ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02168933NAPSIUpdated Sep 18, 2019Results posted

308nm Excimer Laser for Treatment of Fingernail Psoriasis

An interventional study of 308 nm excimer laser and Sham laser in Nail Psoriasis, sponsored by University of Utah. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-09-18.

Sponsored by University of Utah · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
8
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Psoriasis is a common skin disease, which affects 2-3% of the population. Up to two third of patients with psoriasis develop nail changes. These visible changes can be painful and disabling and are associated with social stigma. Most topical treatments are only partially effective. Systemic treatments can have serious side effects. Excimer laser is a form of targeted ultraviolet light therapy that has been successfully used to treat isolated psoriatic plaques on difficult to treat areas such as scalp or palms. The purpose of this study is to investigate efficacy of excimer laser for treatment of fingernail psoriasis. Sixteen patients with stable fairly symmetric fingernail psoriasis will be enrolled. After obtaining informed consent, an investigator will evaluate the severity of nail psoriasis in each hand using an objective score, called Modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI). In a random fashion, one hand will be treated with excimer laser and the other hand will receive sham treatment. During the treatments, patients will wear protective eyewear that does not permit them to see which hand receives active treatment and which hand receives sham treatment. Patients will be treated twice a week for 8 weeks. At weeks 8, 12, and16 the investigator who is blinded to the treatment assignments will re-evaluate the fingernails using mNAPSI score. Mean change from baseline mNAPSI score at weeks 8, 12, and 16 in hands treated with excimer compared to hands treated with sham will be measured. We will also measure patient's assessment of severity of nail disease and the pain or any adverse events associated with laser treatments. Given the slow growth rate of fingernails, the final evaluations will be performed at week 16. In summary, this is the first controlled study to evaluate efficacy of excimer laser in fingernail psoriasis. If found to be effective, excimer laser could be used as a safe, locally administered treatment for recalcitrant nail psoriasis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Nail Psoriasis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • psoriasis
  • nail
  • laser
  • excimer
  • treatment
03

In context

Psoriasis

1,928 studies on the registry are indexed under Psoriasis; 234 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 8 is below the median of 70 across 1,472 interventional studies indexed under Psoriasis.

Browse Psoriasis studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Utah is the lead sponsor of 991 studies on the registry; 177 are open to participants now.

Of its 111 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 64 (58%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Must give written informed consent.
  • Must be at least 18 years old.
  • Must have been diagnosed with stable fingernail psoriasis.
  • Must have fairly symmetric fingernail psoriasis in right and left hand with similar modified NAPSI scores in right and left hand target nails. Target nail is defined as the fingernail with highest modified NAPSI score.
  • Must have active fingernail psoriasis, defined as a target fingernail matrix NAPSI score of at least 2 and modified NAPSI score from a combination of crumbling, onycholysis and pitting at least 2. •
  • No changes in the systemic therapy or nail directed topical therapy during the 16 week study period.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  • Subjects unable to tolerate frequency of visits.
  • History of intolerance to or worsening of psoriasis with ultraviolet light.
  • Current use of known photosensitizing medications.
  • History of Fitzpatrick Type I skin, photosensitivity, or keloid formation.
  • Any new systemic psoriasis therapy including biologics, conventional systemic immunomodulators, phototherapy, or nail directed topical therapy for the last 3 months prior to enrollment.
  • Any other condition that in the eyes of the investigator will disqualify patient from the study.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
8 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    active excimer laser

    308 nm excimer laser treatment: treatment with the laser by a dose protocol with increasing output.

    Device: 308 nm excimer laser

  • Sham comparator
    Sham excimer laser

    Sham 308 nm excimer laser treatment: laser dose was administered with a cap that blocks all active UV passing through the device, therefore is a placebo, but because the procedure is the same, maintains a blind.

    Device: Sham laser

Interventions

  • Device308 nm excimer laser

    Biweekly treatments with 308 nm excimer laser for a total of 8 weeks

  • DeviceSham laser

    Sham laser treatment to the control side biweekly for a total of 8 weeks.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Modified NAPSI Score (Nail Psoriasis Severity Index)

    This is an instrument that scores nail psoriasis severity. Severity for each nail is measured on a scale of 0-13, where crumbling, pitting, onycholysis and oil spots together are each graded 0-3, and other features (leukonychia, splinter hemorrhages, hyperkeratosis, and red spots in lunula) are scored 0 (absent) or 1 (present). Higher score indicates more severe nail psoriasis with 13 being the most severe and 0 being no nail disease present.

    Time frame: at 16 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient Assessment of Nail Psoriasis Activity

    this is a subjective patient reported scale, 0-100, where 100 is the most severe global assessment of the patient's nail psoriasis, and 0 is clear (no nail disease present).

    Time frame: at 16 weeks

07

Results

Posted Aug 20, 2019

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAll Study Participants
Started8
Completed7
Not completed1

Outcome measures

PrimaryModified NAPSI Score (Nail Psoriasis Severity Index)

This is an instrument that scores nail psoriasis severity. Severity for each nail is measured on a scale of 0-13, where crumbling, pitting, onycholysis and oil spots together are each graded 0-3, and other features (leukonychia, splinter hemorrhages, hyperkeratosis, and red spots in lunula) are scored 0 (absent) or 1 (present). Higher score indicates more severe nail psoriasis with 13 being the most severe and 0 being no nail disease present.

Time frame:
at 16 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Modified NAPSI Score (Nail Psoriasis Severity Index)
units on a scaleActiveSham
Modified NAPSI Score (Nail Psoriasis Severity Index)6.3 ± 1.86.0 ± 1.3
SecondaryPatient Assessment of Nail Psoriasis Activity

this is a subjective patient reported scale, 0-100, where 100 is the most severe global assessment of the patient's nail psoriasis, and 0 is clear (no nail disease present).

Time frame:
at 16 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Patient Assessment of Nail Psoriasis Activity
units on a scaleActiveSham
Patient Assessment of Nail Psoriasis Activity58.6 ± 33.055.4 ± 24.3

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse event data were collected over 16 weeks (entire time of participation for each subject from screening to termination.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Active0/7 (0%)0/7 (0%)0/7 (0%)
Sham0/7 (0%)0/7 (0%)0/7 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)All Study Participants
Mean45 (19 to 73)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)All Study Participants
Female1
Male7
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Utah, Department of Dermatology
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84132, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Augustin M, Herberger K, Hintzen S, Heigel H, Franzke N, Schafer I. Prevalence of skin lesions and need for treatment in a cohort of 90 880 workers. Br J Dermatol. 2011 Oct;165(4):865-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2011.10436.x. PubMed 21623753 ↗
  • Schafer I, Rustenbach SJ, Radtke M, Augustin J, Glaeske G, Augustin M. [Epidemiology of psoriasis in Germany--analysis of secondary health insurance data]. Gesundheitswesen. 2011 May;73(5):308-13. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1252022. Epub 2010 Jun 11. German. PubMed 20544588 ↗
  • de Jong EM, Seegers BA, Gulinck MK, Boezeman JB, van de Kerkhof PC. Psoriasis of the nails associated with disability in a large number of patients: results of a recent interview with 1,728 patients. Dermatology. 1996;193(4):300-3. doi: 10.1159/000246274. PubMed 8993953 ↗
  • Klaassen KM, van de Kerkhof PC, Pasch MC. Nail psoriasis: a questionnaire-based survey. Br J Dermatol. 2013 Aug;169(2):314-9. doi: 10.1111/bjd.12354. PubMed 23550612 ↗
  • van der Velden HM, Klaassen KM, van de Kerkhof PC, Pasch MC. Fingernail psoriasis reconsidered: a case-control study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013 Aug;69(2):245-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2013.02.009. Epub 2013 Mar 28. PubMed 23541759 ↗
  • de Vries AC, Bogaards NA, Hooft L, Velema M, Pasch M, Lebwohl M, Spuls PI. Interventions for nail psoriasis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jan 31;2013(1):CD007633. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007633.pub2. PubMed 23440816 ↗
  • Marx JL, Scher RK. Response of psoriatic nails to oral photochemotherapy. Arch Dermatol. 1980 Sep;116(9):1023-24. PubMed 7416754 ↗
  • [Narrow spectrum (311 nm) phototherapy in treatment of psoriatic nail]. Georgian Med News. 2009 Feb;(167):56-9. Russian. PubMed 19276472 ↗
  • Aubin F, Vigan M, Puzenat E, Blanc D, Drobacheff C, Deprez P, Humbert P, Laurent R. Evaluation of a novel 308-nm monochromatic excimer light delivery system in dermatology: a pilot study in different chronic localized dermatoses. Br J Dermatol. 2005 Jan;152(1):99-103. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06320.x. PubMed 15656808 ↗
  • Mudigonda T, Dabade TS, Feldman SR. A review of protocols for 308 nm excimer laser phototherapy in psoriasis. J Drugs Dermatol. 2012 Jan;11(1):92-7. PubMed 22206083 ↗
  • Mudigonda T, Dabade TS, West CE, Feldman SR. Therapeutic modalities for localized psoriasis: 308-nm UVB excimer laser versus nontargeted phototherapy. Cutis. 2012 Sep;90(3):149-54. PubMed 23094316 ↗
  • Al-Mutairi N, Al-Haddad A. Targeted phototherapy using 308 nm Xecl monochromatic excimer laser for psoriasis at difficult to treat sites. Lasers Med Sci. 2013 Jul;28(4):1119-24. doi: 10.1007/s10103-012-1210-4. Epub 2012 Sep 28. PubMed 23053247 ↗
  • Asawanonda P, Anderson RR, Chang Y, Taylor CR. 308-nm excimer laser for the treatment of psoriasis: a dose-response study. Arch Dermatol. 2000 May;136(5):619-24. doi: 10.1001/archderm.136.5.619. PubMed 10815855 ↗
  • Rich P, Scher RK. Nail Psoriasis Severity Index: a useful tool for evaluation of nail psoriasis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003 Aug;49(2):206-12. doi: 10.1067/s0190-9622(03)00910-1. PubMed 12894066 ↗
  • Aktan S, Ilknur T, Akin C, Ozkan S. Interobserver reliability of the Nail Psoriasis Severity Index. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2007 Mar;32(2):141-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2006.02305.x. Epub 2006 Nov 27. PubMed 17137477 ↗
  • Cassell SE, Bieber JD, Rich P, Tutuncu ZN, Lee SJ, Kalunian KC, Wu CW, Kavanaugh A. The modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index: validation of an instrument to assess psoriatic nail involvement in patients with psoriatic arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2007 Jan;34(1):123-9. PubMed 17216680 ↗
  • Yaemsiri S, Hou N, Slining MM, He K. Growth rate of human fingernails and toenails in healthy American young adults. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2010 Apr;24(4):420-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2009.03426.x. Epub 2009 Sep 8. PubMed 19744178 ↗
  • Ortonne JP, Paul C, Berardesca E, Marino V, Gallo G, Brault Y, Germain JM. A 24-week randomized clinical trial investigating the efficacy and safety of two doses of etanercept in nail psoriasis. Br J Dermatol. 2013 May;168(5):1080-7. doi: 10.1111/bjd.12060. PubMed 23013207 ↗
  • de Jong EM, Menke HE, van Praag MC, van De Kerkhof PC. Dystrophic psoriatic fingernails treated with 1% 5-fluorouracil in a nail penetration-enhancing vehicle: a double-blind study. Dermatology. 1999;199(4):313-8. doi: 10.1159/000018281. PubMed 10640840 ↗
10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Jan 2014, a primary completion of Dec 2014 and a completion of Jan 2015. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Aug 2019, 4 years 8 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 18, 2014
First posted
Jun 20, 2014
Start
Jan 2014
Primary completionActual
Dec 2014
CompletionActual
Jan 2015
Results first posted
Aug 20, 2019
Last update
Sep 18, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 18, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02168933
Lead sponsor
University of Utah
Collaborators
American Society for Dermatologic Surgery
Responsible party
Kristina Callis (M.D., University of Utah) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 20, 2014
Start date
Jan 2014
Primary completion
Dec 2014
Completion
Jan 2015
Results posted
Aug 20, 2019
Last update
Sep 18, 2019

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion