ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02241733Updated Oct 3, 2019Results posted

Sustainability of Pulmonary Rehab Gains

An interventional study of Breathing retraining plus exercise and Exercise only in COPD, sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 40 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-10-03.

Sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

People with moderate to severe COPD trap air in their lungs. This lessens their ability to exercise. The investigators developed a computerized breathing retraining program to help patients empty their lungs during exercise. The investigators believe that learning to control breathing will help patients be more active. The purpose of this study is to test the effects of using breathing retraining (intervention group) versus no breathing retraining (control group) as part of a 12-week exercise program. The investigators are examining the long term effects of this training on exercise capacity and the ability to empty ones lungs during exercise. Patients will participate in a 12-week exercise program, with or without breathing retraining. They will then participate in a 42 week adherence program to maintain physical activity. Patient testing will be competed at baseline, 12 weeks, 6 months and 1 year. 250 patients with moderate to severe COPD will be enrolled.

Read the detailed description

Rationale: Development of dynamic hyperinflation is a primary limiting factor of exercise tolerance in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). To lessen the development of dynamic hyperinflation, and to improve exercise tolerance in COPD patients, the investigators have developed a breathing-retraining technique to be used during pulmonary rehabilitation. This breathing-retraining technique is designed to decrease respiratory rate and prolong exhalation. The investigators demonstrated that, in the short-term, hyperinflation and exercise duration improved more with breathing-retraining plus exercise-training than with exercise-training alone. Because a crucial aspect of pulmonary rehabilitation is the maintenance its short-term benefits over the long-term, the investigators now propose to test whether short-term benefits of breathing-retraining plus exercise followed by an adherence-intervention program are sustainable over the long-term Primary Hypothesis: (H1) In COPD patients, improvements in exercise duration on a constant- load treadmill test will be greater after 12 weeks of breathing-retraining plus exercise-training followed by a 42-week adherence-intervention program (1 yr. total) than after 12 weeks of exercise-training alone followed by a 42-week adherence-intervention program (1 yr. total). Secondary Hypotheses: One year after randomization, exercise-induced dynamic hyperinflation will be less during a constant-load treadmill test (H2), 6-minute walking distance will be longer (H3), and mastery over breathing will be greater (H4) in the breathing-retraining plus exercise-training group than in the exercise-alone group. Lastly (exploratory objective), the investigators will assess the effect of the patient's physiologic, psychologic and clinical phenotype on short- term and long-term responsiveness to pulmonary rehabilitation.

Methods: The proposed study is a randomized, controlled clinical trial in which 250 patients with moderate-to-severe COPD will be enrolled. One hundred forty of these patients are expected to qualify for randomization into the breathing-retraining plus exercise-training group or the exercise-training alone group. Patients will receive 12-weeks of supervised training according to group assignment (three times weekly) followed by an adherence-intervention program (weekly phone motivational interviews, home-exercise program, and monthly laboratory booster sessions). Follow-up testing will be completed at 12 weeks, and at 6 and 12 months. Testing will include pulmonary function test, incremental-load and constant-load treadmill tests, 6-minute walk test, measurements of dyspnea, assessment of respiratory and quadriceps muscle strength and endurance and quadriceps ultrasonography. Analysis: In the principal analysis of the primary outcome measure (exercise duration; H1) the investigators will compare changes in exercise duration (constant work-rate treadmill test) from baseline to end of study using 2-sample t-test (two-tailed =.05). The primary analysis will be based on intention-to-treat principles. Multiple imputation will be used for study subjects missing the 12-month measurement. This imputation model will be based on baseline characteristics of study participants. Several secondary analyses of the primary outcome measure will be performed (H2-H4). Linear regression will be used to determine whether the observed treatment benefits persist after adjustment for baseline covariates and measures of adherence to treatment. Since several measurements will be taken on each patient, mixed-models analysis will be used to compare the changes on the constant-load treadmill test over time between the two groups.

02

Conditions studied

  • COPD

Keywords

  • exercise
  • pulmonary rehabilitation
  • dynamic hyperinflation
03

In context

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

4,252 studies on the registry are indexed under Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; 707 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 80 is above the median of 70 across 3,008 interventional studies indexed under Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive.

Browse Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive studies →

Lead sponsor

VA Office of Research and Development is the lead sponsor of 1,767 studies on the registry; 394 are open to participants now.

Of its 209 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 183 (88%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • >/= 40 yrs
  • FEV1 \</= 70% predicted
  • FEV1/FVC \<70% predicted
  • RV/TLC >/=120%
  • SpO2 >/= 90% at peak exercise (with or without exercise)
  • inspiratory capacity decline >.15L from rest to peak exercise

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • respiratory infection/exacerbation within the previous 4 weeks
  • exercise limiting heart disease
  • primary asthma
  • congestive heart failure
  • exercise limiting peripheral arterial disease
  • stops exercise due to arthritic pain in the knee or hips
  • inability to walk on the treadmill
  • pregnancy
  • methadone use
  • any unforeseen illness or disability that would preclude exercise testing or training
  • participation in a formal exercise program within the previous 12 weeks
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Factorial assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
80 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    exercise

    Patients will exercise for 12 weeks and then participate in an adherence program

    Behavioral: Exercise only

  • Experimental
    exercise plus breathing retraining

    Patients will exercise plus breathing retraining for 12 weeks and then participate in an adherence program

    Behavioral: Breathing retraining plus exercise

Interventions

  • BehavioralBreathing retraining plus exercise

    Patients will participate in a 12-week exercise program with breathing retraining. They will also participate in an adherence program.

  • BehavioralExercise only

    Patients will participate in a 12-week exercise program . They will also participate in an adherence program.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Duration of Exercise Time on a Constant Work-rate Treadmill Test

    Patients walk on a treadmill set at a constant workrate. The difference in the time walked on the treadmill from baseline to study completion is the primary outcome measure.

    Time frame: 52 week test

Secondary outcomes

  1. Inspiratory Capacity

    Inspiratory capacity is measured at a set time during the constant workrate treadmill test. The difference between the inspiratory capacity measured at baseline and 52 weeks is a secondary outcome. Inspiratory capacity measured during exercise is a measure of dynamic hyperinflation.

    Time frame: 52 week test

  2. 6 Minute Walk Distance

    Six-minute walk distance will be measured at 52 weeks. The difference in distance walked in meters between baseline and 52 weeks is the secondary outcome measure. The 6 minute walk is conducted using the guidelines issued by the American Thoracic Society.

    Time frame: 52 weeks

  3. Mastery Over Breathing

    Mastery over breathing is measured using the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire. Specifically the subscale 'mastery" is the investigators' secondary outcome. The difference in scores from baseline to 52 weeks is the investigators' outcome measure. The Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire is a valid and reliable questionnaire. 1=minimum score, 7=maximum with the higher score indicating greater mastery. A higher score indicates better health. A change of 0.5 indicates a small change, 1.0 indicates a moderate change and greater or equal to a change of 1.5 indicates a large change.

    Time frame: 52 weeks

07

Results

Posted Oct 3, 2019

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneExerciseExercise Plus Breathing Retraining
Started4040
Completed2530
Not completed1510
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up94
Withdrew: Physician decision62
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject02
Withdrew: Death02

Outcome measures

PrimaryDuration of Exercise Time on a Constant Work-rate Treadmill Test

Patients walk on a treadmill set at a constant workrate. The difference in the time walked on the treadmill from baseline to study completion is the primary outcome measure.

Time frame:
52 week test
Reported as:
Mean · change in number of minutes walked
Duration of Exercise Time on a Constant Work-rate Treadmill Test
change in number of minutes walkedExerciseExercise Plus Breathing Retraining
Duration of Exercise Time on a Constant Work-rate Treadmill Test12.2 ± 3.512.5 ± 3.5
Statistical analysis
  • Exercise vs Exercise Plus Breathing Retraining · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.94
SecondaryInspiratory Capacity

Inspiratory capacity is measured at a set time during the constant workrate treadmill test. The difference between the inspiratory capacity measured at baseline and 52 weeks is a secondary outcome. Inspiratory capacity measured during exercise is a measure of dynamic hyperinflation.

Time frame:
52 week test
Reported as:
Mean · difference in liters inspired
Inspiratory Capacity
difference in liters inspiredExerciseExercise Plus Breathing Retraining
Inspiratory Capacity-0.02 ± .07.15 ± .07
Statistical analysis
  • Exercise vs Exercise Plus Breathing Retraining · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.078
Secondary6 Minute Walk Distance

Six-minute walk distance will be measured at 52 weeks. The difference in distance walked in meters between baseline and 52 weeks is the secondary outcome measure. The 6 minute walk is conducted using the guidelines issued by the American Thoracic Society.

Time frame:
52 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · meters
6 Minute Walk Distance
metersExerciseExercise Plus Breathing Retraining
6 Minute Walk Distance25.9 ± 8.522.8 ± 8.7
Statistical analysis
  • Exercise vs Exercise Plus Breathing Retraining · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.80
SecondaryMastery Over Breathing

Mastery over breathing is measured using the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire. Specifically the subscale 'mastery" is the investigators' secondary outcome. The difference in scores from baseline to 52 weeks is the investigators' outcome measure. The Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire is a valid and reliable questionnaire. 1=minimum score, 7=maximum with the higher score indicating greater mastery. A higher score indicates better health. A change of 0.5 indicates a small change, 1.0 indicates a moderate change and greater or equal to a change of 1.5 indicates a large change.

Time frame:
52 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Mastery Over Breathing
score on a scaleExerciseExercise Plus Breathing Retraining
Mastery Over Breathing1.9 ± 4.92.3 ± 4.6
Statistical analysis
  • Exercise vs Exercise Plus Breathing Retraining · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.76

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse event data were collected over the course of study participation (1 year or the time the patients remained in the study).. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Exercise1/40 (2.5%)16/40 (40%)0/40 (0%)
Exercise Plus Breathing Retraining2/40 (5%)15/40 (37.5%)0/40 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventExerciseExercise Plus Breathing Retraining
COPD ExacerbationRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders13/4011/40
Atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders1/400/40
Rectal abscessGastrointestinal disorders1/400/40
Kidney stonesRenal and urinary disorders1/400/40
brain aneurysmNervous system disorders1/400/40
cellulitisBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/401/40
meningiomaNervous system disorders0/401/40
leukemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/401/40
strokeVascular disorders0/401/40

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)ExerciseExercise Plus Breathing RetrainingTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years121426
>=65 years282654
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)ExerciseExercise Plus Breathing RetrainingTotal
Mean66.5 ± 6.668.3 ± 6.667.4 ± 6.6
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)ExerciseExercise Plus Breathing RetrainingTotal
Female213
Male383977
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)ExerciseExercise Plus Breathing RetrainingTotal
Hispanic or Latino415
Not Hispanic or Latino363975
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)ExerciseExercise Plus Breathing RetrainingTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American11819
White293261
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)ExerciseExercise Plus Breathing RetrainingTotal
United States404080
Time walked on constant workload treadmill test
Time walked on constant workload treadmill test(minutes walked)ExerciseExercise Plus Breathing RetrainingTotal
Mean7.2 ± 1.97.1 ± 2.07.2 ± 1.9
Inspiratory capacity
Inspiratory capacity(liters)ExerciseExercise Plus Breathing RetrainingTotal
Mean2.09 ± .691.88 ± .491.99 ± .59
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Edward Hines Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, IL
    Hines, Illinois 60141-5000, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Aug 13, 2019

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Oct 2014 to primary completion in Oct 2018, 48 months.

Results were first posted in Oct 2019, 11 months after primary completion.

Of 796 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 45. This study's 48 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 848 studies reached it within 24 months; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 42.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 12, 2014
First posted
Sep 16, 2014
StartActual
Oct 1, 2014
Primary completionActual
Oct 21, 2018
CompletionActual
Aug 12, 2019
Results first posted
Oct 3, 2019
Last update
Oct 3, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 3, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02241733
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 16, 2014
Start date
Oct 1, 2014
Primary completion
Oct 21, 2018
Completion
Aug 12, 2019
Results posted
Oct 3, 2019
Last update
Oct 3, 2019

Study contacts

Eileen G. Collins, PhD RN
principal investigator · Edward Hines Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, IL

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion