A Phase 3 interventional study of SOF/VEL and RBV in Hepatitis C Virus Infection, sponsored by Gilead Sciences. Completed at 50 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-11-15.
Sponsored by Gilead Sciences · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment
The primary objectives of this study are to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of sofosbuvir (SOF)/velpatasvir (VEL) fixed dose combination (FDC) with and without ribavirin (RBV) for 12 weeks and SOF/VEL FDC for 24 weeks in adults with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and Child-Pugh-Turcotte (CPT) class B cirrhosis.
6,688 studies on the registry are indexed under Infections; 807 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 268 is above the median of 120 across 4,201 interventional studies indexed under Infections.
Browse Infections studies →Gilead Sciences is the lead sponsor of 680 studies on the registry; 24 are open to participants now.
Of its 259 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 249 (96%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Participants will receive SOF/VEL FDC for 12 weeks.
Drug: SOF/VEL
Participants will receive SOF/VEL FDC plus RBV for 12 weeks.
Drug: SOF/VEL · Drug: RBV
Participants will receive SOF/VEL FDC for 24 weeks.
Drug: SOF/VEL
400/100 mg tablets administered orally once daily
Also known as: GS-7977/GS-5816, Epclusa®
Ribavirin (RBV) tablets administered orally in a divided daily dose according to package insert weight-based dosing recommendations (\< 75 kg = 1000 mg and ≥ 75 kg = 1200 mg)
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response (SVR) 12 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy (SVR12)
SVR12 was defined as HCV RNA \< the lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) 12 weeks following the last dose of study drug.
Time frame: Posttreatment Week 12
Percentage of Participants Who Permanently Discontinued Any Study Drug Due to an Adverse Event
Time frame: Up to 24 weeks plus 30 days
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response 4 and 24 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy (SVR4 and SVR24)
SVR4 and SVR24 were defined as HCV RNA \< LLOQ at 4 and 24 weeks following the last dose of study drug, respectively.
Time frame: Posttreatment Weeks 4 and 24
Percentage of Participants With HCV RNA < LLOQ at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Change From Baseline in HCV RNA at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Failure
Virologic failure was defined as * On-treatment virologic failure * HCV RNA ≥ LLOQ after having previously had HCV RNA \< LLOQ, while on treatment, * \> 1 log10 IU/mL increase in HCV RNA from nadir while on treatment, * HCV RNA persistently ≥ LLOQ through 8 weeks of treatment (ie nonresponse) * Relapse * HCV RNA ≥ LLOQ during the posttreatment period having achieved HCV RNA \< LLOQ at end of treatment, confirmed with 2 consecutive values or last available posttreatment measurement
Time frame: Up to Posttreatment Week 24
Percentage of Participants With a Decrease, No Change, or Increase Between Baseline and Posttreatment Week 24 in MELD Score
Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores are used to assess prognosis and suitability for liver transplantation. Scores can range from 6 to 40; higher scores/increased scores indicate greater severity of disease.
Time frame: Baseline to Posttreatment Week 24
Percentage of Participants With a Decrease, No Change, or Increase Between Baseline and Posttreatment Week 24 in Child-Pugh-Turcotte (CPT) Score
CPT scores grade the severity of cirrhosis and are used to determine the need for liver transplantation. Scores can range from 5 to 15; higher scores/increased scores indicate greater severity of disease.
Time frame: Baseline to Posttreatment Week 24
Participants were enrolled at a total of 47 study sites in the United States. The first participant was screened on 31 July 2014. The last study visit occurred on 25 November 2015.
| Milestone | SOF/VEL 12 Weeks (Group 1) | SOF/VEL+RBV 12 Weeks (Group 2) | SOF/VEL 24 Weeks (Group 3) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Started | 90 | 88 | 90 |
| Completed | 75 | 79 | 77 |
| Not completed | 15 | 9 | 13 |
| Withdrew: Randomized but never treated | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Withdrew: Lack of efficacy | 7 | 1 | 6 |
| Withdrew: Death | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Withdrew: Lost to follow-up | 2 | 3 | 2 |
| Withdrew: Withdrew consent | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Withdrew: Adverse event | 1 | 1 | 0 |
SVR12 was defined as HCV RNA \< the lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) 12 weeks following the last dose of study drug.
| percentage of participants | SOF/VEL 12 Weeks (Group 1) | SOF/VEL+RBV 12 Weeks (Group 2) | SOF/VEL 24 Weeks (Group 3) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response (SVR) 12 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy (SVR12) | 83.3 (74.0 to 90.4) | 94.3 (87.1 to 98.1) | 87.8 (79.2 to 93.7) |
| percentage of participants | SOF/VEL 12 Weeks (Group 1) | SOF/VEL+RBV 12 Weeks (Group 2) | SOF/VEL 24 Weeks (Group 3) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Who Permanently Discontinued Any Study Drug Due to an Adverse Event | 1.1 | 16.1 | 4.4 |
SVR4 and SVR24 were defined as HCV RNA \< LLOQ at 4 and 24 weeks following the last dose of study drug, respectively.
| percentage of participants | SOF/VEL 12 Weeks (Group 1) | SOF/VEL+RBV 12 Weeks (Group 2) | SOF/VEL 24 Weeks (Group 3) |
|---|---|---|---|
| SVR4 | 92.2 (84.6 to 96.8) | 95.4 (88.6 to 98.7) | 90.0 (81.9 to 95.3) |
| SVR24 | 83.3 (74.0 to 90.4) | 94.3 (87.1 to 98.1) | 87.8 (79.2 to 93.7) |
| percentage of participants | SOF/VEL 12 Weeks (Group 1) | SOF/VEL+RBV 12 Weeks (Group 2) | SOF/VEL 24 Weeks (Group 3) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1(Group 1: N=90; Group 2: N=87; Group 3: N=90) | 2.2 | 14.9 | 11.1 |
| Wk 2 (Group 1: N=90; Group 2: N=87;Group 3: N=89) | 34.4 | 49.4 | 39.3 |
| Wk 4 (Group 1: N=90; Group 2: N=87; Group 3: N=89) | 81.1 | 80.5 | 91.0 |
| Wk 6(Group 1: N=89; Group 2: N=85; Group 3: N=88) | 98.9 | 97.6 | 98.9 |
| Wk 8(Group 1: N=89; Group 2: N=84; Group 3: N=87) | 98.9 | 98.8 | 100.0 |
| Wk 10(Group 1: N=89; Group 2: N=84; Group 3: N=87) | 100.0 | 98.8 | 100.0 |
| Wk 12(Group 1: N=89; Group 2: N=83; Group 3: N=87) | 100.0 | 98.8 | 97.7 |
| Wk 16(Group 1: N=0; Group 2: N=0; Group 3: N=86) | NA | NA | 97.7 |
| Wk 20(Group 1: N=0; Group 2: N=0;Group 3: N=84) | NA | NA | 100.0 |
| Wk 24(Group 1: N=0; Group 2: N=0; Group 3: N=84) | NA | NA | 100.0 |
| log10 IU/mL | SOF/VEL 12 Weeks (Group 1) | SOF/VEL+RBV 12 Weeks (Group 2) | SOF/VEL 24 Weeks (Group 3) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1(Group 1: N=89; Group 2: N=83; Group 3: N=88) | -3.51 ± 0.652 | -3.63 ± 0.691 | -3.72 ± 0.680 |
| Wk 2(Group 1: N=89; Group 2: N=87; Group 3: N=88) | -4.24 ± 0.677 | -4.17 ± 0.647 | -4.38 ± 0.669 |
| Wk 4(Group 1: N=88; Group 2: N=86; Group 3: N=88) | -4.78 ± 0.549 | -4.58 ± 0.568 | -4.70 ± 0.613 |
| Wk 6(Group 1: N=89; Group 2: N=85; Group 3: N=88) | -4.87 ± 0.536 | -4.68 ± 0.607 | -4.74 ± 0.630 |
| Wk 8(Group 1: N=89; Group 2: N=83; Group 3: N=87) | -4.87 ± 0.536 | -4.68 ± 0.622 | -4.76 ± 0.613 |
| Wk 10(Group 1: N=89; Group 2: N=84; Group 3, N=87) | -4.87 ± 0.536 | -4.67 ± 0.634 | -4.76 ± 0.613 |
| Wk 12(Group 1: N=89; Group 2: N=82; Group 3: N=86) | -4.87 ± 0.536 | -4.68 ± 0.624 | -4.75 ± 0.618 |
| Wk 16 (Group 1: N=0; Group 2: N=0; Group 3: N=85) | NA ± NA | NA ± NA | -4.76 ± 0.617 |
| Wk 20 (Group 1: N=0; Group 2: N=0; Group 3: N =84) | NA ± NA | NA ± NA | -4.77 ± 0.613 |
| Wk 24 (Group 1: N=0; Group 2: N=0; Group 3: N =84) | NA ± NA | NA ± NA | -4.77 ± 0.613 |
Virologic failure was defined as * On-treatment virologic failure * HCV RNA ≥ LLOQ after having previously had HCV RNA \< LLOQ, while on treatment, * \> 1 log10 IU/mL increase in HCV RNA from nadir while on treatment, * HCV RNA persistently ≥ LLOQ through 8 weeks of treatment (ie nonresponse) * Relapse * HCV RNA ≥ LLOQ during the posttreatment period having achieved HCV RNA \< LLOQ at end of treatment, confirmed with 2 consecutive values or last available posttreatment measurement
| percentage of participants | SOF/VEL 12 Weeks (Group 1) | SOF/VEL+RBV 12 Weeks (Group 2) | SOF/VEL 24 Weeks (Group 3) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With Virologic Failure | 12.2 (6.3 to 20.8) | 3.4 (0.7 to 9.7) | 8.9 (3.9 to 16.8) |
Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores are used to assess prognosis and suitability for liver transplantation. Scores can range from 6 to 40; higher scores/increased scores indicate greater severity of disease.
| percentage of participants | SOF/VEL 12 Weeks (Group 1) | SOF/VEL+RBV 12 Weeks (Group 2) | SOF/VEL 24 Weeks (Group 3) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Decrease (Improvement) | 55.1 | 49.3 | 50.7 |
| No Change | 20.3 | 25.3 | 21.7 |
| Increase (Worsening) | 24.6 | 25.3 | 27.5 |
CPT scores grade the severity of cirrhosis and are used to determine the need for liver transplantation. Scores can range from 5 to 15; higher scores/increased scores indicate greater severity of disease.
| percentage of participants | SOF/VEL 12 Weeks (Group 1) | SOF/VEL+RBV 12 Weeks (Group 2) | SOF/VEL 24 Weeks (Group 3) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Decrease (Improvement) | 44.9 | 53.3 | 63.8 |
| No Change | 43.5 | 37.3 | 27.5 |
| Increase (Worsening) | 11.6 | 9.3 | 8.7 |
Collected over Up to 24 weeks plus 30 days. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| SOF/VEL 12 Weeks (Group 1) | — | 17/90 (18.9%) | 65/90 (72.2%) |
| SOF/VEL+RBV 12 Weeks (Group 2) | — | 14/87 (16.1%) | 74/87 (85.1%) |
| SOF/VEL 24 Weeks (Group 3) | — | 16/90 (17.8%) | 61/90 (67.8%) |
| Event | SOF/VEL 12 Weeks (Group 1) | SOF/VEL+RBV 12 Weeks (Group 2) | SOF/VEL 24 Weeks (Group 3) |
|---|---|---|---|
| SepsisInfections and infestations | 1/90 | 3/87 | 1/90 |
| Gastrointestinal haemorrhageGastrointestinal disorders | 3/90 | 0/87 | 0/90 |
| Hepatocellular carcinomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | 0/90 | 0/87 | 3/90 |
| Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations | 0/90 | 2/87 | 0/90 |
| HyponatraemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders | 1/90 | 2/87 | 0/90 |
| Hepatic encephalopathyNervous system disorders | 2/90 | 2/87 | 1/90 |
| NauseaGastrointestinal disorders | 2/90 | 0/87 | 0/90 |
| AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders | 1/90 | 1/87 | 0/90 |
| AscitesGastrointestinal disorders | 0/90 | 1/87 | 0/90 |
| Duodenal ulcer perforationGastrointestinal disorders | 0/90 | 1/87 | 0/90 |
| Event | SOF/VEL 12 Weeks (Group 1) | SOF/VEL+RBV 12 Weeks (Group 2) | SOF/VEL 24 Weeks (Group 3) |
|---|---|---|---|
| FatigueGeneral disorders | 23/90 | 34/87 | 21/90 |
| AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders | 4/90 | 26/87 | 3/90 |
| HeadacheNervous system disorders | 23/90 | 18/87 | 17/90 |
| NauseaGastrointestinal disorders | 20/90 | 22/87 | 18/90 |
| DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders | 6/90 | 18/87 | 7/90 |
| InsomniaPsychiatric disorders | 9/90 | 12/87 | 9/90 |
| Muscle spasmsMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 3/90 | 10/87 | 4/90 |
| PruritusSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | 10/90 | 4/87 | 4/90 |
| CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 2/90 | 9/87 | 0/90 |
| DyspnoeaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 4/90 | 8/87 | 2/90 |
Safety Analysis Set: participants who were randomized into the study and received at least 1 dose of study drug.
| Age, Continuous(years) | SOF/VEL 12 Weeks (Group 1) | SOF/VEL+RBV 12 Weeks (Group 2) | SOF/VEL 24 Weeks ((Group 3) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 58 ± 6.3 | 58 ± 6.9 | 58 ± 5.8 | 58 ± 6.3 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | SOF/VEL 12 Weeks (Group 1) | SOF/VEL+RBV 12 Weeks (Group 2) | SOF/VEL 24 Weeks ((Group 3) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 33 | 21 | 27 | 81 |
| Male | 57 | 66 | 63 | 186 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | SOF/VEL 12 Weeks (Group 1) | SOF/VEL+RBV 12 Weeks (Group 2) | SOF/VEL 24 Weeks ((Group 3) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hispanic or Latino | 13 | 13 | 13 | 39 |
| Not Hispanic or Latino | 77 | 74 | 77 | 228 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized(participants) | SOF/VEL 12 Weeks (Group 1) | SOF/VEL+RBV 12 Weeks (Group 2) | SOF/VEL 24 Weeks ((Group 3) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Black or African American | 6 | 5 | 6 | 17 |
| White | 79 | 79 | 81 | 239 |
| Asian | 3 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Other | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Not Disclosed | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| HCV RNA Category(participants) | SOF/VEL 12 Weeks (Group 1) | SOF/VEL+RBV 12 Weeks (Group 2) | SOF/VEL 24 Weeks ((Group 3) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| < 800,000 IU/mL | 31 | 42 | 45 | 118 |
| ≥ 800,000 IU/mL | 59 | 45 | 45 | 149 |
| HCV RNA(log 10 IU/mL) | SOF/VEL 12 Weeks (Group 1) | SOF/VEL+RBV 12 Weeks (Group 2) | SOF/VEL 24 Weeks ((Group 3) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 6.0 ± 0.54 | 5.8 ± 0.61 | 5.9 ± 0.63 | 5.9 ± 0.60 |
| HCV Genotype(participants) | SOF/VEL 12 Weeks (Group 1) | SOF/VEL+RBV 12 Weeks (Group 2) | SOF/VEL 24 Weeks ((Group 3) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genotype 1 | 68 | 68 | 71 | 207 |
| Genotype 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 12 |
| Genotype 3 | 14 | 13 | 12 | 39 |
| Genotype 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 8 |
| Genotype 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| IL28B(participants) | SOF/VEL 12 Weeks (Group 1) | SOF/VEL+RBV 12 Weeks (Group 2) | SOF/VEL 24 Weeks ((Group 3) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CC | 20 | 22 | 20 | 62 |
| CT | 51 | 46 | 49 | 146 |
| TT | 19 | 19 | 19 | 57 |
| Missing | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Plan to share: Yes — Qualified external researchers may request IPD for this study after study completion. For more information, please visit our website at http://www.gilead.com/research/disclosure-and-transparency.
Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap
This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Gilead Sciences