CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02180893Updated Mar 15, 2016Results posted

The Use of Paravertebral Block for Cardiac Surgery

A Phase 4 interventional study of Paravertebral Block and Placebo Comparator in Mitral Valve Insufficiency, sponsored by NYU Langone Health. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-03-15.

Sponsored by NYU Langone Health · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Pain after robotic cardiac surgery is a known problem and is often difficult to manage. Paravertebral nerve blocks are a proven method of pain relief following thoracotomy. A paravertebral block has been shown to provide good pain relief with minimal side effects, however, paravertebral blocks for robotic surgery have not been well studied. Currently the investigators routinely perform PVB on this patient population (of 50 MV robotic cases done between January and October 2012, 36 received paravertebral blocks with no adverse events noted). The investigators believe this should be studied further and that paravertebral blocks will reduce the amount of additional pain medication patients require in the first 24 hours after surgery, decrease intubation time and improve PACU and hospital discharge times.

Read the detailed description

Pain after robotic cardiac surgery is a known problem and is often difficult to manage. Paravertebral nerve blocks are a proven method of pain relief following thoracotomy. A paravertebral block has been shown to provide good pain relief with minimal side effects, however, paravertebral blocks for robotic surgery have not been well studied. Currently we routinely perform PVB on this patient population (of 50 MV robotic cases done between January and October 2012, 36 received paravertebral blocks with no adverse events noted). We believe this should be studied further and that paravertebral blocks will reduce the amount of additional pain medication patients require in the first 24 hours after surgery, decrease intubation time and improve PACU and hospital discharge times.

02

Conditions studied

  • Mitral Valve Insufficiency
03

In context

Mitral Valve Insufficiency

459 studies on the registry are indexed under Mitral Valve Insufficiency; 148 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is close to the median of 61 across 274 interventional studies indexed under Mitral Valve Insufficiency.

Browse Mitral Valve Insufficiency studies →

Lead sponsor

NYU Langone Health is the lead sponsor of 1,391 studies on the registry; 254 are open to participants now.

Of its 227 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 191 (84%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • patients over the age of 18 years of age undergoing robotic mitral valve surgery.
  • have capacity to understand and sign consent form

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients that are not candidates for paravertebral block as per ASRA guidelines (Horlocker, Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2010). In short, this includes patients taking specific anti platelet agents such as clopidigrel, anticoagulants such as heparin or low molecular weight heparin, or patients with an INR of greater than 1.5. -patients with a history of COPD or other respiratory diseases that would confound data on time to extubated will be excluded.
  • Patients that with a diagnosis of chronic pain, or patients currently taking narcotics are excluded, as this would confound data on postoperative narcotic requirements.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Paravertebral block

    Patient receiving a PVB prior to robotic mitral valve surgery

    Other: Paravertebral Block

  • Placebo comparator
    No block

    Patients who did not receive PVB

    Other: Placebo Comparator

Interventions

  • OtherParavertebral Block

    Paravertebral nerve block injection

  • OtherPlacebo Comparator

    No block Patients who did not receive PVB

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Postoperative Fentanyl

    Time frame: 24 hours

  2. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores

    Possible scores range from 0-10, with 0 being no pain and 10 being highest level of pain

    Time frame: 24 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Participant Satisfaction

    Participants were asked whether or not they were satisfied with their postoperative pain control (yes or no)

    Time frame: 48 hours

  2. Participant Satisfaction Score

    Participants were asked to score their satisfaction with their postoperative pain control on a scale of 0 (least satisfied) to 10 (most satisfied)

    Time frame: 48 hours

07

Results

Posted Mar 15, 2016

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneParavertebral BlockNo Block
Started3030
Completed2723
Not completed37

Outcome measures

PrimaryPostoperative Fentanyl
Time frame:
24 hours
Reported as:
Mean · microgram/kilogram
Postoperative Fentanyl
microgram/kilogramParavertebral BlockNo Block
Postoperative Fentanyl4.51 ± 2.56.14 ± 2.88
PrimaryVisual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores

Possible scores range from 0-10, with 0 being no pain and 10 being highest level of pain

Time frame:
24 hours
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores
units on a scaleParavertebral BlockNo Block
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores3.33 ± 1.524.13 ± 1.25
SecondaryParticipant Satisfaction

Participants were asked whether or not they were satisfied with their postoperative pain control (yes or no)

Time frame:
48 hours
Reported as:
Number · percentage of "yes" responders
Participant Satisfaction
percentage of "yes" respondersParavertebral BlockNo Block
Participant Satisfaction10086.7
SecondaryParticipant Satisfaction Score

Participants were asked to score their satisfaction with their postoperative pain control on a scale of 0 (least satisfied) to 10 (most satisfied)

Time frame:
48 hours
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Participant Satisfaction Score
units on a scaleParavertebral BlockNo Block
Participant Satisfaction Score8.44 ± 1.256.83 ± 1.90

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Paravertebral Block—0/30 (0%)0/30 (0%)
No Block—0/30 (0%)0/30 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Paravertebral BlockNo BlockTotal
Mean60.1 ± 12.262.2 ± 11.961.15 ± 12.05
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Paravertebral BlockNo BlockTotal
Female51217
Male251843
08

Study locations

1 site
  • NYU Langone Medical Center
    New York, New York 10016, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Suri RM, Antiel RM, Burkhart HM, Huebner M, Li Z, Eton DT, Topilsky T, Sarano ME, Schaff HV. Quality of life after early mitral valve repair using conventional and robotic approaches. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Mar;93(3):761-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.11.062. PubMed 22364970 ↗
  • Lynch JJ, Mauermann WJ, Pulido JN, Rehfeldt KH, Torres NE. Use of paravertebral blockade to facilitate early extubation after minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2010 Mar;14(1):47-8. doi: 10.1177/1089253210363009. PubMed 20472625 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 15, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02180893
Lead sponsor
NYU Langone Health
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 3, 2014
Start date
Jan 2013
Primary completion
Apr 2014
Completion
Apr 2014
Results posted
Mar 15, 2016
Last update
Mar 15, 2016

Study contacts

Peter J Neuburger, MD
principal investigator · NYU

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion