CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02214212TWILIGHTUpdated Nov 9, 2021Results posted

TWILIGHT Study: Effect of Light Exposure During Acute Rehabilitation on Sleep After TBI

An interventional study of Bright White Light (BWL) and Red Light (RL) in Traumatic Brain Injury, TBI and Sleep, sponsored by University of Washington. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-11-09.

Sponsored by University of Washington · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Dec 2013, registered Jul 2014).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
131
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study proposes to investigate how well Bright White Light Therapy will work in the acute inpatient rehabilitation units for people whom have experienced a traumatic brain injury for the purpose of treating sleep disruption. Participants will be assessed based on sleep efficiency, thinking abilities, therapy participation, and perception of fatigue/sleepiness. In previous studies dim red light has not had the same effects on function as bright white light, and will be chosen for use as a placebo. Each subject will be randomized to receive 30 minutes of either Bright White Light Therapy or Red Light Treatment each morning for 10 days.

To measure the effect of this treatment, the investigators will measure the each participants sleep daily by using an actigraph watch. This watch will record movement continuously. The investigators will also measure the subjects' report of how well they slept, whether fatigue is present, and how attentive they are before and after treatment.

Research Hypothesis:

In persons with TBI, prospectively compare overnight sleep in a cohort exposed to morning Bright White Light with a comparison group exposed to Red Light in an acute inpatient rehabilitation setting.

Read the detailed description

The investigators will recruit persons with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) on admission to intensive rehabilitation units. Consented participants (who meet all inclusion and exclusion criteria) will wear an actigraphy watch for 2 nights to obtain a baseline for sleep pattern identification. Prior to treatment, baseline measures (detailed below) will be obtained. Participants will be randomized to receive either Bright White Light (BWL) or Red Light (RL) treatment. Light therapy treatments will be given for 30 minutes daily in the morning for 10 days, and an Actiwatch will be worn continuously during that period. At the end of 10 days, outcome measures will be obtained (as below). The specific period of treatment may be affected by the length of stay on the rehabilitation unit. For lengths of stay less than the 10 days, subjects will receive the intervention until the day of discharge at which time the outcome measures will be administered. The investigators primary outcome measure with be the actigraphic measurement of sleep efficiency. Other secondary measures will be participation in therapy, sleepiness, and attention. The investigators will also evaluate the anticipated device costs and clinical staff burden involved in utilizing light therapy exposure in an inpatient rehabilitation clinical setting.

02

Conditions studied

  • Traumatic Brain Injury
  • TBI
  • Sleep

Keywords

  • traumatic brain injury
  • TBI
  • Sleep
  • Bright White Light Therapy
  • Red Light Therapy
  • Recovery
  • Central Nervous System Diseases
  • Brain Diseases
  • Nervous System Diseases
  • Signs and Symptoms
  • Rehabilitation
  • Actigraphy
03

In context

Brain Injuries

2,113 studies on the registry are indexed under Brain Injuries; 385 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 131 is above the median of 48 across 1,331 interventional studies indexed under Brain Injuries.

Browse Brain Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Washington is the lead sponsor of 1,397 studies on the registry; 225 are open to participants now.

Of its 154 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 132 (86%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Have experienced a moderate to severe TBI.

Defined by any of the following:

  1. Loss of Consciousness greater than 30 minutes.
  2. Emergency Room admission with a Glasgow Coma Scale of 12 or below.
  3. Intracranial abnormalities on imaging.
  4. Post-traumatic amnesia that lasts more than 24 hours.

    • Admitted to acute inpatient rehabilitation unit at Harborview Medical Center within 3 months of their Traumatic Brain Injury.
    • Able to communicate in English.
    • Between the ages of 18 and 70 years old
    • Have a clinician rating of the presence of a sleep disturbance (using the Makley scale)
    • Have some vision in one or both eyes.
    • Have a Body Mass Index lower than 40 kg/m2

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Unable to enroll if any of the following are true

  • Complete blindness
  • Absence of eye opening or disorders of consciousness (Rancho level 1-3).
  • Tetraplegia with less than antigravity strength in all myotomes caudal to C6 level given the limitations on measuring movements with actigraphy in this population (i.e. cannot reliably detect upper extremity or lower extremity movement with this level of paralysis).
  • Past medical history of retinal pathology
  • Past medical history of light sensitivity
  • Past medical history of narcolepsy
  • Past medical history of bipolar disorder
  • Past medical history of obstructive sleep apnea
  • Suspected sleep apnea. (Determined by administering the Berlin questionnaire)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
131 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Red Light (RL)

    Intervention/Device: This patient group will receive 30 minutes of red light daily for a period of 10 days in the morning. Identical baseline and outcome testing will be completed for both arms.

    Device: Red Light (RL)

  • Experimental
    Bright White Light (BWL)

    Intervention/Device: This patient group will receive 30 minutes of bright white light daily for a period of 10 days in the morning. Identical baseline and outcome testing will be completed for both arms.

    Device: Bright White Light (BWL)

Interventions

  • DeviceBright White Light (BWL)

    The device emitting BWL will be placed 24 inches from the participant's face on a pre-measured table. The participant will spend 30 minutes with the eyes open in front of the device. This will occur each morning for 10 days.

    Also known as: Litebook® (Bright White Light)

  • DeviceRed Light (RL)

    The device emitting RL will be placed 24 inches from the participant's face on a pre-measured table. The participant will spend 30 minutes with the eyes open in front of the device. This will occur each morning for 10 days.

    Also known as: Litebook® (Red Light)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Actigraphy Data

    Sleep efficiency scores derived from actigraphy data will be the primary outcome. We will set the Actiwatch to record activity data in 60-second intervals. Actigraphy data will be automatically scored with Actiware software (Respironics, Philips Healthcare), which uses validated algorithms to determine whether an epoch of activity is "sleep" or "wake" (Cole RJ, 1992). Typically there is a lack of a consistent sleep/wake cycle in the study population, therefore we will be using sleep efficiency and total sleep time scores obtained during a set night-time interval (2200 to 0600) as the primary index of sleep function, as has been used in previous publications\[39, 40\]. We will be comparing average between group differences between the BWL and RL groups at baseline and after 10 days of light therapy.

    Time frame: Average percent sleep efficiency (0-100) at baseline and after 10 days of light exposure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Barrow Neurological Institute Fatigue Scale (BNI-FS)

    The Barrow Neurological Institute Fatigue Scale (BNI-FS; Fatigue Outcome) is an 11-point scale that examines fatigue during acute recovery from TBI. Scores on items 1-10 may range from 1 (rarely a problem), 2-3 (occasional problem but not frequent), 4-5 (a frequent problem), 6-7 (a problem most of the time). The last item is a general rating of fatigue from 0 (not a problem) to 10 (a severe problem). The total BNI-FS is a sum of the first 10 items (0-70), where higher scores indicate worse outcome. The BNI-FS is a scale that was designed to examine fatigue during acute recovery from TBI. The clinical staff involved in the care of these subjects were asked to rate the phototherapy intervention for ease of use, perceived relevance to rehabilitation care, and impression of effectiveness.

    Time frame: At Baseline and After 10 Days of Light Exposure

  2. Functional Independence Measure (FIM) - Motor

    Functional Independence Measure (FIM) is the most widely accepted functional assessment measure in use in the rehabilitation community. The FIM is an 18-item ordinal scale, used with all diagnoses within a rehabilitation population. Each item is scored on a 7 point ordinal scale, ranging from a score of 1 to a score of 7. The higher the score, the more independent the patient is in performing the task associated with that item. Motor subscale (the sum of the individual motor subscale items) will be a value between 13 and 91.

    Time frame: Administered at baseline (admission to unit) and after Day 10 of intervention (or at the day of discharge from the rehabilitation unit)

  3. Symbol Digit Modalities Test

    The Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) is a pencil and paper test for attention that takes approximately five minutes to administer and is frequently used in evaluations after TBI. The SDMT was administered at enrollment and after intervention. The Interagency Workgroup on TBI Outcomes selected the SDMT as CORE common data elements in TBI outcomes research. The SDMT measures attention and speed of processing (the test-taker substitutes a number for random presentations of geometric figures). Scoring involves summing the number of correct substitutions within the 90 second interval (min=0, max = 110), with higher scores representing better attention/speed of processing.

    Time frame: Administered at Baseline and After 10 Days of Light Exposure

  4. Positive and Negative Affect Schedule - Positive

    The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS; Mood Outcome) includes a total of 20 items of affect with 10 focused on positive affect and 10 focused on negative affect. The total score of the PANAS: Positive is the sum of the 10 positive items which are rated on a likert scale ranging from 1=very slightly or not at all to 5=extremely. For the total positive score, a higher score indicates more positive affect. affect. Scores can range from 10-50 for Positive Affect.

    Time frame: Administered at Baseline and After 10 Days of Light Exposure

  5. Positive and Negative Affect Schedule - Negative

    The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS; Mood Outcome) includes a total of 20 items of affect with 10 focused on positive affect and 10 focused on negative affect. The total score of the PANAS: Negative is the sum of the 10 negative items which are rated on a likert scale ranging from 1=very slightly or not at all to 5=extremely. For the total negative score, a higher score indicates more negative affect. affect. Scores can range from 10-50 for Negative Affect.

    Time frame: Administered at baseline and after 10 days of light exposure

  6. Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS)

    The Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS; Sleepiness Outcome) is a single-question with a 9-point Likert scale (1 = extremely alert, 9 = extremely sleepy, fighting sleep) measuring subjective sleepiness at the time of report.

    Time frame: Administered at Baseline and after 10 Days of Light Exposure

  7. Makley Scale

    The Makley scale is a 4-point ordinal scale which allows staff to score sleep as follows: 0 = asleep; 1 = drowsy/falling asleep; 2 = drowsy/waking up; 3 = awake.

    Time frame: A sleep log was completed every 2 hours during the night (2200 until 0600) on each patient by the unit nursing staff hours for 12 nights or until discharge from the hospital (2 nights baseline and after 10 nights of intervention light exposure)

  8. Functional Independence Measure (FIM) - Cognitive

    Functional Independence Measure (FIM) is the most widely accepted functional assessment measure in use in the rehabilitation community. The FIM is an 18-item ordinal scale, used with all diagnoses within a rehabilitation population. Each item is scored on a 7 point ordinal scale, ranging from a score of 1 to a score of 7. The higher the score, the more independent the patient is in performing the task associated with that item. Cognition subscale (the sum of the individual cognition subscale items) will be a value between 5 and 35.

    Time frame: Administered at baseline (admission to unit) and after Day 10 of light exposure (or at the day of discharge from the rehabilitation unit)

Other outcomes

  1. Cooperation Measure (Therapy Outcome)

    Cooperation Measure (Therapy Outcome). Patient cooperation was rated using a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0%-not cooperative to 100%- fully cooperative.10 Staff physical therapists were asked to rate cooperation both prior to initiation and after completion of phototherapy.

    Time frame: Collected at Baseline and after 10 days of light exposure

07

Results

Posted Nov 9, 2021

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneRed Light (RL)Bright White Light (BWL)
Started6665
Completed5759
Not completed96

Outcome measures

PrimaryActigraphy Data

Sleep efficiency scores derived from actigraphy data will be the primary outcome. We will set the Actiwatch to record activity data in 60-second intervals. Actigraphy data will be automatically scored with Actiware software (Respironics, Philips Healthcare), which uses validated algorithms to determine whether an epoch of activity is "sleep" or "wake" (Cole RJ, 1992). Typically there is a lack of a consistent sleep/wake cycle in the study population, therefore we will be using sleep efficiency and total sleep time scores obtained during a set night-time interval (2200 to 0600) as the primary index of sleep function, as has been used in previous publications\[39, 40\]. We will be comparing average between group differences between the BWL and RL groups at baseline and after 10 days of light therapy.

Time frame:
Average percent sleep efficiency (0-100) at baseline and after 10 days of light exposure
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of sleep efficiency (0-100)
Actigraphy Data
percentage of sleep efficiency (0-100)Red Light (RL)Bright White Light (BWL)
Baseline72 ± 1776 ± 17
After 10 days of light exposure76 ± 1177 ± 13
Statistical analysis
  • Red Light (RL) vs Bright White Light (BWL) · Mixed Models Analysis · p = .955 · Slope: -0.16 · 95% CI -5.69 to 5.37The reported effect size has been expressed as the modelled difference in sleep efficiency improvement from day 1 to day 10. A positive effect size indicates a higher score in the white-light arm.
SecondaryBarrow Neurological Institute Fatigue Scale (BNI-FS)

The Barrow Neurological Institute Fatigue Scale (BNI-FS; Fatigue Outcome) is an 11-point scale that examines fatigue during acute recovery from TBI. Scores on items 1-10 may range from 1 (rarely a problem), 2-3 (occasional problem but not frequent), 4-5 (a frequent problem), 6-7 (a problem most of the time). The last item is a general rating of fatigue from 0 (not a problem) to 10 (a severe problem). The total BNI-FS is a sum of the first 10 items (0-70), where higher scores indicate worse outcome. The BNI-FS is a scale that was designed to examine fatigue during acute recovery from TBI. The clinical staff involved in the care of these subjects were asked to rate the phototherapy intervention for ease of use, perceived relevance to rehabilitation care, and impression of effectiveness.

Time frame:
At Baseline and After 10 Days of Light Exposure
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Barrow Neurological Institute Fatigue Scale (BNI-FS)
score on a scaleRed Light (RL)Bright White Light (BWL)
Baseline23.7 ± 15.626.5 ± 14.0
After 10 days of light exposure15.6 ± 13.018.3 ± 16.3
Statistical analysis
  • Red Light (RL) vs Bright White Light (BWL) · Mixed Models Analysis · p = .807 · Mean difference (net): 0.69 · 95% CI -4.90 to 6.29
SecondaryFunctional Independence Measure (FIM) - Motor

Functional Independence Measure (FIM) is the most widely accepted functional assessment measure in use in the rehabilitation community. The FIM is an 18-item ordinal scale, used with all diagnoses within a rehabilitation population. Each item is scored on a 7 point ordinal scale, ranging from a score of 1 to a score of 7. The higher the score, the more independent the patient is in performing the task associated with that item. Motor subscale (the sum of the individual motor subscale items) will be a value between 13 and 91.

Time frame:
Administered at baseline (admission to unit) and after Day 10 of intervention (or at the day of discharge from the rehabilitation unit)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Functional Independence Measure (FIM) - Motor
score on a scaleRed Light (RL)Bright White Light (BWL)
FIM Motor -Rehab Admit36.5 ± 18.938.5 ± 17.3
FIM Motor - Rehab Discharge68.2 ± 16.069.8 ± 12.8
Statistical analysis
  • Red Light (RL) vs Bright White Light (BWL) · Mixed Models Analysis · p = .847 · Mean difference (net): -0.48 · 95% CI -5.38 to 4.43Mixed-effects model adjusts for treatment, time (pre/post), site, FIM admit cognitive/motor, and the treatment/time as fixed effects.
SecondarySymbol Digit Modalities Test

The Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) is a pencil and paper test for attention that takes approximately five minutes to administer and is frequently used in evaluations after TBI. The SDMT was administered at enrollment and after intervention. The Interagency Workgroup on TBI Outcomes selected the SDMT as CORE common data elements in TBI outcomes research. The SDMT measures attention and speed of processing (the test-taker substitutes a number for random presentations of geometric figures). Scoring involves summing the number of correct substitutions within the 90 second interval (min=0, max = 110), with higher scores representing better attention/speed of processing.

Time frame:
Administered at Baseline and After 10 Days of Light Exposure
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Symbol Digit Modalities Test
score on a scaleRed Light (RL)Bright White Light (BWL)
Baseline21.3 ± 13.321.6 ± 12.3
After 10 days light exposure25.9 ± 14.429.0 ± 12.0
Statistical analysis
  • Red Light (RL) vs Bright White Light (BWL) · Mixed Models Analysis · p = .252 · Mean difference (net): 3.14 · 95% CI -2.29 to 8.56Statistical significance by mixed-effects regression adjusts for time (pre/post), site, FIM admit cognitive, FIM admit motor as fixed effects.
SecondaryPositive and Negative Affect Schedule - Positive

The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS; Mood Outcome) includes a total of 20 items of affect with 10 focused on positive affect and 10 focused on negative affect. The total score of the PANAS: Positive is the sum of the 10 positive items which are rated on a likert scale ranging from 1=very slightly or not at all to 5=extremely. For the total positive score, a higher score indicates more positive affect. affect. Scores can range from 10-50 for Positive Affect.

Time frame:
Administered at Baseline and After 10 Days of Light Exposure
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Positive and Negative Affect Schedule - Positive
score on a scaleRed Light (RL)Bright White Light (BWL)
Baseline31.8 ± 9.030.9 ± 9.3
After 10 Days of Light Exposure34.0 ± 8.834.2 ± 9.0
Statistical analysis
  • Red Light (RL) vs Bright White Light (BWL) · Mixed Models Analysis · p = .722 · Mean difference (net): 0.67 · 95% CI -3.08 to 4.4
SecondaryPositive and Negative Affect Schedule - Negative

The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS; Mood Outcome) includes a total of 20 items of affect with 10 focused on positive affect and 10 focused on negative affect. The total score of the PANAS: Negative is the sum of the 10 negative items which are rated on a likert scale ranging from 1=very slightly or not at all to 5=extremely. For the total negative score, a higher score indicates more negative affect. affect. Scores can range from 10-50 for Negative Affect.

Time frame:
Administered at baseline and after 10 days of light exposure
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Positive and Negative Affect Schedule - Negative
score on a scaleRed Light (RL)Bright White Light (BWL)
Baseline19.7 ± 8.719.6 ± 8.2
After 10 days of light exposure18.4 ± 8.617.1 ± 7.2
Statistical analysis
  • Red Light (RL) vs Bright White Light (BWL) · Mixed Models Analysis · p = .253 · Mean difference (net): -2.25 · 95% CI -6.13 to 1.64
SecondaryKarolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS)

The Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS; Sleepiness Outcome) is a single-question with a 9-point Likert scale (1 = extremely alert, 9 = extremely sleepy, fighting sleep) measuring subjective sleepiness at the time of report.

Time frame:
Administered at Baseline and after 10 Days of Light Exposure
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS)
score on a scaleRed Light (RL)Bright White Light (BWL)
Baseline4.1 ± 1.84.1 ± 1.8
After 10 Days of Light Exposure4.1 ± 2.03.7 ± 1.7
Statistical analysis
  • Red Light (RL) vs Bright White Light (BWL) · Mixed Models Analysis · p = .351 · Mean difference (net): -0.39 · 95% CI -1.21 to 0.44A positive effect size indicates a higher score in the bright white light (BWL) intervention arm.
SecondaryMakley Scale

The Makley scale is a 4-point ordinal scale which allows staff to score sleep as follows: 0 = asleep; 1 = drowsy/falling asleep; 2 = drowsy/waking up; 3 = awake.

Time frame:
A sleep log was completed every 2 hours during the night (2200 until 0600) on each patient by the unit nursing staff hours for 12 nights or until discharge from the hospital (2 nights baseline and after 10 nights of intervention light exposure)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Makley Scale
score on a scaleRed Light (RL)Bright White Light (BWL)
Baseline0.58 ± 0.380.67 ± 0.54
After 10 Days of Light Exposure0.59 ± 0.290.61 ± 0.33
Statistical analysis
  • Red Light (RL) vs Bright White Light (BWL) · Mixed Models Analysis · p = .910 · Slope: 0.00 · 95% CI -0.03 to 0.03The reported effect size has been expressed as the modelled difference in the Makley scale score improvement from day 1 to day 10. A positive effect size indicates a higher score in the white-light arm.
SecondaryFunctional Independence Measure (FIM) - Cognitive

Functional Independence Measure (FIM) is the most widely accepted functional assessment measure in use in the rehabilitation community. The FIM is an 18-item ordinal scale, used with all diagnoses within a rehabilitation population. Each item is scored on a 7 point ordinal scale, ranging from a score of 1 to a score of 7. The higher the score, the more independent the patient is in performing the task associated with that item. Cognition subscale (the sum of the individual cognition subscale items) will be a value between 5 and 35.

Time frame:
Administered at baseline (admission to unit) and after Day 10 of light exposure (or at the day of discharge from the rehabilitation unit)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Functional Independence Measure (FIM) - Cognitive
score on a scaleRed Light (RL)Bright White Light (BWL)
FIM Cognitive- Admit15.1 ± 6.914.3 ± 6.3
FIM Cognitive-Discharge24.7 ± 5.724.1 ± 5.1
Statistical analysis
  • Red Light (RL) vs Bright White Light (BWL) · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.19 · Mean difference (net): .857 · 95% CI -1.93 to 2.32Mixed-effects model adjusts for treatment time (pre/post)
Other pre-specifiedCooperation Measure (Therapy Outcome)

Cooperation Measure (Therapy Outcome). Patient cooperation was rated using a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0%-not cooperative to 100%- fully cooperative.10 Staff physical therapists were asked to rate cooperation both prior to initiation and after completion of phototherapy.

Time frame:
Collected at Baseline and after 10 days of light exposure
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Cooperation Measure (Therapy Outcome)
score on a scaleRed Light (RL)Bright White Light (BWL)
Baseline77.3 ± 27.384.5 ± 22.5
After 10 Days of Light Exposure86.6 ± 23.089.4 ± 22.5
Statistical analysis
  • Red Light (RL) vs Bright White Light (BWL) · Mixed Models Analysis · p = .345 · Mean difference (net): -4.80 · 95% CI -14.83 to 5.24Mixed-effects model adjusts for treatment, time (pre/post), FIM admit cognitive, site, FIM admit motor as mixed effects.

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse Event Reporting Period The study period during which adverse events were reported was the period from the initiation of study procedures to the end of the study treatment follow-up. For this study, the study treatment follow-up was 2 days following the last study treatment (Day 15).. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Red Light (RL)0/66 (0%)0/66 (0%)0/66 (0%)
Bright White Light (BWL)0/65 (0%)0/65 (0%)0/65 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Red Light (RL)Bright White Light (BWL)Total
Mean42.1 ± 2.739.8 ± 2.641 ± 2.7
Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)Red Light (RL)Bright White Light (BWL)Total
<25151227
25-39152439
40-54191534
55+171229
Unknown022
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Red Light (RL)Bright White Light (BWL)Total
Female221941
Male444690
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Red Light (RL)Bright White Light (BWL)Total
White434891
Black10616
Asian/Pacific Islander202
Native American426
Hispanic5712
Other202
Unknown022
Education
Education(years)Red Light (RL)Bright White Light (BWL)Total
Mean13 ± 2.314 ± 2.513.5 ± 2.5
Marital Status
Marital Status(participants)Red Light (RL)Bright White Light (BWL)Total
Single242751
Married252550
Div/Sep/Widow161127
Unknown123
Cause of Injury
Cause of Injury(Participants)Red Light (RL)Bright White Light (BWL)Total
Vehicular284270
Violence11314
Fall171330
Pedestrian369
Other718
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Harborview Medical Center
    Seattle, Washington 98109, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Bell KR, Fogelberg D, Barber J, Nakase-Richardson R, Zumsteg JM, Dubiel R, Dams-O'Connor K, Hoffman JM. The effect of phototherapy on sleep during acute rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury: a randomized controlled trial. Brain Inj. 2021 Jan 18;35(2):180-188. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2021.1871952. Epub 2021 Jan 17. PubMed 33459040 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Sep 2, 2014

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 9, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02214212
Lead sponsor
University of Washington
Collaborators
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, University of North Texas Health Science Center
Responsible party
Jeanne Hoffman (Professor, University of Washington) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 12, 2014
Start date
Dec 2013
Primary completion
Mar 2017
Completion
Mar 2017
Results posted
Nov 9, 2021
Last update
Nov 9, 2021

Study contacts

Jeanne M Hoffman, PhD
principal investigator · University of Washington

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion