CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02244450DEPISTRECUpdated Jul 24, 2018

Generalized Neonatal Screening of Severe Combined Immunodeficiencies

An interventional study of SCID screening in Severe Combined Immunodeficiency, Atypical, sponsored by Nantes University Hospital. Completed at 51 sites in France. Open to participants aged 3 Days to 18 Months, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-07-24.

Sponsored by Nantes University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Screening

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
190,539
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
3 Days to 18 Months
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Severe combined Immunodeficiencies ( SCID ) are a group of inherited diseases of the immune system by characterised profound abnormalities of T cell development . Infants with SCID require prompt clinical response to Prevent life -threatening infection and studies show significantly improved survival in babies Diagnosed at birth as a result of previous family history . SCID follows criteria for population -based newborn screening since it is asymptomatic at birth and fatal within the first year of life, the confirmation of the disease is easy, there is a curative treatment , and it is known that early stem cell transplantation improves survival . Quantification of TRECs (T- cell receptor excision circles ) in DNA extracted from Guthrie samples is a sensitive screening test for Specific and SCID .

The investigators propose in this study to perform a neonatal screening of SCID , in a population of 200,000 babies over a period of two years .

The investigators propose to study the clinical utility and cost effectiveness ratio, and SCID screening to demonstrate that could result in a broad benefit to Individuals detected , making screening relatively cost-effective in spite of the low incidence of the disease .

Read the detailed description

The project proposes to study the feasibility and cost-effectiveness ratio ( time management and life expectancy to 10 years) of generalized neonatal screening for SCID children by offering this screening to 200 000 children (100 000 children per year) over the entire territory. Prospective control group consists of children diagnosed with SCID out of 700,000 annual births who do not benefit from screening.

The protocol will be leant against the existing newborn screening , that is to say two more drops of blood are placed on a second Guthrie card when current screening (72 hours of life ) is performed after parents' information and consent. Eleven newborn screening regional associations will be involved with the inclusion of children in about 50 maternity hospitals. The card drawn for the protocol will follow the usual network except that the test for quantifying TRECs will be realized in two laboratories instead of eleven laboratories assigned to RA . Investigative Regional Associations (RAs) represent nearly 600,000 births / year and the amount of 200,000 children will be achieved in two years (duration of inclusion) . All children born in the participating maternity may be included if they meet the inclusion criteria. The result of the screening test for SCID will be available within 21 days after birth, provided that there is no need to request a new sample.

At each of eleven RA is associated a pediatrician referent for immune deficiencies, member of the french reference center (CEREDIH) and who will be responsible to call the parents, offer them a consultation and further exploration if the result of screening is assumed positive.

Analysis of cards from 200,000 children will give the following information:

  • Number of children with a presumptive positive screening , requiring a call by the referent pediatrician, consultation and exploration of lymphocyte subpopulations
  • Number of children with a negative screening
  • Number of children with an inconclusive screening (lack of TRECs and lack of amplification of the reference gene) and requiring a new card,

A micro- costing study will be conducted to assess the cost of testing .

This group of 200,000 children is the experimental group to assess the cost of screening , acceptability by parents (participation rate), the recall rate for abnormal or inconclusive result, the rate of follow-up time for results , the incidence of disease . It will also allow to calculate the specificity of the method .

At the end of the inclusions, the vital status at 18 months with cause of death will be sought for the 200 000 children included , with the CESP ( Centre de Recherche en Epidemiologie et Santé des Populations) via RNIPP (Répertoire National d'Identification des Personnes Physiques) and CepiDc ( Centre d'Epidémiologie sur les causes médicales de décès) . This will establish whether there are SCID in this population which were not detected at birth. Furthermore, the investigators include in the study SCID children diagnosed without screening by pediatricians local referents DIP (including Necker main transplant center) . This will enable to approach the sensitivity of the method . All these data allow the calculation of the predictive values of the test.

In this experimental group will be isolated a group of individuals who screened positive and diagnosed as true SCID . Clinical data for these patients will be collected in an electronic CRF ( CRF ) by the pediatrician referral protocol (Dr Thomas C ) , including:

  • The dates and results of explorations : lymphocyte subpopulations , blood count, determination of immunoglobulin levels
  • The diagnosis made with identification of the genetic defect
  • The date of care before curative treatment ( protected area isolation , anti -infective drugs )
  • , Bacterial , fungal anti -viral treatments , and other
  • The date of transplant, type of transplant or other treatment ... ...
02

Conditions studied

  • Severe Combined Immunodeficiency, Atypical

Keywords

  • Neonatal screening
  • severe combined immunodeficiency
  • T-cell Receptor Excision Circle
03

In context

Severe Combined Immunodeficiency

64 studies on the registry are indexed under Severe Combined Immunodeficiency; 15 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 190,539 is above the median of 9 across 34 interventional studies indexed under Severe Combined Immunodeficiency.

Browse Severe Combined Immunodeficiency studies →

Lead sponsor

Nantes University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 825 studies on the registry; 195 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
3 Days to 18 Months
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Screening Group: Newborn on day 3 of birth (premature and non premature)
  • Control group: Patients diagnosed with SCID without screening at participating centers

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lack of parental consent
  • Children whose parents are adults under guardianship,
  • Children without health insurance, for the screening group:
  • The early exit of the child from the maternity hospital
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
190,539 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Screened patients

    SCID screening: more drops of blood are placed on a second Guthrie card when current screening (72 hours of life ) is performed after parents' information and consent. The card drawn for the protocol will follow the usual network except that the test for quantifying TRECs will be realized to determine the presence of SCID.

    Biological: SCID screening

  • No intervention
    Control group

    SCID children diagnosed without screening by pediatricians local referents DIP

Interventions

  • BiologicalSCID screening
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. cost / efficiency ratio of the implementation of the generalized neonatal screening of SCID at birth

    Efficacy endpoint: number of children receiving early therapeutic suitable for curative ( transplant, enzyme treatment or gene therapy)

    Time frame: 18 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Cost / efficiency ratio of the implementation of the generalized neonatal screening of SCID at birth

    Efficacy endpoint: life expectancy of children modeled from the results of the study and data from the literature

    Time frame: 10 years

  2. The cost of care during the first 18 months of life per child enjoying an early curative treatment in the first 4 months of life.

    Costs of care will be estimated during the first 18 months of life of the child.

    Time frame: 18 months

  3. Length of hospitalization of children with SCID in the first 18 months of life

    Time frame: 18 months

  4. number of avoided deaths

    Time frame: 18 months

  5. number of detected SCID patients

    Time frame: 18 months

  6. number of patients detected with other T lymphopenia (SCID variants , DiGeorge , severe T lymphopenia non SCID ... )

    Time frame: 18 months

  7. number of false negative and false positive results

    False negative results : patients from the control group diagnosed with SCID without screening who would have a negative screening or patients from the screening group died from a SCID and with a negative screening False positive: patients from the screening group with a positive screening but without SCID

    Time frame: 18 months

07

Study locations

51 sites
  • Angers Private Hospital Clinique de l'Anjou
    Angers, France
  • Angers University Hospital
    Angers, France
  • Argenteuil Hospital
    Argenteuil, France
  • Aulnay-sous-Bois Hospital CHI Robert Ballanger
    Aulnay-sous-Bois, France
  • Bordeaux Maison de Santé Protestante Bordeaux Bagatelle
    Bordeaux, France
  • Bordeaux Private Hospital Polyclinique Bordeuax Nord Aquitaine
    Bordeaux, France
  • Bordeaux University Hospital
    Bordeaux, France
  • Corbeil Essonnes Hospital Sud Francilien
    Corbeil Essonnes, France
  • Créteil Hospital
    Créteil, France
  • Dijon University Hospital
    Dijon, France
  • Grenoble University Hospital
    Grenoble, France
  • Le Blanc Mesnil Private Hospital
    Le Blanc Mesnil, France
  • Lens Hospital
    Lens, France
  • Libourne Maternity Hospital
    Libourne, France
  • Lille University Hospital
    Lille, France
  • Lormont Maternity Hospital Rive Droite
    Lormont, France
  • Lyon Maternity Hospital
    Lyon, France
  • Lyon University Hospital
    Lyon, France
  • Marseille Saint-Joseph Hospital
    Marseille, France
  • Marseille University Hospital La Conception
    Marseille, France
  • Marseille University Hospital Nord
    Marseille, France
  • Marseille University Hospital
    Marseille, France
  • Meaux Hospital
    Meaux, France
  • Montreuil Hospital CHI André Grégroie
    Montreuil, France
  • Nantes University Hospital
    Nantes, 44000, France
  • Nantes Private Hospital Clinique Jules Verne
    Nantes, France
  • Nantes University Hospital
    Nantes, France
  • Paris Hospital Saint-Joseph
    Paris, France
  • Paris Necker University Hospital
    Paris, France
  • Paris University Hospital Armand-Trousseau
    Paris, France
  • Paris University Hospital Bichat
    Paris, France
  • Paris University Hospital Bicêtre
    Paris, France
  • Paris University Hospital Béclère
    Paris, France
  • Paris University Hospital Jean Verdier
    Paris, France
  • Paris University Hospital La Pitié Salpétrière
    Paris, France
  • Paris University Hospital Louis Mourier
    Paris, France
  • Paris University Hospital Necker
    Paris, France
  • Poissy Hospital CHI Poissy-Saint-Germain
    Poissy, France
  • Pontoise Hospital René Dubos
    Pontoise, France
  • Rennes Private Hospital Clinique Mutualiste La Sagesse
    Rennes, France
  • Rennes University Hospital
    Rennes, France
  • Saint-Grégoire Private Hospital
    Rennes, France
  • Roubaix Hospital
    Roubaix, France
  • Saint-Herblain Private Hospital Polyclinique de l'Atlantique
    Saint-Herblain, France
  • Saint-Mande Army Hospital Begin
    Saint-Mande, France
  • Saint-Martin-d'Hère Private Hospital Clinique Belledonne
    Saint-Martin d'Hères, France
  • Strasbourg Private Hospital Clinique Adassa
    Strasbourg, France
  • Strasbourg University Hospital
    Strasbourg, France
  • Toulouse Private Hospital Clinique Sarrus Teinturiers
    Toulouse, France
  • Toulouse University Hospital P. DE VIGUIER
    Toulouse, France
  • Toulouse University Hospital
    Toulouse, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Thomas C, Durand-Zaleski I, Frenkiel J, Mirallie S, Leger A, Cheillan D, Picard C, Mahlaoui N, Riche VP, Roussey M, Sebille V, Rabetrano H, Dert C, Fischer A, Audrain M. Clinical and economic aspects of newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency: DEPISTREC study results. Clin Immunol. 2019 May;202:33-39. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2019.03.012. Epub 2019 Apr 1. PubMed 30946917 ↗
  • Audrain MAP, Leger AJC, Hemont CAF, Mirallie SM, Cheillan D, Rimbert MGM, Le Thuaut AM, Sebille-Rivain VA, Prat A, Pinel EMQ, Divry E, Dert CGL, Fournier MAG, Thomas CJC. Newborn Screening for Severe Combined Immunodeficiency: Analytic and Clinical Performance of the T Cell Receptor Excision Circle Assay in France (DEPISTREC Study). J Clin Immunol. 2018 Oct;38(7):778-786. doi: 10.1007/s10875-018-0550-7. Epub 2018 Sep 24. PubMed 30251145 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 24, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02244450
Lead sponsor
Nantes University Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 19, 2014
Start date
Dec 2014
Primary completion
Apr 28, 2018
Completion
Apr 28, 2018
Last update
Jul 24, 2018

Study contacts

Caroline THOMAS, MD
principal investigator · Nantes University Hospital
Marie AUDRAIN, MD
study director · Nantes University Hospital
Sophie MIRALLIE
principal investigator · Nantes University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion