CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02201186Updated Apr 26, 2017

To Determine the Effect of Honey Enema in the Treatment of Patients With Acute Pouchitis

A Phase 2 interventional study of Manuka honey enema in Pouchitis, sponsored by Dr. Carl J Brown. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 19 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-04-26.

Sponsored by Dr. Carl J Brown · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
19 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Patients with a bowel condition called ulcerative colitis have bowel surgery in which a portion of their bowel is removed and the reconnected at the small bowel to the anus. Sometimes, after the surgery, this connection part, the pouch, would be inflamed in a condition called Acute Pouchitis. Physicians usually treat them by prescribing antibiotics; however, some patients do not respond and need additional surgery. In this study, we will test an alternative treatment for this complication by performing manuka honey enemas twice a day for 30 days. This is a pilot study and ten patients will undergo enema treatment.

Read the detailed description

Pouchitis is the most common long-term complication of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) in ulcerative colitis (UC). Pouchitis is defined as a clinical syndrome of watery, frequent, at times bloody stool accompanied by urgency, incontinence, abdominal cramps, malaise, and fever. The PDAI (Pouchitis Disease Activity Index) provides a standardized definition of pouchitis based on clinical, endoscopic, and histological markers. Pouchitis is defined as a score ≥ 7 and remission as a score \< 7. Recently, the modified Pouchitis Disease Activity Index has been used to omit biopsy and histology from the standard PDAI. Omission of endoscopic biopsy and histology from the PDAI simplifies pouchitis diagnostic criteria, reduces the cost of diagnosis, and avoids delay associated with determining histology score, while providing equivalent sensitivity and specificity. Patients with acute pouchitis are managed routinely by antibiotics such as Ciprofloxacin and Metronidazole. This treatment has some side effects, is expensive, and fails to respond in some patients. Some patients who are unresponsive to antibiotic therapy will need to have a pouchectomy and ileostomy done.

On the other hand, multiple studies have shown that honey, especially manuka honey has anti-inflammatory, anti-bacterial, wound healing, and anti-ulcerous effects. Phenolic compounds in honey, such as flavonoids, have been reported to exhibit a wide range of biological activities, including antibacterial, antiviral, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, antitumor, anti-allergic, and vasodilatory actions. This honey can clear infection, remove malodour, reduce inflammation and pain, cause edema and exudation to subside, and increase the rate of healing by stimulation of angiogenesis, granulation and epithelialization.

Due to problems associated with antibiotic therapy, such as side effects, cost and failure of some patients to respond, we are looking to find an alternative method for treating acute pouchitis. This study is designed to determine the effect of manuka honey on symptoms, signs and pathology of acute pouchitis patients. We will select patients with any of the signs and symptoms of pouchitis, such as abdominal pain, fever, frequency or urgency of defecation. Proctoscopy will be done before and after honey enema and the modified PDAI scores will be determined. The manuka honey enema will be administered twice a day, for one month. Then, the modified PDAI scores before and after completion of honey enema treatment of these patients, will be compared.

We know that bacterial overgrowth, ischemia, faecal stasis, recurrence of ulcerative colitis in the pouch, or possibly a novel third form of inflammatory bowel disease, are possible etiologies of pouchitis. We also know that manuka honey has anti-inflammatory and anti-bacterial properties. Some studies demonstrate that honey is effective in the treatment of induced colitis in animal models. However, there is no current literature on the effect of honey on colitis or pouchitis in humans. Based on the aforementioned properties of honey, and considering the probable etiologies of pouchitis, we expect that these patients will respond to this method of treatment.

Some research has been done on the effect of honey in the treatment of colitis in animal models, but there have been no clinical studies that have assessed this treatment in pouchitis, or even colitis, in humans. Considering the etiologies of pouchitis, such as inflammation and bacterial overgrowth, and considering the main effects of honey, such as anti-bacterial and anti-inflammatory efficacy, honey enema may be useful in the treatment of pouchitis. Our study is trying to determine the effect of manuka honey enema in the treatment of acute pouchitis. We will try to determine whether the honey enema helps to decrease inflammation and infection in the pouch, and thereby provide us with a safe alternative method for the treatment of pouchitis.

In this pilot study, we will select patients who have any of the signs and symptoms of acute pouchitis, such as abdominal pain, fever, frequency, or urgency of defecation. Proctoscopy will be performed on these patients. Ten patients with modified PDAI score ≥ 7 will receive honey enemas twice a day for one month. We chose a twice daily enema regimen, because patients with inflammatory bowel disease usually receive their enemas twice a day. We expect one month to be enough time, because the duration of antibiotic therapy for patients with acute pouchitis is about one month. Then, the PDAI score of these patients, before and after honey enema will be compared.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pouchitis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • honey enema for pouchitis
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
19 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • have given written informed consent
  • have been diagnosed with ulcerative colitis
  • have had total colectomy and ileal pouch anal anastomosis before
  • have presented with signs and symptoms of pouchitis within the last two months of signing the informed consent
  • PDAI of greater than or equal to 7

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients who are unable to perform enema by themselves
  • patients with an allergy to honey
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
10 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    manuka honey enema treatment

    Study patients diagnosed with acute pouchitis after bowel surgery for ulcerative colitis will perform manuka honey enemas twice a day for 30 days.

    Other: Manuka honey enema

Interventions

  • OtherManuka honey enema

    Study patients diagnosed with acute pouchitis will perform manuka honey enemas twice a day for 30 days.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. PDAI score

    PDAI score is a criterion for defining pouchitis. A PDAI score will be calculated from a proctoscopy assessment before treatment. Within two weeks after the treatment, another proctoscopy will be performed to determine the post-treatment PDAI score to see if there is a decrease in PDAI score for the study patients.

    Time frame: within 2 weeks after the 30-day treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Composite complications

    includes stool frequency (no different, 1-2 stools/day \> postoperative usual, 3 or more stools/day \> postoperative usual), rectal bleeding (none or rare or present daily), fecal urgency or abdominal cramps (none, occasional or usual), presence of fever (temperature \>37.8° C), abdominal pain (no, occasional or usual) and readmission to hospital for any reason.

    Time frame: throughout the 30-day honey enema treatment and within two weeks of the treatment completion date

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Saint Paul's Hospital
    Vancouver, British Columbia V6Z 1Y6, Canada
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Sandborn WJ, Tremaine WJ, Batts KP, Pemberton JH, Phillips SF. Pouchitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a Pouchitis Disease Activity Index. Mayo Clin Proc. 1994 May;69(5):409-15. doi: 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)61634-6. PubMed 8170189 ↗
  • Shen B, Achkar JP, Connor JT, Ormsby AH, Remzi FH, Bevins CL, Brzezinski A, Bambrick ML, Fazio VW, Lashner BA. Modified pouchitis disease activity index: a simplified approach to the diagnosis of pouchitis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003 Jun;46(6):748-53. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-6652-8. PubMed 12794576 ↗
  • Kafadar I, Moustafa F, Yalcin K, Klc BA. A rare adverse effect of metronidazole: nervous system symptoms. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013 Jun;29(6):751-2. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e318294f389. PubMed 23736071 ↗
  • Makhdoom A, Khan MS, Lagahari MA, Rahopoto MQ, Tahir SM, Siddiqui KA. Management of diabetic foot by natural honey. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2009 Jan-Mar;21(1):103-5. PubMed 20364754 ↗
  • Kilicoglu B, Gencay C, Kismet K, Serin Kilicoglu S, Erguder I, Erel S, Sunay AE, Erdemli E, Durak I, Akkus MA. The ultrastructural research of liver in experimental obstructive jaundice and effect of honey. Am J Surg. 2008 Feb;195(2):249-56. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.04.011. PubMed 18083132 ↗
  • Cernak M, Majtanova N, Cernak A, Majtan J. Honey prophylaxis reduces the risk of endophthalmitis during perioperative period of eye surgery. Phytother Res. 2012 Apr;26(4):613-6. doi: 10.1002/ptr.3606. Epub 2011 Oct 6. PubMed 22508360 ↗
  • Hussein SZ, Mohd Yusoff K, Makpol S, Mohd Yusof YA. Gelam Honey Inhibits the Production of Proinflammatory, Mediators NO, PGE(2), TNF-alpha, and IL-6 in Carrageenan-Induced Acute Paw Edema in Rats. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2012;2012:109636. doi: 10.1155/2012/109636. Epub 2012 Jul 1. PubMed 22919407 ↗
  • Medhi B, Prakash A, Avti PK, Saikia UN, Pandhi P, Khanduja KL. Effect of Manuka honey and sulfasalazine in combination to promote antioxidant defense system in experimentally induced ulcerative colitis model in rats. Indian J Exp Biol. 2008 Aug;46(8):583-90. PubMed 18814487 ↗
  • Viuda-Martos M, Ruiz-Navajas Y, Fernandez-Lopez J, Perez-Alvarez JA. Functional properties of honey, propolis, and royal jelly. J Food Sci. 2008 Nov;73(9):R117-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2008.00966.x. PubMed 19021816 ↗
08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02201186
Lead sponsor
Dr. Carl J Brown
Collaborators
Canadian Association of General Surgeons
Responsible party
Dr. Carl J Brown (Head, Division of General Surgery, clinical assistant professor of surgery at University of British Columbia, St. Paul's Hospital, Canada) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jul 25, 2014
Start date
Oct 2014
Primary completion
Nov 2015
Completion
Nov 2015
Last update
Apr 26, 2017

Study contacts

Carl Brown
principal investigator · Saint Paul's Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion