CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02178475Updated Jul 23, 2018Results posted

Prospective Observational Study of Febrile Neutropenia (FN) and Pegfilgrastim Primary Prophylaxis in Breast Cancer and Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Patients Receiving High (>20%) FN-risk Chemotherapy

An observational study in Chemotherapy-induced Febrile Neutropenia, sponsored by Amgen. Completed at 75 sites in 9 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-07-23.

Sponsored by Amgen · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
943
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To estimate the incidence of febrile neutropenia in patients with breast cancer and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma receiving high (> 20%) FN-risk chemotherapy and pegfilgrastim primary prophylaxis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chemotherapy-induced Febrile Neutropenia

Keywords

  • NHL
  • Breast Cancer
03

In context

Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin

1,989 studies on the registry are indexed under Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin; 307 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 943 is above the median of 150 across 159 observational studies indexed under Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin.

Browse Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin studies →

Lead sponsor

Amgen is the lead sponsor of 1,015 studies on the registry; 49 are open to participants now.

Of its 245 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 159 (65%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Patients with NHL or breast cancer who have initiated treatment with a permitted standard-dose chemotherapy regimen that has a high FN risk (> 20%) per published studies or international guidelines, and who started pegfilgrastim in Cycle 1

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years old.
  • Any stage NHL or breast cancer and received the first cycle of a new chemotherapy course.
  • Received the first cycle of a permitted standard dose chemotherapy regimens with an estimated high (> 20%) FN risk according to published data or guidelines (dose modifications +/-10% in Cycle 1 are allowable).
  • Initiated treatment in Cycle 1 with pegfilgrastim according to the pegfilgrastim summary of product characteristics. (SmPC). Enrolment must occur after the first pegfilgrastim dosing in Cycle 1 and before the second day of Cycle 2.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Ongoing or planned concurrent participation in any clinical study involving Investigational Product that has not been approved by the national competent authorities for any indication.
  • Ongoing or planned concurrent participation in any clinical study where the administration of Colony Stimulating Factor (CSF) is determined by the protocol (clinical trials on an approved drug and observational trials are permitted as long as these do not mandate how neutropenia should be treated).
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
943 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Chemotherapy + Pegfilgrastim

    Patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma or breast cancer being treated with a permitted standard-dose chemotherapy regimen with a high FN risk (\> 20%) and who had pegfilgrastim prophylaxis initiated in the first cycle of chemotherapy.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Febrile Neutropenia

    Febrile neutropenia (FN) was defined as an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) of \< 0.5 x 10\^9/L, or \< 1.0 x 10\^9/L predicted to fall below 0.5 x 10\^9/L within 48 hours with fever or clinical signs of sepsis; fever and ANC were measured the same day or within ± 1 calendar day.

    Time frame: Participants were followed for up to 8 cycles of chemotherapy; the average observation time was 4.1 months.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants Who Discontinued Pegfilgrastim Prophylaxis

    Participants who discontinued pegfilgrastim prophylaxis was defined as participants who received at least one cycle of chemotherapy (cycle 2 or later) in which pegfilgrastim prophylaxis was not administered, but other granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) prophylaxis was administered. Participants in this group received either pegfilgrastim or other G-CSF prophylaxis in all chemotherapy cycles. Discontinuation was categorized as either temporary (participant received pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in at least one subsequent cycle) or permanent (participant had at least one cycle of chemotherapy following the cycle in which no pegfilgrastim prophylaxis was administered, and other G-CSF prophylaxis (i.e. not pegfilgrastim) was administered in all subsequent cycles, OR participant did not receive pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in the last cycle of chemotherapy, and other G-CSF prophylaxis was administered).

    Time frame: Participants were followed for up to 8 cycles of chemotherapy; the average observation time was 4.1 months.

  2. Number of Participants Who Discontinued G-CSF Prophylaxis

    Participants who discontinued G-CSF prophylaxis was defined as participants who received at least one cycle of chemotherapy (cycle 2 or later) in which no G-CSF prophylaxis was administered. Discontinuation was categorized as either temporary (participant received G-CSF prophylaxis in at least one subsequent cycle) or permanent (participant had at least one cycle of chemotherapy following the cycle in which no G-CSF prophylaxis was administered, and no G-CSF prophylaxis was administered in any subsequent cycle, OR participant did not receive G-CSF prophylaxis in the last cycle of chemotherapy).

    Time frame: Participants were followed for up to 8 cycles of chemotherapy; the average observation time was 4.1 months.

  3. Characteristics of Participants Who Discontinued Pegfilgrastim Prophylaxis

    Participants who discontinued pegfilgrastim prophylaxis are participants who received at least one cycle of chemotherapy (cycle 2 or later) in which pegfilgrastim prophylaxis was not administered, but other G-CSF prophylaxis was administered in this cycle. Participants in this group received either pegfilgrastim or other G-CSF prophylaxis in all chemotherapy cycles. Data includes both temporary and permanent pegfilgrastim discontinuation.

    Time frame: Participants were followed for up to 8 cycles of chemotherapy; the average observation time was 4.1 months.

  4. Characteristics of Participants Who Discontinued G-CSF Prophylaxis

    Participants who discontinued G-CSF prophylaxis are participants who received at least one cycle of chemotherapy (cycle 2 or later) in which no G-CSF prophylaxis was administered. Data includes both temporary and permanent discontinuation of G-CSF prophylaxis.

    Time frame: Participants were followed for up to 8 cycles of chemotherapy; the average observation time was 4.1 months.

  5. Number of Cycles With No Pegfilgrastim Prophylaxis

    A cycle of chemotherapy (cycle 2 or later) in which pegfilgrastim prophylaxis was not administered, but other G-CSF prophylaxis was administered in this cycle.

    Time frame: Participants were followed for up to 8 cycles of chemotherapy; the average observation time was 4.1 months.

  6. Number of Cycles With no G-CSF Prophylaxis

    A cycle of chemotherapy (cycle 2 or later) in which no G-CSF prophylaxis was administered.

    Time frame: Participants were followed for up to 8 cycles of chemotherapy; the average observation time was 4.1 months.

  7. Reasons for Discontinuation of Pegfilgrastim Prophylaxis

    Participants who discontinued pegfilgrastim prophylaxis are participants who received at least one cycle of chemotherapy (cycle 2 or later) in which pegfilgrastim prophylaxis was not administered, but other G-CSF prophylaxis was administered in this cycle. Participants in this group received either pegfilgrastim or other G-CSF prophylaxis in all chemotherapy cycles. Data includes both temporary and permanent pegfilgrastim discontinuation.

    Time frame: Participants were followed for up to 8 cycles of chemotherapy; the average observation time was 4.1 months.

  8. Reasons for Discontinuation of G-CSF Prophylaxis

    Participants who discontinued G-CSF prophylaxis are participants who received at least one cycle of chemotherapy (cycle 2 or later) in which no G-CSF prophylaxis was administered. Data includes both temporary and permanent discontinuation of G-CSF prophylaxis. Participants may have more than 1 discontinuation reason.

    Time frame: Participants were followed for up to 8 cycles of chemotherapy; the average observation time was 4.1 months.

  9. Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Complications of Febrile Neutropenia

    Complications of febrile neutropenia were defined as FN-related hospitalizations and death, and neutropenia-related chemotherapy dose delays and dose reductions.

    Time frame: Participants were followed for up to 8 cycles of chemotherapy; the average observation time was 4.1 months.

  10. Number of Febrile Neutropenia Events That Occurred During Cycles With No G-CSF Prophylaxis

    The number of febrile neutropenia events that occurred during a cycle of chemotherapy (cycle 2 or later) in which no G-CSF prophylaxis was administered. Febrile neutropenia was defined as an ANC of \< 0.5 x 10\^9/L, or \< 1.0 x 10\^9/L predicted to fall below 0.5 x 10\^9/L within 48 hours with fever or clinical signs of sepsis; fever and ANC were measured the same day or within ± 1 calendar day.

    Time frame: Participants were followed for up to 8 cycles of chemotherapy; the average observation time was 4.1 months.

  11. Number of Participants Who Experienced Febrile Neutropenia During Cycles With No G-CSF Prophylaxis

    The number of participants who received at least one cycle of chemotherapy in which no G-CSF prophylaxis was administered who experienced febrile neutropenia during a cycle of chemotherapy in which no G-CSF prophylaxis was administered. Febrile neutropenia was defined as an ANC of \< 0.5 x 10\^9/L, or \< 1.0 x 10\^9/L predicted to fall below 0.5 x 10\^9/L within 48 hours with fever or clinical signs of sepsis; fever and ANC were measured the same day or within ± 1 calendar day.

    Time frame: Participants were followed for up to 8 cycles of chemotherapy; the average observation time was 4.1 months.

  12. Number of Participants Who Experienced Complications of Febrile Neutropenia During Cycles With No G-CSF Prophylaxis

    The number of participants who received at least one cycle of chemotherapy in which no G-CSF prophylaxis was administered who experienced complications of febrile neutropenia during a cycle of chemotherapy in which no G-CSF prophylaxis was administered. Complications of febrile neutropenia were defined as FN-related hospitalizations and death, and neutropenia-related chemotherapy dose delays and dose reductions.

    Time frame: Participants were followed for up to 8 cycles of chemotherapy; the average observation time was 4.1 months.

  13. Number of Cycles With No G-CSF Prophylaxis in Which Febrile Neutropenia Events Occurred

    The number of chemotherapy cycles during which an event of febrile neutropenia occurred in which no G-CSF prophylaxis was administered. Febrile neutropenia was defined as an ANC of \< 0.5 x 10\^9/L, or \< 1.0 x 10\^9/L predicted to fall below 0.5 x 10\^9/L within 48 hours with fever or clinical signs of sepsis; fever and ANC were measured the same day or within ± 1 calendar day.

    Time frame: Participants were followed for up to 8 cycles of chemotherapy; the average observation time was 4.1 months.

  14. Number of Cycles With No G-CSF Prophylaxis in Which Complications of Febrile Neutropenia Occurred

    The number of chemotherapy cycles during which complications of febrile neutropenia occurred in which no G-CSF prophylaxis was administered. Complications of febrile neutropenia were defined as FN-related hospitalizations and death, and neutropenia-related chemotherapy dose delays and dose reductions.

    Time frame: Participants were followed for up to 8 cycles of chemotherapy; the average observation time was 4.1 months.

  15. Number of Participants Who Permanently Switched From Pegfilgrastim Prophylaxis to Other G-CSF Prophylaxis

    The number of participants who received pegfilgrastim prophylaxis from cycle 1 until a cycle when other G-CSF prophylaxis was administered, and this G-CSF or a different G-CSF agent (not pegfilgrastim) was received as prophylaxis at each remaining cycle of the chemotherapy course.

    Time frame: Participants were followed for up to 8 cycles of chemotherapy; the average observation time was 4.1 months.

  16. Characteristics of Participants Who Received On-schedule Pegfilgrastim Primary Prophylaxis

    On-schedule pegfilgrastim primary prophylaxis was defined as participants who received pegfilgrastim in cycle 1 and continued to receive pegfilgrastim across all cycles, administered 1-3 days after the end of cytotoxic chemotherapy in each cycle.

    Time frame: Participants were followed for up to 8 cycles of chemotherapy; the average observation time was 4.1 months.

07

Results

Posted Jul 23, 2018
Limitations and caveats
The study had planned to enroll equal numbers of subjects with NHL and breast cancer; however, more patients with breast cancer were enrolled.

Participant flow

The study was conducted at 66 centers in Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Greece, Poland, and Romania. The first participant enrolled on 18 July 2014 and the last participant enrolled on 28 April 2016.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneChemotherapy + Pegfilgrastim
Started943
Primary analysis set844
Completed814
Not completed129
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject7
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up10
Withdrew: Death13
Withdrew: Protocol-specified criteria99

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Febrile Neutropenia

Febrile neutropenia (FN) was defined as an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) of \< 0.5 x 10\^9/L, or \< 1.0 x 10\^9/L predicted to fall below 0.5 x 10\^9/L within 48 hours with fever or clinical signs of sepsis; fever and ANC were measured the same day or within ± 1 calendar day.

Time frame:
Participants were followed for up to 8 cycles of chemotherapy; the average observation time was 4.1 months.
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Febrile Neutropenia
percentage of participantsChemotherapy + Pegfilgrastim
Overall3.3 (2.3 to 4.8)
Cycle 11.9 (1.2 to 3.1)
Cycle 20.4 (0.1 to 1.1)
Cycle 30.5 (0.2 to 1.3)
Cycle 40.5 (0.2 to 1.3)
Cycle 50.3 (0.1 to 1.0)
Cycle 60.3 (0.1 to 1.1)
Cycle 70.0 (0.0 to 1.6)
Cycle 80.0 (0.0 to 1.7)
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Discontinued Pegfilgrastim Prophylaxis

Participants who discontinued pegfilgrastim prophylaxis was defined as participants who received at least one cycle of chemotherapy (cycle 2 or later) in which pegfilgrastim prophylaxis was not administered, but other granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) prophylaxis was administered. Participants in this group received either pegfilgrastim or other G-CSF prophylaxis in all chemotherapy cycles. Discontinuation was categorized as either temporary (participant received pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in at least one subsequent cycle) or permanent (participant had at least one cycle of chemotherapy following the cycle in which no pegfilgrastim prophylaxis was administered, and other G-CSF prophylaxis (i.e. not pegfilgrastim) was administered in all subsequent cycles, OR participant did not receive pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in the last cycle of chemotherapy, and other G-CSF prophylaxis was administered).

Time frame:
Participants were followed for up to 8 cycles of chemotherapy; the average observation time was 4.1 months.
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants Who Discontinued Pegfilgrastim Prophylaxis
participantsChemotherapy + Pegfilgrastim
Discontinuation of pegfilgrastim prophylaxis26
Temporary discontinuation4
Permanent discontinuation22
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Discontinued G-CSF Prophylaxis

Participants who discontinued G-CSF prophylaxis was defined as participants who received at least one cycle of chemotherapy (cycle 2 or later) in which no G-CSF prophylaxis was administered. Discontinuation was categorized as either temporary (participant received G-CSF prophylaxis in at least one subsequent cycle) or permanent (participant had at least one cycle of chemotherapy following the cycle in which no G-CSF prophylaxis was administered, and no G-CSF prophylaxis was administered in any subsequent cycle, OR participant did not receive G-CSF prophylaxis in the last cycle of chemotherapy).

Time frame:
Participants were followed for up to 8 cycles of chemotherapy; the average observation time was 4.1 months.
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants Who Discontinued G-CSF Prophylaxis
participantsChemotherapy + Pegfilgrastim
Discontinuation of G-CSF prophylaxis44
Temporary discontinuation9
Permanent discontinuation35
SecondaryCharacteristics of Participants Who Discontinued Pegfilgrastim Prophylaxis

Participants who discontinued pegfilgrastim prophylaxis are participants who received at least one cycle of chemotherapy (cycle 2 or later) in which pegfilgrastim prophylaxis was not administered, but other G-CSF prophylaxis was administered in this cycle. Participants in this group received either pegfilgrastim or other G-CSF prophylaxis in all chemotherapy cycles. Data includes both temporary and permanent pegfilgrastim discontinuation.

Time frame:
Participants were followed for up to 8 cycles of chemotherapy; the average observation time was 4.1 months.
Reported as:
Number · participants
Characteristics of Participants Who Discontinued Pegfilgrastim Prophylaxis
participantsChemotherapy + Pegfilgrastim
Male6
Female20
Race: Black0
Race: White15
Race: Missing11
Age < 65 years15
Age ≥ 65 years11
Age ≥ 75 years1
Tumor type: NHL15
Tumor type: Breast cancer11
SecondaryCharacteristics of Participants Who Discontinued G-CSF Prophylaxis

Participants who discontinued G-CSF prophylaxis are participants who received at least one cycle of chemotherapy (cycle 2 or later) in which no G-CSF prophylaxis was administered. Data includes both temporary and permanent discontinuation of G-CSF prophylaxis.

Time frame:
Participants were followed for up to 8 cycles of chemotherapy; the average observation time was 4.1 months.
Reported as:
Number · participants
Characteristics of Participants Who Discontinued G-CSF Prophylaxis
participantsChemotherapy + Pegfilgrastim
Male8
Female36
Race: Black0
Race: White36
Race: Missing8
Age < 65 years26
Age ≥ 65 years18
Age ≥ 75 years2
Tumor type: NHL13
Tumor type: Breast cancer31
SecondaryNumber of Cycles With No Pegfilgrastim Prophylaxis

A cycle of chemotherapy (cycle 2 or later) in which pegfilgrastim prophylaxis was not administered, but other G-CSF prophylaxis was administered in this cycle.

Time frame:
Participants were followed for up to 8 cycles of chemotherapy; the average observation time was 4.1 months.
Reported as:
Number · cycles
Number of Cycles With No Pegfilgrastim Prophylaxis
cyclesChemotherapy + Pegfilgrastim
Number of Cycles With No Pegfilgrastim Prophylaxis56
SecondaryNumber of Cycles With no G-CSF Prophylaxis

A cycle of chemotherapy (cycle 2 or later) in which no G-CSF prophylaxis was administered.

Time frame:
Participants were followed for up to 8 cycles of chemotherapy; the average observation time was 4.1 months.
Reported as:
Number · cycles
Number of Cycles With no G-CSF Prophylaxis
cyclesChemotherapy + Pegfilgrastim
Number of Cycles With no G-CSF Prophylaxis105
SecondaryReasons for Discontinuation of Pegfilgrastim Prophylaxis

Participants who discontinued pegfilgrastim prophylaxis are participants who received at least one cycle of chemotherapy (cycle 2 or later) in which pegfilgrastim prophylaxis was not administered, but other G-CSF prophylaxis was administered in this cycle. Participants in this group received either pegfilgrastim or other G-CSF prophylaxis in all chemotherapy cycles. Data includes both temporary and permanent pegfilgrastim discontinuation.

Time frame:
Participants were followed for up to 8 cycles of chemotherapy; the average observation time was 4.1 months.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Reasons for Discontinuation of Pegfilgrastim Prophylaxis
ParticipantsChemotherapy + Pegfilgrastim
Daily G-CSF preferred to once-per-cycle G-CSF14
Cost1
Following protocol of hospital or country/region2
Adverse reaction to G-CSF6
Other3
SecondaryReasons for Discontinuation of G-CSF Prophylaxis

Participants who discontinued G-CSF prophylaxis are participants who received at least one cycle of chemotherapy (cycle 2 or later) in which no G-CSF prophylaxis was administered. Data includes both temporary and permanent discontinuation of G-CSF prophylaxis. Participants may have more than 1 discontinuation reason.

Time frame:
Participants were followed for up to 8 cycles of chemotherapy; the average observation time was 4.1 months.
Reported as:
Number · participants
Reasons for Discontinuation of G-CSF Prophylaxis
participantsChemotherapy + Pegfilgrastim
Chemotherapy dose intensity reduced9
Patient no longer considered at high risk of FN14
Cost3
Following protocol of hospital or country/region2
Adverse reaction to G-CSF3
Other22
Missing2
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Experienced Complications of Febrile Neutropenia

Complications of febrile neutropenia were defined as FN-related hospitalizations and death, and neutropenia-related chemotherapy dose delays and dose reductions.

Time frame:
Participants were followed for up to 8 cycles of chemotherapy; the average observation time was 4.1 months.
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Complications of Febrile Neutropenia
percentage of participantsChemotherapy + Pegfilgrastim
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Complications of Febrile Neutropenia6.8 (5.2 to 8.7)
SecondaryNumber of Febrile Neutropenia Events That Occurred During Cycles With No G-CSF Prophylaxis

The number of febrile neutropenia events that occurred during a cycle of chemotherapy (cycle 2 or later) in which no G-CSF prophylaxis was administered. Febrile neutropenia was defined as an ANC of \< 0.5 x 10\^9/L, or \< 1.0 x 10\^9/L predicted to fall below 0.5 x 10\^9/L within 48 hours with fever or clinical signs of sepsis; fever and ANC were measured the same day or within ± 1 calendar day.

Time frame:
Participants were followed for up to 8 cycles of chemotherapy; the average observation time was 4.1 months.
Reported as:
Number · febrile neutropenia events
Number of Febrile Neutropenia Events That Occurred During Cycles With No G-CSF Prophylaxis
febrile neutropenia eventsChemotherapy + Pegfilgrastim
Number of Febrile Neutropenia Events That Occurred During Cycles With No G-CSF Prophylaxis2
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Experienced Febrile Neutropenia During Cycles With No G-CSF Prophylaxis

The number of participants who received at least one cycle of chemotherapy in which no G-CSF prophylaxis was administered who experienced febrile neutropenia during a cycle of chemotherapy in which no G-CSF prophylaxis was administered. Febrile neutropenia was defined as an ANC of \< 0.5 x 10\^9/L, or \< 1.0 x 10\^9/L predicted to fall below 0.5 x 10\^9/L within 48 hours with fever or clinical signs of sepsis; fever and ANC were measured the same day or within ± 1 calendar day.

Time frame:
Participants were followed for up to 8 cycles of chemotherapy; the average observation time was 4.1 months.
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants Who Experienced Febrile Neutropenia During Cycles With No G-CSF Prophylaxis
participantsChemotherapy + Pegfilgrastim
Number of Participants Who Experienced Febrile Neutropenia During Cycles With No G-CSF Prophylaxis2
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Experienced Complications of Febrile Neutropenia During Cycles With No G-CSF Prophylaxis

The number of participants who received at least one cycle of chemotherapy in which no G-CSF prophylaxis was administered who experienced complications of febrile neutropenia during a cycle of chemotherapy in which no G-CSF prophylaxis was administered. Complications of febrile neutropenia were defined as FN-related hospitalizations and death, and neutropenia-related chemotherapy dose delays and dose reductions.

Time frame:
Participants were followed for up to 8 cycles of chemotherapy; the average observation time was 4.1 months.
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants Who Experienced Complications of Febrile Neutropenia During Cycles With No G-CSF Prophylaxis
participantsChemotherapy + Pegfilgrastim
Number of Participants Who Experienced Complications of Febrile Neutropenia During Cycles With No G-CSF Prophylaxis3
SecondaryNumber of Cycles With No G-CSF Prophylaxis in Which Febrile Neutropenia Events Occurred

The number of chemotherapy cycles during which an event of febrile neutropenia occurred in which no G-CSF prophylaxis was administered. Febrile neutropenia was defined as an ANC of \< 0.5 x 10\^9/L, or \< 1.0 x 10\^9/L predicted to fall below 0.5 x 10\^9/L within 48 hours with fever or clinical signs of sepsis; fever and ANC were measured the same day or within ± 1 calendar day.

Time frame:
Participants were followed for up to 8 cycles of chemotherapy; the average observation time was 4.1 months.
Reported as:
Number · cycles
Number of Cycles With No G-CSF Prophylaxis in Which Febrile Neutropenia Events Occurred
cyclesChemotherapy + Pegfilgrastim
Number of Cycles With No G-CSF Prophylaxis in Which Febrile Neutropenia Events Occurred2
SecondaryNumber of Cycles With No G-CSF Prophylaxis in Which Complications of Febrile Neutropenia Occurred

The number of chemotherapy cycles during which complications of febrile neutropenia occurred in which no G-CSF prophylaxis was administered. Complications of febrile neutropenia were defined as FN-related hospitalizations and death, and neutropenia-related chemotherapy dose delays and dose reductions.

Time frame:
Participants were followed for up to 8 cycles of chemotherapy; the average observation time was 4.1 months.
Reported as:
Number · cycles
Number of Cycles With No G-CSF Prophylaxis in Which Complications of Febrile Neutropenia Occurred
cyclesChemotherapy + Pegfilgrastim
Number of Cycles With No G-CSF Prophylaxis in Which Complications of Febrile Neutropenia Occurred3
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Permanently Switched From Pegfilgrastim Prophylaxis to Other G-CSF Prophylaxis

The number of participants who received pegfilgrastim prophylaxis from cycle 1 until a cycle when other G-CSF prophylaxis was administered, and this G-CSF or a different G-CSF agent (not pegfilgrastim) was received as prophylaxis at each remaining cycle of the chemotherapy course.

Time frame:
Participants were followed for up to 8 cycles of chemotherapy; the average observation time was 4.1 months.
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants Who Permanently Switched From Pegfilgrastim Prophylaxis to Other G-CSF Prophylaxis
participantsChemotherapy + Pegfilgrastim
Number of Participants Who Permanently Switched From Pegfilgrastim Prophylaxis to Other G-CSF Prophylaxis22
SecondaryCharacteristics of Participants Who Received On-schedule Pegfilgrastim Primary Prophylaxis

On-schedule pegfilgrastim primary prophylaxis was defined as participants who received pegfilgrastim in cycle 1 and continued to receive pegfilgrastim across all cycles, administered 1-3 days after the end of cytotoxic chemotherapy in each cycle.

Time frame:
Participants were followed for up to 8 cycles of chemotherapy; the average observation time was 4.1 months.
Reported as:
Number · participants
Characteristics of Participants Who Received On-schedule Pegfilgrastim Primary Prophylaxis
participantsChemotherapy + Pegfilgrastim
Male72
Female611
Race: White546
Race: Black or African American2
Race: Other1
Race: Missing134
Age < 65 years464
Age ≥ 65 years219
Age ≥ 75 years38
Tumor type: NHL112
Tumor type: Breast cancer571

Adverse events

Collected over Participants were followed for up to 8 cycles of chemotherapy; the average observation time was 4.1 months.. Non-serious events are listed at a 1.00% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Chemotherapy + Pegfilgrastim—5/844 (0.6%)11/844 (1.3%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventChemotherapy + Pegfilgrastim
Febrile neutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders3/844
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders2/844
Back painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/844
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventChemotherapy + Pegfilgrastim
Bone painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders11/844

Baseline characteristics

Primary Analysis Set

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Chemotherapy + Pegfilgrastim
Mean57.2 ± 12.2
Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)Chemotherapy + Pegfilgrastim
< 65 years563
≥ 65 years281
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Chemotherapy + Pegfilgrastim
Female723
Male121
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Chemotherapy + Pegfilgrastim
Black4
White673
Other1
Missing166
Tumor Type
Tumor Type(Participants)Chemotherapy + Pegfilgrastim
Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL)190
Breast cancer654
Baseline Comorbidities
Baseline Comorbidities(participants)Chemotherapy + Pegfilgrastim
Liver disease18
Cardiovascular disease211
Diabetes mellitus75
COPD/Pulmonary disease41
Renal disease/impaired clearance16
Current infection8
Open wound3
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status(Participants)Chemotherapy + Pegfilgrastim
0 (Fully active)645
1 (Restrictive but ambulatory)129
2 (Ambulatory but unable to work)14
3 (Limited self-care)6
4 (Disabled, confined to bed/chair)1
Missing49
History of Febrile Neutropenia
History of Febrile Neutropenia(Participants)Chemotherapy + Pegfilgrastim
Yes5
No839
08

Study locations

75 sites
  • Research Site
    Eggenburg, 3730, Austria
  • Research Site
    Graz, 8036, Austria
  • Research Site
    Leoben, 8700, Austria
  • Research Site
    Schwarzach im Pongau, 5620, Austria
  • Research Site
    Wien, 1030, Austria
  • Research Site
    Wien, 1090, Austria
  • Research Site
    Arlon, 6700, Belgium
  • Research Site
    Liege, 4000, Belgium
  • Research Site
    Liège, 4000, Belgium
  • Research Site
    Pleven, 5800, Bulgaria
  • Research Site
    Sofia, 1756, Bulgaria
  • Research Site
    Chomutov, 430 12, Czechia
  • Research Site
    Horovice, 268 31, Czechia
  • Research Site
    Novy Jicin, 741 01, Czechia
  • Research Site
    Plzen, 304 60, Czechia
  • Research Site
    Praha 10, 100 34, Czechia
  • Research Site
    Praha 2, 128 08, Czechia
  • Research Site
    Aix en Provence, 13100, France
  • Research Site
    Amiens, 80000, France
  • Research Site
    Beuvry, 62660, France
  • Research Site
    Marseille cedex 5, 13385, France
  • Research Site
    Marseille, 13009, France
  • Research Site
    Meaux Cedex, 77100, France
  • Research Site
    Nancy, 54100, France
  • Research Site
    Nimes cedex 09, 30029, France
  • Research Site
    Orleans Cedex, 45067, France
  • Research Site
    Perpignan, 66000, France
  • Research Site
    Pierre Benite Cedex, 69495, France
  • Research Site
    Périgueux cedex, 24004, France
  • Research Site
    Saint Priest en Jarez Cedex, 42270, France
  • Research Site
    Sarcelles, 95200, France
  • Research Site
    Strasbourg, 67000, France
  • Research Site
    Bonn, 53111, Germany
  • Research Site
    Dresden, 01307, Germany
  • Research Site
    Fulda, 36043, Germany
  • Research Site
    Hildesheim, 31134, Germany
  • Research Site
    Kassel, 34119, Germany
  • Research Site
    Stolberg, 52222, Germany
  • Research Site
    Troisdorf, 53840, Germany
  • Research Site
    Velbert, 42551, Germany
  • Research Site
    Westerstede, 26655, Germany
  • Research Site
    Athens, 11527, Greece
  • Research Site
    Athens, 11528, Greece
  • Research Site
    Athens, 12462, Greece
  • Research Site
    Chania, 73300, Greece
  • Research Site
    Kalamata, 24100, Greece
  • Research Site
    Larissa, 41110, Greece
  • Research Site
    Nea Kifissia, Athens, 14564, Greece
  • Research Site
    Papagou, 11526, Greece
  • Research Site
    Piraeus, 18537, Greece
  • Research Site
    Thessaloniki, 54622, Greece
  • Research Site
    Thessaloniki, 54636, Greece
  • Research Site
    Thessaloniki, 54645, Greece
  • Research Site
    Thessaloniki, 55236, Greece
  • Research Site
    Bialystok, 15-027, Poland
  • Research Site
    Gdynia, 81-519, Poland
  • Research Site
    Koszalin, 75-581, Poland
  • Research Site
    Krakow, 31-501, Poland
  • Research Site
    Krakow, 31-531, Poland
  • Research Site
    Poznan, 61-485, Poland
  • Research Site
    Walbrzych, 58-309, Poland
  • Research Site
    Warszawa, 02-097, Poland
  • Research Site
    Warszawa, 02-781, Poland
  • Research Site
    Baia Mare, 430031, Romania
  • Research Site
    Braila, 810325, Romania
  • Research Site
    Bucharest, 022328, Romania
  • Research Site
    Bucharest, 022338, Romania
  • Research Site
    Bucharest, 030171, Romania
  • Research Site
    Bucuresti, 010825, Romania
  • Research Site
    Bucuresti, 031864, Romania
  • Research Site
    Campina, 105600, Romania
  • Research Site
    Cluj-Napoca, 400124, Romania
  • Research Site
    Iasi, 700483, Romania
  • Research Site
    Oradea, 410469, Romania
  • Research Site
    Ploiesti, 100337, Romania
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Mahtani RL, Belani R, Crawford J, Dale D, DeCosta L, Gawade PL, Huynh C, Lawrence T, Lewis S, MacLaughlin WW, Narang M, Rifkin R. A prospective cohort study to evaluate the incidence of febrile neutropenia in patients receiving pegfilgrastim on-body injector versus other options for prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia: breast cancer subgroup analysis. Support Care Cancer. 2022 Jul;30(7):6135-6144. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07025-2. Epub 2022 Apr 14. PubMed 35426046 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 23, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02178475
Lead sponsor
Amgen
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 30, 2014
Start date
Jul 18, 2014
Primary completion
Oct 28, 2016
Completion
Oct 28, 2016
Results posted
Jul 23, 2018
Last update
Jul 23, 2018

Study contacts

MD
study director · Amgen

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion