CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT02236247CONSTATHEUpdated Jan 2, 2017

Control of Sinus Node Tachycardia as an Additional Therapy in Patients With Decompensated Heart Failure

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of ivabradine and Placebo in Decompensated Heart Failure, sponsored by University of Sao Paulo. Status unknown at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-01-02.

Sponsored by University of Sao Paulo · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Dec 2016), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Study aims to compare the I(f) inhibitor ivabradine with placebo as strategy of heart rate control in patients with decompensated heart failure (DHF).

Read the detailed description

Sympathetic hyperactivity and consequent increase in heart rate (HR) are physiological responses to low cardiac output in patients with decompensated heart failure (DHF). However, elevated HR may become inappropriate in these patients, increasing myocardial oxygen demand and decreasing diastolic filling time and might lead to hemodynamic deterioration, ventricular dysfunction (tachycardiomyopathy) and clinical deterioration.

Studies show the elevated HR is a predictor of poor prognosis in DHF. Subanalyses of large clinical trials using beta blockers (BBs) demonstrate the adequate control of HR correlates with a better outcome in patients with stable chronic heart failure (HF). However, use of BBs in patients with DHF is limited due to negative inotropic and hypotensive effects of these drugs.

As alternative to BBs, ivabradine has shown to increase survival of patients with chronic stable systolic HF. Compared to BBs, ivabradine has the advantage of "pure" negative chronotropic effect, no effect on myocardial contractility or peripheral vascular resistance. Despite the inhibition of I (f) has been validated as a therapeutic option in patients with stable HF, there are no studies available on this strategy in patients with DHF.

We hypothesized that HR control by ivabradine might improve clinical, hemodynamic and neurohormonal parameters in patients with DHF. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of HR control with ivabradine in patients with DHF.

02

Conditions studied

  • Decompensated Heart Failure

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • ivabradine
  • heart rate
  • heart failure
03

In context

Heart Failure

5,701 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Failure; 1,220 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 72 across 3,736 interventional studies indexed under Heart Failure.

Browse Heart Failure studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Sao Paulo is the lead sponsor of 1,005 studies on the registry; 90 are open to participants now.

Of its 7 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Sinus node rhythm
  • HR> 80 bpm
  • Hospitalization for DHF
  • Ejection fraction ≤ 40%
  • Sign informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Systolic blood pressure \<85 mmHg
  • Signs of hypoperfusion
  • Dobutamine>15 mcg/Kg/min
  • Acute myocarditis
  • Primary valvular disease requiring surgery
  • Stroke in the last three months
  • Hypertrophic or restrictive cardiomyopathy
  • Sinus node disease
  • Atrial fibrillation or flutter
  • Second or third degree atrio-ventricular blockade
  • Long QT syndrome
  • Severe pulmonary disease
  • Pulmonary embolism in the last three months
  • Need for invasive ventilatory support
  • Septicemia or septic shock
  • Hepatic failure
  • Creatinine > 2.5 mg/dL
  • Hemodialysis
  • Advanced malignancy
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Immunosuppressive therapy
  • Use of cytochrome P450 inhibitors
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ivabradine

    I(f) inhibitor, heart rate controller

    Drug: ivabradine

  • Placebo comparator
    placebo

    placebo pill will be administered orally twice daily

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • Drugivabradine

    5 mg oral twice daily

    Also known as: procoralan

  • DrugPlacebo

    A placebo pill (identical to ivabradine) will be administered twice daily

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline heart rate

    Heart rate will be assessed at morning, after 30 minutes of rest, recorded by electrocardiogram.

    Time frame: Baseline, day 5 after intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline blood pressure

    Blood pressure will be measured at morning by electronic cuff

    Time frame: Baseline, day 5 after intervention

  2. Change from baseline ejection fraction

    Ejection fraction will be measured by echocardiography using Simpson´s rule

    Time frame: Baseline, day 5 after intervention

  3. Change from baseline stroke volume

    Stroke volume will be measured by echocardiography using Doppler velocity-time integral technique.

    Time frame: Baseline, day 5 after intervention

  4. Change from baseline creatinine

    Serum creatinine will be measured

    Time frame: Baseline, day 5 after intervention

  5. Change from baseline brain natriuretic peptide

    Serum brain natriuretic peptide will be measured

    Time frame: Baseline, day 5 after intervention

  6. Clinical

    Time of survival and free of readmission

    Time frame: Up to 6 months

Other outcomes

  1. Safety/Adverse Event Outcome Measure

    Number of Participants with Serious and Non-Serious Adverse Events

    Time frame: Up to day 15 days after intervention

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Heart Failure Unit, Heart Institute, University of Sao Paulo Medical School
    Sao Paulo, 05403-900, Brazil
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Lofrano-Alves MS, Issa VS, Biselli B, Chizzola P, Ayub-Ferreira SM, Bocchi EA. Control of sinus tachycardia as an additional therapy in patients with decompensated heart failure (CONSTATHE-DHF): A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2016 Oct;35(10):1260-1264. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2016.06.005. Epub 2016 Jun 7. No abstract available. PubMed 27469019 ↗

Related links

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 2, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02236247
Lead sponsor
University of Sao Paulo
Collaborators
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
Responsible party
Marco Stephan Lofrano Alves (MD, University of Sao Paulo) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 10, 2014
Start date
May 2013
Primary completion
Jan 2017 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 2017 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 2, 2017

Study contacts

Marco S. Alves, MD
Contact
marco.alves@incor.usp.br
+55 11 981431512
Edimar A. Bocchi, MD-PHD
Contact
edimar.bocchi@incor.usp.br
+55 11 2661-5419
Edimar A Bocchi, MD-PHD
study chair · Heart Failure Unit, Heart Institute, University of Sao Paulo Medical School

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Dec 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion