeEchocardiographyTotal
ACE-inhibitors9514
No therapy7175146

2 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

1 site
  • Ospedale Regionale di Bellinzona e Valli (ORBV) - Sede Bellinzona
    Bellinzona, 6500, Switzerland
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Antonelli M, Levy M, Andrews PJ, Chastre J, Hudson LD, Manthous C, Meduri GU, Moreno RP, Putensen C, Stewart T, Torres A. Hemodynamic monitoring in shock and implications for management. International Consensus Conference, Paris, France, 27-28 April 2006. Intensive Care Med. 2007 Apr;33(4):575-90. doi: 10.1007/s00134-007-0531-4. PubMed 17285286 ↗
  • Carpenter RL, Caplan RA, Brown DL, Stephenson C, Wu R. Incidence and risk factors for side effects of spinal anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 1992 Jun;76(6):906-16. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199206000-00006. PubMed 1599111 ↗
  • Kim HJ, Kim JS. A cardiovascular collapse following vigorous cough during spinal anesthesia. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2013 Dec;65(6 Suppl):S49-50. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2013.65.6S.S49. No abstract available. PubMed 24478870 ↗
  • Nogueira CS, Lima LC, Paris VC, Neiva PM, Otani ET, Couceiro Rde O, Burim F, Ferreira JA Jr, Cadecaro P. A comparative study between bupivacaine (S75-R25) and ropivacaine in spinal anesthesia for labor analgesia. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2010 Sep-Oct;60(5):484-94. doi: 10.1016/S0034-7094(10)70060-X. English, Portuguese. PubMed 20863929 ↗
  • Cherpanath TG, Geerts BF, Lagrand WK, Schultz MJ, Groeneveld AB. Basic concepts of fluid responsiveness. Neth Heart J. 2013 Dec;21(12):530-6. doi: 10.1007/s12471-013-0487-7. PubMed 24170232 ↗
  • Jabalameli M, Soltani HA, Hashemi J, Behdad S, Soleimani B. Prevention of post-spinal hypotension using crystalloid, colloid and ephedrine with three different combinations: A double blind randomized study. Adv Biomed Res. 2012;1:36. doi: 10.4103/2277-9175.100129. Epub 2012 Aug 28. PubMed 23326767 ↗
  • Xu S, Wu H, Zhao Q, Shen X, Guo X, Wang F. The median effective volume of crystalloid in preventing hypotension in patients undergoing cesarean delivery with spinal anesthesia. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2012 May-Jun;62(3):312-24. doi: 10.1016/S0034-7094(12)70132-0. PubMed 22656677 ↗
  • Buggy DJ, Power CK, Meeke R, O'Callaghan S, Moran C, O'Brien GT. Prevention of spinal anaesthesia-induced hypotension in the elderly: i.m. methoxamine or combined hetastarch and crystalloid. Br J Anaesth. 1998 Feb;80(2):199-203. doi: 10.1093/bja/80.2.199. PubMed 9602585 ↗
  • Vieillard-Baron A, Chergui K, Rabiller A, Peyrouset O, Page B, Beauchet A, Jardin F. Superior vena caval collapsibility as a gauge of volume status in ventilated septic patients. Intensive Care Med. 2004 Sep;30(9):1734-9. doi: 10.1007/s00134-004-2361-y. Epub 2004 Jun 26. PubMed 15375649 ↗
  • Zollei E, Bertalan V, Nemeth A, Csabi P, Laszlo I, Kaszaki J, Rudas L. Non-invasive detection of hypovolemia or fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing subjects. BMC Anesthesiol. 2013 Nov 5;13(1):40. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-13-40. PubMed 24188480 ↗
  • Barbier C, Loubieres Y, Schmit C, Hayon J, Ricome JL, Jardin F, Vieillard-Baron A. Respiratory changes in inferior vena cava diameter are helpful in predicting fluid responsiveness in ventilated septic patients. Intensive Care Med. 2004 Sep;30(9):1740-6. doi: 10.1007/s00134-004-2259-8. Epub 2004 Mar 18. PubMed 15034650 ↗
  • Zhang Z, Xu X, Ye S, Xu L. Ultrasonographic measurement of the respiratory variation in the inferior vena cava diameter is predictive of fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2014 May;40(5):845-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2013.12.010. Epub 2014 Feb 2. PubMed 24495437 ↗
  • Lamia B, Ochagavia A, Monnet X, Chemla D, Richard C, Teboul JL. Echocardiographic prediction of volume responsiveness in critically ill patients with spontaneously breathing activity. Intensive Care Med. 2007 Jul;33(7):1125-1132. doi: 10.1007/s00134-007-0646-7. Epub 2007 May 17. PubMed 17508199 ↗
  • Muller L, Bobbia X, Toumi M, Louart G, Molinari N, Ragonnet B, Quintard H, Leone M, Zoric L, Lefrant JY; AzuRea group. Respiratory variations of inferior vena cava diameter to predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients with acute circulatory failure: need for a cautious use. Crit Care. 2012 Oct 8;16(5):R188. doi: 10.1186/cc11672. PubMed 23043910 ↗
  • Chinachoti T, Tritrakarn T. Prospective study of hypotension and bradycardia during spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine: incidence and risk factors, part two. J Med Assoc Thai. 2007 Mar;90(3):492-501. PubMed 17427526 ↗
  • Slama M, Masson H, Teboul JL, Arnout ML, Susic D, Frohlich E, Andrejak M. Respiratory variations of aortic VTI: a new index of hypovolemia and fluid responsiveness. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2002 Oct;283(4):H1729-33. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00308.2002. Epub 2002 Jun 20. PubMed 12234829 ↗
  • Ceruti S, Anselmi L, Minotti B, Franceschini D, Aguirre J, Borgeat A, Saporito A. Prevention of arterial hypotension after spinal anaesthesia using vena cava ultrasound to guide fluid management. Br J Anaesth. 2018 Jan;120(1):101-108. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.08.001. Epub 2017 Nov 23. PubMed 29397116 ↗
10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of May 2014, a primary completion of Nov 2014 and a completion of Dec 2014. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Apr 2015, 5 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 10, 2014
First posted
Oct 22, 2014
Start
May 2014
Primary completionActual
Nov 2014
CompletionActual
Dec 2014
Results first posted
Apr 20, 2015
Last update
Aug 31, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 31, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02271477
Lead sponsor
Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 22, 2014
Start date
May 2014
Primary completion
Nov 2014
Completion
Dec 2014
Results posted
Apr 20, 2015
Last update
Aug 31, 2017

Study contacts

Samuele Ceruti, MD
principal investigator · Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion