ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02229578LidocaineBurnUpdated Jul 1, 2024Results posted

Lidocaine For Treatment of Post-operative Pain From Donor Sites Following Burn Injury.

A Phase 4 interventional study of Lidocaine and Placebo in Pain, sponsored by University of Florida. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-07-01.

Sponsored by University of Florida · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
34
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Burn pain is known to be one the most severe forms of acute pain often requiring large amounts of narcotics in addition to other adjuvants. Topical lidocaine is effective for controlling pain in various settings including dressing changes of burns. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the effectiveness of topical lidocaine in decreasing pain scores and narcotic requirements when applied to donor graft sites while at the same time not interfering with the standard of care TheraBond dressing. During this study the investiagtors will be monitoring for evidence of delayed wound healing, and surgical site infection.

Read the detailed description

Pain from burns is a severe form of acute pain that requires aggressive use of opioids. Even with the implementation of multiple modalities for analgesia, pain from skin debridements and grafting procedures remains a challenge to control. Local anesthetics have been used for pain relief in burn patients previously as a topical gel or IV infusion and have been found to significantly reduce medication consumption, without apparent adverse effects on wound healing. Lidocaine actually has potent anti-inflammatory effects which could be advantageous on wounds. In addition, topical application of lidocaine to wounds result in different degrees of systemic absorption. High concentrations of lidocaine have potential for central nervous system (seizures (>5mg/L)) and cardiovascular toxicity (arrhythmias (>9mg/L)). Plasma concentration of lidocaine depend upon drug dose, rate of absorption, patient weight, physical status and thickness of skin harvested. A prior study where up to 6.7mg/kg of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine was sprayed on donor graft sites found that systemic lidocaine levels were far below toxic levels at their peak (average level of 1.4, with maximum level at 2.2). In this study the levels peaked between 30 and 60 minutes and systemic levels of lidocaine were detectable 6 hours following application of the solution. Studies have demonstrated the beneficial effects of systemic lidocaine administered via IV infusions in reducing perioperative pain scores.Topical lidocaine is effective as a topical anesthetic in multiple clinical trials however only two studies to date has shown that topical lidocaine applied to skin-harvest sites produces an analgesic effect, reduces narcotic requirements while not affecting wound healing or causing toxic blood concentrations. In both these studies systemic intravenous lidocaine levels were monitored and were found to be significantly below toxic limits. The use of topical lidocaine on donor sites is still not widely used, partly for fear the lidocaine will interfere with wound healing and/or dressing adherence. No study to date has demonstrated lidocaine solution to be effective on burn sites when used in conjunction with TheraBond silver foam dressing. TheraBond is an absorbent, atraumatic dressing coated with ionic silver that is routinely used on donor sites at the University of Florida. This study will also offer additional supporting evidence that topical lidocaine is effective in post operative pain management of donor skin sites and should be more widely utilized. In addition, this study will serve as a stepping stone for analyzing different local anesthetic solutions in the future and the potential for reapplication to surgical sites.

The purpose of this study is to offer the medical community data on a simple and relatively cheap adjuvant that can be utilized to help reduce the amount of post-operative pain and narcotic requirement in burn patients requiring skin grafts.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Burn pain
  • lidocaine
  • donor site pain
  • Narcotic use
03

In context

Pain

2,450 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain; 945 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 34 is below the median of 70 across 2,101 interventional studies indexed under Pain.

Browse Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Florida is the lead sponsor of 1,285 studies on the registry; 199 are open to participants now.

Of its 177 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 141 (80%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients who have suffered second to third degree burns requiring a single split thickness skin graft surgery.
  • Donor sites will be between 3-15% TBSA.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have history of chronic pain,
  • opioid abuse history,
  • major renal and/or liver dysfunction,
  • history of seizures or major neurologic deficiencies,
  • allergy to local anesthetics,
  • reported allergy to hydromorphone,
  • pregnancy, or
  • currently have other injuries that significantly contribute to pain (i.e. multi-trauma patients) will be excluded from the study.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
34 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Lidocaine Treatment Group

    Subjects in this group will receive a nonpyrogenic solution of lidocaine 2% in isotonic saline (Solution A) sprayed on the donor site of the grafted skin prior to emergence from general anesthesia. A total maximum of 7mg/kg of lidocaine solution will be available for administration. Prior to spraying of the Solution A, the donor site will be soaked with epinephrine soaked towels as per routine burn care. The site will then be covered with TheraBond dressing as per standard burn care.

    Drug: Lidocaine

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo Treatment Group

    Subjects in this group will receive a nonpyrogenic solution of isotonic saline (Solution B) sprayed over the donor site. Prior to spraying of the Solution B, the donor site will be soaked with epinephrine soaked towels as per routine burn care. The site will then be covered with TheraBond dressing as per standard burn care.

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • Subjects in this group will receive a nonpyrogenic solution of lidocaine 2% in isotonic saline (Solution A) sprayed on the donor site of the grafted skin prior to emergence from general anesthesia. A total maximum of 7mg/kg of lidocaine solution will be available for administration. Prior to spraying of the Solution A, the donor site will be soaked with epinephrine soaked towels as per routine burn care. The site will then be covered with TheraBond dressing as per standard burn care.

  • DrugPlacebo

    Subjects in this group will receive a nonpyrogenic solution of isotonic saline (Solution B) sprayed over the donor site. Prior to spraying of the Solution B, the donor site will be soaked with epinephrine soaked towels as per routine burn care. The site will then be covered with TheraBond dressing as per standard burn care.

    Also known as: Saline

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain Change

    Improvement of pain perception for those receiving lidocaine vs those that do not. Pain will be measured by the Verbal Numerical Rating Scale (VNRS). This scale ranges from 0 to 10, with 0 being no pain and 10 being worst pain.

    Time frame: 24 hours

  2. Pain Change in 24 Hours (Self Reported Pain From Electronic Health Records)

    Pain will be measured by the Verbal Numerical Rating Scale (VNRS). This scale ranges from 0 to 10, with 0 being no pain and 10 being worst pain.

    Time frame: Immediate post-op to 24 hours post op

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Hydromorphone in 24 Hours

    This was an intention to treat analysis. records and improvement was change from immediate post-op to 24 hours post-op (pain at 24 hours minus pain immediate postop) Assessment. Hydromorphone was quantified as morphine milligram equivelents (MME).

    Time frame: Immediate post-op to 24 hours post op

07

Results

Posted Jul 1, 2024

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneLidocaine Treatment GroupPlacebo Treatment Group
Started1915
Completed1612
Not completed33
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject13
Withdrew: Protocol violation20

Outcome measures

PrimaryPain Change

Improvement of pain perception for those receiving lidocaine vs those that do not. Pain will be measured by the Verbal Numerical Rating Scale (VNRS). This scale ranges from 0 to 10, with 0 being no pain and 10 being worst pain.

Time frame:
24 hours
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Pain Change
units on a scaleLidocaine Treatment GroupPlacebo Treatment Group
Pain Change-3.8 (-5.3 to -2.2)-4.0 (-5.5 to -2.5)
Statistical analysis
  • Lidocaine Treatment Group vs Placebo Treatment Group · t-test, 2 sided · p = <0.05 · Mean difference (final values): 0.45 · 95% CI -1.2 to 2.1
PrimaryPain Change in 24 Hours (Self Reported Pain From Electronic Health Records)

Pain will be measured by the Verbal Numerical Rating Scale (VNRS). This scale ranges from 0 to 10, with 0 being no pain and 10 being worst pain.

Time frame:
Immediate post-op to 24 hours post op
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Pain Change in 24 Hours (Self Reported Pain From Electronic Health Records)
units on a scaleLidocaine Treatment GroupPlacebo Treatment Group
Pain Change in 24 Hours (Self Reported Pain From Electronic Health Records)-2.1 (-4.6 to -0.5)-4.0 (-5.1 to -2.9)
Statistical analysis
  • Lidocaine Treatment Group vs Placebo Treatment Group · t-test, 2 sided · p = <0.05 · Mean difference (final values): -0.14 · 95% CI -1.77 to 1.49
SecondaryChange in Hydromorphone in 24 Hours

This was an intention to treat analysis. records and improvement was change from immediate post-op to 24 hours post-op (pain at 24 hours minus pain immediate postop) Assessment. Hydromorphone was quantified as morphine milligram equivelents (MME).

Time frame:
Immediate post-op to 24 hours post op
Reported as:
Mean · milligram morphine equivalents (MME)
Change in Hydromorphone in 24 Hours
milligram morphine equivalents (MME)Lidocaine Treatment GroupPlacebo Treatment Group
Change in Hydromorphone in 24 Hours0.4 (-0.4 to 1.3)4.7 (-3.4 to 12.9)
Statistical analysis
  • Lidocaine Treatment Group vs Placebo Treatment Group · t-test, 2 sided · p = <0.05 · Mean difference (final values): -1.76 · 95% CI -9.62 to 6.09

Adverse events

Collected over 21 days. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Lidocaine Treatment Group0/16 (0%)5/16 (31.3%)5/16 (31.3%)
Placebo Treatment Group0/12 (0%)2/12 (16.7%)3/12 (25%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventLidocaine Treatment GroupPlacebo Treatment Group
Infection at donor siteInfections and infestations5/162/12
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventLidocaine Treatment GroupPlacebo Treatment Group
Acute lood loss AnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders2/161/12
Graft failureSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/161/12
Prolongation of hospitalizationInvestigations0/161/12
Wound breakdownSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/160/12
Acute kidney injuryRenal and urinary disorders1/160/12

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Lidocaine Treatment GroupPlacebo Treatment GroupTotal
Mean43.2 ± 15.144.1 ± 14.743.7 ± 14.6
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Lidocaine Treatment GroupPlacebo Treatment GroupTotal
Female516
Male111122
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Lidocaine Treatment GroupPlacebo Treatment GroupTotal
Hispanic or Latino112
Not Hispanic or Latino151126
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Lidocaine Treatment GroupPlacebo Treatment GroupTotal
United States161228
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • Shands Hospital, University of Florida
    Gainesville, Florida 32601, United States
  • Shands Hospital
    Gainesville, Florida 32603, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Dec 8, 2016

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 1, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02229578
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 1, 2014
Start date
Sep 2014
Primary completion
Nov 14, 2017
Completion
Nov 14, 2017
Results posted
Jul 1, 2024
Last update
Jul 1, 2024

Study contacts

Brenda Fahy, MD
principal investigator · University of Florida

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Lidocaine

Start the discussion