An interventional study of Delefilcon A contact lenses and Narafilcon A contact lenses in Myopia and Refractive Error, sponsored by Alcon Research. Completed at 1 site in Japan. Open to participants aged 20 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-01-29.
Sponsored by Alcon Research (part of Alcon) · Not applicable and Interventional
The purpose of this study is to compare the lens centration of DAILIES TOTAL1® (DT1) contact lenses to 1-DAY ACUVUE® Tru-Eye® (1DAVTE) contact lenses in a Japanese population after 7 ± 2 days of wearing of each product.
1,007 studies on the registry are indexed under Myopia; 210 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 53 is below the median of 80 across 803 interventional studies indexed under Myopia.
Browse Myopia studies →Alcon Research is the lead sponsor of 624 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.
Of its 111 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 100 (90%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Delefilcon A contact lenses worn first, followed by narafilcon A contact lenses. Each product worn bilaterally for 7 days on a daily wear, daily disposable basis.
Device: Delefilcon A contact lenses · Device: Narafilcon A contact lenses
Narafilcon A contact lenses worn first, followed by delefilcon A contact lenses. Each product worn bilaterally for 7 days on a daily wear, daily disposable basis.
Device: Delefilcon A contact lenses · Device: Narafilcon A contact lenses
Silicone hydrogel contact lenses (8.5 and 8.8 base curves) dispensed per manufacturer's guidelines for daily disposable wear
Also known as: DAILIES TOTAL1®
Silicone hydrogel contact lenses (8.5 and 9.0 base curves) dispensed per manufacturer's guidelines for daily disposable wear
Also known as: 1-DAY ACUVUE® TruEye®
Success Rate of Lens Centration After 7 ± 2 Days of Wear
Lens centration (the centration of the contact lens over the cornea) was rated by the investigator during slit lamp examination using a 5-point scale (0=optimal, 4=severe decentration). Success was defined as the percentage of subjects whose lens centration was rated as "optimal" or "slight decentration. One eye (study eye) was analyzed.
Time frame: Day 7, each product
Subjects were recruited from 3 study centers located in Japan.
| Milestone | DT1, Then 1DAVTE | 1DAVTE, Then DT1 |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 23 | 24 |
| Completed | 23 | 24 |
| Not completed | 0 | 0 |
| Milestone | DT1, Then 1DAVTE | 1DAVTE, Then DT1 |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 23 | 24 |
| Completed | 23 | 24 |
| Not completed | 0 | 0 |
Lens centration (the centration of the contact lens over the cornea) was rated by the investigator during slit lamp examination using a 5-point scale (0=optimal, 4=severe decentration). Success was defined as the percentage of subjects whose lens centration was rated as "optimal" or "slight decentration. One eye (study eye) was analyzed.
| percentage of subjects | Dailies Total 1 | 1DAVTE |
|---|---|---|
| Success Rate of Lens Centration After 7 ± 2 Days of Wear | 100.0 | 86.7 |
Collected over Adverse events (AEs) were collected for the duration of a subject's participation in the study (up to 14 days). AEs were obtained through use of a subjective questionnaire.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dailies Total 1 | — | 0/47 (0%) | 0/47 (0%) |
| 1DAVTE | — | 0/47 (0%) | 0/47 (0%) |
This analysis group includes all randomized subjects.
| Age, Continuous(years) | Overall |
|---|---|
| Mean | 37.0 ± 9.6 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Overall |
|---|---|
| Female | 37 |
| Male | 10 |
The record gives a start of Oct 2014, a primary completion of Nov 2014 and a completion of Nov 2014. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.
Results were first posted in Dec 2015, 1 year 1 month after primary completion.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.