An observational study in Heart Defects, Congenital, sponsored by Philip Moons. Completed at 24 sites in 15 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-03-12.
Sponsored by Philip Moons · Observational
The purpose of this study is to examine the differences in perceived health, psychosocial functioning, behavioral outcomes and quality of life of adults with congenital heart disease who are living in different areas of the world, and how these differences can be understood (e.g., differences in sense of coherence or illness perceptions).
991 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Defects, Congenital; 251 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 4,000 is above the median of 119 across 440 observational studies indexed under Heart Defects, Congenital.
Browse Heart Defects, Congenital studies →This is the only study on the registry with Philip Moons as lead sponsor.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Adults with congenital heart disease who are in continuing follow-up at an adult congenital heart disease center or included in a national/regional registry.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patient-reported health status (EuroQol-5D)
Time frame: Baseline
Patient-reported psychosocial functioning (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale)
Time frame: Baseline
Patient-reported behavioral outcomes (Health Behavior Scale - Congenital Heart Disease)
Time frame: Baseline
Patient-reported quality of life (Linear Analog Scale Quality of Life;Satisfaction with Life Scale)
Time frame: Baseline
Patient-reported sense of coherence (Sense of Coherence scale 13 items)
Time frame: Baseline
Patient-reported illness perceptions (Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire)
Time frame: Baseline
Patient-reported socio-demographic variables (e.g. age, educational level)
Time frame: Baseline
Medical variables by chart review (e.g. cardiac surgeries, frequency of follow-up)
Time frame: Baseline
This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.