CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02175628Updated Aug 5, 2019Results posted

Comparison of the Sensitivity and Specificity of Acoustic Angiography to the Sensitivity and Specificity of Conventional Ultrasound

An interventional study of Acoustic Angiography in Signs and Symptoms, sponsored by UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-08-05.

Sponsored by UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
23
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Purpose: This study will evaluate a new ultrasound imaging technology called acoustic angiography. Acoustic angiography uses an ultrasound contrast agent, already FDA approved for use in cardiology, to enhance imaging of blood vessels. Since acoustic angiography uses ultrasound, and not x-rays, the patient is not exposed to ionizing radiation, unlike traditional angiography and mammography. Specific goals will be to evaluate the quality of the images provided by acoustic angiography in the human breast, and furthermore to evaluate whether or not acoustic angiography provides additional diagnostic information over traditional ultrasound which could provide an improvement in assessing breast lesions. Specifically, this additional diagnostic information will hopefully enable us to reduce false positive tests and discriminate lethal cancers from non-lethal disease.

Participants: The investigators are recruiting 60 patients from the UNC Breast Clinic who are undergoing core needle biopsy or surgical biopsy (BIRADS 4 and 5 breast lesions).

Procedures (methods): Acoustic Angiography imaging will be performed in conjunction with standard diagnostic imaging, including b-mode ultrasound . Then, a reader study will be conducted to compare these modalities. Finally, the images will be analyzed with image processing techniques to determine quantitative metrics exhibited by the blood vessel morphology in the images. These metrics will be utilized to develop a "malignancy score" equation to predict malignancy of a lesion.

Read the detailed description

Increasing the sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic imaging in patients at high risk for breast cancer could provide substantial clinical benefit by improving diagnosis, preventing over-treatment, and reducing healthcare costs. Acoustic angiography is a new type of contrast enhanced ultrasound imaging which is specifically sensitive to microvascular structure and density. It evaluates tumor micro-vasculature and may provide a powerful prognostic tool for the diagnosis of breast cancer, and eventually for treatment evaluation.

Sixty patients who are to have a clinical surgical breast biopsy based on results from pre-study standard of care (SOC) imaging will be recruited from the UNC Breast Clinic for participation in the study. The primary objective of this single arm study is to compare the sensitivity and specificity of acoustic angiography with traditional b-mode ultrasound in the distinction of malignant versus benign breast lesions. Secondary objectives include a comparison of area under the curve (AUC) for acoustic angiography versus b-mode ultrasound, comparison of radiologist preference for the two imaging techniques for each of 3 lesion characteristics, and quantification of vessel tortuosity based on acoustic angiography imaging results. These metrics will be used to develop a predictive model of malignancy which will subsequently be compared to results from radiology review.

02

Conditions studied

  • Signs and Symptoms

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Ultrasound
  • Breast
  • Angiography
03

In context

Hypersensitivity

1,916 studies on the registry are indexed under Hypersensitivity; 265 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 23 is below the median of 57 across 1,384 interventional studies indexed under Hypersensitivity.

Browse Hypersensitivity studies →

Lead sponsor

UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center is the lead sponsor of 414 studies on the registry; 96 are open to participants now.

Of its 32 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 25 (78%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Women ≥18 years old
  • Scheduled for breast core needle or surgical biopsy of at least one breast lesion based on suspicious breast lesion (BIRADS score of 4 or 5) from pre-study SOC imaging studies
  • Center of suspicious lesion is not deeper than 1.5 cm, and the diameter of the lesion is not greater than 2 cm
  • Able to provide informed consent
  • Negative urine pregnancy test in women of child-bearing potential

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Male (it is uncommon for men to present for imaging and the overwhelming majority of findings are non-cancerous and do not lead to biopsy; male breast cancer represents \<1% of newly diagnosed breast cancer)
  • Institutionalized subject (prisoner or nursing home patient)
  • Critically ill or medically unstable and whose critical course during the observation period would be unpredictable (e.g., chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
  • Known hypersensitivity to sulfur hexafluoride or to any component of perflutren lipid (Definity®)
  • Right to left shunt, severe pulmonary hypertension (pulmonary artery pressure >90mmHg), or adult respiratory distress syndrome
  • Active cardiac disease including any of the following:

    • Severe congestive heart failure (class IV in accordance with the classification of the New York Heart Association)
    • Unstable angina.
    • Severe arrhythmia (i.e. ventricular tachycardia, flutter fibrillation; ventricular premature complexes occurring close to the preceding T-wave, multifocal complexes).
    • Myocardial infarction within 14 days prior to the date of proposed Definity® administration.
    • Uncontrolled systemic hypertension (systolic blood pressure (BP) >150 mm Hg and/or diastolic BP >90 mm Hg despite optimal medical management
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
23 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Acoustic Angiography

    All breast patients will be included in the experimental group.

    Device: Acoustic Angiography

  • Experimental
    Healthy Volunteers

    A volunteer group was added to the study to perfect the image acquisition techniques.

    Device: Acoustic Angiography

Interventions

  • DeviceAcoustic Angiography

    Acoustic angiography imaging involves a research high frequency ultrasound scanner (VisualSonics Vevo 770) and a prototype transducer as well as conventional b-mode ultrasound to guide the location of the imaging. The conventional ultrasound will be conducted just prior to the acoustic angiography for localization. The imaging also requires administration of Definity ultrasound contrast agent. Acoustic angiography imaging will be performed by trained medical personnel using mild compression to eliminate motion. Total imaging time is estimated to be less than 15 minutes. All image data will be de-identified and transferred for off-line analysis based on a study ID. The research images will NOT be interpreted or analyzed for clinical decisions related to the patient.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Sensitivity and Specificity (Percentage)

    To compare (using a reader study) the sensitivity and specificity of acoustic angiography to the sensitivity and specificity of conventional b-mode ultrasound in evaluation of breast lesions

    Time frame: 1.5 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Acoustic Angiography

    The AUC of acoustic angiography compared to the AUC of b-mode ultrasound

    Time frame: 1.5 years

  2. Radiologist Preference

    To compare radiologist preference of acoustic angiography to conventional b-mode ultrasound for each lesion characteristic (shape, margins and vascularity)

    Time frame: 1.5 years

  3. Vessel Tortuosity (No Units)

    To quantify vessel tortuosity metrics for the acoustic angiograph images, and to use these metrics to develop a model for predicting malignancy (a model-based malignancy score)

    Time frame: 1.5 years

  4. Model-based Malignancy Score (Arbitrary Units)

    To compare the model-based malignancy score to the acoustic angiography reader study

    Time frame: 1.5 years

07

Results

Posted Aug 5, 2019

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAcoustic AngiographyHealthy Volunteers
Started617
Completed617
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimarySensitivity and Specificity (Percentage)

To compare (using a reader study) the sensitivity and specificity of acoustic angiography to the sensitivity and specificity of conventional b-mode ultrasound in evaluation of breast lesions

Time frame:
1.5 years

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryArea Under the Curve (AUC) of Acoustic Angiography

The AUC of acoustic angiography compared to the AUC of b-mode ultrasound

Time frame:
1.5 years

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryRadiologist Preference

To compare radiologist preference of acoustic angiography to conventional b-mode ultrasound for each lesion characteristic (shape, margins and vascularity)

Time frame:
1.5 years

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryVessel Tortuosity (No Units)

To quantify vessel tortuosity metrics for the acoustic angiograph images, and to use these metrics to develop a model for predicting malignancy (a model-based malignancy score)

Time frame:
1.5 years

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryModel-based Malignancy Score (Arbitrary Units)

To compare the model-based malignancy score to the acoustic angiography reader study

Time frame:
1.5 years

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Adverse events

Collected over 30 minutes post imaging. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Acoustic Angiography0/6 (0%)0/6 (0%)0/6 (0%)
Healthy Volunteers0/17 (0%)0/17 (0%)0/17 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Acoustic AngiographyHealthy VolunteersTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years51520
>=65 years123
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Acoustic AngiographyHealthy VolunteersTotal
Mean48 ± 1443 ± 1745 ± 17
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Acoustic AngiographyHealthy VolunteersTotal
Female61420
Male033
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Acoustic AngiographyHealthy VolunteersTotal
Hispanic or Latino011
Not Hispanic or Latino6814
Unknown or Not Reported088
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Acoustic AngiographyHealthy VolunteersTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American224
White459
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported01010
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Acoustic AngiographyHealthy VolunteersTotal
United States61723
08

Study locations

1 site
  • UNC Hospital
    Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jul 17, 2017
  • Informed consent form · May 1, 2018

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 5, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02175628
Lead sponsor
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
Collaborators
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 26, 2014
Start date
Jun 2014
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2018
Completion
Jun 30, 2018
Results posted
Aug 5, 2019
Last update
Aug 5, 2019

Study contacts

Yueh Lee, MD, PhD
principal investigator · University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion