CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02181517Updated May 17, 2016Results posted

A Study of Abicipar Pegol in Patients With Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration

A Phase 2 interventional study of abicipar pegol and ranibizumab in Macular Degeneration, sponsored by Allergan. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 50 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-05-17.

Sponsored by Allergan · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
25
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
50 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a safety and efficacy study of abicipar pegol in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration to establish comparability between Japanese and non-Japanese.

02

Conditions studied

  • Macular Degeneration
03

In context

Macular Degeneration

1,474 studies on the registry are indexed under Macular Degeneration; 206 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 25 is below the median of 51 across 985 interventional studies indexed under Macular Degeneration.

Browse Macular Degeneration studies →

Lead sponsor

Allergan is the lead sponsor of 499 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 91 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 89 (98%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of wet age-related macular degeneration in at least 1 eye
  • Best corrected visual acuity of 20/32 to 20/320 in the study eye and 20/200 or better in the fellow eye

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hypersensitivity, allergy, or anaphylactic reaction to iodine
  • Cataract or refractive surgery within the last 3 months
  • History of vitrectomy
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
25 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    abicipar pegol 1 mg

    Abicipar pegol 1 mg administered to the study eye by intravitreal injection at day 1, weeks 4 and 8, followed by a sham procedure at weeks 12 and 16.

    Drug: abicipar pegol · Other: sham procedure

  • Experimental
    abicipar pegol 2 mg

    Abicipar pegol 2 mg administered to the study eye by intravitreal injection at day 1, weeks 4 and 8, followed by a sham procedure at weeks 12 and 16.

    Drug: abicipar pegol · Other: sham procedure

  • Active comparator
    ranibizumab 0.5 mg

    Ranibizumab (Lucentis®) 0.5 mg administered to the study eye by intravitreal injection every 4 weeks from day 1 through week 16.

    Drug: ranibizumab

Interventions

  • Drugabicipar pegol

    Abicipar pegol administered to the study eye by intravitreal injection at day 1, weeks 4 and 8.

  • Drugranibizumab

    Ranibizumab (Lucentis®) 0.5 mg administered to the study eye by intravitreal injection every 4 weeks from day 1 through week 16.

    Also known as: Lucentis®

  • Othersham procedure

    Sham procedure to the study eye at weeks 12 and 16.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study Eye at Week 16 Using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Scale

    BCVA is measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly using the ETDRS Scale (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye at Week 20 Using the ETDRS Scale

    BCVA is measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly using the ETDRS Scale (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 20

  2. Percentage of Patients With a BCVA Gain of 15 or More Letters in the Study Eye Using the ETDRS Scale

    BCVA is measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly using the ETDRS Scale (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 20

  3. Percentage of Patients With a BCVA Gain of 10 or More Letters in the Study Eye Using the ETDRS Scale

    BCVA is measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly using the ETDRS Scale (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 20

  4. Change From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) in the Study Eye

    CRT was assessed using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), a non-invasive diagnostic system providing high-resolution imaging sections of the retina. SD-OCT was performed in the study eye after pupil dilation. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 16, Week 20

07

Results

Posted Apr 5, 2016

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAbicipar Pegol 1 mgAbicipar Pegol 2 mgRanibizumab 0.5 mg
Started10105
Completed10105
Not completed000

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study Eye at Week 16 Using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Scale

BCVA is measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly using the ETDRS Scale (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 16
Reported as:
Mean · letters
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study Eye at Week 16 Using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Scale
lettersAbicipar Pegol 1 mgAbicipar Pegol 2 mgRanibizumab 0.5 mg
Baseline55.2 ± 12.9759.0 ± 10.3657.6 ± 17.04
Change from Baseline at Week 164.4 ± 8.9610.1 ± 10.515.2 ± 6.72
SecondaryChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye at Week 20 Using the ETDRS Scale

BCVA is measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly using the ETDRS Scale (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 20
Reported as:
Mean · letters
Change From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye at Week 20 Using the ETDRS Scale
lettersAbicipar Pegol 1 mgAbicipar Pegol 2 mgRanibizumab 0.5 mg
Baseline55.2 ± 12.9759.0 ± 10.3657.6 ± 17.04
Change from Baseline at Week 205.6 ± 12.126.7 ± 15.9814.4 ± 7.89
SecondaryPercentage of Patients With a BCVA Gain of 15 or More Letters in the Study Eye Using the ETDRS Scale

BCVA is measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly using the ETDRS Scale (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 20
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Patients With a BCVA Gain of 15 or More Letters in the Study Eye Using the ETDRS Scale
percentage of participantsAbicipar Pegol 1 mgAbicipar Pegol 2 mgRanibizumab 0.5 mg
Percentage of Patients With a BCVA Gain of 15 or More Letters in the Study Eye Using the ETDRS Scale30.030.060.0
SecondaryPercentage of Patients With a BCVA Gain of 10 or More Letters in the Study Eye Using the ETDRS Scale

BCVA is measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly using the ETDRS Scale (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 20
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Patients With a BCVA Gain of 10 or More Letters in the Study Eye Using the ETDRS Scale
percentage of participantsAbicipar Pegol 1 mgAbicipar Pegol 2 mgRanibizumab 0.5 mg
Percentage of Patients With a BCVA Gain of 10 or More Letters in the Study Eye Using the ETDRS Scale40.040.060.0
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) in the Study Eye

CRT was assessed using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), a non-invasive diagnostic system providing high-resolution imaging sections of the retina. SD-OCT was performed in the study eye after pupil dilation. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 16, Week 20
Reported as:
Mean · microns
Change From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) in the Study Eye
micronsAbicipar Pegol 1 mgAbicipar Pegol 2 mgRanibizumab 0.5 mg
Baseline443.8 ± 107.32383.8 ± 146.90348.8 ± 33.26
Change from Baseline at Week 16-106.5 ± 128.50-112.8 ± 169.75-124.4 ± 49.51
Change from Baseline at Week 20-78.2 ± 104.73-90.3 ± 178.22-110.4 ± 45.87

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Abicipar Pegol 1 mg—1/10 (10%)5/10 (50%)
Abicipar Pegol 2 mg—1/10 (10%)6/10 (60%)
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg—0/5 (0%)2/5 (40%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventAbicipar Pegol 1 mgAbicipar Pegol 2 mgRanibizumab 0.5 mg
PneumoniaInfections and infestations0/101/100/5
Escherichia bacteremiaInfections and infestations0/101/100/5
Basal cell carcinomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/100/100/5
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 20
Most frequent other events
EventAbicipar Pegol 1 mgAbicipar Pegol 2 mgRanibizumab 0.5 mg
Eye painEye disorders0/101/101/5
Oedema peripheralGeneral disorders0/101/101/5
Aortic stenosisVascular disorders0/100/101/5
Conjunctival haemorrhageEye disorders0/100/101/5
Corneal abrasionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/100/101/5
Pulmonary hypertensionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/100/101/5
Tricuspid valve incompetenceCardiac disorders0/100/101/5
Dry eyeEye disorders1/101/100/5
Drug hypersensitivityImmune system disorders0/101/100/5
InfluenzaInfections and infestations0/101/100/5

Baseline characteristics

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(participants)Abicipar Pegol 1 mgAbicipar Pegol 2 mgRanibizumab 0.5 mgTotal
≤ 65 years0000
> 65 years1010525
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Abicipar Pegol 1 mgAbicipar Pegol 2 mgRanibizumab 0.5 mgTotal
Female97420
Male1315
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Phoenix, Arizona, United States
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 17, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02181517
Lead sponsor
Allergan
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 4, 2014
Start date
Jul 2014
Primary completion
Mar 2015
Completion
Mar 2015
Results posted
Apr 5, 2016
Last update
May 17, 2016

Study contacts

Medical Director
study director · Allergan

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion