ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02221466Updated Apr 28, 2017

Measurement of Endothelial Function With Peripheral Arterial Tonometry in Patients Undergoing Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy

An observational study in Diabetic Peripheral Vascular Disease, sponsored by Ole Hyldegaard. Completed at 1 site in Denmark. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-04-28.

Sponsored by Ole Hyldegaard · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
45
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this clinical study is to test whether or not patients treated with HBOT for diabetic foot ulcers will demonstrate measurable changes of the blood vessel function during the course of HBOT treatments. , i.e. an expected increase in the reactive hyperemic index (RHI) measured by the peripheral arterial tonometry (PAT).

Read the detailed description

Measurement and monitoring of endothelial function can be used for prediction of outcome in acute, severe disease. Diabetic patients have a poorer peripheral vascular function measured by peripheral arterial tonometry (PAT) as compared to normals, but the effect of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) on endothelial function in these patients is unknown. Measurement of PAT in patients with diabetic foot ulcers undergoing HBOT, may help to improve treatment and changes in the reactive hyperemic index (RHI) might correlate with wound healing in these patients.

Peripheral arterial tonometer (PAT) has been shown to be an easy, fast and standardized method for measuring the peripheral arterial endothelial function. The method is also operator-independent and has a high reproducibility.

The PAT apparatus (ENDOPAT) measures the post-ischemic response to a five-minute blood flow occlusion of the upper arm, and the relationship between the pre-and post-ischemic pulse amplitude is expressed as a reactive hyperemic index (RHI). The normal RHI in young healthy persons is more than 2, while in critically ill patients and patients with diabetes, hypertension or heart disease it is significantly decreased.

The study aims to test whether or not patients treated with HBOT for diabetic foot ulcers will demonstrate an improvement of the endothelial function in the peripheral vessels, i.e. an increase in RHI measured by the PAT. Similarly, essential mediators of angiogenesis and nitric oxide bioavailability will be measured in peripheral blood taken during the PAT measurements which will be performed at the time of inclusion, before HBOT and subsequently for each 10th HBOT session.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetic Peripheral Vascular Disease

Keywords

  • diabetes
  • foot
  • wounds
  • nitric oxide
  • endothelium
  • infection
  • biological markers
  • observational study
  • hyperbaric oxygen
  • ulcers
  • cytokines
  • inflammation
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus

8,290 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus; 1,077 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 45 is below the median of 246 across 1,936 observational studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus studies →

Lead sponsor

Ole Hyldegaard is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Diabetic and none diabetic patients admitted for HBOT.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diabetic patients with foot ulcer
  • None diabetic patients
  • Age > 18 years
  • Patients referred to hyperbaric oxygen therapy.
  • Patients who have given written to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who cannot cooperate to participate in the study
  • Patients who do not understand or speak Danish or English
  • Allergy to the materials used in the experiment.
  • Patients \< 18 years
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
45 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • diabetic patients

    Diabetic patients given HBOT

  • None diabetic patients

    None diabetic patients given HBOT

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Peripheral arterial tonometry (PAT)

    Changes in PAT measurements upon completion of HBOT sessions.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  2. Peripheral arterial tonometry (PAT)

    Changes in PAT measurements upon completion of HBOT sessions after 12 weeks.

    Time frame: 18 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Nitric oxide and cytokine expression

    Measurement of nitric oxide bioavailability and levels of cytokine expression levels in serum after HBOT completion.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  2. Nitric oxide and cytokine expression

    Measurement of nitric oxide bioavailability and levels of cytokine expression levels in serum after HBOT completion following 12 weeks.

    Time frame: 18 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University Hospital of Copenhagen - Rigshospitalet
    Copenhagen, Capitol Region 2100, Denmark
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Londahl M, Katzman P, Nilsson A, Hammarlund C. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy facilitates healing of chronic foot ulcers in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2010 May;33(5):998-1003. doi: 10.2337/dc09-1754. PubMed 20427683 ↗
  • Patvardhan EA, Heffernan KS, Ruan JM, Soffler MI, Karas RH, Kuvin JT. Assessment of vascular endothelial function with peripheral arterial tonometry: information at your fingertips? Cardiol Rev. 2010 Jan-Feb;18(1):20-8. doi: 10.1097/CRD.0b013e3181c46a15. PubMed 20010335 ↗
  • Celermajer DS, Sorensen KE, Gooch VM, Spiegelhalter DJ, Miller OI, Sullivan ID, Lloyd JK, Deanfield JE. Non-invasive detection of endothelial dysfunction in children and adults at risk of atherosclerosis. Lancet. 1992 Nov 7;340(8828):1111-5. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)93147-f. PubMed 1359209 ↗
  • Brant LC, Barreto SM, Passos VM, Ribeiro AL. Reproducibility of peripheral arterial tonometry for the assessment of endothelial function in adults. J Hypertens. 2013 Oct;31(10):1984-90. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e328362d913. PubMed 23751970 ↗
  • Bergstrom A, Staalso JM, Romner B, Olsen NV. Impaired endothelial function after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage correlates with arginine:asymmetric dimethylarginine ratio. Br J Anaesth. 2014 Feb;112(2):311-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet331. Epub 2013 Oct 1. PubMed 24085770 ↗
  • Mahmud FH, Van Uum S, Kanji N, Thiessen-Philbrook H, Clarson CL. Impaired endothelial function in adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus. J Pediatr. 2008 Apr;152(4):557-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.08.044. Epub 2007 Nov 5. PubMed 18346515 ↗
  • Moerland M, Kales AJ, Schrier L, van Dongen MG, Bradnock D, Burggraaf J. Evaluation of the EndoPAT as a Tool to Assess Endothelial Function. Int J Vasc Med. 2012;2012:904141. doi: 10.1155/2012/904141. Epub 2012 Feb 14. PubMed 22500237 ↗
  • Eisenbud DE. Oxygen in wound healing: nutrient, antibiotic, signaling molecule, and therapeutic agent. Clin Plast Surg. 2012 Jul;39(3):293-310. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2012.05.001. Epub 2012 Jun 2. PubMed 22732377 ↗
  • Boykin JV Jr, Baylis C. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy mediates increased nitric oxide production associated with wound healing: a preliminary study. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2007 Jul;20(7):382-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000280198.81130.d5. PubMed 17620739 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 28, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02221466
Lead sponsor
Ole Hyldegaard
Responsible party
Ole Hyldegaard (Associate Professor, Medical Director, MD, Ph.D, DMSci, Rigshospitalet, Denmark) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Aug 20, 2014
Start date
Feb 2014
Primary completion
Jan 21, 2016
Completion
Jan 21, 2016
Last update
Apr 28, 2017

Study contacts

Ole Hyldegaard, MD, DMSci
principal investigator · University Hospital Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion