CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02156232Updated Oct 25, 2022

Embolization of Large Spontaneous Portosystemic Shunts for the Prevention of Post-TIPS Hepatic Encephalopathy

An interventional study of TIPS and SPSS embolization in Liver Cirrhosis, sponsored by Air Force Military Medical University, China. Completed at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-10-25.

Sponsored by Air Force Military Medical University, China · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
56
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) combined with large spontaneous portosystemic shunts embolization are effective in the prevention of hepatic encephalopathy (HE).

Read the detailed description

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) has been used for more than 20 years since 1988 to treat some of the complications of portal hypertension, especially variceal bleeding and ascites refractory to conventional therapy. However, this procedure has two major disadvantages: shunt dysfunction and hepatic encephalopathy (HE). Notabley, the use of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE)-covered stent has significantly reduced the risk of shunt dysfunction, but the post-TIPS HE remains a problem even with these new stents.

The incidence of post-TIPS HE ranges between 5% and 35% HE during the first year and tends to be particularly frequent during the first months after TIPS and less common with time. Meta-analysis has that increased age, prior HE and higher Child-Pugh class/score were the most robust predictors for post-TIPS HE.

There is no consensus on the management of post-TIPS HE. Episodic HE after TIPS can be treated traditionally. The cornerstones of the treatment of this type of HE are the identification and treatment of the precipitating event and the general support of the patients. Refractory HE not responding to standard treatment is, in our opinion, the most important problem faced when a patients has to be treated with TIPS. In some cases, the occurrence of this complication may deeply reduce the patient's quality of life and the cure may be worse than the disease. Refractory HE can be treated by reducing the diameter of the stent or by occluding the shunt. However, the procedure is not without dangers and may not solve the problem in all patients, and the complications of portal hypertension, such as varices or refractory ascites, which were supposed to be managed by the TIPS, may recur as a consequence of shunt reduction or occlusion.

Besides, there are no established methods or drugs to effectively prevent the occurrence of HE after TIPS. One possibility is the use of stents with a small diameter, since post-TIPS HE was related to the amount of blood shunted. Riggio et al. compared the incidence of HE after TIPS created with 8-or 10-mm PTFE-covered stents and the study was stopped because of higher complications due to portal hypertension after TIPS in the 8-mm group. Our center performed a RCT to evaluate the effectiveness of L-ornithine-L-aspartate (LOLA) on plasma ammonia in cirrhotic patients after TIPS. Another RCT reevaluateing the effect of TIPS with 8- or 10-mm covered stent for the prevention of variceal rebleeding in cirrhotic patients was also undergoing.

But for those with large spontaneous portosystemic shunts(SPSS), embolization might also represent a therapeutic target.SPSS is, as the name implies, potential communications between the portal venous circulation and the systemic venous circulation that can open, develop, and potentially grow to enable flow within them when one of these circulations (portal or venous) has high pressure or is obstructed or both in an effort to reduce pressure or bypass an obstruction or both. SPSS mainly include splenorenal shunt, gastrorenal shunt, paraesophageal vein, paraumbilical vein, et al. For patients with decompensated cirrhosis, the portal vein pressure increased significantly and some blood were diverted to the systemic circulation by collateral vessels between the splenorenal vein, short gastric veins, posterior gastric vein, and so on, namely SPSS. The nature history of SPSS in patients with liver cirrhosis is still unclear. Most patients were diagnosed by chance.

Previous reports have suggested that the incidence of SPSS was 16% in patients with liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension and the incidence of refractory HE was about 46%. A study published in 2005 revealed that about 71% of the patients with cirrhosis with refractory HE have large SPSS. Therefore, the presence of a SPSS not only provides an explanation for the persistence or recurrence of HE despite an acceptable liver function, it might also represent a therapeutic target. Nowadays, several series have reported embolization of large SPSSs for the treatment of chronic therapy-refractory HE.To date, no data was about the safety and efficacy of embolization of large SPSS in the prevention of post-TIPS HE.

02

Conditions studied

  • Liver Cirrhosis

Keywords

  • hepatic encephalopathy (HE)
  • vericeal bleeding
  • spontaneous portosystemic shunts (SPSS)
  • transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS)
  • embolization
03

In context

Liver Cirrhosis

1,642 studies on the registry are indexed under Liver Cirrhosis; 358 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 56 is below the median of 72 across 995 interventional studies indexed under Liver Cirrhosis.

Browse Liver Cirrhosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Air Force Military Medical University, China is the lead sponsor of 172 studies on the registry; 36 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Signed written informed consent
  • Dignosis of liver cirrhosis (clinical or by liver biopsy)
  • Admission due to variceal bleeding occurred 5 to 42 days prior and standard treatment for secondary prophylaxis failed
  • Confirmed spontaneous portosystemic shunts in abdominal imagings
  • Sum of targeted spontaneous portosystemic shunts diameters greater than half the diameter of portal vein

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hepatic carcinoma and/or other malignancy diseases
  • Portal vein thrombosis (≥50% of the lumen)
  • Budd-Chiari syndrome
  • Child-Pugh score>13 points
  • Sepsis
  • Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis
  • Uncontrollable hypertension
  • Serious cardiac or pulmonary dysfunction
  • Renal failure
  • With TIPS contraindications
  • Spontaneous recurrent hepatic encephalopathy
  • Previous TIPS or collateral embolization
  • Pregnancy or breast-feeding
  • History of liver transplantation
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
56 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    TIPS, SPSS Emboliaztion

    The covered stents wil be used for TIPS The SPSS will be embolized during the procedure of TIPS

    Procedure: TIPS · Procedure: SPSS embolization

  • Active comparator
    TIPS alone

    The covered stents will be used for TIPS No embolization of SPSS will be performed during TIPS

    Procedure: TIPS

Interventions

  • ProcedureTIPS

    TIPS is performed with a standard technique. TIPS revision will be planned if any evidence of shunt dysfunction is observed.

  • ProcedureSPSS embolization

    Embolization of SPSS will be conducted via the same jugular vein before TIPS implantation. The major procedures included (a) angiography of SPSS after successful intrahepatic puncture of a branch of the portal vein and (b) embolization of SPSS with coils of varying diameters or Amplatzer Vascular Plug, which resulted in the SPSS disappearing at postembolization angiography.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number and severiy of participants with overt hepatic encephalopathy

    Time frame: 2 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of participants with variceal rebleeding

    Time frame: 2 years

  2. Number of participants with shunt dysfunction

    Time frame: 2 years

  3. Change of liver function

    Time frame: 2 years

  4. All-cause mortality

    Time frame: 2 years

  5. Adverse events

    Time frame: 2 years

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University
    Xi'an, Shaanxi 710032, China
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 25, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02156232
Lead sponsor
Air Force Military Medical University, China
Responsible party
Guohong Han (M.D., Ph.D., Air Force Military Medical University, China) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 5, 2014
Start date
Jun 15, 2014
Primary completion
Mar 5, 2021
Completion
Mar 5, 2021
Last update
Oct 25, 2022

Study contacts

Guohong Han, PhD,MD
principal investigator · Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion