CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT02240472Updated Jul 14, 2026

Sentinel Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer: Omission of Axillary Clearance After Macrometastases. A Randomized Trial.

An interventional study of Omission of axillary clearance in Breast Cancer, sponsored by Karolinska Institutet. Active, not recruiting at 33 sites in 3 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-14.

Sponsored by Karolinska Institutet · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
2,766
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Since the introduction of sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer, it has become clear that its use is reliable and reproducible. Today, it is clinical routine to not remove further lymph nodes from the axilla (arm pit) in case the sentinel node (which is the first lymph node/s reached by lymphatic flow from the breast) is free of tumor deposits. It is also routine to leave remaining lymph nodes behind in case the sentinel node contains a minimal cluster of tumor cells, called isolated tumor cells (formerly submicrometastasis). Even in slightly larger tumor deposits, so called micrometastasis (up to 2 mm in size), it has been shown that a completion axillary clearance (removal of further lymph nodes from the arm pit) does not contribute to a better survival. Data from a randomized study indicate that it seems safe to omit axillary clearance even if the sentinel node biopsy shows up to 2 nodes with tumor deposits over 2 mm in size (macrometastasis). These studies have changed clinical practice in many countries, however, it is still debated whether it is safe to omit axillary clearance in the case of sentinel node macrometastasis due to under-recruitment in the aforementioned study. The rationale for omitting extensive axillary surgery is the avoidance of postoperative morbidity such as arm lymphedema, loss of sensation, pain and swelling.

The hypothesis is that refraining from axillary clearance in breast cancer patients with 1-2 sentinel nodes with macrometastasis will not worsen 5-year overall survival (primary endpoint) by more than a maximum of 2.5%.

This study is a prospective international randomized trial planning for enrolment of 3500 patients.

Breast cancer patients without signs of axillary nodal involvement will be eligible for sentinel node biopsy. Those who are found to have up to two sentinel node containing macrometastasis will be informed about this trial Those wishing to participate will be randomized to either undergo further axillary surgery (clearance) or not. Secondary endpoints are oncological outcomes at 1-5, 10 and 15 years (local, regional and distant recurrence, recurrence-free and breast cancer-specific survival and contralateral breast cancer), patient-reported arm morbidity at 1, 3, 5 and 10 years, patient-reported quality of life at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years, and health economic outcomes at 1, 3, 5 and 10 years.

Read the detailed description

Details can be found on www.senomac.se

02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Cancer

Keywords

  • sentinel node biopsy, lymph node metastasis, survival
03

In context

Breast Neoplasms

12,543 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 2,892 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 2,766 is above the median of 72 across 9,302 interventional studies indexed under Breast Neoplasms.

Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Karolinska Institutet is the lead sponsor of 1,113 studies on the registry; 267 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with invasive breast cancer (T1-T3)
  • N0 on palpation
  • Preoperative ultrasound performed
  • Macrometastasis in 1-2 sentinel lymph nodes
  • The patient must have provided oral and written consent
  • Age ≥ 18 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Metastases outside of the ipsilateral axilla
  • Prior history of invasive breast cancer
  • Pregnancy
  • Bilateral breast cancer if one side meets exclusion criteria
  • Medical contraindication for radiotherapy or systemic treatment
  • Inability to absorb or understand the meaning of the study information; for example, through disability, inadequate language skills or dementia.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
2,766 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Axillary clearance

    Patients in this arm will be treated by completion axillary clearance after a sentinel node biopsy showing 1-2 nodes with macrometastasis

  • Experimental
    No axillary clearance

    Patients in this arm will not undergo further axillary surgery after a sentinel node biopsy showing 1-2 nodes with macrometastasis

    Procedure: Omission of axillary clearance

Interventions

  • ProcedureOmission of axillary clearance

    The intervention is the omission of completion axillary clearance after the detection of sentinel node macrometastasis

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. overall survival

    death of any cause in both arms measured at a median follow-up of 5

    Time frame: up to 15 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. recurrence-free survival

    Any invasive breast cancer recurrence and death of any cause are regarded as events

    Time frame: 5, 10 and 15 years

  2. breast cancer-specific survival

    Death attributed to breast cancer is regarded as the event

    Time frame: 5, 10 and 15 years

  3. patient-reported outcomes

    Patients report on any arm-related problems and functional outcomes at an early postoperative assessment and after 1, 3, 5 and 10 years. Questionnaires include EORTC QLQ-BR23 and C30 and Lymph-ICF.

    Time frame: early postoperative, 1, 3, 5, and 10 years

  4. health economy

    The use of health care resources is assessed by QUALYs by means of the EQ5D questionnaire

    Time frame: 1, 3, 5 and 10 years

  5. additional oncological outcomes

    local, regional and distant recurrences will be reported as events and reported within recurrence-free survival and as distinct events

    Time frame: yearly 1-5 years, 10 and 15 years

07

Study locations

33 sites
  • Sygehus Sonderjylland
    Aabenraa, Denmark
  • Aalborg University Hospital
    Aalborg, Denmark
  • Aarhus University Hospital
    Aarhus, Denmark
  • Rigshospitalet
    Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Sydvestjysk Sygehus
    Esbjerg, Denmark
  • Sygehus Lillebaelt
    Lillebaelt, Denmark
  • Odense University Hospital
    Odense, Denmark
  • Randers Regionshospitalet
    Randers, Denmark
  • Regionshospitalet Viborg
    Viborg, Denmark
  • Athens University Hospital
    Athens, Greece
  • Gävle sjukhus
    Gävle, Sweden
  • Sahlgrenska University Hospital
    Gothenburg, Sweden
  • Hallands sjukhus
    Halmstad, Sweden
  • Helsingborg lasarett
    Helsingborg, Sweden
  • Länssjukhuset Ryhov
    Jönköping, Sweden
  • Kalmar sjukhus
    Kalmar, Sweden
  • Blekinge sjukhuset
    Karlskrona, Sweden
  • Karlstad sjukhus
    Karlstad, Sweden
  • Central Hospital Kristianstad
    Kristianstad, Sweden
  • Linköping University Hospital
    Linköping, Sweden
  • Malmö/Lund University Hospital
    Lund, Sweden
  • Örebro University Hospital
    Örebro, Sweden
  • Skaraborgs sjukhus
    Skövde/Lidköping, Sweden
  • Karolinska University Hospital
    Stockholm, Sweden
  • Southern Gerenal Hospital
    Stockholm, Sweden
  • St. Görans Hospital
    Stockholm, Sweden
  • Sundsvall länssjukhus
    Sundsvall, Sweden
  • Uddevalla sjukhus
    Uddevalla, Sweden
  • Umeå University Hospital
    Umeå, Sweden
  • Akademiska Sjukhuset
    Uppsala, Sweden
  • Varbergs sjukhus
    Varberg, Sweden
  • Västerås Central Hospital
    Västerås, Sweden
  • Västervik Hospital
    Västervik, Sweden
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Alkner S, Appelgren M, Szulkin R, Wieslander E, Rogowski V, Gustafsson CJ, Nissen HD, Sackey H, Lundstedt D, Andersson Y, Bergkvist L, Frisell J, Olofsson Bagge R, Sund M, Ryden L, Offersen BV, de Boniface J. Association between shoulder joint radiation dose and arm morbidity in the randomized breast cancer trial SENOMAC. Radiother Oncol. 2026 May;218:111454. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2026.111454. Epub 2026 Feb 21. PubMed 41730479 ↗
  • Skarping I, Bendahl PO, Szulkin R, Alkner S, Andersson Y, Bergkvist L, Christiansen P, Filtenborg Tvedskov T, Frisell J, Gentilini OD, Kontos M, Kuhn T, Lundstedt D, Vrou Offersen B, Olofsson Bagge R, Reimer T, Sund M, Ryden L, de Boniface J. Prediction of High Nodal Burden in Patients With Sentinel Node-Positive Luminal ERBB2-Negative Breast Cancer. JAMA Surg. 2024 Dec 1;159(12):1393-1403. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.3944. PubMed 39320882 ↗
  • de Boniface J, Appelgren M, Szulkin R, Alkner S, Andersson Y, Bergkvist L, Frisell J, Gentilini OD, Kontos M, Kuhn T, Lundstedt D, Offersen BV, Olofsson Bagge R, Reimer T, Sund M, Christiansen P, Ryden L, Filtenborg Tvedskov T; SENOMAC Trialists' Group. Completion axillary lymph node dissection for the identification of pN2-3 status as an indication for adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment: a post-hoc analysis of the randomised, phase 3 SENOMAC trial. Lancet Oncol. 2024 Sep;25(9):1222-1230. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00350-4. Epub 2024 Aug 6. PubMed 39121881 ↗
  • de Boniface J, Filtenborg Tvedskov T, Ryden L, Szulkin R, Reimer T, Kuhn T, Kontos M, Gentilini OD, Olofsson Bagge R, Sund M, Lundstedt D, Appelgren M, Ahlgren J, Norenstedt S, Celebioglu F, Sackey H, Scheel Andersen I, Hoyer U, Nyman PF, Vikhe Patil E, Wieslander E, Dahl Nissen H, Alkner S, Andersson Y, Offersen BV, Bergkvist L, Frisell J, Christiansen P; SENOMAC Trialists' Group; SENOMAC Trialists' Group. Omitting Axillary Dissection in Breast Cancer with Sentinel-Node Metastases. N Engl J Med. 2024 Apr 4;390(13):1163-1175. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2313487. PubMed 38598571 ↗
  • Appelgren M, Sackey H, Wengstrom Y, Johansson K, Ahlgren J, Andersson Y, Bergkvist L, Frisell J, Lundstedt D, Ryden L, Sund M, Alkner S, Vrou Offersen B, Filtenborg Tvedskov T, Christiansen P, de Boniface J; SENOMAC Trialists' Group. Patient-reported outcomes one year after positive sentinel lymph node biopsy with or without axillary lymph node dissection in the randomized SENOMAC trial. Breast. 2022 Jun;63:16-23. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.02.013. Epub 2022 Mar 1. PubMed 35279508 ↗
  • de Boniface J, Ahlgren J, Andersson Y, Bergkvist L, Frisell J, Lundstedt D, Olofsson Bagge R, Ryden L, Sund M; SENOMAC Trialists' Group. The generalisability of randomised clinical trials: an interim external validity analysis of the ongoing SENOMAC trial in sentinel lymph node-positive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Feb;180(1):167-176. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05537-1. Epub 2020 Jan 27. PubMed 31989379 ↗
  • de Boniface J, Frisell J, Andersson Y, Bergkvist L, Ahlgren J, Ryden L, Olofsson Bagge R, Sund M, Johansson H, Lundstedt D; SENOMAC Trialists' Group. Survival and axillary recurrence following sentinel node-positive breast cancer without completion axillary lymph node dissection: the randomized controlled SENOMAC trial. BMC Cancer. 2017 May 26;17(1):379. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3361-y. PubMed 28549453 ↗

Related links

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Feb 23, 2023
  • Statistical analysis plan · Sep 7, 2023

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 14, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02240472
Lead sponsor
Karolinska Institutet
Collaborators
The Swedish Research Council, Swedish Cancer Foundation, Nordic Cancer Union
Responsible party
Jana de Boniface (Professor, Karolinska Institutet) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 15, 2014
Start date
Jan 27, 2015
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2021
Completion
Dec 31, 2031 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 14, 2026

Study contacts

Jana de Boniface, PhD
principal investigator · Karolinska Institutet
Jan Frisell, Professor
study chair · Karolinska University Hospital
Leif Bergkvist, Professor
study chair · Central Hospital Västerås
Yvette Andersson, PhD
study chair · Central Hospital Västerås
Lisa Ryden, Professor
study chair · Lund University
Malin Sund, Professor
study chair · University Hospital, Umeå
Olofsson Roger, PhD
study chair · Sahlgrenska University Hospital
Johan Ahlgren, PhD
study chair · Region Örebro County
Dan Lundstedt, PhD
study chair · Sahlgrenska University Hospital
Peer Christiansen, Professor
principal investigator · Aarhus University Hospital
Tove Tvedskov Filtenborg, MD
study chair · Rigshospitalet Copenhagen, Dnmark
Michalis Kontos, PhD
study chair · University of Athens
Birgitte Offersen, Professor
study chair · University of Aarhus
Thorsten Kühn, Professor
principal investigator · Klinikum Esslingen
Toralf Reimer, Professor
principal investigator · Universität Rostock
Oreste Gentilini
principal investigator · San Raffaele Hospital, Milano
Roland Reitsamer
principal investigator · Universitätsklinikum Salzburg

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion