An interventional study of Flap including bilateral nerve branches in Soft Tissue Injuries, sponsored by The Second Hospital of Tangshan. Completed at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 15 Years to 60 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-10-29.
Sponsored by The Second Hospital of Tangshan · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Sensory coverage in the finger continues to be a challenging problem. This study reports sensory reconstruction of the fingers with the bilaterally innervated dorsal digital flaps and compares the results between the dual- and single-innervated flaps.The main evaluated outcomes are static 2-point discrimination and Semmes-Weinstein monofilament scores of the flap, fingertip pain and joint motion.
Pain was given subjectively by the patient using the visual analogue scale (VAS). The VAS consists of a 10 cm line that was grouped into mild (0-3 cm), moderate (4-6 cm) and severe (7-10 cm). Tinel's sign was rated as the following: grade 1=none; grade 2=mild, slight tingle; grade 3=moderate, very uncomfortable; and grade 4=severe, patient unable to use hand because of any stimulation of the neuroma.
61 studies on the registry are indexed under Soft Tissue Injuries; 9 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 73 is above the median of 65 across 48 interventional studies indexed under Soft Tissue Injuries.
Browse Soft Tissue Injuries studies →The Second Hospital of Tangshan is the lead sponsor of 21 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Two nerve branches attached with the flap for sensory reconstruction.
Procedure: Flap including bilateral nerve branches
Two nerve branches are attached with the flap for sensory coverage
Static 2PD test
We use a Disk-Criminator to test two nearby points when touching the flap
Time frame: 18 months to 24 months after surgery
This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
The Second Hospital of Tangshan